Babur and Babri

Babur was not a Muslim in the first place as per Islamic definitions. He would have been stoned to death long ago if he were to live today in any Muslim country!

In reality, Babur was a disgrace in the name of Islam. To know Babur better let us not depend on claims of Hindu ‘fundamentalists’ or biased ‘right-winged’ historians. Let us instead hear from the horse’s mouth. Let us review the autobiography of Babur – Baburnama – which is available in all prominent languages.

For the purpose of this chapter, we shall refer to the English translation by Annette Susannah Beveridge published in 1922. This translation was done directly from whatever portions of original Turkish manuscript were available. These suffice to establish the true character of Babur.

Babur – the homosexual drunkard child molester

The autobiography clearly establishes Babur as a compulsive homosexual child molester. So those defending Babri Masjid should first clearly explain if Islam justifies homosexuality and child molestation. If not, Babur was a disgrace in the name of Islam, and hence any structure constructed by him is also a disgrace in the name of Islam.

In Page 120-121 of the biography, Babur says that he was not much interested in his wife but was maddened by a boy named Babri. He confesses that he had not loved anyone like he was mad for this boy. Babur used to compose verses in the love of the boy. For example: “There has been no lover except me who is so sad, passionate and insulted. And there is no one more cruel and wretched than my lover!”

He says that Babri used to come ‘close’ to him and that used to make Babur so excited that he could not even utter a word. Because of being intoxicated, he could not even thank Babri for his show of love.

Once Babur was roaming with his friends, and when Babri came in front of him in a lane, Babur had loss of speech and could not even look at him due to the excitement. He narrated: “I get embarrassed looking at my lover. My friends leer at me, and I leer at someone else.”

He admits that in passion and desire of youth, he got mad and used to roam around the naked head and naked foot without even looking at anything else.

He writes, “I used to get mad in excitement and passion. I could not think that lovers have to face this. I could not go away from you, nor can I stay with you due to a high level of excitement. You have made me completely mad, O my (male) lover!”

Now this proves beyond doubt that:

• Babur and his gangs were homosexual and child molesters.

• Punishment for these, as per Islamic Shariat, is death by stoning. This is prevalent even today in Islamic countries.

• Babri Masjid is nothing but a memoir in the name of Babur’s sex partner who was named Babri.

Does Islam consider monuments created by or named after such sexual perverts to be mosques or symbols of shame?

Babur – the barbaric killer, looter, rapist, drunkard and drug addict

(Only a few samples from this barbaric vulgar autobiography of Babur are being provided here as it is too brutal and gross for detailed reading.)

– Page 232: He writes that his gang beheaded the innocent Afghans who came to him for a truce, and then created a pillar from these heads. The same feat was repeated in Hangu where 200 Afghan heads were cut to create a pillar.

– Page 370: Because people of Bajaur did not believe in Islam, more than 3000 people were murdered, and their wives and children were taken as captives.

– Page 371: Several heads of captured people were sent to Kabul, Balkh and other places to spread news of victory.

– Page 371: A tower of cut heads was set up on the ground to celebrate the victory.

– Page 371: There was a wine party on Muharram where we drank whole night. (Translator notes here that Babur was a heavy drunkard till end of his life). A large portion of Baburnama describes these wine parties.

– Page 373: Babur took such intoxicants once that he could not go even for prayers. He further says that had he taken such intoxicants today, he would not have produced half the intoxication.

– Page 374: Babur fathered several children with several women in his brothel. His first wife promised to adopt all his future illegitimate children because several children born to her could not live. It looks as if Babur’s brothel was akin to a poultry farm for chicken production!

– Page 385-388: Babur was so happy with the birth of Humayun that he went to a boat with his friends and drank wine all night and took narcotics. Then they fought with each other due to intoxication and party broke up. After a similar party, he vomited a lot and forgot everything by morning.

– Page 527: A party was given in the pillared porch of the domed building in Agra (Referring to Taj Mahal falsely associated with Shah Jahan).

Almost all pages of his autobiography describe how he looted, threatened, murdered and plundered wherever he went and ate ‘Haram’ (forbidden in Islam) meat. Note that the way Babur includes all this in his autobiography implies that he was proud of all this. One would shudder to imagine what all other crimes he had committed that do not form part of this self-eulogizing biography.

Summary

Babur was anything but a follower of Islam, going by his misdeeds that can put any human to shame. And if indeed some perverts assert that Babur was still a Muslim as per their definition of Islam, then there can be nothing more disgusting than that definition of Islam.

Disclaimer

This post is based on the translations and commentaries of Islamic texts like Quran, Hadiths etc. as published by all major Islamic publishing sources. These are the publicly available translations that are used for promotion of Islam by prominent representatives. It also borrows for books on history, most of which are in public-domain.

We believe that most religious texts have been wrongly translated, misinterpreted, misquoted or even have been tampered with and interpolated to suit the selfish designs of proponents of Islam after Muhammad. Thus, we believe that original Islam and original Quran of Muhammad are totally different from what have been propagated by some of his fanatic followers in name of Islam. There are few minority groups in Muslims whose scholars subscribe to our views and interpret/translate Islamic texts differently. Some even refuse to consider the available Quran and Hadiths as authentic. But these scholars themselves are considered Kafirs and are condemned by many dominant elite of Islam. Thus, when we refer to Islam, we actually imply these dominant elites of Islam and not Muslims or all Islamic scholars in general.

Wherever we critically evaluate Muhammad, we imply the fictitious Muhammad propagated by these false texts or their wrong translations and not the original Muhammad. We have high regard for original Muhammad who stood for non-violence and tolerance. Similarly, when we analyze Islamic texts, we refer to these questionable translations/versions and NOT original texts.

Further, we have a sense of the highest level of brotherhood for Muslims in general. Wherever we use the word Muslim in a critical manner, it refers to false intolerant representatives of Islam and not Muslims in general. Readers are requested to keep this in mind to understand the correct perspective of the post.

Nowhere should they assume the words like Islam, Quran, Prophet etc. to be referring to original noble entities, unless it has been referred in a positive light. We restrict ourselves only to notions prevalent in minds of fanatics and those without reason.

[mybooktable book=”the-naked-mughals” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]
[mybooktable book=”complete-works-agniveer” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]