No Beef in Vedas – 20 Min Crash Course

superb guys!!!!!! wonderful!!!!!

Tom Alterji i’m a great fan of yours since the days of SHAKTIMAAN……. so good to see u again….

Thank you Agniveer and Tom Alter Ji!!

Very good work ! Keep rocking agniveer team

I will build Gaushala whenever i would have sufficient money.

agniveer this is just brilliant, spreading of vedic knowledge is one of the topmost duties of all humans, you have my full support

Thanks all members of Agniveer team , for your gread work for mankinds

Suryakant Mishra

Very good work by Agniveer. Thank you very much.

My Sincere thanks to Agniveer team and Tom Alter Ji for the great work you have put in. May Iswara help on the path of dharma.

Gau Samprokshan is a commendable work. I’d like to contribute to the cause. Please gimme some details.

Aadarniya Agniveer ji , i have a question regarding Rigvedadibhashya bhumika. Sanskrit sentences were written by dayanand ji.
Who Translated the sanskrit sentences into bhasha(hindi). Was this done by rishi Dayanand ji or other pundits ?

“NO BEEF IN VADAS” – Very nice and interesting presentation. Thanks for such a program.
I have some doubt of my own. I would be grateful, if you please care to clarify the following points:
1. In this program, one SLOKA says “We are to Destroy those, who eat cooked and uncooked meat”. So we are supposed to destroy/kill all curnivores such as tigers, lions, bears, snakes, foxes, wolves so many others. We should kill also all the non-vegiterian peoples around us. And, this is one of the ‘KARTYABYA’s, we (Hindus)are supposed to follow!!
2. We are against killing of Cows, because, cows give us milk, plow our land, draw our carts, etc. – is the statement right? OR it should be expressed in this way, “We are against killing of cows, because, wecan STEAL milks from them without resistance, we can MAKE THEM plow our land or draw our carts (with lashes, most of the time), in short, we can get an excellent SLAVE in a LIVING COW.”
I am not a learned person in SHASHTRAS. But the Shashtras ahve been created by human, keeping human welfare in mind. Also sometimes welfare for a “Special Group” of humen. We are talking Big to save cows. So big that we will not hesitate to destroy forests to provide feeding ground for cows, destroying forest dwellers as well. I, am sorry to say, but this is not my idea of Hinduism.

I am very happy and proud to see this movie and want very HINDU to know and spread the word about this.

ok i beleive eating or killing any kind of meat is not good, either its beef or pork or chicken….every life is sacred.
beef is eaten all over the world , so you are saying all those are sinners and only we who dont eat meat are true beleivers? yaar is tarah ki batein to islamic scholars bhi kartein hai .
please explain

वेदों में भी था बिग बैंग और हिग्स बोसोन का जिक्र
http://www.livehindustan.com/news/desh/national/article1-european-scientist-higs-boson-ved-book-39-39-241271.html
यूरोपीय वैज्ञानिक ने जिंस हिग्स बोसोन से मिलते जुलते जिस कण को खोजने का दावा किया है, उसका एवं बिग बैंग सिद्धांत का सबसे पहला जिंक्र वेदों में आता है।

वैज्ञानिकों ने हिग्स बोसोन को गॉड पार्टिकल अर्थात ब्रह्म कण का नाम दिया है। सबसे प्राचीन वेद ऋगवेद में वर्णित नासद सूक्त में प्राचीन मानव और अंतिरक्ष को समझने की उसकी मूलभूत जिज्ञासा का पता चलता है। नासद सूक्त में कहा गया है कि सृष्टि से पहले कुछ भी नहीं था, न आकाश था, न जमीन और न जल। इस पौराणिक श्लोक में ब्रह्मा की तुलना हिरण्‍यगर्भ से करते हुए बताया गया है कि सृष्टि से पहले ब्रह्म ही विद्यमान थे और उन्हें से सारी सृष्टि का विकास हुआ है। वेदों और उपनिषदों के बाद आई पुराणों में अंतिरक्ष के सृजन के सिद्धांत से आगे बढ़ते हुए युगों की शुरुआत और उनके खात्मे का जिक्र किया गया। पुराणों में ब्रह्म के एक दिन को चार अरब 32 करोड़ वर्ष के बराबर बताया गया है जो एक महायुग और चार युगों के बराबर होता है। एक महायुग की समाप्ति के बाद प्रलय आती है और समूचा ज्ञान और सभ्यताएं नष्ट हो जाती हैं और एक नई सृष्टि का सृजन होता है।

Great work Agniveer Team. Hats Off to you.

No person can only feed on meat.You need spices and corriander etc which are vegeterian for the meaty meal.Eating meat in excess means everyday can lead to mental and psycological diseases.This is wat happening in western countries.Also in ancient times we used to export many items including vegeterian items to west in exchange of gold and other items.Even now germany exports a lot of vegeterian food from us.

Wonderful video! We need more like this.

very good job ,lot of knowledge on vedas
thank you
agniveer

An excellent video with proofs from the different Vedas dispelling the myth of beef eating and clarifying the true meaning of ‘Medha’.

u must publicly debate with dr zakir naik.

Dear brothers,
Pls dont fight with religion.follow religion by heart and do good for evry human being.think hw can we develope our country from corruption

I am an american christian but I do visit India often for my business. Since my childhood, I was more curious to explore the truth. I came across David Frawley website https://vedanet.com/

Here is very good article:
https://vedanet.com/2015/10/22/why-indian-intellectuals-need-to-study-more-vedanta/

I would say that Vedas do not allow to kill any animal for food. There is definitely very high respect for Cow and Bull and even killing cow for any reason is considered crime.

To start with, the Manu-samhita clearly and logically recommends that, “Meat can never be obtained without injury to living creatures, and injury to sentient beings is detrimental to the attainment of heavenly bliss; let him therefore shun the use of meat. Having well considered the disgusting origin of flesh and the cruelty of fettering and slaying corporeal beings, let him entirely abstain from eating flesh.” (Manu-samhita 5.48-49)

However, it is not simply the person who eats the meat that becomes implicated by eating the dead animal, but also those who assist in the process. “He who permits the slaughter of an animal, he who cuts it up, he who kills it, he who buys or sells meat, he who cooks it, he who serves it up, and he who eats it, must all be considered as the slayers of the animal. There is no greater sinner than that man who though not worshiping the gods or the ancestors, seeks to increase the bulk of his own flesh by the flesh of other beings.” (Manu-samhita 5.51-52)

As we get further into the Manu-samhita, there are warnings that become increasingly more serious. For example, “If he has a strong desire (for meat) he may make an animal of clarified butter or one of flour (and eat that); but let him never seek to destroy an animal without a (lawful) reason. As many hairs as the slain beast has, so often indeed will he who killed it without a (lawful) reason suffer a violent death in future births.” (Manu-samhita 5.37-38)

By not killing any living being, one becomes fit for salvation.” (Manu-samhita 6.60)

The earlier texts, such as the Rig-veda (10.87.16), also proclaim the need to give up the eating of slaughtered animals. “One who partakes of human flesh, the flesh of a horse or of another animal, and deprives others of milk by slaughtering cows, O King, if such a fiend does not desist by other means, then you should not hesitate to cut off his head.”

pl check this link for more details:

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/vegetarianism_recommended_in_Vedic_scripture.htm

In his book Animal Liberation, Peter Singer states that the basic principle of equality does not require equal or identical treatment; it requires equal consideration. This is an important distinction when talking about animal rights. People often ask if animals should have rights, and quite simply, the answer is “Yes!”

Animals surely deserve to live their lives free from suffering and exploitation. Jeremy Bentham, the founder of the reforming utilitarian school of moral philosophy, stated that when deciding on a being’s rights, “The question is not ‘Can they reason?’ nor ‘Can they talk?’ but ‘Can they suffer?’”

In that passage, Bentham points to the capacity for suffering as the vital characteristic that gives a being the right to equal consideration. The capacity for suffering is not just another characteristic like the capacity for language or higher mathematics. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They feel pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and motherly love. Whenever we consider doing something that would interfere with their needs, we are morally obligated to take them into account.

Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent worth—a value completely separate from their usefulness to humans. We believe that every creature with a will to live has a right to live free from pain and suffering. Animal rights is not just a philosophy—it is a social movement that challenges society’s traditional view that all nonhuman animals exist solely for human use. As PETA founder Ingrid Newkirk has said, “When it comes to pain, love, joy, loneliness, and fear, a rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. Each one values his or her life and fights the knife.”