Recently a family of traitors refused to stand up for National Anthem in a movie theatre in Mumbai. Kudos to the people around that humiliated the rogues and made them leave the theatre.

As usual, human right champions that stood for the rights of Qasab, Afzal Guru and Yakub have again come out of their rat-holes. According to them, because India is a democracy. As if democracy means to surrender before rascals.

Unfortunately, this land of Bismil, Ashfaq and APJ also produces Yakubs whose ultimate aim is to make India the slave of a hate-cult. Here is a brief timeline of what its followers have been doing recently and what are the future projections if this stupidity continues to go unchallenged.

In 2010- Vande Mataram is against my religion, won’t sing it. See I have no problem with Jan Gan Man, I love India.

In 2015- Jan Gan Man is against my tradition. I won’t stand up when it is played. See I have no problem with tricolor. I love India.

In 2020- Tricolor is not God. I only bow down to holy stone of Mecca. I won’t salute tricolor. See I have no problem with constitution. I love India.

In 2025- Constitution is not holy book from God. I have no faith in it. Only my holy book can be India’s constitution. See I have no problem with people from other religions. I love India.

In 2030- People from other religions are sinners as they don’t believe in my book. It is clearly mentioned in holy book that God only loves Muslims and hates Kafirs. See I have no problem with them living in India but they need to pay Jaziya tax. Great rulers like
Aurangzeb also forced Jaziya. Its Indian tradition. I love my India.

In 2040- Jaziya is enough. Now we are in majority. Others must now convert to our religion or must be ready to face the consequences. And fools! I never loved India. It was just a lollipop for idiots like you when we were in minority.
—–

Poor Indians will be found unprepared again as they were when Ghoris, Ghaznis and Aurangzebs attacked/killed/enslaved them centuries back or when Jihadis slaughtered lacs in 1947 in direct action called by Jinnah. Another bloodshed and mass-rapes.
Want to avoid it in 2040? Act in 2015. If you don’t want to get killed in 2040, stop Jaziya in 2030. Want to avoid Jaziya in 2030? Stop tolerating insult of constitution (separate laws for Muslims under Sharia) in 2025. Want to save constitution in 2025? Save tricolor from insults in 2020. Want to save tricolor in 2020? Defend Jan Gan Man in 2015. Want to defend Jan Gan Man in 2015? Defend Vande Mataram TODAY.

Be one step ahead of offenders. Stop the imaginary tolerance-non tolerance debate. Get real. When swords talk, debates have no meaning.
~ Vashi

Facebook Comments

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help bring change.

Disclaimer: By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. For full disclaimer, visit "Please read this" in Top and Footer Menu.

16 COMMENTS

    • So it is expected a normal behavior from muslims even if they insult National anthem or song. If someone points it out that it’s wrong, so person like you do not even have guts to say that it is wrong. It is just because Hindus like you who do not have self esteem and love for their country and religion, muslims can show any irrational behavior. They can create a mob of thousands of people and openly say to kill any animal. For you, it does not matter till that islamic violence kill you one day and still it won’t matter as it was expected anyway….

      • Ah…correction is needed in my previous message. I meant ” They can create a mob of thousands of people and openly demonstrate violence to kill any human being because that person has different view point”.

  1. Narendra Modi’s current insistence on ‘India First’ makes many an intellectual of the Congress era rather uncomfortable. Hitherto the idea of India had always been given a secondary place. Primary place was given to the concerns of diverse communities. In practice this meant accepting or winking at patently communal positions, especially when they came in handy in crushing the opponents of the Congress. Few would recall today the surreptitious help provided by the numerous Congress governments in Maharashtra to the Shiv Sena with the objective of cutting down the influence of Communists in Mumbai. In Punjab, people still remember how in order to cut down the Akali Dal, the Congress promoted Bhindranwale. The consequent events resulted in thousands being killed. The wounds of those days still rankle.

    The only way to regain some legitimacy for the intellectuals is to voice the concerns of the people rather than condemning the people for not being as intelligent as the intelligentsia; to maintain a distance from parties and politics. The days of that kind of engagement with parties and politics, so popular among those who grew up under the influence of the rebellious sixties, are truly over.

    — The writer is Professor of history, Panjab University

  2. A very good article written by Prof Ravilochan – The ideological vacuum
    The indian intellectual too has lost credibility

    As the prime minister, Nehru would frequently threaten to resign should the other leaders of the Congress not do what he wished them to do. It was such a threat that allowed him to push through the extremely contentious Hindu Code Bill. He forced the resignation of powerful Congress leaders through the Kamraj plan by threatening to resign himself. His colleagues, strongly rooted political creatures themselves, bowed before Nehru’s arbitrariness because they recognised the tremendous love that the people of India had for Nehru.

    The intellectuals supporting a vision of Nehruvian India did not face much public scrutiny. Today, however, things are different. India is no more in thrall of modernity. No more is the Indian wondering whether India is a nation or not. The antinomies of democratic politics that were sown into the body politic by the Communal Award of 1932 have created a serious backlash against those trying to push the idea of secularism.

    In 1932, when the colonial government had provided for separate electorates for Muslims and Sikhs, it was only the Sikhs, within the Congress and with the Akali Dal, who expressed open contempt for this effort by the government to divide Indians.

    The Congress party, under the leadership of Nehru, maintained a studied silence lest it alienate Muslims. While campaigning for the elections of 1937, Congress leaders from Punjab and Bengal sent repeated desperate requests to the Congress leadership to please condemn the Communal Award. The Muslims are not going to vote for the Congress, they would say. Now with the seeming Congress support to the Communal Award, even the Hindu vote was getting alienated. It was only then did Nehru make some ambivalent noises distancing the Congress from the Communal Award.

  3. A very good article written by Prof Ravilochan – The ideological vacuum
    The indian intellectual too has lost credibility

    Enough has been said of the unfairness of the intellectuals of India being unfair in targeting only Hindus and Hinduism. The point is this: The Indian intellectual was always seen as an ineffective person. Of use only in ideological battles. And even there not particularly influential in changing the minds of the people. The ham-handed effort by historians to promote secularism and syncretism by rewriting Indian history, papering over the evil deeds of Muslim rulers, was not much use in the containment of communalism in India. If anything, it only reduced the value of history as a subject in India. So much so that today schools are finding it difficult to get students to opt for the subject at the plus two level.

    Today, the intellectual in India has ceased to be even an ideological leader. In the ideological vacuum the madcaps of the VHP and MIM step in quite easily, attracting considerable numbers.

    The ideological vacuum in society persuades the intellectual to find considerable similarities between Narendra Modi and Hitler. The key commonality between the two being their ability to mobilise thousands in the name of nationalism and national development. But, then so did Jawaharlal Nehru.

    Nehru was so aware of his hold over the people that at least once, in an obituary note on himself, he warned of such popularity going to the head of the popular one, turning him into a dictator. Not that Nehru heeded this warning when doing what he considered were good things for India.

  4. A very good article written by Prof Ravilochan – The ideological vacuum
    The indian intellectual too has lost credibility

    MY teacher Majid Hayat Siddiqi was one of the rare JNU historians who publicly condemned, not once but many times, in print, the constant engagement that historians of JNU showed in what they loved to believe was the fight against communalism. Majid’s position was simply this: The reality out there is far too complex for such interventions to be of use unless the intellectual had first understood all sides of the problem. If anything, it only made such intellectuals look extraordinarily partisan and disconnected from the realities of India. Majid would insist that the proper task of the intellectual was to examine all aspects of the problem rather than privileging just one; present the results before the people and let the people decide.

    Never particularly important within India, the Indian intellectual today has lost considerable legitimacy within India.
    Their anachronistic concerns, their views that were designed for an India of the national movement period, simply do not fit well with the concerns and aspirations of India of current times. The great idea of secularism, once taken for granted in India, has been put under question because of the unfair manner in which the old intellectuals have sought to support it by unfairly targeting Narendra Modi. The threat to India’s syncretism is as much from the vigilantes of the cow protection brigades as from those who remain partial in their condemnation of the acts of violence and intolerance.

  5. If India falls to Islam or Xtianity or any Semitic creed all Dharmics will indeed become slaves once again. Only Dharmic traditions condemn every form of slavery. The vegetarian ethic and deep ecology and the idea of rebirth again on Dharti Mata (Earth) is nonexistent in the Semitic world-view (actually it is a hell-view not a world-view) The Semitics judge by genetics – Xtiantiy is being slave to the albinics/jews/zionists and Izlam is being slaves of arabs. For the love of Akal Purakh do something today to prevent future generations of Dharmics from slavery in future.
    Now is the time to act, not when Bharat becomes another Islamo hell-hole. Is anything uglier than forced prayer? Is anything more evil and torturous than mutilating infant and children’s genitalia? Is anything more disgusting than the after life brothel? Is anything more evil than calling the Divine “angry and jealous”? Is anything worse than calling man’s best friend, the canine “dirty”? Is anything more evil than banning art, music, dance and other arts? Is anything more dysgenic than marrying family members? Is anything more enslaving than polygamy and divorce? Dr. Elst states Xtianity retarded European science by 1000 years. Imagine the new dark ages, no, the new black age of an Islamic planet. We must do everything we can with body, mind heart and soul to prevent the evil of Semitic thinking from spreading in our beloved Aryvarta.
    I love canines; I love Sikhi; I love keeping body intact and respecting all creatures and meditating upon Naam. I love the vegetarian ethic of Aryavarta. Deluded Dharmics with zero knowledge of philosophy and zero knowledge of history will defend Semitics. There is nothing worth defending about non-vegetarians. Read good books – Captain Vadakayil warns the Puranas have been adulterated by hostile jealous foreigners.
    Towards Akhand Bharat! Towards freedom for all creatures! Live and let live – ahimsa and cheers fellow Dharmics.

  6. If India falls to Islam or Xtianity or any Semitic creed all Dharmics will indeed become slaves once again. Only Dharmic traditions condemn every form of slavery. The vegetarian ethic is nonexistent in the Semitic world-view (actually it is a hell-view not a world-view) The Semitics judge by genetics – Xtiantiy is being slave to the albinics/jews/zionists and Izlam is being slaves of arabs. For the love of Akal Purakh do something today to prevent future generations of Dharmics from slavery in future.
    Now is the time to act, not when Bharat becomes another Islamo hell-hole. Is anything uglier than forced prayer? Is anything more evil and torturous than mutilating infant and children’s genitalia? Is anything more disgusting than the after life brothel? Is anything more evil than calling the Divine “angry and jealous”? Is anything worse than calling man’s best friend, the canine “dirty”? I love canines; I love Sikhi; I love keeping body intact and respecting all creatures. I love the vegetarian ethic of Aryavarta. Deluded Dharmics with zero knowledge of philosophy and zero knowledge of history will defend Semitics. There is nothing worth defending about non-vegetarians. Read good books – Captain Vadakayil warns the Puranas have been adulterated by hostile jealous foreigners.
    Towards Akhand Bharat! Towards freedom for all creatures! Live and let live – ahimsa and cheers fellow Dharmics.

  7. A man born in Dhaka in 1942 was an Indian. In 1947 he became a Pakistani. In 1971 he became a Bangladeshi. So what is so sacrosanct about nationalism. For the sake of this piece of land called India, please do not spew venom. This pride of being in majority can hurt grievously. Have a heart and be humanist and not only a minority baiter. I hope you will be blessed with a more humane and rational approach which will not harm our country.This country is not anybody’s Jagir.

  8. Dear Indians,

    I have not even iota of doubt about India becoming a sovereign Islamic state in 30-40 years, if we don’t insist on respect to our National Anthem, Vande Mataram, our flag and our constitution.

    We must be supremely clear: Whomsoever misuses the constitution in the name of secularism should be dealt with iron hand. If not the day will come when anti nationals will say, we have freedom to be anti national too.

    I dont know how to convince our Indians, most of who are all sleeping. Should we wake up only when the day comes, when our wives, daughters are kept slave and converted into Islam, like it happened in the past. After all most Muslims in India are the product of forcibly converted Ancestors.

    Vande Mataram,

    May we all unite to protect our country being Dharmic state at all the time in future. We must respect every religion on earth, but never allow Abrahmic religions to take our, which kills our freedom to remain as we are.

    Regards,
    Ganapati

  9. Namaste Agniveer,

    Aa a freethinker, I have a few questions and I would appreciate a civil discussion on them.

    Do people have a choice? Are we Humans first or citizens of a nation which secured it’s Independence as recently as 1947? Did the National Anthem exist since eternity? Is the composer the omnipresent, omnipotent and omniscient god? Is it ordained for all men? Is it legal to chastise people who cannot stand up when the National Anthem is playing? If standing is the norm, does it condone criminals who comply, and make bonafide Samaritans who don’t, guilty before the law? Is it a safe haven for scoundrels to prove their patriotism while hiding their hypocrisy? For those who don’t stand, what gives others the right to call them names and vilify them? Is respect only given while standing up?

    I am an earnest seeker and I question things before accepting them. This way, I can accept the truth and reject falsehood.

    Please enlighten me.

    Dhanyavaad.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here