UPI - [email protected]
There is no such person with the name of Mir Baqi in the entire book of Babaunama leave alone him being the Governor of Oudh which was a very important province considering its very high revenues that it offered to the state treasury. This is now established that the Mir Baqi mentioned in the civil suit lingering in the Supreme Court is a mere figment of imagination. Now when there is no such person with this name, how can he be credited with creating a Masjid at Ayodhya leave alone demolishing it. So there was no Masjid at the site during the 16th century. The claims of the Muslims hence do not stand any merit. It is a pure figment of imagination that should be disregarded during the trials.
The shocking anti-climax when 6 ISIS Jihadis trap the Gurkha knife of a Kafir. Afzals will be ripped apart every time they mess with Shivaji!
Q. Vashi Sir, someone has asked me that Ram left Sita. Is this women empowerment? How to respond to him?A. Depends upon who he...
It seems this half-broken last pillar of unity will not last long enough.
As always, the reality lies at the other end of the diameter from fake liberals on the circle of logic.
ताजमहल एक शिव मंदिर है, न कि एक आतंकवादी के प्यार का कोई रोमांटिक प्रतीक। ताजमहल में स्पष्ट मंदिर परंपराओं को कवर करने वाली 100 प्रमाणों की श्रृंखला का भाग 5।