Comments on: Zakir Naik’s Introduction to Hinduism (edited with comments)

By: chaitanya

chaitanya — Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:14:37 +0000

namaste agniveerji
plz tell me which book should i reffer while living as hindu…if vedas then why not bhagvatgita?

By: Tyagi

Tyagi — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:15:00 +0000

Is Zakir Naik ne yahi ka namak khaya hai aur yahi ki buraai kar raha hai , ISLAM itna acchha hai to behenchod Pakistan kyun nahi gaya

By: daily bread

daily bread — Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:53:40 +0000

We applaud the writer of this article,written so cleverly point by point. Although we are aware of the facts of Hinduism in this article, but the manner it is so smartly written leaves no room for Zakir Naik to manouver any further with his deceits and lies. We have learned so much from this page.God Bless Agniveer.

By: vibiesh

vibiesh — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:28:11 +0000

God is both with form and formless,the form is not God and God is not without Form,How?Do you believe God is complete or Absolute?If God and This world is different how can he be complete?So God should be Omnipresent to be complete or Absolute,and as God is present everywhere, everything can be considered as his image,but God is not that image and God is not without an image

By: vibiesh

vibiesh — Fri, 11 Nov 2011 02:33:45 +0000

The vedas aslo says Tatwamasi God and Soul is one
God is both with form and formless,the form is not God and God is not without Form,How?Do you believe God is complete or Absolute?If God and This world is different how can he be complete?So God should be Omnipresent to be complete or Absolute,and as God is present everywhere, everything can be considered as his image,but God is not that image and God is not without an image