Lance Naik Hanamanthappa joined the league of brave martyrs.  He was the lone survivor of Siachen avalanche. Entire nation was praying for him holding breath. Someone offered her kidney, someone waited keenly in temple of Army Hospital. Millions of eyes got wet on this news.
And few kilometers away, some traitors are distributing sweets in JNU campus. They are shouting slogans: “We will fight till Kashmir is freed and India is destroyed.” While Hanamanthappa was battling for life, these ‘intellectuals’ were busy organizing commemoration for a terrorist who killed hundreds.

On TV prime-time, there is debate over whether feeding cobras in public parks an acceptable hobby. And is closing my apartment doors to these cobras a crime? I mean, whether we have right to protest when one encourages terrorists to bomb us.

These cobras have been killing and raping our folks for at least 1300 years now. They come as Qasim, Ghazni, Ghori, Khilji, Babur, Akbar, Aurangzeb, Masood, Memon, Afzal, Kasab, Baghdadi. Their reptile brains know one instinct – kill all Hindus. Those who are too weak to kill, curse Hindus to eternal Hell. They provide ecosystem to nurture and shield stronger cobras.

There are reptiles posing as humans among us. They find more to share with cobra counterparts than fellow humans. Probably out of fear, opportunism, or the core reptilian instinct of treachery. In pretense of Naag Panchami, they feed milk to cobras. Our tolerance towards these Mir Zafars, Jai Chands, JNU leftists, Haider-makers may not have killed those who are reading this post right now. But it has killed several millions in bloodiest history of world, made booty of sex-slaves out of ancestors of every Indian who is alive today, snatched away a third of our country, and created the greatest nuisance facing the entire world.

Gandhi was right in “My experiments with truth”: “If someone slaps you, offer the other cheek. That will change their hearts.”

The problem is that this applies to humans, not reptiles. If you don’t believe, experiment yourself with a real cobra. Tweet your survival after every bite so that we know how many bites it took for you to die or the cobra to have heart-transplant. But I will not allow such stupid experiments to be done on my family, my society, my countrymen, my fellow-humans across the globe. 

I do not care what happens in debates and panel discussions. I will still crush the hood of every cobra that roams in open. I will still thrash those reptiles whose experiments risk lives of humans.

These Afzal Guru sympathizers are squarely responsible for death of Hanamanthappa and his companions. We are forced to risk lives of our brothers to protect Siachen and prevent infiltration of terrorists because they get support from these MFs who fetish in painting Bharat Mata nude.

Liberalism, Freedom of Expression – these values make sense only to extent that they do not threaten the safety and security of nation. But the moment these translate into massive processions in funeral of a terrorist who killed 257 innocents, it is time for emergency action. When there is silence of ‘liberal’ on lakhs of zombies threatening beheading in Malda, Muzaffarnagar and scores of other cities in India, it is sure-shot sign that the ‘liberal’ is a cobra-feeding reptile in human disguise. When they get bold enough to defend anti-India functions in support of terrorists, it is red-alert.

Hanamanthappa’s sacrifice is another debt on us to stand for nation at the time when it needs us the most. A frog boils to death because it cannot sense the gradual rise in temperature. Cobras love frogs.

Let us be brave instead. Let us be Agniveers that burn cobras. Let us stand up for right without hiding in political correctness. Let us pay true homage to Hanamanthappa.

Vande Mataram

– Sanjeev Newar


Sanjeev Newar is a data scientist by profession. His risk management products have been named in top 20 of world for 2014 and 2015. He is the only Indian (and Asian) to have ever made to this list. He has been behind several inclusive and encompassing innovations. He is a mentor to several eminent young scientists of country. Sanjeev is an alumnus of IIT Guwahati and IIM Calcutta.

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help revive Dharma.

Disclaimer:  We believe in "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" (entire humanity is my own family). "Love all, hate none" is one of our slogans. Striving for world peace is one of our objectives. For us, entire humanity is one single family without any artificial discrimination on basis of caste, gender, region and religion. By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. Please read Full Disclaimer.
  • MrMD Sadruddin,

    Allah hates idol worshippers. When i prostrate before idols Allah is very angry on me and want to sent me till eternity to HELL. Allah is angry when muslims sing Vande mataram ?

    But, wait a minute. This is some thing from Pickthall’s translation of Quran. Sura al – baqara.2:34

    002.034 And when We said unto the angels: Prostrate yourselves before Adam, they fell prostrate, all save Iblis. He demurred through pride, and so became a disbeliever.

    Iblis(Satan) did’nt prostrate before Adam and thus became disbeliever? He was avoiding shirk!!!! Here We is Allah

    Many muslim apologists defend this by saying Iblis is made of fire and his prostartion is not like humans do. This story happened in another realm , it should not be compared to earthly life etc. Here prostration means just show respect. I am sure you will join them.

    Btw, i am not clear on below ayat. As you would agree quran is supposed to be crystal clear message written in most unambigous language(viz arabic). Still i am not clear on below

    Who saw whom? Did Nabi saw Allah???

    sura an najm 53:12-Yusuf ali translation:-

    “For indeed he saw him at a second descent”

  • Allah hates idol worshippers. When i prostrate before idols Allah is very angry on me and want to sent me till eternity to HELL. Allah is angry when muslims sing Vande mataram ?

    But, wait a minute. This is some thing from Pickthall’s translation of Quran. Sura al – baqara.2:34

    002.034 And when We said unto the angels: Prostrate yourselves before Adam, they fell prostrate, all save Iblis. He demurred through pride, and so became a disbeliever.

    Iblis(Satan) did’nt prostrate before Adam and thus became disbeliever? He was avoiding shirk!!!! Here We is Allah

    Many muslim apologists defend this by saying Iblis is made of fire and his prostartion is not like humans do. This story happened in another realm , it should not be compared to earthly life etc. Here prostration means just show respect. I am sure you will join them.

    Btw, i am not clear on below ayat. As you would agree quran is supposed to be crystal clear message written in most unambigous language(viz arabic). Still i am not clear on below

    Who saw whom? Did Nabi saw Allah???

    sura an najm 53:12-Yusuf ali translation:-

    “For indeed he saw him at a second descent”

  • Miss suman,here you are behaving like a mullah who asks for severe punishment for one who questions the principals of islam same way you should not asks, for those who are questioning the nation and don’t call them traitors as they are not planning to destroy india, they are just questioning the nation,so please don’t make the nation like a religion.

  • Unfortunately, the people who are against the imposition of ‘sedition’ charges against Kanhaiya Kumar under section 124(A) have very less knowledge about IPC and CrPC. The question is not whether he made those statements, even if he was part of that assembly, he is equally responsible. However, those who actually raised these slogans can’t be spared under any circumstance. There are enough laws other than sedition under IPC and CrPC that can be used against these people and Police has every right to exercise these legal provisions.

    We have an independent judiciary and therefore, if anybody believes that he or she is being victimised then that person can challenge the actions of the state and police in a court of law. Our constitution gives us this right. Let’s cherish it, respect it.

    Let’s come to that section which believes that one has the right to say anything and everything because Indian constitution provides us with the fundamental right of freedom to speech and expression. These intellectuals always tend to forget that under Indian Constitution, right to freedom of speech and expression is not absolute. It comes with clear-cut restrictions.

    Let’s first understand what does Article 19 of Indian constitution says.

    Article 19 (1)(a) says “All citizens shall have the right to freedom of speech and expression.” However, Article 19(2) makes it clear that this article doesn’t stop the state from making any law that imposes reasonable restrictions on the exercise of the right conferred in the interests of the sovereignty and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, defamation or incitement to an offence.

    Obviously, the right to freedom and speech is not absolute. The constitution itself empowers the state to frame laws to stop misuse of this fundamental right and IPC and CrPC have many such laws already in place.

  • Usually muslims and communists behave the same way. They can’t tolerate criticism yet they criticize everyone else. They believe that end justifies the means and end is international Islamic caliphate or international polit bureau dictatorship respectively. We Hindus believe in dharma. Every second follow dharma. Everyone follow good means and that’s the happy ending.

    Now there is a undercurrent between communists and islamists. India’s leftists are supporting islamists and Pakistani islamists and supporting China.

    In Xinjiang , China has asked Uighur muslim shop owners to sell alcohol and food during Ramadan otherwise they will loose licence. Paki jihadist -ISI and Pak army have no problem with China despite this. They want to fight the idol worshipping Hindus and Indians who according to them are oppressing muslims.

    As Uma Bharati said once, Shakthishali ko sab naman karte hei. Might (mass movements by people) is always right for islam and communism. ISI sees China too powerful, so they want to be friendly with them. Only way we can defend ourselves is Hindus must be powerful and then muslims will come to terms with us.

    May be islamists think China will one day help them in their battle against great satan US?

    Having said, I don’t know what Kanaiya kumar said or did. Let law take it’s own course.

  • Aur yaad rakhna duniya walo

    30-35 saalo ke baad Bhaarat desh duniya me JAGADGURU banega aur ye aap sab apni najaro se dekhoge

    Aur wo bhi Hinduism ko lekar

    Duniya ki Mahasatta hoga Mera Bhaarat Mahan

  • Aur ha is desh aur hamari is sanatan sanskruti par aaj tak hajaro attack hue phir bhi hamari sanskruti jivit rahi he
    Muslim kavi Ikbaalji ne kaha tha
    Unano misara roma sab mit gaye jahan se ab tak magar he baaki namo nishaan hamara kuch baat hai ki hasti mitati nahi hamari sadio raha he dushman dore jahan hamara saare jahan se achhchhaa HIDUSTAAN hamara
    Esi konsi ‘KUCH BAAT’ hai hamare desh me ki hamari hasti kabhi mit nahi sakti????????????????????????????

    Wo he hamari sanaatan sanskruti, hamara sanaatan dharm hamare mandir hamare shastra aur hamaare sachche Sant. Khud bhagwaan ne hi hamari ye sanskruti ko banaya he unhone hi uska raxan kiya kar rahe he aur wo hi karenge

  • Isme jitni public ki galti he utni hi political leaders bhi rahi he, unhone hamare desh ko videshioke haath me bech dala aur aaj bhi bech rahe he me openly Narendra Modi ko support karta hu kyoki ek hi vo ese deshbhakt he jinhone chalange swikar kar laalchowk me tiranga laharaya tha baaki aajke kahalane vale deshbhakt deshdrohioko support karte hai aur apne aapko bahut bade deshbhakt batate he ese logo ko to apne goun me vaapis bhej dena chahie (Itali)
    Aur rahi public ki baat to vo to mahamurkh hi hai hamari sthiti gandhari jesi hi he kyoki pati dhrutrashtra to andh hi tha lekin usne bhi apni aankho pe patti laga li usi tarah hamko pata hona chahie hamne kis kasaioke haathme apane desh ko diya tha lekin aaj hamne samjo ki bhagwan ke haath me hi hamare desh ko diya hai bhir bhi un piddio se bhachake rakhana hai hamare desh ko

  • Rishika, Sumanji & All,

    As per the saying ‘Use the past & build the Future’, We must remember all our martyrs. But when we go to our history only then we can come to our real courage.

  • Sanjeev and other Agniveer team members,

    I have one sincere request. Hope you will appreciate it. Can you please dedicate a page or a subsite to our Indian soldiers who sacrifice their lives on duty. Most of the soldiers who die remain unknown. We came to know about Lance Naik Hanamanthappa from news only because he was found alive after 5 days (though unfortunately he also died) but what about other 9 brave soldiers who also joined the league of brave martyrs, we do not even know their names. Our so many brave soldiers sacrifice their lives but they hardly get any type of public recognition. No one even knows their name and they have sacrificed everything for their country. It’s really very shameful.

  • Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. This is the biggest problem in India. Good people do not do anything. They completely ignore bad deeds and remain self centered.

    Remember, someone said “A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury.”

    • You are absolutely right Suman. This is inherent problem in majority of indians. They are silent community. They do not believe in any actions to rectify things and suffer due to that. Majority of indians will prefer to watch Cricket match or Bollywood hangama or TV soap opra but won’t care about the incidents those are bleeding country. They have least interest in displaying strong anger or criticism to anti national people like Rahul, Kejriwal or even bollywood khans even if these people can go to any extent to show disloyalty to the country. Moreover, I have felt Indians in general do not express gratitude to those who have made great sacrifices to preserve the freedom of country. These brave soldiers must openly be recognized, public should thank them for their services and should appreciate their contributions. They would like to follow Valentine’s day but do not care about Veterans Day. I have no problem in celebrating Valentine’s day if they would like to pick it from western culture but would like to ask them why they never thought about Veterans Day.

      We should be ashamed that till now roads, cross sections, buildings in majority of cities in india display the names of foreign invaders who have looted India and brutally killed millions of indians. Really shameful, that we could not change even these names after 69 years of independence yet. It is all because majority of Indians are passive and silent.

  • Any person shouting anti-India slogan and challenges the nation’s sovereignty and integrity while enjoying benefits of higher education at the cost of Indian tax payers should not be tolerated and summarily removed. This amounts to sedition and should be punished with maximum penalty possible. The autonomy of the university is for the purpose of pursuing research, developing critical thinking, enhancing education level and developing ideas for betterment of people who pay for it. Universities are not places for Slogan Chanting, attacking national sovereignty, supporting people committing crimes , indulging in corruptions against their fellow beings. Such type of institutions are not indispensable and should be closed or modified for better purpose. JNU should learn from IIT right next to them where people go to learn and help nation develop and defend not shouting slogan on the street. They do not have time to waste on streets and politicking. It is impossible to see how people pursuing higher education have time for such activities. Great universities all across the world have never been afflicted with this time of rowdy and nonintellectual behavior.

  • हिंदुस्तान में सिर्फ दो चैनल देशभक्त हैं उनके नाम है … जी न्यूज़ और सुदर्शन न्यूज, इन दोनों चैनलों को रोजाना देखना चाहिए, हिंदुस्तान के बाकि सब चैनल देशद्रोही है, सब हिंदुस्तान के खिलाफ काम कर रहे हैं.

  • We will never be able to assess the immense physical harm done to India by the Muslim invasions. Even more difficult is to estimate the moral and the spiritual damage done to Hindu India. But once again, the question is not of vengeance, or of reawakening old ghosts, but of not repeating the same mistakes. Unfortunately, the harm done by the Muslims conquest is not over.

    The seeds planted by the Moghols, by Babar, Mahmud, or Aurangzeb, have matured: the 125 million Indian Muslims of today have forgotten that they were once peaceful, loving Hindus, forcibly converted to a religion they hated. And they sometimes take-up as theirs a cry of fanaticism which is totally alien to their culture.

    Indeed, as Sri Aurobindo once said: “More than 90% of the Indian Muslims are descendants of converted Hindus and belong as much to the Indian nation as the Hindu themselves”…(Rebirth of India, p.237)

    The embryo of secession planted by the Mahomedans, has also matured into a poisonous tree which has been called Pakistan and comes back to haunt India through three wars and the shadow of a nuclear conflict embracing South Asia.

    And in India, Kashmir and Ayodhya are reminders that the Mugal cry for the house of Islam in India is not yet over, as Kargil has just shown.

  • And ultimately the question is: Are the Muslims of today ready to accept Hinduism ? Unfortunately no. For Muslims all over the world, Hinduism is still the Infidel religion ” par excellence “. This what their religion tell them, at every moment, at every verse, at the beginning of each prayer : ” Only Allah is great “. And their mollahs still enjoin them to go on fight ” jihad ” to deliver the world of the infidels. And if the armies of Babar are not there any longer; and if it is not done any more to kill a 100.000 Hindus in a day, there is still the possibility of planting a few bombs in Bombay, of fuelling separatisms in the hated land and eventually to drop a nuclear device, which will settle the problem once and for all. As to the Indian Muslim, he might relate to his Hindu brother, for whatever he says, he remains an Indian, nay a Indu; but his religion will make sure that he does not forget that his duty is to hate the Infidel.
    This is the crux of the problem today and the riddle if Islam has to solved, if it wants to survive in the long run.

  • And here we must say a word about monotheism, for it is the key to the understanding of Islam. Christians and Muslims have always harped on the fact that their religions sprang-up as a reaction against the pagan polytheist creeds, which adored many Gods. ” There is only one real God they said (ours), all the rest are just worthless idols “. This ” monotheism versus polytheism business ” has fuelled since then the deep, fanatic, violent and murderous zeal of Islam against polytheist religions, particularly against Hinduism, which is the most comprehensive, most widely practiced of all them. It even cemented an alliance of sorts between the two great monotheist religions of the world, Christianity and Islam, witness the Britishers’ attitude in India, who favoured Indian Muslims and Sikhs against the Hindus; or the King of Morocco who, even though he is one of the most moderate Muslim leaders in the world, recently said in an interview: ” we have no fight with Christianity, our battle is against the Infidel who adores many gods “.

    But the truth is that Hinduism is without any doubt the most monotheist religion in the World, for it recognises divine unity in multiplicity. It does not say: ” there is only one God, which is Mohammed. If you do not believe in Him I will kill you “. It says instead: ” Yes Mohammed is a manifestation of God, but so is Christ, or Buddha, or Krishna, or Confucius “. This philosophy, this way of seeing, which the Christians and Muslims call ” impious “, is actually the foundation for a true monotheist understanding of the world. It is because of this ” If you do not recognize Allah (or Christ), I will kill you “, that tens of millions of Hindus were slaughtered by Arabs and other millions of South Americans annihilated by the Christians.

  • Unfortunately for Habib and his school, the Muslims invaders did record with glee their genocide on Hindus, because they felt all along that they were doing their duty; that killing, plundering, enslaving and razing temples was the work of God, Mohammed. Indeed, whether it was Mahmud of Ghazni (997-1030), who was no barbarian, although a Turk, and patronised art and literature, would recite a verse of the Koran every night after having razed temples and killed his quota of unbelievers; or Firuz Shah Tughlak (1351-1388) who personally confirms that the destruction of Pagan temples was done out of piety and writes: “on the day of a Hindu festival, I went there myself, ordered the executions of all the leaders AND PRACTITIONERS of his abomination; I destroyed their idols temples and built mosques in their places”. Finally, as Elst points out, “Muslim fanatics were merely faithful executors of Quranic injunctions. It is not the Muslims who are guilty but Islam”. (Negationism in India, p. 44)

  • The happiest in this matter must be the Muslims themselves. What fools these Hindus are, they must be telling themselves: We killed them by the millions, we wrested a whole nation out of them, we engineer riots against them, and they still defend us!… But don’t the Hindus know that many orthodox Indian Muslims still cling to the Deoband school, which says that India was once “Dar-ul-Islam”, the house of Islam, and should return to that status. Maulana Abul Kala Azad, several times Congress President, and Education Minister in free India, was a spokesman for this school. The Aligarh school on the contrary, led by Mohammed Iqbal, propounded the creation of Pakistan. What particularly interests us in the Aligarh school is the attempt by Muslim historians, such as Mohamed Habiib, to rewrite the Chapter of Muslim invasions in India. In 1920, Habib started writing his magnum opus, which he based on four theories: 1) that the records (written by the Muslims themselves) of slaughters of Hindus, the enslaving of their women and children and razing of temples were “mere exaggerations by court poets and zealous chroniclers to please their rulers”. 2) That they were indeed atrocities, but mainly committed by Turks, the savage riders from the Steppe. 3) That the destruction of the temples took place because Hindus stored their gold and jewels inside them and therefore Muslim armies plundered these. 4) That the conversion of millions of Hindus to Islam was not forced, “but what happened was there was a shift of opinion in the population, who on its own free will chose the Shariat against the Hindu law (smriti), as they were all oppressed by the bad Brahmins”…!!!

  • What are the facts? Aurangzeb (1658-1707) did not just build an isolated mosque on a destroyed temple, he ordered ALL temples destroyed, among them the Kashi Vishvanath, one of the most sacred places of Hinduism and had mosques built on a number of cleared temples sites. All other Hindu sacred places within his reach equally suffered destruction, with mosques built on them. A few examples: Krishna’s birth temple in Mathura, the rebuilt Somnath temple on the coast of Gujurat, the Vishnu temple replaced with the Alamgir mosque now overlooking Benares and the Treta-ka-Thakur temple in Ayodhya. (Neg 60). The number of temples destroyed by Aurangzeb is counted in 4, if not 5 figures; according to his own official court chronicles: “Aurangzeb ordered all provincial governors to destroy all schools and temples of the Pagans and to make a complete end to all pagan teachings and practices”. The chronicle sums up the destructions like this: “Hasan Ali Khan came and said that 172 temples in the area had been destroyed.

    .. His majesty went to Chittor and 63 temples were destroyed..Abu Tarab, appointed to destroy the idol-temples of Amber, reported that 66 temples had been razed to the ground”.. Aurangzeb did not stop at destroying temples, their users were also wiped-out; even his own brother, Dara Shikoh, was executed for taking an interest in Hindu religion and the Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur was beheaded because he objected to Aurangzeb’s forced conversions. As we can see Romila Thapar and Percival Spear’s statement of a benevolent Aurangzeb is a flagrant attempt at negationism. Even the respectable Encyclopedia Brittannica in its entry on India, does not mention in its chapter on the Sultanate period any persecutions of Hindus by Muslims, except “that Firuz Shah Tughlaq made largely unsuccessful attempts at converting his Hindu subjects and sometime persecuted them”.

  • In India, two or three young generations since the early twenties, were tutored on negating Muslim genocide on the Hindus. In “Communalism and the writing of Indian history”, Romila Thapar, Harbans Mukhia and Bipan Chandra, professors at the JNU in New Delhi, the Mecca of secularism and negationism in India, denied the Muslim genocide by replacing it instead with a conflict of classes.

    The redoubtable Romila Thapar in her “Penguin History of India”, co-authored with Percival Spear, writes: “Aurangzeb’s supposed intolerance, is little more than a hostile legend based on isolated acts such as the erection of a mosque on a temple site in Benares”. How can one be so dishonest, or so blind? But it shows how negationism is perpetuated in India.

  • Now let us talk about those people who represent the foremost current of negationism in India, which is Marxist inspired and they are clearly traitors or can be called as Cobras.

    Take a glimpse of their negationism –

    Yes, what has happened in India, at the hand of Hindus themselves, is a constant denial and even a perversion of the genocide committed by Muslims in India.

    Hasn’t the “radical humanist” M.N. Roy, written “that Islam has fulfilled a historic mission of equality and abolition of discrimination in India, and that for this, Islam has been welcomed in India by the lower castes”. “If AT ALL any violence occurred, he goes on to say, it was a matter of justified class struggle by the progressive forces against the reactionary forces, meaning the feudal Hindu upper classes..”

    Want to listen to another such quote?

    This one deals with Mahmud Ghaznavi, the destroyer of thousands of Hindu temples, who according to his chronicler Utbi, sang the praise of the Mathura temple complex, sacred above all to all Hindus… and promptly proceeded to raze it to the ground: “Building interested Mahmud and he was much impressed by the city of Mathura, where there are today a thousand edifices as firm as the faith of the faithful. Mahmud was not a religious man. He was a Mahomedan, but that was just by the way. He was in the first place a soldier and a brilliant soldier”…

    Amazing eulogy indeed of the man who was proud of desecrating hundreds of temples and made it a duty to terrorise and humiliate pagans. And guess from whom is that quote? From Jawaharlal Nehru himself, the first Prime Minister of India and one of the architects of independence!

  • Negationism means that this whole aspect of Indian history has been totally erased, not only from history books, but also from the memory, from the consciousness of Indian people. Whereas the Jews have constantly tried, since the Nazi genocide, to keep alive the remembrance of their six million martyrs, the Indian leadership, political and intellectual, has made a wilful and conscious attempt to deny the genocide perpetrated by the Muslims. No one is crying for vengeance. Do the Jews of today want to retaliate upon contemporary Germany? NO.

    It is only a matter of making sure that history does not repeat its mistakes, as alas it is able to do today: witness the persecution of Hindus in Kashmir, whose 250,000 Pandits have fled their 5000 year old homeland; or the 50,000 Hindus chased from Afghanistan; or the oppression of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

    And most of all, to remember, is to BE ABLE TO LOOK AT TODAY WITH THE WISDOM OF YESTERDAY. No collective memory should be erased for appeasing a particular community.

  • Belgian scholar Koenraad Elst, wrote a book called “negationism in India”.

    In his foreword to the book of the same title, Koenraad explains that negationism, which means in this context “the denial of historical crimes against humanity”, is not a new phenomenon. In modern history, the massacre by the Turks of 1,5 millions Armenians, or that of the 6 million Jews by the Nazis, the several millions of Russians by Stalin, or again the 1 million Tibetans by the Chinese communists, are historical facts which have all been denied by their perpetrators… But deny is not the exact word. They have been NEGATED in a thousand ways: gross, clever, outrageous, subtle, so that in the end, the minds of people are so confused and muddled, that nobody knows anymore where the truth is.

    “But what of the conquest of India by Muslims”, asks Elst?

    In other parts of Asia and Europe, the conquered nations quickly opted for conversion to Islam rather than death. But in India, because of the staunch resistance of the 4000 year old Hindu faith, the Muslim conquests were for the Hindus a pure struggle between life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and their populations massacred. Each successive campaign brought hundreds of thousands of victims and similar numbers were deported as slaves. Every new invader made often literally his hill of Hindu skulls. Thus the conquest of Afghanistan in the year 1000, was followed by the annihilation of the entire Hindu population there; indeed, the region is still called Hindu Kush, ‘Hindu slaughter’. The Bahmani sultans in central India, made it a rule to kill 100.000 Hindus a year. In 1399, Teimur killed 100.000 Hindus IN A SINGLE DAY, and many more on other occasions. Koenraad Elst quotes Professor K.S. Lal’s “Growth of Muslim population in India”, who writes that according to his calculations, the Hindu population decreased by 😯 MILLION between the year 1000 and 1525. INDEED PROBABLY THE BIGGEST HOLOCAUST IN THE WHOLE WORLD…

  • Israel’s nuclear programme is accepted as a matter of course, justified by the country’s genuine security concerns; but when India, which has equally legitimate security concerns, conducted nuclear tests, it provoked American sanctions.

    If the world ignores Hindu security concerns, one of the reasons is that Hindus have never bothered to tell the world how many Hindus have been killed already.

  • Jews have drawn from their genocide experience: they created a modern and militarily strong state. Even more importantly, they helped foster an awareness of the history of their persecution among their former persecutors, the Christians, which makes it unlikely that Christians will target them again. In this respect, the Hindus have so far failed completely. With numerous Holocaust memorials already functioning, one more memorial is being built in Berlin by the heirs of the perpetrators of the Holocaust; but there is not even one memorial to the Hindu genocide, because even the victim community doesn’t bother, let alone the perpetrators.

  • Some facts from history those were purposefully deleted from Indian history books.

    In Indian schoolbooks and the media, an idyllic picture of Hindu-Muslim harmony in the pre-British period is propagated in outright contradiction with the testimony of the primary sources. Like Holocaust denial, this propaganda can be called negationism. The really daring negationists don’t just deny the crimes against Hindus, they invert the picture and blame the Hindus themselves. Thus, it is routinely alleged that Hindus persecuted and destroyed Buddhism; in reality, Buddhist monasteries and universities flourished under Hindu rule, but their thousands of monks were killed by Ghori and his lieutenants.

    Apart from actual killing, millions of Hindus disappeared by way of enslavement. After every conquest by a Muslim invader, slave markets in Bagdad and Samarkand were flooded with Hindus. Slaves were likely to die of hardship, e.g. the mountain range Hindu Koh, “Indian mountain”, was renamed Hindu Kush, “Hindu-killer”, when one cold night in the reign of Timur Lenk (1398-99), a hundred thousand Hindu slaves died there while on transport to Central Asia. Though Timur conquered Delhi from another Muslim ruler, he recorded in his journal that he made sure his pillaging soldiers spared the Muslim quarter, while in the Hindu areas, they took “twenty slaves each”. Hindu slaves were converted to Islam, and when their descendants gained their freedom, they swelled the numbers of the Muslim community. It is a cruel twist of history that the Muslims who forced Partition on India were partly the progeny of Hindus enslaved by Islam.

  • @Agniveer

    Political parties work according to sentiments of people. Congress, Left, JDU, Kejrwriwal, Mamata, Mulayam, Owaishi, have their respective Vote Banks. If they support & defend traitors that means a large population of India support their ideology. Otherwise, they never dare to go against their Vote Bank.

    Seed of India’s division are growing. How can you expect growth, peace and prosperity in country where people have too much difference in religious ideology? How can north poll and south poll be united? Makers of India’s constitution have lack of foresight.

    India may be divided in 10 parts as Pakistan sponsored JNU students wished. Expecting any good from fools & ignorant Hindu worthless.

    If any outer circumstances can save India these are complete destruction of Pakistan and Saudi Arbia.

    • A nation comes before any religion. If your house is under fire, everyone who is living under the roof of that house should protect that house. India is our house and it is responsibility of every indian citizen to protect India. All religions are useless if you will not save your house from fire first. So make sure anyone who is shouting against India, must be severely punished. We can’t let this happen in our country.

  • Researching and studying the impact of Islam and jihad on the world, we have come to the conclusion that India today is not living under its own authentic Hindu culture. The country is deeply contaminated by Islam. The Hinduism we see today which has shaped the current day India is basically Islam rather than Hindu. The problems in the country which has put India on the map of various scaled of human rights violations, with oppression and abuse of women, active human slavery, rape waves, incest, obsessive modesty, and many of the traits found in Islamic culture, is a habit that has remained from Muslim occupation. Prior to Muslim presence in the country history will find that India was a different society. Women were bare chested and the people abided by Hinduism meaning violence was forbidden and they were vegetarian. Although bare chested there appears to be no historic evidence of rape being a common factor in the country at the time. It was considered a great crime to kill an animal in Hinduism and the eating of animal flesh was strictly forbidden. Today basically 90% of the population are meat eaters, buying mainly halal meat from Muslim butchers.

  • Please see this article to know the real facts on the biggest holocaust of the world history.

    Looks like Indians have Alzheimer disease that they can’t remember what happened to their ancestors and how could they suffered. Indian muslims, open your eyes and see how this peaceful religion killed brutally your own ancestors.

  • Suman, I agree with you and Indian Home minister’s statement. There should be harsh punishment to everyone who is chanting anti-indian slogans and praising Afjal guru. These people are clearly traitors. Congress is clearly anti-national. Shame on Kejriwal also who is using this opportunity to get the political advantage. There is no patriotism in politicians and obviously these students are completely misguided by JNU parties. These students are getting scholarships and subsidies o their expenses from Indian govt and they are shouting slogans in favor of Pakistan. Really clearly have no sense of patriotism. These students should be immediately expelled from the university and must be trained to fight against Pak army on the borders. Govt should send them to Siachin and let them fight to Pakistan. Then they will learn the meaning of freedom of expression.

  • Rajnath Singh, India’s Home Minister said “If anyone raises anti-India slogans and questions the unity, integrity and sovereignty of the country, they will not be forgiven in any way”.

    There should be very severe punishment to the traitors so that it can act as a deterrent to committing treason or participating in treasonous acts.

    It’s enough. India should learn lessons from the past. There should be zero tolerance to those people who are like Mir Zafars, Jai Chands, JNU leftists, Haider-makers.


  • Completely right except about Gandhi
    Gandhi spoke all sorts of nonsense like the Hindus who were left in Pakistan should let themselves get raped and killed without protest.This insane man we now call the father of the nation asked Indians in India to be non-violent with theives who had seized control of our mother land while recruiting sepoys for WW2. Agression should be answered to violently.Someone insulting you in your own home is a criminal and should be treated like one.

  • A typical hindu response will be “God will incarnate and punish them. No, religion teach violence. You just worship your God and leave all things aside. We should not criticize any one.”

    I did not see any Hindu religious authority having karor of followers like Bramkumari, Radha Swami, Nirankari, Iskon, etc. etc. to discuss such issues related to country.
    There is no place among fools Hindu for the revolutionary like Mahirishi Dayanand.

    • I agree with you Abdu. Till the time typical Hindu will be self centered, these cobras will keep spreading poison in this country. Regarding religious authorities, they do not care about country, they care about their own greed and how can they fool and exploit ignorant masses.

      Swami Dayanand was a revolutionary because he wanted to spread the truth of our vedic wisdom. Throughout his life, he preached against oppressive and dogmatic traditions and because of his teachings, hundreds of thousands of youth joined freedom movement. Swami Dayanand should be called as father of India, not Gandhi who had only minority appeasing policy.

  • Thanks Sanjeev.

    Instead of external danger, internal danger is much more damaging for India and it has been throughout the history of this country. The reason is the tolerance to traitors. India never severely punished traitors rather they always forgave them or ignored them. Even most of the times, they even supported them. That’s the reason there is not so much love for their country and there is no nationalism feeling. People are divided and selfish.

    If India would have been united, no one could have made India slave for hundreds of years. If all Indians would have decided to throw out British, they could have done easily. It is because of the massive support from majority of landlords and kings, these foreign invaders (Mugals and British) could rule india for centuries. These Indian traitors were main reason for the unsuccessful first war of independence.

    Eve after Independence, we still had soft corners for these traitors (jamindars, navabs) who supported British empire. These people enjoyed luxurious lives in independent India and they were never got defamed or punished for their immoral acts and greed. Terrorists like Dawood, Yakub and many more who were born in India but worked against own motherland and could still find a big population of supporters in this country. It’s real shame that Indians are divided on the basis of religion, caste and region.

    Now when these JNU leftist traitors are shouting slogans against their own motherland, where are so called Liberals and Secular Artists who were returning their rewards. Why are they silent?
    Because they support these leftist traitors silently. These so called liberals enjoy all the freedom of this country and then they provide shelter and support to terrorists like Kasab and Headley to destroy the fabric of this country.

    • Actually Indians lost the battles with the Islamic invaders because they had a strict code of ethics regarding warfare.Cobras (read peacefuls) on the other had have no such ethics as they are barbarians.Besides their terrorist attacks on innocents tells us clearly regarding the morality of their ilk.

      • I agree Kiran. In addition, Indians were not united. Though indians were in majority but they were divided and there was no one nation feeling. Chanakya realized this weakness when Alexandra attacked India and he helped to unite india in Maurya Dynasty. But later when buddhism and jain religion spread. It spread non violence and defense strategy was completely ignored. Especially border states Sindh and Afganishtan became buddhist. These buddhist states were not at all prepared to brutal attacks by islamic invaders. The kings felt combat skills/military not required & made subjects vulnerable to invaders.