Zakir Jihadi Naik takes the support of a famous historian to prove his theory, that Islam is not spread through sword. The parrot as always, is again knocked-out by Agniveer!
Zakir Naik says: The famous historian de lacy o’leary says that fanatical Muslims across the world forcing Islam at the point of the sword is the most fantastic absurd myth historians have ever repeated.
0. Ten times more famous historian than de lacy, Will Durant writes in his book- The Story of Civilization page 505: “The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history“. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period. ”
1. Now the fight remains as to which of these two historians is higher authority? For this we will direct our readers to the chronicles and accounts of the Ghazis themselves in the next articles who have, with full pride, written volumes on how they attacked India and made it Dar ul Islam from Dar ul Harb.
2. Famous historian of Zakir Jihadi, de lacy, has however researched on Islamic conquest also and writes in How Greek science passed to the Arabs, the following
It is a debated point whether Muhammad intended his religion to be a universal one, or for the Arabs alone…. It is necessary for all Arabs to believe in Muhammad if they are to escape hell (Muslim, i, 54), but it is not stated to be necessary for non-Arabs to believe…. As regards the non-Arab world, the Qur’an seems to contemplate conquest rather than conversion (Qur., ix, 19-23)….. But these passages fall far short of a definite missionary command to go forth and preach Islam to all the nations of the earth.
So here the famous historian of Zakir Naik makes some interesting points which may not equally comfort Jihadis, for example
a. It is unclear whether Muhammad came with a universal religion or an Arabic one!
b. Islam is unclear on
This post is part of following Agniveer book. To continue reading full post and to be an expert on destroying root of Islamic terrorism, get this eye-opening book (Number 3 Hot New Release in Islam category on Amazon.in – the largest bookstore):
Indian Muslims – Children of India or Slaves of Arabs?
Facts from the accounts, chronicles, and biographies of Muslim rulers on how sword, slavery, destruction, and subjugation were used by Islamic invaders to hand over the legacy of Islam over to the native Indians – Hindus.
A typical Indian Muslim is raised based on two theories from childhood. Either he is raised as an Arab//Central Asian/Afghan who conquered India and ruled it for a thousand years. Or as the progeny of those ‘enlightened’ souls who embraced Islam leaving behind the ‘darkness’ of idolatry- Hinduism.
However, deep within, they know the real story of the most bloodiest chapter of human history – the Islamic conquest of Indian subcontinent which killed, raped and converted their ancestors to Islam.
This book presents the story of undeniable mass killing, rapes and conversions of Hindus of Indian subcontinent whose children are now known as Indian (and Pakistani/Bangladeshi) Muslims. This book is a message of unity. Mother India is torn between its two children – Hindus and Muslims who were one once.
It is the call to brave, accept your roots. Find your lost mother. Find your lost brothers.
Disclaimer: By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. For full disclaimer, visit site.