UPI - agniveerupi@sbi, agniveer.eazypay@icici
PayPal - [email protected]

Agniveer® is serving Dharma since 2008. This initiative is NO WAY associated with the defence forces scheme launched by Indian Govt in 2022

UPI
agniveerupi@sbi,
agniveer.eazypay@icici

Agniveer® is serving Dharma since 2008. This initiative is NO WAY associated with the defence forces scheme launched by Indian Govt in 2022

I am Good but Born Loser

How Islam was sabotaged

There must have been a truly noble inspiration behind Muhammad’s decision to name his belief-system as Islam – that means ‘humble submission’ or ‘peace’. Perhaps he was inspired by the vision of Vedas that resides within every human being to seek peace, equality, rationality and humility in his tribe. On surface, the great Muhammad was just another disease-inflicted ordinary illiterate born in the primitive Arabic society that hardly knew of any world beyond Arab and any religion beyond Paganism, Judaism and Christianity.  But he possessed the glorious rare inspiration to drive this mini-world of his towards enhanced sensibilities and humble submission to almighty God, despite his limitations. In a superstitious society where even his followers and relatives were fighting each other for petty selfish agendas, he possessed the guts to lay the roadmap for humble submission aka Islam despite the convulsing challenges and lack of education.

Agniveer salutes the genius of this great legend. That is why Agniveer considers Muhammad to be a role model. It wonders what would have been the nature of miracles the glorious Muhammad would have performed, had he received the opportunity to understand formally even the rudimentary basics of Vedas, Brahmacharya, Upasana and Vedic Dharma in general. Alas! It is difficult to comprehend His Lila at times!

Nevertheless, Muhammad was so far-ahead of his primitive society, that for them, his message was the final message for all times in future. But little did he knew that very message of peace given by him would become the breeding ground of terrorist forces, violence and intolerance immediately after his era!

Thus we all know how immediately after his death, his politically motivated followers cooked up fake Hadiths and killed each other to compile a Quran of their own choice, disregarding the true motto of humble Muhammad. Even his son-in-law and child-wife were fighting each other claiming divinity. One claimed that Quran was actually supposed to be have revealed on him. Other said that her marriage to Muhammad as a baby was ordained divinely by Allah Himself! Quran was supposed to have been collected from leafs, twigs, cloth pieces, leather pieces and what not! A lot many people were killed for claiming to propagate ‘false’ verses of Quran and even the Caliph who finally compiled the final official version of Quran 20 years after death of Muhammad, was murdered! What could be greater mockery of Islam that stood for Peace!

If this was not sufficient, even the word ‘Quran’ was coined much after death of Muhammad! And then began the satanic mission of dominating the entire world with this new ‘Quran’ and fake ‘Sahih Hadiths’ in name of order of Allah! Thus the simple message of Muhammad was converted into a recipe for intolerance that did not spare even followers of Islam.

Since then, peaceful Muslims have been murdered and subverted. The saga continues even till today. And all that happens in name of Muhammad!

First false stories were cooked up through fake Hadiths and fake verses of Quran to create a completely fictitious account of Muhammad’s life. These stories insult the great Muhammad by claiming that Muhammad was a pedophile, he used to promote sex-slavery, he married his daughter-in-law, he killed many innocents and what not. And then those who opposed it were threatened with damaging consequences!

Agniveer stands against such a grave insult to this great person and hence rejects all those Hadiths and verses of Quran that denigrate his character. Instead of trying to justify objectionable stories through even more objectionable reasons, we outrightly reject them as imaginations of Muhammad’s politically and criminally motivated relatives and followers.

The conquest of post-Muhammad Islam  in entire world, thus, is nothing but a political and criminal expedition continuing even till today, that has nothing to do with original legacy of Muhammad. And the worst victims have been the sane, rational, compassionate and good Muslims.

Times have changed, methods have changed, but one thing remains same – ALMOST ALL GROUPS AND PEOPLE WHO AGGRESSIVELY REPRESENT ISLAM AND WANT WORLD TO EMBRACE ISLAM ARE TERRORISTS.

So Babur was a terrorist, Aurangzeb was a terrorist, Nadir Shah was a terrorist, Ghazni was a terrorist and today Zakir Naik (including his entire cult of supporters) are terrorists.

Terrorists have become spokespersons of Islam

Two weeks ago, we wrote an article requesting Muslims on Agniveer site to share their views on certain specific points relating to terrorist and barbaric views of likes of Zakir Naik. This was done to segregate good Muslims from fanatics who were threatening Agniveer and all critics of ‘Terrorist Islam of Zakir Naik et al’ with dire consequences. You can review the article here:

Islam will not be a threat if…

We did not publish anything for last 2 weeks to await response on this article. We disabled commenting on other Islam related articles to have clear views of good Muslims on this article first and thus differentiate them from ‘terrorist Muslims’.

But the results from comments and mails that we received in these 2 weeks were most disappointing and shocking:

a. Not one single Muslim dared to condemn Zakir Naik for his justification of killing apostates and forbidding non-Muslims to preach in Muslim countries yet have rights for Muslims to propagate Islam in non-Muslim countries. Thus Zakir Naik is more important to them than the great Muhammad!

b. There were people who vaguely agreed to most of the points of articles were still refused to reject or condemn the books and people who support such views strongly. On other hand they would very vociferously condemn Agniveer for these articles defending Muhammad and rejecting the false Islam! Why such double standards? Nothing except Al-Taqiah (concept of fraud legitimized by religion) can explain it.

c. Many claimed that there is no concept of nationalism in Islam. A Muslim should only support a Muslim regardless of country. Thus cheating one’s own country to support a Muslim from other country represents true Islam as per them! In other words, they agree that one should never be assured about patriotism of Muslims!

This is one of the greatest dilemmas for good Muslims – how-so-much patriotic they may be, Al-Taqiah or ‘divinely blessed fraud’ and anti-national ideologies of their leaders and representatives would always put a question mark on their credibility.

d. There were people who openly justified things like Jaziya on non-Muslims because Muslims also pay another kind of tax. They refused to justify why tax-system should be based on one’s religion. And no Muslim criticized such views. Discrimination on basis of religion is something ingrained in their blood from very childhood and nothing can be more dangerous for humanity.

e. Not one single Muslim came up to say that all such Hadiths which insult Muhammad or humanity in general should be rejected regardless of they being called ‘Sahih’ (Correct) or not.

In other words, its ok for them to call Muhammad a pedophile, rapist, murderer, psychopath, lecher and they would go all lengths to justify all these through most perverted logics. But they would not agree to simply reject all these bogus verses that insult the great person. To the fanatic Muslim, their uneducated Ulemas and semi-literate witch-doctors like Zakir Naik are more important that Muhammad.

So blinded are they by vision of fanatic Islam, that they refuse to apply their minds to conclude even this much that if Islam means humble submission or peace, all the verses of Quran or Hadiths that talk of contrary have to be false!

f. No one condemned Saudi Arab or other countries for disallowing other religions but justified their rights to preach Islam elsewhere! They simply stated that it is their internal matter and hence they would not comment. I wonder why they do not apply the same standards for Agniveer site or Ali Sina or Salman Rushdie. When they can refuse to comment on Saudi Arab killing apostates in name of Islam, what prompts them to apply altogether different standards for non-Muslims? Are we witnessing yet another form of Al-Taqiah?

Summary Lessons

Under such a situation, following points emerge clearly:

a. ALL those Muslims who try to defend Islam or Zakir Naik are basically with terrorist mindsets. They believe that till they are powerless, they should vaguely showcase Islam as peace through Al-Taqiah. But once in dominance, verse of Sword takes over. Finally when dominance is complete, apostates deserve being killed!

b. Good Muslims simply do not come to debate or defend Islam or Quran. They peacefully indulge in their activities but are scared to condemn fanatic Muslims because these fanatic Muslims have a grip over Muslim population.

We met a few noble-hearted Muslims who even admitted that new Quran and Hadiths is all crap and has nothing to do with actual Islam. Others agreed that all existing translations of these texts published and propagated by mainstream Islamic schools are wrong. But they feared to come in public with such views because they are scared of the brutal dominance of terrorist minds over Islamic society that cannot tolerate any questions. The safety of their lives and those of their near and dear ones prevents them from condemning the false Islam in open.

c. While an Agniveer would be immediately condemned for anything against their views, Muslim preachers would not dare criticize Zakir Naik for his intolerant views on apostasy because Islam forbids condemning fellow Jihadis. This is because as per modern Islam (new Quran and fake Hadiths), the first and foremost criteria to qualify as being innocent, or humble, or deserving mercy, or not deserving hatred is being a Muslim (non-Muhammad version). Being non-Muslim is greatest crime for terrorists like Zakir Naik and his followers.

d. Most of these Muslims are brainwashed from childhood to hate non-Muslims. We received several mails that laid imaginary allegations on us for abusing and using defamatory words against Muhammad in our articles. When we replied requesting specific references, there was no response. Basically this is a case of a typical Jihadi Muslim taught to stereotype anyone who questions them to be abusive and insulting. They live in their world of hateful imaginations and create allegations that exist only in their minds!

e. A typical Jihadi aka terrorist Muslim propagating Dawah or invitation to Islam sees world in only two colors – green and non-green like a dog. The definition of green varies from cult to cult and person to person. So a wahabi terrorist like Zakir Naik or Osama would consider even Sufis and Qadiyanis as non-green. A Qadiyani would allow even non-Muslims into heaven in certain conditions. A typical Shia would not take religious scriptures so seriously but a Sunni would abuse Shia as a non-green.

f. Al-Taqiah or Cheating is an established way to fool people into believing that their version of Islam means peace. And obviously, it being ‘cheating’, no one would admit that they ‘cheat’! But it is clear from their deeds – when they claim Islam is peace but refuse to condemn those fellow terrorists like Zakir Naik who justify death for apostates!

g. Two of the worst hit casualties of terrorist dominance of Islam have been:

– Innocent good Muslims who want to join the mainstream, reject fundamentalism, live and let live, be patriots, be productive citizens but are helpless because they are at gunpoint of fundamentalists. Further they are brainwashed since childhood to remain in confused state throughout their lives.

– The founder of Islam – Muhammad. Today the world knows a completely different Muhammad – thanks to fake Hadiths and false Quran – and either hates him or adores him for all the wrong reasons. Only the word ‘Islam’ implying Peace and Humility stands to hint at original message and intent of original Muhammad. All the rest of the evidences and testimonies have been long deleted by terrorist Islam.

This represents the most dangerous situation for humanity as a whole:

– Till perverts like Zakir Naik remain in dominance, along with the entire mafia that breeds fanaticism and terrorism, non-Muslims and even moderate Muslims cannot afford to remain in peace.

– The concept of Al-Taqiah combined with foolish secularism of fraud leaders cutting across party lines, brainless glamor driven media and commercial mafia ensures that they would never explore the roots of terrorism – false Hadiths, false Quran and the mafia that perpetuates this fraud and instead confuse ordinary citizens about true nature of Islam through ‘My name is Khan’, or beaten records of ‘ Terrorism has no religion’ or other gimmicks.

This allows fanatic terrorist forces like IRF to spread their web more easily and work towards shaking the foundations through conversions, deceit and attacks.

– Good Muslims continue to remain scapegoats and viewed with doubt and mistrust across the globe. This is further used by terrorists like Zakir Naik to spread hatred against non-Muslims and promote attacks like 9/11 or 26/11 or Kashmir Jihad.

Soul of Muhammad would continue to weep over such mockery of his efforts!

The only way out

a. Spread education among ordinary Muslims and non-Muslims alike about true Muhammad and false Islam. The mainstream media mafia and political frauds would act as barriers but alternative means must be explored. There is no other way.

b. Create an environment of welcome and invitation for bringing back good Muslims back to Vedic fold – their original roots. This would help them live with dignity without anyone doubting their intents and patriotism.

c. Muslims have been the most uneducated class thanks to misdeeds of their leaders and preachers like Zakir Naik. Today the contribution of Muslims to Indian economy is negligible. In fact disgusting policies like Sachar Committee recommendations are being used to allow incompetent have preferential rights over country’s resources.

The only productive Muslims are those who are non-Muslims as per standards of fanatics like Zakir Naik. For example a Bohra like Azim Premji or Upanishad and Geeta lover like APJ Abul Kalam.

In fact by reading the comments made by defenders of Zakir Naik on Agniveer site itself, one can assess the level of education, mastery of language and intelligence of an average Zakir fan.

Thus Muslim youth HAVE to be educated BEYOND the Madarsa farce. They need to be taught personality development, etiquettes, communication skills, technical skills, logical and analytical abilities and modern science so that jokers and cartoons like Terrorist Naik do not become their role models.

I wish if instead of such a joker, an Azim Premji, or APJ Abul Kalam, or Ashfaqullah, or Abdul Hamid would have been their role  models!

Agniveer Plans

Agniveer is committed to this mission to safeguard the entire humanity and is resolved to take following immediate steps:

a. Create more articles on Vedas and Vedic Dharma so that Muslims and non-Muslims alike can understand the true concepts and not go by fake brainwashing that is imbibed by fanatics since childhood. Thus all false notions about Vedas like polytheism, casteism need to be eradicated and its true rational, scientific and logical face would be explored.

b. Create a Dawah site to invite good Muslims back to Vedic fold. Also launch the Dawah movement of Shuddhi at ground level to help good Muslims embrace true Islam that points only to Vedic Dharma. We have already been doing this but would launch this in more structured manner now. This does not mean conversion from one religion to another. It means accepting entire humanity as own family.

c. Have a section on Personality Development to teach specific skills and concepts that would help a typical reader have a better attitude, more effective communication skills, seek a decent job, enhance his or her career, improve soft skills, improve logical and analytical reasoning, enhance emotional intelligence, improve aptitude and be more professional in whatever they do.

Agniveer team comprises people from IIT, IIM, PGs in Medical Science, Top Executives etc and hence believes that this would be an effective way to help everyone, especially Muslims be more competent in being productive and useful for country and the world. After all this is the core foundation of Vedas!

And also learn, in process, why a rude, illogical, comical, ill-mannered fanatic terrorist like Zakir Naik should not be a role model for any sensible human being.

d. Continue to refuse to debate or discuss with anyone who does not first openly and clearly condemn Zakir Naik for his views of killing apostates and all non-Muslims going to Hell. Unless and until one very clearly puts his or her stand on the 10 points mentioned in

Islam will not be a threat if…

we would continue to bracket such persons into ‘Terrorist gang’ and refuse to have any discussions with them. After all discussions happen only with humans and not terrorists.

e. We have received a huge number of challenges for debates. It is impossible for us to allocate scholars for every child that desires to debate us. So we request them to follow the steps listed in http://agniveer.com/terms/eligibility-rules-for-debate/ and send us the necessary details. But only after they have expressed their clear humanist views in:

Islam will not be a threat if…

The above article has summarized the essence of our entire stand against fanatic Islam and why we consider followers of the version of Islam who dare not condemn those who seek death and Hell for non-Muslims as greatest threat for humanity.

Agniveer movement is resolved to expose and eradicate this terrorism in name of religion through all legitimate means (non- Taqiah!) as ordained in Vedic Religion in brief.

The next phase of Agniveer movement would witness a shift in focus by bringing education and personality development among all who are either victims (non-Muslims) or scapegoats (good Muslims) of intolerant Islam through ground level as well as internet based initiatives. We shall conduct an experiment on how peace, tolerance, compassion, education and knowledge can melt away the strongest walls of terrorism, hatred and intolerance.

We pray to Ishwar for His blessings to enable us to make utmost efforts to reach a situation where we are no longer required to segregate people as Muslim/ non-Muslim and can proudly refer to all our brothers and sisters as humans alone regardless of religion.

The Goal is far and the night is dark.
But He is my light and I can walk!

Agniveer
Agniveer
Vedic Dharma, honest history, genuine human rights, impactful life hacks, honest social change, fight against terror, and sincere humanism.

166 COMMENTS

  1. According Hindu believe koormam, fish, narasimha and varaharam are created before the human. But from Veda we can saw that during their period human existed……………….

    Eg)Vishnu taking fish Incarnation when King of asura kidnap the Veda.
    King Sathyvridha saw the Incarnation of fish when he saw the lake. (Sree maha bagavadham (ashtamaskantham 24:9 to 13)………………………

    According to sree maha Devi bagvadham first section we saw that first 26 Incarnation, 4 of them are human (sanakan, sanandan, sanathan and sanal Kumar)…………………..

    Swami Vivekananda says “Incarnation of human is never happened. According to Veda it may be a prophet or leader of the society” (San Francisco speech 8:4:1990)…………..

    We can never saw the Incarnation of human from the Veda, Upanishath and bagvath geetha…………………………………..

  2. ——————————————————————————————————————
    i think there are two group of scholar is there in the period of Veda

    group1:…………………………………………………..

    They are the authority of the above verses, they know the truth, they hide the truth from people, either they beware the people action against them or they got some physical earning, they try to deviate the people from once of god.

    group2:………………………………………………………………………………

    They believe orginal essence of Veda, they try to make the people to original essence of Veda. they make the verses as follow

    ” yo devanam thamada yeka yeva “(Rigveda 8:3:3)
    ” We know the god in different names of devan, but he is one ”

    Unfortunately group1 suppressed the gorup2,today Hindu believe 33 cores of god.
    Dr. Radhakrishnan criticizes the group1.
    (Dr. Radhakrishnan: Indian Philosophy Vol I Page 145.)

    Kabir says ” we never worship the people they are born and died here(earth),i never believe Raman was the incarnations of god “(Dr. Thara Chand: Influence of Islam on Indian Culture, Page 163.)

    Human can’t Incarnation of god, they are just true believer than normal people. The character of Ramakrishna was created the imagination of human being. If we believe they are incarnation of god, we have to face lot of contradiction about that belief(Harijan:Mahatma Gandhi 22-6-1947)

    ” Mahabharata never been a authorized things, it never include a single verses as a divine, I never believe Krishna a incarnation of god, none can have a clear evidence as its divinity and no one can prove it was a authorized one “(Young India Oct 1, 1925-Quoted from The Encyclopedia of Gandhi an Thoughts, Page 190.)
    ——————————————————————————————————————

  3. ——————————————————————————————————————
    Primitive Aryans never follow the polyithsm, they pary one god ‘ohm’,but period of adarva veda aryans fall into Polytheism, worship to several gods, devan and devis.(encyclopedia vol:2 page-281)

    We can saw from geetha that it try to combined all god to one

    ” yea panya devatha baktha yejentha sredha yanitha the pi mameva kountheya yejantha vidi porvikam “(bagavath geetha9:23)

    krishna says ” hey son of kundi,you understand that worship of devies not belongs devies, actually they worship to me ”

    Similar verses like above (bagavath geetha 9:17, bagavath geetha 7:6, bagavath geetha 9:18)

    But we can saw verses from same bagavath geetha contradiction to above verses.

    ” Iandrathi devavritha devan prithyan yanthi pithrevritha buthani yanthi bu thejo yanthi mathyajinopimam “(bagavath geetha 9:25)

    krishna says ” if they being Fast for Indradi devan it belongs to Indradi devan,they worship to prithredeva it belongs to prithredeva, they worship to me it belong to me ”

    Similar verses like above (bagavath geetha 7:21,22)

    Some years ago there are different orgnisation was here for promoting once of god, but today none of them existing.

    Where is brahmasamaj by rajaram mohan ray?
    Where is prarthana samaj by Ranade?
    Where is bhakthi prasthanam by ramanadan and kabeer?
    For more where is the essence of one god and moral things from bakthi prasthanam by dhayanada saraswathi?

    Miracle thing was the entire Hindu group highly supports the ‘adhyoida darsanam’ from sree sangarajyarya.high celebrating his birthday, mass follower; they exaggerate him and Flatter him, even atheist. Because he built the basement of polytheism.

    In India today only existing some terror,fundamental and self nationalism from bakthi prasthanam for dhayanada saraswathi, golwakirsm, baltakrism,etc.all the positive, moral and democratic theories are died here. Today who are the authority of Hindu?…

  4. @ Shabeer: Did you wake up from some dream and are suddenly seeing the world differently. All your questions are absolutely redundant and I think you need to look up archives of Agniveer for all this. But here is something for starters…

    Theisms in Vedas: Vedas are beyond theisms. Vedas espouse a bi-directional premise where many manifestations of an integrated singular entity is portrayed and the multiple manifestations are integrated back to a single integrated entity. So who cares about West Asian theisms? Only those draped in Abrahamic conditioning do…

    Incarnation: Given you have used Bhagavad Gita for your discussion point, did you miss reading this in BG??

    Bhagavad Gita 9:11: FOOLS DERIDE ME IN MY HUMAN FORM, UNABLE TO COMPREHEND MY SUPREME NATURE AS THE ULTIMATE CONTROLLER OF ALL ENTITIES.

    So now, before raising any further questions, please check the archives in agniveer.com …

  5. Brother Shabir, you are again roaming in the darkness… Many times I have proved that the sorces from where you have copied the above texts is not a hindu scholar. They are there just to fool innocent and unaware people like you.

    Brother I say to open your eyes and see the facts around. Read my comment why there are so many worshipable characters in Hinduism. See brother those who worship the devatas alone are considered as ignorant.

    I can answer all your posts here. But I don’t understand what is your problem. What is your doubt ?? Ask a specific question, I will answer you. If I can not answer you, I will leave Vedas, but you have to promise, If I will give you answer, you will leave Islam.

    Brother, neither you know Sanskrit, nor you know about Vedas well nor you are aware of Islam. Being you are a muslim, you are just tryng to go to some petro-dollar arabic terrorists propogated sites, copy some hatred quotes which are not at all in accordance with the Vedas, paste here just to prove that you are superior.

    But we for your silly acts, some times I feel pity on you, because you are ignorant of every thing, some times I feel angry on you, how many times will you need to understand ?

    The mothers and sisters of your grand parents were raped, thousands were killed, pillars of their heads were made, then your grand fathers accepted Islam. But no body preached Vedas. Vedas were restricted only for those who were tallented to acquire knowledge. Only the summary of Vedas were available for all, Vedas were preserved for the purpose of research. Still majority of people follow Vedas.

    I can prove brother that Vedic Religion is followed every where around the Glove. Go to akhilapadhi.weebly.com, go to “My Religious View” page, read how Sanatan Philosophy is followed around the world.

    Open your eyes brother….. accept the truth… Remove your ego…..

    I will answer all your question, but put a question first. If the answer to that question will contain any hatred words for any human or…

  6. koi muslim sacha manusy bhi nah ban sakta ,aur n sachha muslim ban sakta hai , sachhe muslim ke liye to kuran v hadis ki gulami karni hogi muhammad ji ke adarsho para chalna hohga aj kitne muslim jaid jaise logon ko god lekar apna putr jaisa pyar de rahe hai ?muhammad ji ne apna pahala nikah mata saman vidhva khudeeja ji se kiya thaaaj kitne muslim apna pahala nikah mata saman umr ki v vidhava mahila se karte hai ?muhammad ji pachas salki umr me 6-7 sal ki umr ki poti saman aysha se nikah banane ki mansikta banai ! aaj kitne muslim pachas sal ki umr me kisi poti saman umr ki bachhi se nikah karne ki mansikta banate hai ? muhammad ji ne anek vivah karke bhi dasiyo [mariya kabti]se bagair nikah ke sex kiya , unse bachhe paida kiya[abdulla ] aaj kitne muslim is tarah ke avidh sambandh banate hai ? kamal ki bathai khuda ka ejent ka dva karne vale muhammad ji ki umr matr 63 sal tak rahi v unko rasul manne vale bahut se muslim 63 sal se jyada umr bhi pa jate hai 1 kya khuda in muslimo se muhammad ji ke mukable me jyada khush rahata hai ? ab muslim kaise manvata ke gun la sakenge ! jab muslimo ka ek tyohar hi janvaro ki hatya karme me hai khun kharaba karte hai 1 bdla khor unke sanskar me hai tab unke pas manushyta ka gun kaise ayega ? “dusre ke sath vahi vyvhar karo jo apne liye bhi pasand aye ” yahi manvta ka ek matr kasauti hai ? kya muslim is manvta ki kasauti ko chunauti dena chahenge ?jab ham kisi janvar ko svayam ya apne kisi bachhe ko hani nahi pahunchna dena chahte hai tab hame kya adhikar hai ki ham kisi janvar ko ghayal to kya uski hatya bhi kaise kare ? kya koi manushy kisi janvar ke ankh kan adi bana sakta hai tabuske ango ko kyo nasht kare jabki shakahari ban kar ham uska utpadan bhi karte hai tabhi uska upyog bhi karte hai 1 ham na kare koi hamara bhai saman manushy to avshay karta hai 1 lekin yah bat kisi janvar ke nirman par nahi lagu ho pati !

    • @raj.hyd
      Raj Ji aap thik kahate hai parantu hamare muslim bhaiyo ka tarak hai Allah ne janavaro ko manushayo ke khane ke liye hi banaya hai. Aur kitane muslman aaj kafiro ko markar unaki aurto ke sath sex karate hai jaise mohamad ne Arab ke kabilo ke logo ko kaffir kah kar mar dala aur ushi rat unki aurto ke sath sex kiya. Muslman chahate hai ki ab bhi aesa hi ho parantu ye yah nahi samajh sakate ki iss yug me ye sambhav nahi hai.

      • manniy truth seekar ji , shayad apko taklif hogi ki dosh muslimo ka nahi parantu ham ap jaiso ka hai ! “satyarth paraksh “ki kitab ko mahatv dene vale v ved ka jyada nam lene vale jab in grantho ka prachar nahi karenge , aur jyada samajhdar hone ka dava bhi karenge ! tab jaisa karm karenge , vaisa hi to fal prapt hone ki hi ummeed karenge 1 ved ke anuyayi to apne dhan ka upyog apas ki ladai me hi kharch kar rahe hai 1 jara “atm nirikshan ” bhi kijiye aur dekiye kitne logon ke pas ved uplabdh hai ? “jinhe sansar me sansar ka upkar karna tha , unhe dekhiye samajo ko mitane ke liye taiyar baithe hai ” agar satyarth parkash ka prachar kai karod ki sankhya me hota , samajik buraiyo ko dur karne ka prayatn hota to muslim bhi apne ghar ki or lautne ki koshish bhi karte ! chaliye purani baton ko chodiye agar aj se bhi satyarth parkash ka dhuna dhaar prchar v prsar kiya jaye unke ankul acharan karne vale kai karod ho to is desh ki vyvstha me badlav bhi kafi laya ja sakta hai ! bas koishi jarur karni hogi !

      • @raj.hyd
        Raj aapki bat 100% satya hai, me bhi ab Ved ka parchar karne me lag gaya hun aur ye website bhi vedic mission me ek mill ka pathar sabit hogi & ye wesbite ham sabhi ke liye bhi marg darshan ki tarah hai. Iss desh me lakho karodo rupeye ramayan aur bhagwat katha aadi me kharch hote hai agar ham itne paise vedo ka parchar karne me lagaate to aaj bharat ki dusri tasvir hoti. Lekin aab bhi samay hai ham sabhi ko agar iss desh bachana hai to vedo ke parchar me ji jan se jut jaye.

    • AAp jo keh rahe hai, shayad isse aapke ander se musalmano se jalne ki boo aa rahi hai, mai yeh aapka dil dukhane ki ya aapko galat kehne ke liye nahi keh rah hoo, ek baat bataye kya aapke bhagwan krishna bachpan se kitne achche the or kitni ladkiyon ke sath kitni raasleelayen ki hongi unhone mahabharat jesi ek kahani bhi rachi kya wo kerna sahi tha jo unhone karwaya, or aise hi bahut se bhagwan hai jinhe aap “Bhagwan” kehte hai jese “indra” bhi hai, to aap jara inke baare mein pura pehle gyan lelen, fir kisi ke uper aisi ungli uthayen to hi theek hoga,
      ……………………..muaf kijiyega agar meri kisi baat per aapko bura laga ho,
      but pehle soche kehne se pehle……..

      • देखिए! आपको किसी ने गलत सूचना दे कर रखी है। हिन्दू तो स्वयं ही कहते है कि उनके पुराण आज उतने प्रामाणिक नही जितने 40,000 वर्ष पूर्व थे। किंतु मुहम्मद साहब के बारे में जितने भी अपशब्द होते है – वह सब सही हादिस के कारण है। मैं तो मानने को तैयार हु कि हादिस मुहम्मद साहब को अकारण बदनाम करने के लिए लिखे गए है लेकिन मुसलमान ही नही मानता। अब बेचारे हिन्दू भी क्या करे – मुसलमान तो वही करते है जो सही हादिस में लिखा है – उसके लिए क़ुरान का भी अपमान चलेगा। केवल एक बार youtube पर 19 questions to muslim scholars डालकर समस्त 21 चलचित्र देखे – मेरी बात में कितना दम है वह आपको वही दिख जाएगा। fromdtothelight ऐसा channel का नाम है, यदि आवश्यकता पड़े तो सारे चलचित्र देखे। इस्लाम क्या था और इस्लाम क्या है – वह पता चल जाएगा।

        आवश्यकता है तो यह पता करने की कि सच्चा मुसलमान कौन है – वह कोई अरबी लुटेरा नही बल्कि भारत के महान संत गुरु नानक ने समझाया है। श्री गुरु ग्रंथ साहिब पृष्ठ 141 केवल इस्लाम का ही गुणगान करता है। उन्होने कहा है कि दया की मस्जिद में जाओ, विश्वास का मुसल्ला रखो, ईमानदारी तेरी क़ुरान हो, नम्रता रूपी ख़तना करो, रहमत का रोज़ा रखो, शांति को काबा बना, शरणागति को तसवीह बना और सत्य को ईमाम रख। ऐसा मुसलमान बनो। दूसरे के माल से अपनी तिजोरी भरना अर्थात सुअर को खाना है। 5 नमाज़ का विज्ञान यह है – पहली नमाज़ अर्थात सत्यप्रियता, दूसरी ईमानदारी, तीसरी दान पुण्य, चौथी नेक व्यवहार, पाँचवी है अल्लाह की बन्दगी। जो झूठा है वह तो असत्य में ही जाएगा। मुसलमान बनना कठिन है और केवल सच्चा मुसलमान ही मुसलमान है। पहले तो नबी के सन्देश की मिठास लाओ, फिर अपने अहंकार को नष्ट करो, मुहम्मद के सच्चे मुसलमान बन्दे, यदि सम्भव हो तो जीवन – मृत्यू के मोह को दूर करे, अल्लाह की शरणागति से स्वार्थ का नाश करो। जब ऐसा व्यक्ति सब प्राणियो पर दया करे तब वह मुसलमान कहलाएगा। सच्चे मुसलमान की ऐसी सुन्दर परिभाषा कोई अरबी विद्वान नही दे पाया। यदि इस कसौटी को आधार बनाया जाए तो 125 कोटी मुसलमानी आबादी में से केवल 1.456% ही मुसलमान कहलाने योग्य है – शेष सभी काफ़िर है।

        देख तेरे संसार की हालत क्या हो गई भगवान! इनसान = शैतान!

      • Ashraf bhai, jalan to ho rahi kyunki hame aapki tarah izzat lutne ki ijazat jo nahi mili hai na. Krishna ji jo kiya so kiya kam se kam kisi ke sath zabardasti nahi. Aur rahi baat indra ve anya devo ki, jo jisne jaisa kiya waisa bhoga. Lekin aapke toh bare maje hain. Izzat luto, qatl karo, maal luto, bas allah ka naam lo aur sabhi gunaah pal mein maaf. Sahi mein, jalan toh ho rahi hai bhai.

  7. GLORY OF SUFIS IN INDIA…..
    http://dikgaj.wordpress.com/dealing-with-islamic-terror-indian-subcontinent/

    ==> The Islamic conversion in India of non-Muslims into Islam has been declared to have been done by Sufi preachers who were always a very tolerant, integrative, and peaceful interpretation of Islam always using peaceful means to convert Hindus. Let us see, what the Sufi’s themselves say about their conversion methods in the early days of Islam in India.

    The author of Siyarul-Arifin, Hamid bin Fazlullah is also known as Dervish Jamali Kamboh Dihlawi. He was a Sufi of the Suhrawardiyya sect who died in AD 1536 while accompanying the Mughal Emperor Humayun on an expedition to Gujarat. His son, Shykh Gadai was with the Mughal army in the Second Battle of Panipat (AD 1556) and advised Akbar to kill the Hindu king, Himu imprisoned in battle, with his own hand. On Akbar’s refusal, according to Badauni, Shykh Gadai helped Bairam Khan in beheading the blinded and fatally wounded Himu [So much for treatment of prisoners of war in Islam]. This work, completed between AD 1530 and 1536, is an account of the Chishti and Suhrawardi Sufis of the period.

    Sheikh Jalaluddin Tabrizi (AH 533-623) was the second most famous disciple of Sheikh Shihabuddin Suhrawardi (AD 1145-1235), founder of the Suhrawardiyya silsila of Sufism. Having lived in Multan, Delhi and Badaun, he finally settled down in Lakhanauti, also known as Gaur, in Bengal.

    Devatala (Bengal) “Shaikh Jalaluddin had many disciples in Bengal. He first lived at Lakhnauti, constructed a khanqah and attached a langar to it. He also bought some gardens and land to be attached to the monastery. He moved to Devatalla (Deva Mahal) near Pandua in northern Bengal. There a kafir (either a Hindu or a Buddhist) had erected a large temple and a well. The Shaikh demolished the temple and constructed a takiya (khanqah) and converted a large number of kafirs… Devatalla came to be known as Tabrizabad and attracted a large number of pilgrims.”
    [S.A.A. Rizvi: A History of…

  8. kurani allah ke sath muhammad ji ka nam kyo? batlaiye kuran me kis ayat me kalma likha hai ? jab ved jinko mile ved ka gyaan mukhy hai jin maharshiyo ko mila vah mukhy nahi hai 1 ramayan mukhy hai tulsi das v valmiki ji aur na jane kitne lekhko ne ramayan likhi ai mukhy nahi hai ! rel ke injan ke avishakarkarta ka nam kitne lohg jante hai? mobaail fon ke avishkar karta ka kitne log jante hai lekin istemal to sabhi karte hai ?

    • arya bhai mai aapki yeh baat se sahmat nahi ki insan ko galat uska deen/dharm banata hai, kyunki deen/dharam to sirf shanti or aman ki siksha deta hai, ab ramayan me hi aapke bhagwan RAM ko hi dekhe sari umar kitni pareshaniyon ka samna kerte hain (jo wo kerne ke uddesya se aye the) fir bhi wo wahi kerte hai jo ek dharm ke hisab se kerna chahiye,

      • अशरफ़ भाई !

        यह सत्य है कि सभी धर्म मानवता का ही सन्देश देते है। लेकिन उस धर्म का कोई लाभ नही जिसका कोई पालन करने वाला नही हो। अब क़ुरान के 2 256 में पुरी पुस्तक का सार दे दिया कि मजहब में कोई जबरदस्ती नही क्योकि सत्य असत्य से अलग ही रहेगा। …

        परंतु प्रश्न यह उठता है कि कौन है जो अल्लाह के इस महावाक्य को स्वीकारता है? कई देशो में गैर मुसलमानो की हत्या कर दी जाती है। गैर मुसलमान छोड़िए – शिया, सुन्नी, सुफी आपस में लड़ मरते है। जब ऐसे समाचार पढ़ता हू तो सोचता हु कि – या अल्लाह तू अंतत: चाहता क्या है? अभी youtube पे कुछ चलचित्र देख रहा था तो पाया कि सारे हादिस किसी धर्मभ्रष्ट ने मुसलमानो को नष्ट करने के लिए बनाए है। अरब में स्वधर्मत्यागी ( अर्थात apostate ) को मार दिया जाता है। वहाँ पर पत्थर फेंककर मारा जाता है। आपको जानकर आश्चर्य होगा कि ऐसा कोई अनर्थकारी उपदेश क़ुरान में नही है। 41 34 और 41 35 में तो बुराई का बदला अच्छाई से ही देने को कहा है। फिर अधिकांश आतंकवादी मुसलमान क्यो?

        एक प्रश्न पूछना था – क़ुरान 9 5 के अनुसार मुसलमानो को प्रतिमापूजको को मारने का विधान है। विद्वान कहते है कि मुसलमानो ने प्रतिमापूजको के साथ सन्धि करी थी और प्रतिमापूजको ने उसके नियम भंग किए। तो मैं यह जानता चाहता हु कि अल्लाह ने सामान्यीकरण क्यों किया? कुछ प्रतिमापूजको ने सन्धि तोड़ी – उन्हे मारो। सारे प्रतिमापूजको को मारने का आदेश क्यो दिया? यदि अल्लाह सामान्यीकरण करने लगा तो मनुष्य क्यो न करे? एक मुसलमान आतंकवादी – सबको मारो। ऐसी अराजकता अल्लाह क्यो फैलाना चाहता है?

        तो यह कुछ समस्याए है जिनका समाधान करना है। अंतत: केवल यह कहना चाहुँगा कि सर्वत्र शांति स्थापित हो।

  9. 100 ki seedhi ek baat kahun mai radhe bhai, ki ek purani kahawat hai ki “ek nek/sachche raste per chalne wale ko is duniya me kabhi sukoon nahi milta”, wohi is kalyugi dunia me ho rha hai aur kuch nahi,,

    • आपने सही कहा!

      दुनिया में किसी अच्छे इनसान को जीने का मौका नही मिलता। लेकिन यह सत्य नही कि केवल अच्छे मुसलमान ही प्रताड़ित होते है। प्रताड़ित कोई भी हो सकता है – फिर चाहे वह हिन्दू हो अथवा ईसाई, यहुदी, पारसी, जैन, बौद्ध क्यो न हो। आचार्य चाणक्य के अनुसार

      नात्यंतं सरलैर्भाव्यं गत्वा पश्य वनस्थलीं। छिद्यंते सरलास्तत्र कुब्जास्तिष्ठन्ति पादपा:॥ चाणक्य नीती 7.12

      अर्थात आवश्यकता से अधिक सरल न बनो – जाओ वन मे देखो। पहले सीधे वृक्ष कटते है और टेढ़े मेढ़े खड़े ही रहते है। अत: दबाया तो किसी भी नेक मनुष्य को जा सकता है। किंतु यदि विशेष रुप से देखा जाए तो पाया जाएगा कि नेक मुसलमान बाकी प्राणियो से 2 गुना अधिक दबते है। अब एक उदाहरण यहाँ दिया गया है।

      http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qadir_Sheikh_(former_Muslim)

      इस्लाम को छोड़कर ऐसा कोई धर्म नही जहाँ कुछ प्रश्न पूछने पर यदि अपने को उत्तर नही पता है तो पूछने वाले को धार्मिक स्थलो में प्रवेश बन्द करा दिया जाता है। बेचारे की 37 वर्षो की निष्ठा का उसे पुरस्कार नही बल्कि दण्ड मिला। यदि मुल्ला / मौलवी लोग ऐसे कर्म करेंगे तो एक पुरानी कहावत आप भी सुनिए – “एक मछली सारा तालाब गन्दा करती है”

      आवश्यकता है कि धार्मिक कट्टरता को छोड़कर उसे सुधारा जाए। तभी विश्व में मानवता पूर्णतया प्रतिस्थापित की जा सकती है अन्यथा धर्म के नाम पर अधर्म होता रहेगा। सर्वत्र शांति स्थापित हो।

  10. Great work Agniveer, I must say that I have much relieved that there are people who are confronting people like Zakir Naik and likes… I am reading your articles from some time… and I am also a fan of Ali Sina. In this article you have written that the Muhammad portrayed in Shih Hadths and Seerat is not the true Muhammad, can you please explain a bit more about it. Mr. Sina seems to have a very different take on this issue.
    Thank You

  11. Hi, Neat post. There’s a problem with your website in web explorer, may test this? IE nonetheless is the marketplace chief and a good component to folks will miss your magnificent writing due to this problem.

      • @Agniveer Agni
        ______One who attacks cannot be a Muslim._________
        But Quran says

        Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

        Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.”

      • @ Truth Seeker

        Refrain yourself from misquoting or partially quoting the verses from Qur’an in order to spice up your fantasies.

        Quran (4:76)

        “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah , and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of Taghut. So fight against the allies of Satan. Indeed, the plot of Satan has ever been weak.”

        [i]Surprisingly (2:216) provides a very complete meaning when read along with its context as in Qur’an (2:190) which says[/i]

        “And Fight in God’s cause AGAINST THOSE WHO WAGE WAR against you, but do not commit aggression-for, verily, God does not love aggressors.”

      • brother it says “Warfare is ordained for you, though it is hateful unto you; but it may happen that ye hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that ye love a thing which is bad for you. Allah knoweth, ye know not” 2.216 and “Those who believe do battle for the cause of Allah; and those who disbelieve do battle for the cause of idols. So fight the minions of the devil. Lo! the devil’s strategy is ever weak”. 4.76

  12. This is a Veic site -Hinduism, why is Islam being mentioned, let us not detract to other faiths and focus on the beauty of our faith!

    • yes but to remove misconceptions made by muslims and others if they respect us then we can respect them but most do not

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
91,924FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe
Give Aahuti in Yajnaspot_img

Related Articles

Categories