Reclaim Temples and kick out the fraud

Read Post Disclaimer

It is possible that this post is based on the translations and commentaries of Islamic texts like Quran, Hadiths etc. as published by all major Islamic publishing sources. These are the publicly available translations that are used for promotion of Islam by prominent representatives.

We, however, believe that most of these texts have been wrongly translated, misinterpreted, misquoted or even have been tampered with and interpolated to suit the selfish designs of proponents of Islam after Muhammad. Thus, we believe that original Islam and original Quran of Muhammad are totally different from what have been propagated by his followers in name of Islam. There are few minority groups in Muslims whose scholars subscribe to our views and interpret/translate Islamic texts differently or even refuse to consider the available Quran and Hadiths as authentic. But these scholars themselves are considered Kafirs and are condemned by a dominant elite group of Islam. Thus, when we refer to Islam, we actually imply these dominant elites of Islam and not Muslims or all Islamic scholars in general.

Wherever we critically evaluate Muhammad, we imply the fictitious Muhammad propagated by these false texts or their wrong translations and not the original Muhammad. We have high regard for original Muhammad who stood for non-violence and tolerance. Similarly, when we analyze Islamic texts, we refer to these questionable translations/versions and NOT original texts.

Further, we have a sense of the highest level of brotherhood for Muslims in general. Wherever we use the word Muslim in a critical manner, it refers to false representatives of Islam and not Muslims in general. Readers are requested to keep this in mind to understand the correct perspective of such posts on this website.

Nowhere should they assume the words like Islam, Quran, Prophet etc. to be referring to original noble entities, unless it has been referred in a positive light. We restrict ourselves only to notions prevalent in minds of fanatics and those without reason.

अस्वीकरण पढ़ें

इस पूरी वेबसाईट में जहाँ भी ‘इस्लाम’ वा ‘मुसलमान’ वा पैग़म्बर आदि मज़हबी शब्दों का प्रयोग हुआ है, उसका अर्थ केवल और केवल इस्लाम वा मुसलमान वा पैग़म्बर आदि शब्दों की वह व्याख्या है जो कट्टर इस्लाम के मशहूर और लोकप्रिय प्रचारक जैसे - ज़ाकिर नाईक़, अंजम चौधरी, हाफ़िज़ सईद, मौलाना इसरार अहमद, मौलाना मसूद अज़हर और उनके समर्थक करते हैं जिसके अनुसार हर ग़ैर-मुसलमान जहन्नम/नर्क की आग में जलेगा और हर इस्लाम छोड़ने वाले को क़त्ल कर देना चाहिए।

इस पूरी वेबसाईट में जहाँ भी ‘क़ुरान’ शब्द प्रयुक्त हुआ है, उसका अर्थ क़ुरान की पुस्तक के वो अनुवाद और व्याख्याएँ हैं जो कट्टर इस्लाम के प्रतिनिधियों द्वारा इंटरनेट और अन्य स्थानों पर प्रचारित-प्रसारित की जाती हैं जिन्हें पढ़कर कमज़ोर दिल के लोग कट्टरता की दिशा में मुड़ रहे हैं। हम जानते हैं कि क़ुरान व उपरिलिखित शब्दों की कुछ व्याख्याएँ ऐसी भी हैं जो हिंसा को आज के दिन ठीक नहीं समझतीं, एवं ग़ैरमज़हबी मानवता पर बल देती है पर ऐसी व्याख्याएँ और व्याख्याता कट्टर इस्लाम के प्रतिनिधियों और उनके अनुयायियों की दृष्टि में मुर्तद (मुसलमान जिसने इस्लाम छोड़ दिया हो) घोषित किए गए हैं। ऐसे व्याख्याता और उनकी व्याख्याएँ इस वेबसाईट के विषय नहीं हैं। चिंता का विषय है कि आज इंटर्नेट आदि माध्यमों में कट्टरवादी व्याख्याओं का बाहुल्य है एवं उदारवादी सहिष्णु व्याख्याएँ दुष्प्राप्य हैं।

हम मानते हैं कि मूल इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर, क़ुरान आदि बहुत प्रेम और आनंद सिखाते होंगे। परंतु इस वेबसाईट में इन शब्दों से केवल वो अर्थ लिए जाएँ जो नवीन लोगों ने अपने हिसाब से अपने मिलावटी ग्रंथ/अनुवाद बना लिए हैं। हम इन मिलावटी ग्रंथों/अनुवादों को ठीक नहीं मानते और हमारी इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर या क़ुरान आदि विषयों की व्याख्या को आज के कट्टरवादी प्रचलित/मिलावटी अनुवादों के संदर्भ में ही लिया जाए। हमारी कोई बात मूल इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर और क़ुरान के लिए नहीं है। उसके लिए तो बस सम्मान है।

किसी भी व्यक्ति, समुदाय, उदारवादी विचारधारा की भावना को ठेस पहुँचाना इस वेबसाईट का उद्देश्य नहीं है। किंतु विषय गम्भीर है, संवेदनशील है। प्रचारित इतिहास पर प्रश्नचिन्ह उठाता है। कुछ स्थानों पर एतिहासिक विषयों को नाटकीय रूप में भी प्रस्तुत किया गया है। अतः यह निवेदन है कि यदि इन विषयों को लेकर आप किंचित भी संवेदनशील है तो इस वेबसाईट को आगे न पढ़ें। यह वेबसाईट केवल परिपक्व मनस हेतु है जो इस अस्वीकरण को ध्यान रखते हुए, हमारी मूल भावना का सम्मान करते हुए, हमारे सृजनात्मक अभिव्यक्ति के अधिकार को अंगीकार कर सकें।

This entry is part [part not set] of 14 in the series Taj Mahal is Shiva Temple

Taj Mahal is Shiva Temple

Who built Taj Mahal?

Shahjahan

Why did he build Taj Mahal?

Because his 3rd wife and 30th sex-partner – Mumtaz Mahal died tragically giving birth to his 14th child.

Why did he name it Taj Mahal?

After Mumtaz Mahal. You see Mumtaz has a Taz.

Any reason he chose a nickname not documented in history instead of full name? I thought building memorial for dead is not a matter of joke and fun.

Well, you know, may be …..whatever be it. It is documented in history that Shah Jahan built Taj Mahal.

Who wrote that documented history?

The courtiers and travelers of Shah Jahan’s era.

How are they different from ISIS stooges calling Baghdadi the greatest legend today? Did any unbiased person document it? Are all alleged documents of history consistent with each other in details of construction? My twenty friends will vouch that I traveled to Paradise on a donkey yesterday night. Will you believe it and put it in history books?

Ummm. Well, you know. British have done all research and some JNU professors have also worked on it.

Got it. So you rely on those whose loyalty to India is beyond any doubts! And where did you read? In your school text book? Where mugging and vomiting in exam would fetch numbers? Or some Bollywood movie? Or some romantic shayari?

Don’t pull my legs. I just know it is true because Shah Jahan was great builder.

Oh. And who wrote that? Again his stooges? By the way did you read those books by his stooges? They also glorify his non-stop beheading and rape expeditions since childhood till death. Do you think addicted rapists and perverted killers would indulge in developing architectures? And even if they do, are they matters of glorification or shame?

I am having a bad throat.

And did you know that Mumtaz Mahal died 800 km away from Agra? The dead body would be turned into a stinking cadaver that even vultures will refuse to eat by the time they would transport her from Burhanpur.

I have to go. Some urgent work.

Should I also discuss Qutub Minar, Fatehpur Sikri, Jama Masjid, Krishna Janmabhoomi, Kashi Vishwanath, Red Fort…..?

You are a saffron terrorist, right-winged, communal threat to nation. I am going. Will not listen to you.

Moral of the story

Taj Mahal is just one small example. All claims of Islamic architecture are based on ridiculous evidences, poems of romantic shayars, British agenda for India, and stories taught to us as children in school books.

If we believe in truth and fairness, we have two options.

Option 1 – All medieval era architectures that are claimed to be mosques or Islamic contribution must be given back to Hindus. Even a cursory review of architectural details and sources of history make things crystal clear.

This is the ideal option assuming Satyameva Jayate is national motto of India.

Option 2 – If we want to act diplomatic, not get into land disputes and would like to do a more thorough research in next 100 years, we have an immediate alternative as well. The documents that are used to establish some Mughal ruler as founder of these architectures also hail the same ruler as a rapist and pervert killer. For example, Akbar’s courtiers have glorified how he beheaded his enemies and abducted women for his harem. Same with Shah Jahan, Jahangir, Aurangzeb and others. So put up a board in front of these monuments that “this building was allegedly constructed by a rapist, murderer and psychopath who was no less than Osama Bin Laden or Baghdadi.” Throw away glorification of these rascals from text books. Also mention that claims over construction of the monument are under dispute.

You cannot have both options. If you disown the documents that expose crimes of these Medieval rulers, you must also disown claims of they being architects. If you own the claims of they being great builders, you must also acknowledge that they were even greater rapists and murderers.

Agniveer is committed to honesty and justice. We will be bringing out the evidences to strengthen our demand for these monuments to be given back to Hindus.

Q: Are you not being anti-Islamic?

A: No. In fact, Islam does not believe in these designs and architectures. Apart from India, nowhere do you see such elaborate buildings. And as we all hear, Islam means Peace and Honesty. So Muslims must also participate in this honest mission. That will be more Islamic than glorifying butchers who were a joke in name of Islam or any religion. For example, many Muslims participated in Kar Sewa at Ayodhya because they know that homosexual Babur was a disgrace to Islam.

Our Demands

Hindus must reclaim all temples and monuments that were forcibly usurped by invaders.
Government must remove all forms of glorification of any ruler who was involved in rape, fetish for brutal killing or celebration with dead bodies.
The text books and official records must be re-edited to include Hindu claims and evidences over these monuments as well.
The government notices and guide-books must be amended to include Hindu evidences, including those at tourist spots. For example, if one visits Taj Mahal, if the guide explains tourists about Shah Jahan’s 30th love, he must also elaborate on Hindu claims. Official boards should highlight the same.
If you destroy history, history will destroy you. We are being destroyed yet not realizing. The lovers of Bharat Mata must intensify the movement for reclaiming not just a Ram Temple, but all the thousands of monuments without any compromise whatsoever. If you tolerate perverts, you just create Talibans, Al Qaedas, and ISIS.

Let us reclaim honest history. Let us reclaim our temples.

Series Navigation

Read Post Disclaimer

It is possible that this post is based on the translations and commentaries of Islamic texts like Quran, Hadiths etc. as published by all major Islamic publishing sources. These are the publicly available translations that are used for promotion of Islam by prominent representatives.

We, however, believe that most of these texts have been wrongly translated, misinterpreted, misquoted or even have been tampered with and interpolated to suit the selfish designs of proponents of Islam after Muhammad. Thus, we believe that original Islam and original Quran of Muhammad are totally different from what have been propagated by his followers in name of Islam. There are few minority groups in Muslims whose scholars subscribe to our views and interpret/translate Islamic texts differently or even refuse to consider the available Quran and Hadiths as authentic. But these scholars themselves are considered Kafirs and are condemned by a dominant elite group of Islam. Thus, when we refer to Islam, we actually imply these dominant elites of Islam and not Muslims or all Islamic scholars in general.

Wherever we critically evaluate Muhammad, we imply the fictitious Muhammad propagated by these false texts or their wrong translations and not the original Muhammad. We have high regard for original Muhammad who stood for non-violence and tolerance. Similarly, when we analyze Islamic texts, we refer to these questionable translations/versions and NOT original texts.

Further, we have a sense of the highest level of brotherhood for Muslims in general. Wherever we use the word Muslim in a critical manner, it refers to false representatives of Islam and not Muslims in general. Readers are requested to keep this in mind to understand the correct perspective of such posts on this website.

Nowhere should they assume the words like Islam, Quran, Prophet etc. to be referring to original noble entities, unless it has been referred in a positive light. We restrict ourselves only to notions prevalent in minds of fanatics and those without reason.

अस्वीकरण पढ़ें

इस पूरी वेबसाईट में जहाँ भी ‘इस्लाम’ वा ‘मुसलमान’ वा पैग़म्बर आदि मज़हबी शब्दों का प्रयोग हुआ है, उसका अर्थ केवल और केवल इस्लाम वा मुसलमान वा पैग़म्बर आदि शब्दों की वह व्याख्या है जो कट्टर इस्लाम के मशहूर और लोकप्रिय प्रचारक जैसे - ज़ाकिर नाईक़, अंजम चौधरी, हाफ़िज़ सईद, मौलाना इसरार अहमद, मौलाना मसूद अज़हर और उनके समर्थक करते हैं जिसके अनुसार हर ग़ैर-मुसलमान जहन्नम/नर्क की आग में जलेगा और हर इस्लाम छोड़ने वाले को क़त्ल कर देना चाहिए।

इस पूरी वेबसाईट में जहाँ भी ‘क़ुरान’ शब्द प्रयुक्त हुआ है, उसका अर्थ क़ुरान की पुस्तक के वो अनुवाद और व्याख्याएँ हैं जो कट्टर इस्लाम के प्रतिनिधियों द्वारा इंटरनेट और अन्य स्थानों पर प्रचारित-प्रसारित की जाती हैं जिन्हें पढ़कर कमज़ोर दिल के लोग कट्टरता की दिशा में मुड़ रहे हैं। हम जानते हैं कि क़ुरान व उपरिलिखित शब्दों की कुछ व्याख्याएँ ऐसी भी हैं जो हिंसा को आज के दिन ठीक नहीं समझतीं, एवं ग़ैरमज़हबी मानवता पर बल देती है पर ऐसी व्याख्याएँ और व्याख्याता कट्टर इस्लाम के प्रतिनिधियों और उनके अनुयायियों की दृष्टि में मुर्तद (मुसलमान जिसने इस्लाम छोड़ दिया हो) घोषित किए गए हैं। ऐसे व्याख्याता और उनकी व्याख्याएँ इस वेबसाईट के विषय नहीं हैं। चिंता का विषय है कि आज इंटर्नेट आदि माध्यमों में कट्टरवादी व्याख्याओं का बाहुल्य है एवं उदारवादी सहिष्णु व्याख्याएँ दुष्प्राप्य हैं।

हम मानते हैं कि मूल इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर, क़ुरान आदि बहुत प्रेम और आनंद सिखाते होंगे। परंतु इस वेबसाईट में इन शब्दों से केवल वो अर्थ लिए जाएँ जो नवीन लोगों ने अपने हिसाब से अपने मिलावटी ग्रंथ/अनुवाद बना लिए हैं। हम इन मिलावटी ग्रंथों/अनुवादों को ठीक नहीं मानते और हमारी इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर या क़ुरान आदि विषयों की व्याख्या को आज के कट्टरवादी प्रचलित/मिलावटी अनुवादों के संदर्भ में ही लिया जाए। हमारी कोई बात मूल इस्लाम, पैग़म्बर और क़ुरान के लिए नहीं है। उसके लिए तो बस सम्मान है।

किसी भी व्यक्ति, समुदाय, उदारवादी विचारधारा की भावना को ठेस पहुँचाना इस वेबसाईट का उद्देश्य नहीं है। किंतु विषय गम्भीर है, संवेदनशील है। प्रचारित इतिहास पर प्रश्नचिन्ह उठाता है। कुछ स्थानों पर एतिहासिक विषयों को नाटकीय रूप में भी प्रस्तुत किया गया है। अतः यह निवेदन है कि यदि इन विषयों को लेकर आप किंचित भी संवेदनशील है तो इस वेबसाईट को आगे न पढ़ें। यह वेबसाईट केवल परिपक्व मनस हेतु है जो इस अस्वीकरण को ध्यान रखते हुए, हमारी मूल भावना का सम्मान करते हुए, हमारे सृजनात्मक अभिव्यक्ति के अधिकार को अंगीकार कर सकें।

10 COMMENTS

kaleemulla khan May 20, 2016 At 12:08 pm

Dravidian are the original inhabitants of India. Aryan Brahmins came from present Iran. So Brahmins must go back to where they belong.

Reply
- Rajesh May 20, 2016 At 2:35 pm
  
  Again pigism
  
  Reply
- Amit May 20, 2016 At 5:51 pm
  
  By that logic all Muslims should go back to Saudi.
  
  Reply
  - Rishika May 21, 2016 At 6:27 am
    
    Actually muslims should go back to their roots. Their roots, their DNA is not from Arabic culture. It is from their own hindu ancestors. They should leave islam and adopt hindu religion. Moreover, any person who literally follows islam can never do any progress. This is a backward religion that is founded on hatredness and violence.
  - Abdu May 23, 2016 At 3:10 pm
    
    @Rishika
    
    What is Hinduism? No one can explain? Though explanation of Arya easy but Hindu can not be defined property. There are so much confusion in Hindu word.
    
    Bharat- Symbol of slavery of Royal Indian Family.
    Hindustan- Symbol of Muslims’s ruler Slavery.
    India- Symbol of Britishers’s Slavery.
    
    What left?
    Only
    
    Aryavart- Symbol of “land of Great people”.
- Rishika May 21, 2016 At 6:17 am
  
  The often perceived and frequently quoted racial division in India between the fairer Aryan North
  and the darker Dravidian South is pernicious and dangerous. The British gave currency to this
  view of racial divide in India. It was part of their “divide and rule” strategy. The Northern
  people in India got especially sucked into this interpretation of history because it made the
  “Aryan” northerners appear racially closer to the white races of Europe.
  
  Reply
- Rishika May 21, 2016 At 6:21 am
  
  New studies with plenty of archeological and DNA evidence clearly reject the view that Aryans entered India from the outside. They also reject the notion that the Dravidian people were the conquered races, or that the Dravidians were pushed down south by the invading Aryans.
  People of North and South India have lived together in peace as two branches of one family since antiquity. People who talk of an Aryan conquest of India parrot the 19th century British viewpoint which is now discredited.
  
  Reply
- Abdu May 23, 2016 At 3:04 pm
  
  @kaleemulla
  
  Do you mean Muslim are not original inhabitants of India? Stop this absurdity.
  99% Muslim are original inhabitants of India since eternity. They are Muslim today but they Indian too even before arrival of Islam in India around 1000 A.C.
  
  Reply
Rishika May 21, 2016 At 6:19 am

New studies reject the view that Aryans entered India from the outside. They also reject the notion that the Dravidian people were the conquered races, or that the Dravidians were pushed down south by the invading Aryans.
People of North and South India have lived together in peace as two branches of one family since antiquity. People who talk of an Aryan conquest of India parrot the 19th century British viewpoint which is now discredited.

Reply
छलावे का अंत और मंदिरों की पुनः प्राप्ति July 24, 2016 At 8:02 pm

[…] For original post in English, visit Reclaim temples and kick out the fraud. […]

Reply