Reclaim temples - Agniveer

Who built Taj Mahal?


Why did he build Taj Mahal?

Because his 3rd wife and 30th sex-partner – Mumtaz Mahal died tragically giving birth to his 14th child.

Why did he name it Taj Mahal?

After Mumtaz Mahal. You see Mumtaz has a Taz.

Any reason he chose a nickname not documented in history instead of full name? I thought building memorial for dead is not a matter of joke and fun.

Well, you know, may be …..whatever be it. It is documented in history that Shah Jahan built Taj Mahal.

Who wrote that documented history?

The courtiers and travelers of Shah Jahan’s era.

How are they different from ISIS stooges calling Baghdadi the greatest legend today? Did any unbiased person document it? Are all alleged documents of history consistent with each other in details of construction? My twenty friends will vouch that I traveled to Paradise on a donkey yesterday night. Will you believe it and put it in history books?

Ummm. Well, you know. British have done all research and some JNU professors have also worked on it.

Got it. So you rely on those whose loyalty to India is beyond any doubts! And where did you read? In your school text book? Where mugging and vomiting in exam would fetch numbers? Or some Bollywood movie? Or some romantic shayari?

Don’t pull my legs. I just know it is true because Shah Jahan was great builder.

Oh. And who wrote that? Again his stooges? By the way did you read those books by his stooges? They also glorify his non-stop beheading and rape expeditions since childhood till death. Do you think addicted rapists and perverted killers would indulge in developing architectures? And even if they do, are they matters of glorification or shame?  

I am having a bad throat.

And did you know that Mumtaz Mahal died 800 km away from Agra? The dead body would be turned into a stinking cadaver that even vultures will refuse to eat by the time they would transport her from Burhanpur.  

I have to go. Some urgent work.

Should I also discuss Qutub Minar, Fatehpur Sikri, Jama Masjid, Krishna Janmabhoomi, Kashi Vishwanath, Red Fort…..?

You are a saffron terrorist, right-winged, communal threat to nation. I am going. Will not listen to you.

Moral of the story

Taj Mahal is just one small example. All claims of Islamic architecture are based on ridiculous evidences, poems of romantic shayars, British agenda for India, and stories taught to us as children in school books.

If we believe in truth and fairness, we have two options.

Option 1 – All medieval era architectures that are claimed to be mosques or Islamic contribution must be given back to Hindus. Even a cursory review of architectural details and sources of history make things crystal clear.

This is the ideal option assuming Satyameva Jayate is national motto of India.

Option 2 – If we want to act diplomatic, not get into land disputes and would like to do a more thorough research in next 100 years, we have an immediate alternative as well. The documents that are used to establish some Mughal ruler as founder of these architectures also hail the same ruler as a rapist and pervert killer. For example, Akbar’s courtiers have glorified how he beheaded his enemies and abducted women for his harem. Same with Shah Jahan, Jahangir, Aurangzeb and others. So put up a board in front of these monuments that “this building was allegedly constructed by a rapist, murderer and psychopath who was no less than Osama Bin Laden or Baghdadi.” Throw away glorification of these rascals from text books. Also mention that claims over construction of the monument are under dispute.

You cannot have both options. If you disown the documents that expose crimes of these Medieval rulers, you must also disown claims of they being architects. If you own the claims of they being great builders, you must also acknowledge that they were even greater rapists and murderers.

Agniveer is committed to honesty and justice. We will be bringing out the evidences to strengthen our demand for these monuments to be given back to Hindus.

Q: Are you not being anti-Islamic?

A: No. In fact, Islam does not believe in these designs and architectures. Apart from India, nowhere do you see such elaborate buildings. And as we all hear, Islam means Peace and Honesty. So Muslims must also participate in this honest mission. That will be more Islamic than glorifying butchers who were a joke in name of Islam or any religion. For example, many Muslims participated in Kar Sewa at Ayodhya because they know that homosexual Babur was a disgrace to Islam.

Our Demands

  • Hindus must reclaim all temples and monuments that were forcibly usurped by invaders.
  • Government must remove all forms of glorification of any ruler who was involved in rape, fetish for brutal killing or celebration with dead bodies.
  • The text books and official records must be re-edited to include Hindu claims and evidences over these monuments as well.
  • The government notices and guide-books must be amended to include Hindu evidences, including those at tourist spots. For example, if one visits Taj Mahal, if the guide explains tourists about Shah Jahan’s 30th love, he must also elaborate on Hindu claims. Official boards should highlight the same.
  • If you destroy history, history will destroy you. We are being destroyed yet not realizing. The lovers of Bharat Mata must intensify the movement for reclaiming not just a Ram Temple, but all the thousands of monuments without any compromise whatsoever. If you tolerate perverts, you just create Talibans, Al Qaedas, and ISIS.

Let us reclaim honest history. Let us reclaim our temples.

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help revive Dharma.

Disclaimer:  We believe in "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" (entire humanity is my own family). "Love all, hate none" is one of our slogans. Striving for world peace is one of our objectives. For us, entire humanity is one single family without any artificial discrimination on basis of caste, gender, region and religion. By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. Please read Full Disclaimer.
  • New studies reject the view that Aryans entered India from the outside. They also reject the notion that the Dravidian people were the conquered races, or that the Dravidians were pushed down south by the invading Aryans.
    People of North and South India have lived together in peace as two branches of one family since antiquity. People who talk of an Aryan conquest of India parrot the 19th century British viewpoint which is now discredited.

      • Actually muslims should go back to their roots. Their roots, their DNA is not from Arabic culture. It is from their own hindu ancestors. They should leave islam and adopt hindu religion. Moreover, any person who literally follows islam can never do any progress. This is a backward religion that is founded on hatredness and violence.

      • @Rishika

        What is Hinduism? No one can explain? Though explanation of Arya easy but Hindu can not be defined property. There are so much confusion in Hindu word.

        Bharat- Symbol of slavery of Royal Indian Family.
        Hindustan- Symbol of Muslims’s ruler Slavery.
        India- Symbol of Britishers’s Slavery.

        What left?

        Aryavart- Symbol of “land of Great people”.

    • The often perceived and frequently quoted racial division in India between the fairer Aryan North
      and the darker Dravidian South is pernicious and dangerous. The British gave currency to this
      view of racial divide in India. It was part of their “divide and rule” strategy. The Northern
      people in India got especially sucked into this interpretation of history because it made the
      “Aryan” northerners appear racially closer to the white races of Europe.

    • New studies with plenty of archeological and DNA evidence clearly reject the view that Aryans entered India from the outside. They also reject the notion that the Dravidian people were the conquered races, or that the Dravidians were pushed down south by the invading Aryans.
      People of North and South India have lived together in peace as two branches of one family since antiquity. People who talk of an Aryan conquest of India parrot the 19th century British viewpoint which is now discredited.

    • @kaleemulla

      Do you mean Muslim are not original inhabitants of India? Stop this absurdity.
      99% Muslim are original inhabitants of India since eternity. They are Muslim today but they Indian too even before arrival of Islam in India around 1000 A.C.