This article series on ‘Islamic invasion in India’ is contributed by Rushmore, the active member of Satyagni team.

Once a Pakistani little boy asked his father- “Abba Ji! Was there water all over Pakistan before Muhammad Bin Qasim came?” Who are the Muslims of Indian Subcontinent- India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and even Afghanistan? Who were their ancestors when Muhammad Bin Qasim was not even born? In spite of the fact that many of the sub continent Muslims think they belong to Arabs, the truth remains that their ancestors were Hindus and Buddhists. We know this truth brings thunderbolts to many subcontinent Muslims because it makes them inferior in front of Arabs in Sunnat of prophet (to be like Muhammad) which has direct say in getting heaven or hell hereafter. In order to convince themselves and of course Allah and Muhammad that they are no less Arabs, Mullahs in the subcontinent preach the gullible masses to ape Arabs in every possible field starting from worshipping in a language which is alien to them (Arabic) to using odd number of stones and dirt instead of water while cleansing…

The purpose of this article series is not to create hatred of one community among rest. Rather the objective is to help the scared and confused subcontinent Muslims come out of identity crisis and recognize their roots which are Indian and not Arabic for sure. This series aims at reminding Muslims the atrocities brought down to their ancestors as the price of becoming Muslims from Hindus. Those friends, who happily accept being called as slaves/apes of Arabs but feel shame in calling India as Mother and ancestral land, are requested to read it carefully. This is the challenge to all fanatic Mullahs and pseudo historians who are trying tooth and nail to fill hatred of ancestors and ancestral land in the hearts of already filled gullible Muslims.

Our message to Muslims- You are our Brothers and Sisters. You did not attack India you did not rule India but you were attacked and were ruled. You are natives, sharing with us the common ancestry. Jihadis from Arab and central Asia attacked us and made you slaves (as will be proven in this series). They don’t even consider you pure Muslims. So its high time that you give up this symbol of humiliation and slavery of 1000 years and come back to your original ancestral faith of Vedas. We are here to welcome you.

Our message to Hindus- Indian Subcontinent Muslims did not attack us as they are no outsiders but are natives and were Hindus. They were the real sufferers who had to give sacrifices of lives of dear and near ones during the Jihadi onslaught and still couldn’t save their faith. They are those who got converted at the point of sword with no second option. They have started hating us now because of their own troubles and our reluctance of taking them back in our Dharma which was/is their right. So its our foremost duty to convince them in most compassionate manner to come back to our/their Dharma.

There prevails a sick defeated mentality in subcontinent that believes in making people ostriches who bury their heads in sand when see any danger. Most of the Mullahs like Zakir Naik and Imam Bukhari suffer from this ailment. They believe in moving the goalpost after they have shot. Instead of facing truth and recognizing the problems they deny the existence of problems by twisting the facts, denouncing logic and distorting history. They are like a school kid who answers the questions he knows the solution for in a test and cries for rest of the questions as out of syllabus or incorrect!

The fanatic supporter of Osama Bin Laden, Taliban, and peace (?), Zakir Naik, who claims to be the expert/student of Islam and Hinduism without knowing Arabic and Sanskrit has his interesting thesis over Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus in India. This expert of Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity, Judaism and all other isms in the world, has now become expert of history also. He claims that Islam was spread by intellectual sword instead of steel. He argues that Muslims ruled India for 1000 years and if Muslims would want, they could have converted each Hindu at the point of sword. In this articles series we will puncture this argument to the full.

All true Historians across the board agree that Islam in India was spread by force of sword. Actually any person who argues that Islam was spread peacefully and there were no forced conversions of Hindus in the reigns of Islamic rulers, ceases to be a historian! It is because by saying this, he goes against the very accounts, chronicles and biographies of Muslim rulers written by THEMSELVES and THEIR STOOGES. This article series will highlight only few examples from the vast accounts from Islamic rulers and Historians of atrocities, plunder, kill, rape, enslavement, and forced conversion Jihadis caused to the natives of India.

We have divided this work into two categories. First one to analyze the arguments of Jihadis of modern times in the support of peaceful history of Islamic spread in the subcontinent and the other one to let the facts speak for themselves. This article presents the logical analysis of Jihadi Zakir Naik’s arguments. So here we go with his video and subsequently the analysis of main points raised by him therein

1. Zakir: Islam was spread by sword means peace was spread by sword because Islam means peace.


0. We couldn’t understand the point Jihadi Zakir is trying to make here. If some person named Aman (means peace) detonates a bomb and kills hundreds, does it mean he should not be given punishment because his name means peace?

1. So Islam means peace and Muslim means peaceful. So why not translate the below news –

“Talibani Muslim blew up the suicide jacket in a Muslim area and killed N no of Muslims to establish Islamic rule”


“Talibani peaceful blew up the suicide jacket in a peaceful area and killed N no of peaceful to establish peace”

(Unless Zakir Naik calls Taliban and Al Qaida terrorists as Kafirs, the above translation is perfect as per his dictionary!)

2. Zakir: Just like many common misnomers such as earth is flat, squared triangle, and 2+2=5, Islamic terrorism is also a misnomer. Islam and terrorism are exactly opposite.


0. Misnomers of Flat earth, squared triangle, and 2+2=5 might be popular in Jihadi camps due to their beliefs in center of earth at surface, geocentric model of universe, and lack of basic mathematics skills but they are no longer misnomers for outside world.

1. BTW aren’t Jihadis expert in coining misnomers? Just look at following lines that splash all around the cyberspace on Jihadi websites these days

Quran has scientific miracles

Miracle of moon breaking is scientifically proven

 Islam teaches equal treatment of free and slave

One wonders because if miracle, by definition, is something that can not be explained by science then how wise it is to use ‘scientific’ before miracle? If moon breaking is scientific i.e. as per scientific laws, then does it not cease to be miracle in first place? And among free and slaves, how the hell equality saves a slave from being a slave?

2. We agree with “Islam and terrorism are exactly opposite” completely. But it is to be noted that terrorism as per Islam is a bit different from rest of others. Lets see what Quran has to say about terrorism and how Islam deals with this

If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein [For ever]: And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him. [4:93]

Sahih Bukhari 9/83/50:

Narrated Abu Juhaifa: I asked `Ali “Do you have anything Divine literature besides what is in the Qur’an?”… Ali said,… we have nothing except what is in the Qur’an …and what is written in this sheet of paper.” I asked, “What is on this paper?” He replied, “…. and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever).

So here we go, as per Islam, killing a Muslim intentionally brings death penalty to the killer in this world and hell hereafter. But on the other hand if a Muslim kills a Kafir (non believer) even intentionally, he is not to be put to death and neither this is any sin for which he is denied houris of heaven!

So terrorism has been defined as “killing of Muslims” in Islam and this is surely against Islam!

3. Zakir: The famous historian de lacy o’leary says that fanatical Muslims across the world forcing Islam at the point of the sword is the most fantastic absurd myth historians have ever repeated.


0. Ten times more famous historian than de lacy, Will Durant writes in his book- The Story of Civilization page 505:The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history“. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride of the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period.

1. Now the fight remains as to which of these two historians is higher authority? For this we will direct our readers to the chronicles and accounts of the Ghazis themselves in the next articles who have, with full pride, written volumes on how they attacked India and made it Dar ul Islam from Dar ul Harb.

2. Famous historian of Zakir Jihadi, de lacy, has however researched on Islamic conquest also and writes in How Greek science passed to the Arabs, the following

It is a debated point whether Muhammad intended his religion to be a universal one, or for the Arabs alone…. It is necessary for all Arabs to believe in Muhammad if they are to escape hell (Muslim, i, 54), but it is not stated to be necessary for non-Arabs to believe…. As regards the non-Arab world, the Qur’an seems to contemplate conquest rather than conversion (Qur., ix, 19-23)….. But these passages fall far short of a definite missionary command to go forth and preach Islam to all the nations of the earth.


So here the famous historian of Zakir Naik makes some interesting points which may not equally comfort Jihadis, for example

a. It is unclear whether Muhammad came with a universal religion or an Arabic one!

b. Islam is unclear on the necessity of accepting Muhammad as messenger by Non Arabs!


d. There are no commands for Muslims to preach Islam to other nations than Arabs in Quran!

We would like to see the comments of Zakir Bhai MBBS on his famous historian’s take on Islam itself. Zakir Bhai says there is no compulsion in religion and Islam means peace but his famous historian says that Quran believes in conquest instead of conversion 🙁


4. Zakir: “We” Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years, “we” Muslims- the Arabs are the lord of the Arab land for last 1400 years, but still 14 million Coptic Christians live in Arab, “we” Muslims ruled India for 1000 years, but still 80% population of India is Non Muslim. If we would want, we could have converted each and every Hindu at the point of the sword but we didn’t do it


0. Did the readers notice “we Muslims”? Isn’t it quite interesting that a person with Hindu lineage ‘Naik’ is claiming co ruling with Arabs and Mughals over Spain, Arab, and India for thousand years? 🙂 Isn’t it funny if a neo converted tribal Christian in Orissa starts claiming that we Christians ruled India for 200 years, grew industries and railways for tribal and uneducated people of India!

1. So Zakir Naik believes that if Coptic Christians in Arab, Hindus in India and Christians in Spain managed to survive their culture during Islamic rule then this is the proof that Islam didn’t force non Muslims to Islam. Great! But is this a valid logic? What if we apply this logic on

a. Pagans of Arabia who were 100% before advent of Islam but today even their traces are not found in Arab

b. Zoroastrians of Iran who are not found in today’s Iran

c. Hindus and Buddhists of today’s Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Kashmir who constitute less than 1% of the population today but used to constitute 100% some 1400 years ago

d. And all the Non Arab nations and their natives who were 100% Non Muslims before Islam came and are 100% Muslims today?

If Zakir’s logic has to be true, he will have to accept that Islam was spread by sword in Arab, Persia, Today’s Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, and all Muslim countries who used to be Non Muslims before Islamic invasions and are now almost 100% Islamic. Whom are you fooling Jihadi Zakir?

2. The reason of survival of Hindus in India was the presence of warriors like Durgadas Rathore, Rana Sanga, Maharana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Dingh, Banda Vairagi, Chhatrasaal, Krishnadev Rai and innumerable Hindu warriors of North-East who used to show the path of Jannah to Ghazi invaders in the battlefields. Muslim historian of Akbar, Badayuni, who also took part in famous Haldighati battle wrote- “There is not even a single race among Pathans and Mughals which can equal Hindus in valor and martial arts.” Islamic historians such as Ghulam Ali and Murtaza Hussain write- “Ten Maratha soldiers are sufficient for more than twenty well built Pathan warriors” [Ref: Hindu Itihas: Veeron ki daastaan by Rajesh Arya]


5. Zakir: It was the sword of intellect that forced Non Muslims to convert to Islam. Quran [16:125] commands every Muslim to argue with others and bring them to Islam through dialogues


0. Why are both ‘preachers’ and ‘converted’ intellectuals who preached and converted to Islam through intellect have been the most gullible people of all times? Where are these intellectuals who are expected to participate in intellectual activities like science and technologies?

1. Anyway Mullah Zakir Naik is in full swing with his Taqiyya (lying sanctioned by Islam to deceit Kafirs)! He quotes Quran [16:125] which has been canceled by Ayah e Saif or the verse of sword [9:5] which asks Muslims to slay idolaters wherever they are found.  This Taqiyya is well exposed by none other than Zakir’s co terrorist Israr Ahmed, prominent Islamic scholar from Pakistan and an eminent speaker of Peace (?) TV of Zakir Naik. Please see at 3:48 in the below video and you would know what is the reality of the intellectual sword of Islam

He says- what we (Muslims) told Non Muslims (during conquest) that either you accept Islam and be equal to us or live as inferiors to us in Islamic state or let our swords decide!

We now suggest Zakir Naik to clarify as to which one of these two is lying, he himself or Israr?

2. Zakir’s Taqiyya is also busted by the most authentic Sunni Tafsir of Quran by Ibn Kathir, in the verse [3:110] and it says

“You, Muslims, are the best nation of people for the people, you bring them tied in chains on their necks (capture them in war) and they later embrace Islam.”

3. During Muslim rule in India, not just people got converted to Islam but places and animals were also converted (oops reverted as per ZN)! Karnavati was converted to Ahmedabad and Prayag accepted Islam and became Allahabad. In the battle of Haldighati, elephant of Maharana Pratap named Ramprasad was captured by Akbar’s forces and he made Ramprasad accept Islam to become Peerprasad! Just asking Zakir Naik, were the cities and animals also intellectual enough to get convinced by Islamic intellectual sword?

6. Zakir: The only religion accepted by Allah is Islam which means peace! [9:33] 


0. So finally Zakir ends up shooting his own foot! Allah will kill you if you don’t bow to Islam which means peace 🙂 It resembles with the example we gave in the starting where we proved that Taliban are peaceful because they spread peace to the peaceful people by killing them in blasts (which are noisy BTW)!

In the end, we share with our readers two accounts of two most respected Jihadis in the subcontinent, Muhammad Bin Qasim and Mahmoud of Ghazna IN THEIR OWN WORDS (historian Zakir Naik can still deny these bare facts because Islam means peace but for others, it is time to think)

Muhammad Bin Qasim writes to Hijaj Bin Yusuf, The Caliph- The forts of Siwistán and Sísam have been already taken. The nephew of Dáhir, his warriors, and principal officers have been despatched, and the infidels converted to Islám or destroyed. Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, the call to prayers is raised, so that devotions are performed at the stated hours. The takbír and praise to the Almighty God are offered every morning and evening.

 Tarikh-i-Yamini of Utbi (regarding Mahmoud of Ghazna) contains- (At Thanesar) The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discoloured, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it. Had not night come on and concealed the traces of their flight, many more of the enemy would have been slain. The victory was gained by God’s grace, who has established Islám for ever as the best of religions, notwithstanding that idolaters revolt against it. The Sultán returned with plunder which it is impossible to recount.—Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honour he bestows upon Islám and Musulmáns!


More such accounts will be discussed in subsequent articles which will clearly prove that denying the bloodshed during Islamic reign is itself the biggest lie historians (?) like Zakir Naik have ever produced. Now in the end we share a video from Pakistan in which famous intellectuals of Pakistan are shedding tears on distortion of history of Islam in Indian subcontinent. Readers will find that not everything is lost and there are still few people left in Muslim society who do not mince the truth and love their pre Islamic culture.

For those readers who don’t understand Urdu, we give here important points made by the scholars in the video

1. Pakistani Muslims celebrated the memories of Alexander the great near the banks of Chinab and called him Sikander e Azam thinking that he was a Muslim and he defeated Hindu King Porus!

2. It was not Alexander but Porus who won the battle! But Porus, being Hindu, is downplayed against Alexander by Muslims of subcontinent!

3. Muslims are masters in distorting history.

4. Islamic rulers were so much against the education, science and technology that when someone offered Shahzahan a printing press, he refused saying it is disgusting and deserves hatred (Lanati)!

5. The biggest base on US military is in Qatar and the Caliph there admits that we are thankful to US because if they wouldn’t establish their base in our country, it would have been already invaded and conquered by rest of Arab countries!

6. Pakistani policy makers have now decided to exclude Ashoka and Chandragupt Mourya from the history of subcontinent because they were Hindus!

7. Muhammad Bin Qasim did not come to Sind on the call of a woman as foolishly glorified and taught to Muslims. He had attempted twice already to capture Sind before he is said to have come on the call of a girl!

8. Mahmoud of Ghazna burnt whole city of Lahore during one of his invasions. These are blatant lies that Mahmoud Ghaznavi made Lahore the cultural center as thought by many.

9. It is false that Subcontinent Muslims ruled India for 600 Years. It were invaders of Central Asia and Iran etc who ruled.

10. Mughals hated Indians too much and Baburnama is the evidence of their hatred.

11. No native Muslim (converted from Hindu) was considered to be Sultan of Muslims.

12. It is false that Babur, Akbar and other Mughals loved India. They hated India and its culture so much that they used to have Persian as official language in courts and Turkish in their homes ignoring native languages.

So with this we end the article. Next few articles will be based on bare facts that will prove that Muslims of subcontinent were Hindus originally and were forced to accept Islam. In this article we have shown the fallacy in the arguments of fanatics like Zakir Naik who want to build their case on lies. They don’t want Muslims to return to their ancestral faith but it Muslims themselves who have to decide whether to continue turning the blind eyes from the truth or to accept the truth and come back to their culture and Dharma.


Let the truth prevail!

Nothing Found

Complete Works of Agniveer – Vol 1 (eBooks – 54 Books)

Complete works by Sanjeev Newar and Vashi Sharma! Agniveer’s complete book collection.

Life-changing works of Agniveer on Hinduism, Yoga, motivation, spirituality, Moksha and burning issues concerning society, nation and Dharma.

More info →


Liked the post? Make a contribution and help revive Dharma.

Disclaimer:  We believe in "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" (entire humanity is my own family). "Love all, hate none" is one of our slogans. Striving for world peace is one of our objectives. For us, entire humanity is one single family without any artificial discrimination on basis of caste, gender, region and religion. By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. Please read Full Disclaimer.
Previous articleAgniveer is back
Next articleEid Mubarak – 2
Agniveer symbolizes the efforts of a soul marching towards the ultimate goal through destruction of ego and falsehood. With focus only on right knowledge, right actions and right devotion. In other words, Agniveer stands for compassion, character, tolerance and rational humanism. Agniveer believes in One World, One Humanity, One Family.
    • Dear Vidhwansak

      This book is probably not available online. However it can be obtained from

      Vedayan Pariwar, Hudda 42, sector 11, Panipat, Haryana.

      • Dear Vidhwansak

        You can mail me at

        v a j r a a r y a [at] gmail[dot]com

        Please remove all spaces and replace [at] and [dot] by @ and . respectively. But better option would be to add me your friend on FB. Just search for Vajra Arya.

        And thanks for the interesting and informative link. But that would be more useful if you give references side by side so that authenticity of the info is not questioned.

        Please keep reading the articles on Satyagni and stay tuned for more. You can search for a book “Hindu superiority” by Harbilas Sarda, published sometimes around 1900. That book talks in details about the glorious past of Hindus including the heroic resistance by Hindus against foreign invasion. Just google it out and download.


  • • Mopla Rebellion: ‘Swaraj within a year’
    The most startling fact to come to light is probably Gandhi’s promise of “Swaraj within a year” to the Ali brothers in return for their support for his non-cooperation movement. What actually did Gandhi’s promise of ‘Swaraj’ entail, beyond forcing the British to leave India? What was to take its place, especially since Gandhi had redefined Swaraj to mean the Khilafat for the benefit of the Ali brothers? (Gandhi had also diverted a substantial sum of money from the Tilak Swaraj Fund to the Khilafat movement.)
    There is at least one other major surprise. Annie Beasant tells us that the Mopla uprising began exactly a year later. In her words: “The Khilafat Raj is established there [in Malabar]; on August 1, 1921, sharp to the date first announced by Mr. Gandhi for the beginning of Swaraj and the Vanishing of the British Rule, a police inspector was surrounded by the Moplas, revolting against that Rule.”
    The outbreak began on August 1, and by August 20 it had spread to the surrounding areas and become a full-scale rebellion. Civil authority broke down, and the Army had to be called in. According to Annie Beasant “From that date [August 1] onwards thousands of the forbidden war-knives were secretly made and hidden away, and on August 20, the rebellion broke out; Khilafat flags were hoisted on police stations and Government offices. …” By then civil authority had all but disappeared and anarchy prevailed. (This is confirmed by others, see Appendix. Incidentally, August 1, 1921 was also the first death anniversary of Tilak.)
    All this indicates careful planning by the Khilafatists for the uprising well before its actual outbreak which took place on the exact date of expiry of Gandhi’s promise. Somebody or some organization had to be financing it — most likely the Khilafat Committee with wealthy patrons like the Aga Khan behind it. It was by no means a spontaneous outburst rooted in frustration as some historians claim.
    This also had the effect of catching the victims unprepared, for they had no way of knowing beforehand what the promise of ‘Swaraj’ — and its failure — held for them. Gandhi had promised them that it was to be a ‘Nonviolent Non-cooperation’ movement. They had no reason to expect such a violent outbreak, let alone planned mutiny. Had the Ali brothers given Gandhi an ultimatum? At the very least, Gandhi had been reckless in his promise of Swaraj in one year. And those who trusted him paid a terrible price.
    Again what was this Swaraj to be — the one which Gandhi had promised to the Ali brothers? Who would be the new rulers? Was it to be a ‘Khilafat Raj’ — as Annie Beasant called it — headed by the Ali brothers? Gandhi’s infatuation with the Ali brothers is hard for us to comprehend today. What did Gandhi hope to get in return? Uncontested leadership of the Congress, which was up for grabs following Tilak’s death on August 1, 1920? All these are questions begging for answers.
    It is worth noting that the goal of Swaraj as complete independence did not return to the Congress agenda until 1929, long after the failure of the Khilafat. All this has been swept under the rug by historians. This alone is sufficient to justify the need for a re-examination of the history. There are probably many more skeletons in the closet waiting to be exposed.
    -Sankaran Nair’s book, Gandhi and Anarchy”
    Conclusion: need for historical revision
    Gandhi’s ‘Bargain with the Devil’ — of compromising with reactionary and even anti-national elements — could serve as a useful starting point. Whether this proves to be the case or not, there cannot be much dispute over the need for such a re-examination.
    It will probably take another generation before both scholars and the public can face up to the reality of Gandhi’s failures both as a national leader and as a unifier of Hindus and Muslims.

  • Vajraji ,Mistake is mine ,ok but …

    Muhammad Bin Qasim writes to Hijaj Bin Yusuf, The Caliph- The forts of Siwistán and Sísam have been already taken. The nephew of Dáhir, his warriors, and principal officers have been despatched, and the infidels converted to Islám or destroyed.

    But Sir Do u know what Firishta states abt it ??? Firishta states even though it was a resounding victory for Bin Qasim ,but the resistance of the people of Sindh was so strong ,That even Bin Qasim had to pay 3% of the annual income of the royal treasure to the Hindu Pandits of the Temples(that was a practice continued from Raja Dahir of Rai dynasty)

    though I havent read Tarikh-E-Firishta ,I quoted it from Heroic Hindu Resistance to Muslim
    Invaders(636 AD to 1206 AD) written by Sitaram Goel & dont think he has favoured Hindus by exaggerating history like Muslims
    Here is the link

    But can u please link me [Ref: Hindu Itihas: Veeron ki daastaan by Rajesh Arya]..
    I will be grateful to you

  • I dint liked it at all Agniveerji .I have read nearly all vital points of Indian History & hindu resistance against Muslims .Yes you are right in 1 point that Islam was indeed spread by sword ,But franlkly speaking U seem to ignore the valiant deeds of Lalitadaitya Muktapida,Mularaja(A teenage prince who defeated Ghouri),Khusrou Khan(A Hindu convert who brought an end to the Khilji DYnasty),Nagabhatta,NarsinghDeva & many more (the list being Endless)

    And even after 1000 years of resistance by the Muslims(NOT RULE) we are 80% Hindus(excludin Bangladeshis),That means we must have put some resistance infront of them

    Reply shall be appreciable

    • Namaste Vidhwansak

      I think you missed second point under 4th heading of the article, which I reproduce here

      ———–2. The reason of survival of Hindus in India was the presence of warriors like Durgadas Rathore, Rana Sanga, Maharana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Dingh, Banda Vairagi, Chhatrasaal, Krishnadev Rai and innumerable Hindu warriors of North-East who used to show the path of Jannah to Ghazi invaders in the battlefields. Muslim historian of Akbar, Badayuni, who also took part in famous Haldighati battle wrote- “There is not even a single race among Pathans and Mughals which can equal Hindus in valor and martial arts.” Islamic historians such as Ghulam Ali and Murtaza Hussain write- “Ten Maratha soldiers are sufficient for more than twenty well built Pathan warriors” [Ref: Hindu Itihas: Veeron ki daastaan by Rajesh Arya]———-

  • Brother fake asman, whats ur take on prostitute in heaven. You agree that the people who hav not got the message would go straight to heaven. The animals are going to heaven? The cannibels of africa hav not got the message. So they would also go to hevan. It is sure that they would not change their food habits. So when they wil b hungry they wil enjoy the flesh of momins. 😉 whats ur solution of it? Momins r so lucky that they ud get 72 virgins. Wil there not b over population? Wil there b production? What vl happen if momins fight wid each other for the most beautiful virgin? Final question- do u wet ur clothes thinking about those virgins? I hope u would answer. Dhanyawad

    • When I first learned about Godra massacre, my eyes filled with tear for all the innocents died, raped burnt.. either it be hundus in train or muslims out side…

      I hated Narendra Modi…. in my words it was just glimpse of what Ghori, Ghazini did…
      If all great Islam matyrs sent by all to rape kill hindus from hindu-kush mountains to delhi; I understand how merciful allah is and how peaceful islam is…

      But still I hate Modi/who ever responsible for that… But if muslims & pakistan brothers will not speak & behave like humanitarians it will surly show some Ghori, Ghazi from hindu side and he will do lakh times to what they did…

      Then you will understand what humanity is, because lathon ke booth, baathonse nahi manthe…
      Result is before you: later that incident there are no riots in gujrat unlike before…

    • @satyaaasman
      Yes, True Islam (Vedic Religion) is God made. Original Koran (Veda) knowledge directly emanates from Allah in starting of creation & No one have dare to corrupt & destroy the knowledge emanates from Allah.
      Veda are eternal & everlasting.

    • @satyaaasman
      ________coz they hate islam__________-

      But Your prophet Jakir Niak is Supporter of Osama & according to JN All these are fighting for spreading Islam & following footprints of Gouri, Gajni, Babur, Auruangeb, Abdali etc.

  • @satyaaasman
    __________agniveer and satyagni are RSS agent ________
    Why Not agniveer and satyagni agent of Al-Qaeda & Taliban?

    • yup i can send u snaps of agniveer and satyaagny with al-qaeda and taliban they are true muslims you know I was the one taking that snap

  • I was asked by a young lady in London, “What have you Hindus done? You have never even conquered a single nation.” That is true from the point of view of the Englishman, the brave, the heroic, the Kshatriya; conquest is the greatest glory that one man can have over another. That is true from his point of view, but from ours it is quite the opposite.

    If I ask myself what has been the cause of India’s greatness, I answer, because we have never conquered. That is our glory. You are hearing every day, and sometimes, I am sorry to say, from men who ought to know better, denunciations of our religion, because it is not at all a conquering religion. To my mind that is the argument why our religion is truer than any other religion, because it never conquered, because it never shed blood, because its mouth always shed on all, words of blessing, of peace, words of love and sympathy.

    It is here and here alone that the ideals of toleration were first preached. And it is here and here alone that toleration and sympathy have become practical. It is theoretical in every other country, it is here and here alone, that the Hindu builds mosques for the Mohammedans and churches for the Christians.
    — Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902)




  • Is God’s own country on the path to Kashmir? Why: WHY: doesnt the Hindus unite? An ideologically sound platform like agniveer/satyagni can unite Hindus, but unless a passion for their own religion, to explore what Hinduism really is, comes into their mind, the Kerela Hindus can very well say goodbye to their culture in the next 25 years.
    This article is highly disturbing. Islam may or may not have spread by the sword, but look how the ideology is penetrating now.

  • The usual arguments of the apologists of the “peacenik” islam has been that their forefathers rejected the casteism of Hinduism and accepted the light of islam. Casteism has to have no place in our society but what did these “peacenik” forefathers ended up embracing? The gullible Forefathers were never told by the so called barriers of islamic light that they had 2 versions of initiation into islam – one the sunni way and the other the shia way that includes Ali’s name, they were never told that if they belong to one of the 72 sects that may or may not make the cut on judgement day and get salvation. And these 72 sects are based not on philosophy, not one strict theology but purely on historical events and people like Alir or Abu Bakr or Uthman. So Allah is gonna depend on mortals like the above to take a call on which is the true sect deemed worthy of salvation. That’s just brilliant.

    Here is some light of Islam based on a few sects

    Ajaridah: Followers of Abd-al-Karim ibn-Ajrad. They believed that a child should be called to Islam after it has attained maturity. Also they believed booty of war to be unlawful till the owner is killed.

    Saltiyah:Followers of Salt ibn-Uthman. They believed in the conversion of adults only and if father has converted to Islam children were considered disbeliever till they reach maturity

    This is the light that was offered by peaceniks like babur and bin quasim when they invaded….

  • Great article Rushmore! Nailed it with authentic historical/Momin accounts of what transpired. Let the subcontinent Muslims reclaim the multi-millenia old heritage called Sanatana Dharma as their own. It is as much theirs as ours. Let us embrace our Muslim brothers as they re-embrace Sanatana Dharma.

    Om Tat Sat.

  • Pranam Brother Rubab. It is truth that Muslims are our own brothers. They r just misguided. Their ancestors were forced to accept islam. We should make them undestood of the fact how islam was spread by sword. The muslim brothers do need to come back home (i.e. Vedas). Dhanyawad

  • It is well known fact that islam is nothing but a barbaric cult of 7th century. I don’t understand why people still follow that religion blindly even after knowing the TRUE face of that religion?

    • Fear of the death punishment, the only certificate that Islam gives for apostasy!!! That’s the only reason most Muslims do not even think about leaving that death cult!!

    • Hello Brother Spirit!

      I am not a brother, I am your sister 🙂
      Of course that I believe in God, but I do not want any institution to rule my and my childrens life. Everyone has his own conscience.

      Religions only separates people, they are not good. When there was a war in my country, from them I only could hears the words of hate and anger. It wasnt in their interest to make peace. It is a busniness and they work for themselves, not for the community.

      And Vedas, in their pure form, are excellent texts-without any particular religion, but for all people.
      Love should be “religion” for the century.

      Love and blessings for All!

      • Dear Sister,
        In 2004 Kargil was going on, at the same time world cup.. Still India was in game whole slave Indians were busy watching game… none came out for funds very rarely… Once team was out of game, people started running in streets collecting funds…

        The bollywood (who teach what is love), gave zero from their coreres of looted profit after showin tits & ties. But bollywood & criters played a game to collect money from slave minded people and donated..

        In 2007, Nandigram incident.. Police was killing farmers & raping their wives & daughters..

        No need to talk about Army behaviour in Kashmir or 7 sisters…

        I want to know what is love how will humanise wake-up, the sub-continent slaves of british getting into trap of money & lust and care about self but none…

        I wondered a lot read many books… my answer is
        To wake-up a 16 years old Shivaji to kill the rapists, he must be taught about Rama & Krishna in beginning later upanishads; thus duty of humanbeing under such surcumstances, thus equality of humans.

        If you look into Globalization (WB, IMF, WTO) policies, any humanist will cryout loud and say hell with this economy. Their policy is not to suply AIDS medicine for patients but spread AIDS and then increase demand thier by price and get profits.

        To wake-up a chanakya who can change this economy, we must teach our vedas, upanishads, ramayan, bharatha & late brahmin oppression, islam invasion, christian invasion must and should be taught to children….

        love, love……….what love? slowly I started hating.. I pary to god like this ‘Buddy if you are there then please for love of humanity erase all humanbeings from this land, or you come down to change this or give that much energy to change this’….

        May holy spirit give strength to all,
        Vivekananda Insp

  • Some moron from irf will say that these are exaggerated accounts of history. Babur and Mahmoud of Ghazni rode into India with white doves on their shoulders and spread the light of islam to deluded pagans in India 🙂

  • Islam was spread by sword, the same as Christianity in the Crusades.

    Ethnic Croatian Catholic communities in Bosnia suffered hell under the Turks during the Ottoman reign, with the majority of them forced to convert to Islam. Girls were raped, children were taken to Turkey as slaves and Turkish Chiefs had the right to sleep with Christian women on their wedding nights before the bride’s husband even got a look in. Lame.
    And Zakir Naik probably thinks that force and rape means intelectual sword-very twisted and insidiously. We all should grow up and overcome the religions. We should all live for the thruth, love and peace-without any religion.

    • link not appearing 🙁

      >>>>>>> a Dutch member of parliament speech in US:

      ‘In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?’

      Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.

      Dear friends,

      Thank you very much for inviting me.

      I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.

      First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

      The Europe you know is changing.

      You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

      All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

      There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

      Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

      In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

      Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

      In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

      In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

      Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

      A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

      Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

      The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

      Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

      Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

      The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

      Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

      Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

      This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

      The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

      Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed.

      The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’.

      In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing.

      The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.

      Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.

      We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.