Once a Pakistani little boy asked his father- “Abba Ji! Was there water all over Pakistan before Muhammad Bin Qasim came?” Who are the Muslims of Indian Subcontinent- India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and even Afghanistan? Who were their ancestors when Muhammad Bin Qasim was not even born? In spite of the fact that many of the sub continent Muslims think they belong to Arabs, the truth remains that their ancestors were Hindus and Buddhists. We know this truth brings thunderbolts to many subcontinent Muslims because it makes them inferior in front of Arabs in Sunnat of prophet (to be like Muhammad) which has direct say in getting heaven or hell hereafter. In order to convince themselves and of course Allah and Muhammad that they are no less Arabs, Mullahs in the subcontinent preach the gullible masses to ape Arabs in every possible field starting from worshipping in a language which is alien to them (Arabic) to using odd number of stones and dirt instead of water while cleansing…
The purpose of this article series is not to create hatred of one community among rest. Rather the objective is to help the scared and confused subcontinent Muslims come out of identity crisis and recognize their roots which are Indian and not Arabic for sure. This series aims at reminding Muslims the atrocities brought down to their ancestors as the price of becoming Muslims from Hindus. Those friends, who happily accept being called as slaves/apes of Arabs but feel shame in calling India as Mother and ancestral land, are requested to read it carefully. This is the challenge to all fanatic Mullahs and pseudo historians who are trying tooth and nail to fill hatred of ancestors and ancestral land in the hearts of already filled gullible Muslims.
Our message to Muslims- You are our Brothers and Sisters. You did not attack India you did not rule India but you were attacked and were ruled. You are natives, sharing with us the common ancestry. Jihadis from Arab and central Asia attacked us and made you slaves (as will be proven in this series). They don’t even consider you pure Muslims. So its high time that you give up this symbol of humiliation and slavery of 1000 years and come back to your original ancestral faith of Vedas. We are here to welcome you.
Our message to Hindus- Indian Subcontinent Muslims did not attack us as they are no outsiders but are natives and were Hindus. They were the real sufferers who had to give sacrifices of lives of dear and near ones during the Jihadi onslaught and still couldn’t save their faith. They are those who got converted at the point of sword with no second option. They have started hating us now because of their own troubles and our reluctance of taking them back in our Dharma which was/is their right. So its our foremost duty to convince them in most compassionate manner to come back to our/their Dharma.
There prevails a sick defeated mentality in subcontinent that believes in making people ostriches who bury their heads in sand when see any danger. Most of the Mullahs like Zakir Naik and Imam Bukhari suffer from this ailment. They believe in moving the goalpost after they have shot. Instead of facing truth and recognizing the problems they deny the existence of problems by twisting the facts, denouncing logic and distorting history. They are like a school kid who answers the questions he knows the solution for in a test and cries for rest of the questions as out of syllabus or incorrect!
The fanatic supporter of Osama Bin Laden, Taliban, and peace (?), Zakir Naik, who claims to be the expert/student of Islam and Hinduism without knowing Arabic and Sanskrit has his interesting thesis over Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus in India. This expert of Islam, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism, Jainism, Christianity, Judaism and all other isms in the world, has now become expert of history also. He claims that Islam was spread by intellectual sword instead of steel. He argues that Muslims ruled India for 1000 years and if Muslims would want, they could have converted each Hindu at the point of sword. In this articles series we will puncture this argument to the full.
All true Historians across the board agree that Islam in India was spread by force of sword. Actually any person who argues that Islam was spread peacefully and there were no forced conversions of Hindus in the reigns of Islamic rulers, ceases to be a historian! It is because by saying this, he goes against the very accounts, chronicles and biographies of Muslim rulers written by THEMSELVES and THEIR STOOGES. This article series will highlight only few examples from the vast accounts from Islamic rulers and Historians of atrocities, plunder, kill, rape, enslavement, and forced conversion Jihadis caused to the natives of India.
We have divided this work into two categories. First one to analyze the arguments of Jihadis of modern times in the support of peaceful history of Islamic spread in the subcontinent and the other one to let the facts speak for themselves. This article presents the logical analysis of Jihadi Zakir Naik’s arguments. So here we go with his video and subsequently the analysis of main points raised by him therein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IOyMZpcYQM
Islam was spread by sword and deceit in India. Every single page of accounts, chronicles, and biographies of Muslim rulers written by themselves or their salaried sycophants bear testimony to that.
Zakir Naik distorts Indian History
Alleged lovers of Osama Bin Laden, Taliban, and the absconding preacher Zakir Naik, who claims to be the expert of Islam and Hinduism without knowing Arabic and Sanskrit, has his interesting thesis over Islamic invasion and conversion of Hindus in India. He claims that intellectual sword spread Islam in the Indian subcontinent and not the sword that kills. He argues that Muslims ruled India for 1000 years, and if Muslims had wanted, they could have converted each Hindu at the point of sword.
Before we provide facts on the bloodiest history of Islamic conquest of India in subsequent chapters, let’s first examine the claims of ‘intellectual sword’.
Zakir Naik: Islam means peace. Hence when you say Islam was spread by sword, it translates into – Peace was spread by sword, which can’t be true
Analyst:
We couldn’t understand the point made here. Can’t a person named ‘Aman’ (meaning ‘peace’ in Urdu) throw bomb and kill innocents? Does he get clemency from court just because an Urdu dictionary reads ‘Aman=peace’ at page number 420?
If Islam means peace and Muslim means peaceful, then why not translate the below news –
“Talibani Muslim blew up suicide jacket in a Muslim area and killed N number of Muslims to establish Islamic rule.”
as
“Talibani peaceful blew up suicide jacket in a peaceful area and killed N number of peaceful to establish peace.”
Does it make any sense? (Unless Zakir Naik calls Taliban and Al Qaida terrorists as Kafirs, the above translation is perfect as per his dictionary!)
Zakir Naik: Islamic terrorism is a misnomer
Just like many common misnomers such as the flat earth, square triangle, and 2+2=5, Islamic terrorism is also a misnomer. Islam and terrorism are exactly opposite.
Analyst:
‘Misnomers’ of flat earth, square triangle and 2+2=5 might be common in Madarsa due to lack of basic mathematics, aptitude, and science skills, but they don’t exist in normal world.
Interestingly, coining Islamic misnomers seems to be the favourite pastime of Kafir-haters. Look at any Islamic website or social media page. Below claims are made with impunity and ultimate belief.
• Quran has scientific miracles.
• The Miracle of Moon-breaking by Prophet is scientifically proven.
• Islam teaches equal treatment of free and slave.
One wonders because
• If a miracle, by definition, is something that is performed by violating laws of physics, how can it be ‘scientific’ in first place?
• If moon-breaking has been proven scientifically (which is factually incorrect) i.e. it happened under scientific laws, it is not a miracle in first place.
• If you allow slave to be a slave, how does Islamic equality save a slave from remaining a slave?
We eagerly want to agree that “Islam and terrorism are exactly opposite.” However, the popular translations of holy texts draw our attention.
If a man kills a believer intentionally, his recompense is Hell, to abide therein [For ever]: And the wrath and the curse of Allah are upon him, and a dreadful penalty is prepared for him.
[Quran 4:93]
Narrated Abu Juhaifa: I asked `Ali “Do you have anything Divine literature besides what is in the Qur’an?”… Ali said,… we have nothing except what is in the Qur’an …and what is written on this sheet of paper.” I asked, “What is on this paper?” He replied, “…. and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever).
[Sahih Bukhari 9/83/50]
So, as per Islamic texts, killing a Muslim intentionally results in death penalty to the killer in this world and hell hereafter. But on the other hand, if a Muslim kills a Kafir (non-believer) even intentionally, he is neither to be put to death nor is this any sin for which he is denied houris in Heaven!
If these texts are to be believed, terrorism has been defined as “killing of Muslims” alone. This ‘terrorism’ is certainly against Islam!
Zakir Naik: De Lacy O’Leary said Islam was spread peacefully
The famous historian De Lacy O’Leary says that fanatical Muslims across the world forcing Islam at the point of the sword is the most fantastic absurd myth historians have ever repeated.
Analyst:
“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride of the slaughter of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period. ”
[Will Durant, The Story of Civilization, page 505]
Now the fight remains as to which of these two historians is higher authority? For this, we will direct our readers to the chronicles and accounts of the Ghazis (those who participated in the religious war of Islam) themselves in the next chapters who have, with full pride, written volumes on how they attacked India and made it Dar ul-Islam from Dar ul-Harb.
It’s interesting to read what the famous historian of Zakir Naik, De Lacy O’Leary writes on Islamic conquest elsewhere:
It is a debated point whether Muhammad intended his religion to be a universal one, or for the Arabs alone…. It is necessary for all Arabs to believe in Muhammad if they are to escape hell (Muslim, i, 54), but it is not stated to be necessary for non-Arabs to believe…. As regards the non-Arab world, the Qur’an seems to contemplate conquest rather than conversion (Qur., ix, 19-23)….. But these passages fall far short of a definite missionary command to go forth and preach Islam to all the nations of the earth.
[De Lacy O’Leary, How Greek science passed to the Arabs]
So the historian of Zakir Naik makes some interesting points which may not equally comfort Islamists.
• It is unclear whether Muhammad came with a universal religion or an Arabic one!
• Islam is unclear on the necessity of accepting Muhammad as a messenger by Non-Arabs!
• Quran believes in conquest and not in conversion.
• There are no commands for Muslims in Quran to preach Islam to nations other than Arab!
Zakir Naik’s historian ends up claiming that Quran believes in conquest instead of conversion thereby proving exactly opposite to what Zakir Naik was trying to establish. He maintains that Quran has more to do with sword than any religious proselytization. So if Zakir’s historian is right, his claims of “there is no compulsion in religion” and “Islam means peace” bite the dust.
Zakir Naik: 80% population of India is still Non-Muslim
“We” Muslims ruled Spain for 800 years. “We” Muslims, the Arabs, have been the Lord of the Arab land for last 1400 years, but still 14 million Coptic Christians live in Arab. “We” Muslims ruled India for 1000 years, but still 80% population of India is Non- Muslim. If we had wanted, we could have converted each and every Hindu at the point of the sword, but we didn’t.
Analyst:
Did the readers notice “We” Muslims? Isn’t it interesting that a person with Hindu surname ‘Naik’ is claiming co-ruling with Arabs and Mughals over Spain, Arab, and India for thousand years? Isn’t it funny if a neo-converted tribal Christian in Orissa starts claiming that ‘we Christians’ ruled India for 200 years, grew industries and railways for poor people of India?
Zakir Naik believes that if Coptic Christians in Arab, Hindus in India and Christians in Spain managed to survive during Islamic rule, then this is the proof that Islam didn’t force non-Muslims to Islam. Great! But is this a valid logic? What if we apply this logic to
• Pagans of Arabia, who were 100% before the advent of Islam, but today even their traces are not found in Arab.
• Zoroastrians population of Iran is not found in today’s Iran.
• Hindus & Buddhists of today’s Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Kashmir, who constitute less than 1% of the population today but used to constitute 100% of the population 1400 years ago.
• All the Non-Arab nations that were 100% Non-Muslims before Islam came to their lands and are 100% Muslims today?
If Zakir’s logic has to be true, he will have to accept that Islam was spread by the sword in Arab, Persia, Today’s Afghanistan, Pakistan, parts of India, Bangladesh, and all Muslim countries that used to be Non-Muslims before Islamic invasions and are now almost 100% Islamic.
The reason behind Hindu survival in India despite bloodshed was the presence of warriors like Raja Suhel Dev, Durgadas Rathore, Rana Sanga, Maharana Pratap, Shivaji Maharaj, Guru Govind Singh, Veer Banda Vairagi, Chhatrasaal, Krishnadev Rai, Lachit Borphukan, and innumerable Hindu warriors who used to dispatch Islamic Ghazi invaders to Jannat in the battlefields. It is because of these warriors Islamic attacks could not wipe out Hindus totally from today’s India. Hindu-Buddhists of Afghanistan & today’s Pak resisted but couldn’t survive centuries of bloodshed. They were all converted at sword’s point.
Zakir Naik: Sword of intellect converted Hindus to Islam
It was the sword of intellect that forced Non-Muslims to convert to Islam. Quran [16:125] commands every Muslim to argue with others and bring them to Islam through dialogues.
Analyst:
Why are both ‘preachers’ and ‘converted’ intellectuals who preached and converted to Islam through intellect have been the most illiterate people of all times? Where are these intellectuals who are expected to participate in intellectual activities like science and technologies? Why does Sachchar Committee report name Muslim society as most backward and illiterate?
Zakir Naik is clearly doing Taqiyya (lying sanctioned by Islamic texts to deceit Kafirs) here! He quotes Quran [16:125] which has been cancelled by Ayah e Saif or the verse of sword [9:5] which asks Muslims to “slay idolaters wherever they are found.” Zakir keeps quoting cancelled verse and hides real verse of sword! This Taqiyya is well exposed by none other than Zakir’s co-Mullah Israr Ahmed, a prominent Islamic scholar from Pakistan and an eminent speaker of Peace TV of Zakir Naik.
He says: What we (Muslims) told Non-Muslims (during conquest) that either you accept Islam and be equal to us or live as inferiors to us in an Islamic state or let our swords decide!
Zakir’s Taqiyya is also busted by the most authentic Sunni Tafsir of Quran by Ibn Kathir, in verse [3:110] and it says:
“You, Muslims, are the best nation of people for the people, you bring them tied in chains on their necks (capture them in war), and they later embrace Islam.”
During Muslim rule in India, not just people, but places and animals were also converted to Islam. Karnavati was converted to Ahmedabad and Prayag was made to accepted Islam that became Allahabad. In the battle of Haldighati, the elephant of Maharana Pratap named Ramprasad was captured by Akbar’s forces, and he made Ramprasad accept Islam to become Peerprasad! Question is, were the cities and animals also intellectual enough to get convinced by Islamic intellectual sword?
Zakir Naik: Allah only accepts religion of peace
The only religion accepted by Allah is Islam which means peace! [9:33]
Analyst:
So finally Zakir ends up shooting his own foot! Allah will kill you if you don’t bow to Islam which means peace?
Accounts of Muhammad Bin Qasim and Mahmud of Ghazna
Here are accounts of two most respected Jihadis in the subcontinent, Muhammad Bin Qasim and Mahmud of Ghazna in their own words. “Historian” Zakir Naik can still deny these bare facts because Islam means peace, but for others, it is time to think.
“The forts of Siwistán and Sísam have been already taken. The nephew of Dáhir, his warriors, and principal officers have been dispatched, and the infidels converted to Islám or destroyed. Instead of idol temples, mosques and other places of worship have been built, pulpits have been erected, the Khutba is read, the call to prayers is raised, so that devotions are performed at the stated hours. The takbír and praise to the Almighty God are offered every morning and evening.”
[Muhammad Bin Qasim’s letter to Hijaj Bin Yusuf,
The Caliph]
“The blood of the infidels flowed so copiously, that the stream was discolored, notwithstanding its purity, and people were unable to drink it. Had not night come on and concealed the traces of their flight, many more of the enemy would have been slain. The victory was gained by God’s grace, who has established Islám forever as the best of religions, notwithstanding that idolater’s revolt against it. The Sultán returned with plunder which it is impossible to recount.—Praise be to God, the protector of the world, for the honor, he bestows upon Islám and Musulmáns!”
[Tarikh-i-Yamini of Utbi (regarding Mahmoud of Ghazna) contains- (At Thanesar)]
More such accounts will be discussed in subsequent chapters.
Muslim tells the truth about distorted Indian History
There is a video from Pakistan in which famous intellectuals of Pakistan are shedding tears on the distortion of the history of Islam in the Indian subcontinent. Important points made by the scholars in the video are
• Pakistani Muslims celebrated at memorial of ‘Alexander the great’ near the banks of Chinab and called him ‘Sikander e Azam’ thinking he was a Muslim, and he defeated Hindu King Porus!
• It was not Alexander but Porus who won the battle! But Porus, being Hindu, is downplayed against Alexander by Muslims of subcontinent!
• Pak Muslims are masters in distorting history.
• Islamic rulers were so much against the education, science, and technology that when someone offered Shahjahan a printing press, he refused saying it is disgusting and deserves hatred (Lanati)!
• One of the biggest bases of US military is in Qatar, and the Caliph there admits that we are thankful to the US for keeping rest of Arab armies and countries at bay!
• Pakistani policy makers have now decided to exclude Ashoka and Chandragupta Maurya from the history of subcontinent because they were Hindus!
• Muhammad Bin Qasim did not come to Sindh on the call of a woman as foolishly glorified and taught to Muslims. He had attempted twice already to capture Sindh before!
• Mahmud of Ghazni burnt the whole city of Lahore during one of his invasions. These are blatant lies that Mahmud Ghaznavi made Lahore the cultural centre.
• Subcontinent Muslims never ruled India for 600 Years. It was the invaders of Central Asia and Iran who ruled.
• Mughals hated Indians too much, and Baburnama is the evidence of their hatred.
• No native Muslim (converted from Hindu) was considered to be Sultan of Muslims.
• It is absolute rubbish that Babur, Akbar, and other Mughals loved India. They hated India and its culture so much that they used to have Persian as official language in courts and Turkish in their homes. They had nothing in native languages.
Conclusion
Logical fallacies and factual errors can’t make Zakir Naik victorious. Bitter truth is that Mullahs like Zakir Naik don’t want Muslims to connect with their ancestral culture & roots. A web of lies is created to trap Muslims in denial about their identity and origins. An honest analysis of the bare facts is all that is required to end darkness.
[mybooktable book=”islamic-invasion-9-books” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]
[mybooktable book=”complete-works-agniveer” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]
Brilliant article. Let sum students of irf madrasa cum and refute this article. Good job satyagni ji. Dhanyawad
link not appearing 🙁
>>>>>>> a Dutch member of parliament speech in US:
‘In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?’
Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, Chairman, Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem.
Dear friends,
Thank you very much for inviting me.
I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe.
First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.
The Europe you know is changing.
You have probably seen the landmarks. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.
All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe. These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.
There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.
Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.
In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.
Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear ‘whore, whore’. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.
In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin. The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.
In England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels, because he was drinking during the Ramadan.
Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel. I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.
A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.
Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.
The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.
Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators ‘settlers’. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies; they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.
Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.
The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.
Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ‘submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.
Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam ‘the most retrograde force in the world’, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.
This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.
The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.
Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed.
The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’.
In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing.
The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.
Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe, American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
We have to take the necessary action now to stop this Islamic stupidity from destroying the free world that we know.
—-link not appearing—
yeah, dunno why it is happening. even i tried few days ago.
Islam was spread by sword, the same as Christianity in the Crusades.
Ethnic Croatian Catholic communities in Bosnia suffered hell under the Turks during the Ottoman reign, with the majority of them forced to convert to Islam. Girls were raped, children were taken to Turkey as slaves and Turkish Chiefs had the right to sleep with Christian women on their wedding nights before the bride’s husband even got a look in. Lame.
And Zakir Naik probably thinks that force and rape means intelectual sword-very twisted and insidiously. We all should grow up and overcome the religions. We should all live for the thruth, love and peace-without any religion.
Some moron from irf will say that these are exaggerated accounts of history. Babur and Mahmoud of Ghazni rode into India with white doves on their shoulders and spread the light of islam to deluded pagans in India 🙂
Pranam Brother missy. So u r an atheist?
Hello Brother Spirit!
I am not a brother, I am your sister 🙂
Of course that I believe in God, but I do not want any institution to rule my and my childrens life. Everyone has his own conscience.
Religions only separates people, they are not good. When there was a war in my country, from them I only could hears the words of hate and anger. It wasnt in their interest to make peace. It is a busniness and they work for themselves, not for the community.
And Vedas, in their pure form, are excellent texts-without any particular religion, but for all people.
Love should be “religion” for the 21.st century.
Love and blessings for All!
Dear Sister,
In 2004 Kargil was going on, at the same time world cup.. Still India was in game whole slave Indians were busy watching game… none came out for funds very rarely… Once team was out of game, people started running in streets collecting funds…
The bollywood (who teach what is love), gave zero from their coreres of looted profit after showin tits & ties. But bollywood & criters played a game to collect money from slave minded people and donated..
In 2007, Nandigram incident.. Police was killing farmers & raping their wives & daughters..
No need to talk about Army behaviour in Kashmir or 7 sisters…
I want to know what is love how will humanise wake-up, the sub-continent slaves of british getting into trap of money & lust and care about self but none…
I wondered a lot read many books… my answer is
To wake-up a 16 years old Shivaji to kill the rapists, he must be taught about Rama & Krishna in beginning later upanishads; thus duty of humanbeing under such surcumstances, thus equality of humans.
If you look into Globalization (WB, IMF, WTO) policies, any humanist will cryout loud and say hell with this economy. Their policy is not to suply AIDS medicine for patients but spread AIDS and then increase demand thier by price and get profits.
To wake-up a chanakya who can change this economy, we must teach our vedas, upanishads, ramayan, bharatha & late brahmin oppression, islam invasion, christian invasion must and should be taught to children….
love, love……….what love? slowly I started hating.. I pary to god like this ‘Buddy if you are there then please for love of humanity erase all humanbeings from this land, or you come down to change this or give that much energy to change this’….
May holy spirit give strength to all,
Vivekananda Insp
Argument is not the best thing to do with Muslims. They should be exiled from this country.
It is well known fact that islam is nothing but a barbaric cult of 7th century. I don’t understand why people still follow that religion blindly even after knowing the TRUE face of that religion?
Fear of the death punishment, the only certificate that Islam gives for apostasy!!! That’s the only reason most Muslims do not even think about leaving that death cult!!
Pranam Brother Rubab. It is truth that Muslims are our own brothers. They r just misguided. Their ancestors were forced to accept islam. We should make them undestood of the fact how islam was spread by sword. The muslim brothers do need to come back home (i.e. Vedas). Dhanyawad
Great article Rushmore! Nailed it with authentic historical/Momin accounts of what transpired. Let the subcontinent Muslims reclaim the multi-millenia old heritage called Sanatana Dharma as their own. It is as much theirs as ours. Let us embrace our Muslim brothers as they re-embrace Sanatana Dharma.
Om Tat Sat.
Great article Rushmore brother! Here are some slides from history. Muslims kindly do not read this.
http://www.oocities.org/hindoo_humanist/medieval.html
The usual arguments of the apologists of the “peacenik” islam has been that their forefathers rejected the casteism of Hinduism and accepted the light of islam. Casteism has to have no place in our society but what did these “peacenik” forefathers ended up embracing? The gullible Forefathers were never told by the so called barriers of islamic light that they had 2 versions of initiation into islam – one the sunni way and the other the shia way that includes Ali’s name, they were never told that if they belong to one of the 72 sects that may or may not make the cut on judgement day and get salvation. And these 72 sects are based not on philosophy, not one strict theology but purely on historical events and people like Alir or Abu Bakr or Uthman. So Allah is gonna depend on mortals like the above to take a call on which is the true sect deemed worthy of salvation. That’s just brilliant.
http://www.real-islam.org/73_8.htm
Here is some light of Islam based on a few sects
Ajaridah: Followers of Abd-al-Karim ibn-Ajrad. They believed that a child should be called to Islam after it has attained maturity. Also they believed booty of war to be unlawful till the owner is killed.
Saltiyah:Followers of Salt ibn-Uthman. They believed in the conversion of adults only and if father has converted to Islam children were considered disbeliever till they reach maturity
This is the light that was offered by peaceniks like babur and bin quasim when they invaded….
woo!!!
that video in the end is really really brilliant !!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGr19sfcY_o&feature=related
really an eye opener!!
*Test*
Is God’s own country on the path to Kashmir? Why: WHY: doesnt the Hindus unite? An ideologically sound platform like agniveer/satyagni can unite Hindus, but unless a passion for their own religion, to explore what Hinduism really is, comes into their mind, the Kerela Hindus can very well say goodbye to their culture in the next 25 years.
This article is highly disturbing. Islam may or may not have spread by the sword, but look how the ideology is penetrating now.
http://www.saveindia.com/for_hindus_in_kerala_it.htm
good job bro rushmore,
now lets see the reactions of mullahs and zakir naik stooges for this one
INDIAN MUSLIM LEADERS PLANNING FOR ELIMINATION OF HINDUS WITH THE HELP OF BANGLADESH GOVT AND TRAITOR AND SPINELESS CONG LEADERS LIKE MANMOHAN SINGH. THEY ARE GOING TO SIGN AN ACCORD WITH BANGLADESHI GOVT TO CREATE A RAILWAY LINK FROM BANGLADESH TO OTHER PARTS OF INDIA LIKE GUJARAT, RAJASTHAN, MAHARASHTRA AND MANY OTHER STATES, AT PRESENT IT IS PRESENT ONLY TILL KOLKATA.
ONCE BANGLADESH GOVT IS ABLE TO CREATE THIS RAILWAY LINK, TERRORISM AND ILLEGAL BANGLADESHI MUSLIM IMMIGRATION WILL TURN TO NEW HEIGHTS. ILLEGAL BANGLADESHI MUSLIMS WILL MERGE WITH INDIAN MUSLIMS AND CHANGE THE DEMOGRAPHY OF MANY STATES AND THROUGH VOTE BANK POLITICS AND TERRORISM WILL DESTROY HINDUS.
ISI AND DGFI IS THE MOST TO BENEFIT FROM THIS RAILWAY LINK.
Very good Article Sir.
Thanks a ton !!!
here are some insights into “spreading”
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=20098
Rajiv Ji’s lecture on all Muslims are Sanatani Hindu and How British responsible for first Hindu Muslim Riot in India.
Amaizing…………
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGLjWFt0ELU&feature=related
I was asked by a young lady in London, “What have you Hindus done? You have never even conquered a single nation.” That is true from the point of view of the Englishman, the brave, the heroic, the Kshatriya; conquest is the greatest glory that one man can have over another. That is true from his point of view, but from ours it is quite the opposite.
If I ask myself what has been the cause of India’s greatness, I answer, because we have never conquered. That is our glory. You are hearing every day, and sometimes, I am sorry to say, from men who ought to know better, denunciations of our religion, because it is not at all a conquering religion. To my mind that is the argument why our religion is truer than any other religion, because it never conquered, because it never shed blood, because its mouth always shed on all, words of blessing, of peace, words of love and sympathy.
It is here and here alone that the ideals of toleration were first preached. And it is here and here alone that toleration and sympathy have become practical. It is theoretical in every other country, it is here and here alone, that the Hindu builds mosques for the Mohammedans and churches for the Christians.
— Swami Vivekananda (1863-1902)
illogical article
islam means peace. it is just hijacked by some wrong persons. fear judgement day kafiro
@aasman:
I have a question about Judgement day. Will you be a sport and answer logically?
@kb insaallah
@aasman:
What will be your age in Jannah?
agniveer and satyagni are RSS agent .
@satyaaasman
__________agniveer and satyagni are RSS agent ________
Why Not agniveer and satyagni agent of Al-Qaeda & Taliban?
yup i can send u snaps of agniveer and satyaagny with al-qaeda and taliban they are true muslims you know I was the one taking that snap
@ts coz they hate islam
@satyaaasman
________coz they hate islam__________-
But Your prophet Jakir Niak is Supporter of Osama & according to JN All these are fighting for spreading Islam & following footprints of Gouri, Gajni, Babur, Auruangeb, Abdali etc.
@ravi why are you quoting some false incidents. had you seen them
@ts what is bad in following ghazni gauri they were great martyrs. remember GHAZWA E HIND. ITS NOT TOO FAR
remember concept of county is man made but concept of islam is god made. and who is master man or god.
When I first learned about Godra massacre, my eyes filled with tear for all the innocents died, raped burnt.. either it be hundus in train or muslims out side…
I hated Narendra Modi…. in my words it was just glimpse of what Ghori, Ghazini did…
If all great Islam matyrs sent by all to rape kill hindus from hindu-kush mountains to delhi; I understand how merciful allah is and how peaceful islam is…
But still I hate Modi/who ever responsible for that… But if muslims & pakistan brothers will not speak & behave like humanitarians it will surly show some Ghori, Ghazi from hindu side and he will do lakh times to what they did…
Then you will understand what humanity is, because lathon ke booth, baathonse nahi manthe…
Result is before you: later that incident there are no riots in gujrat unlike before…
it feels like you just had a nice chat with allah ‘the creator of islam’; and he told you that he created islam…
@satyaaasman
Yes, True Islam (Vedic Religion) is God made. Original Koran (Veda) knowledge directly emanates from Allah in starting of creation & No one have dare to corrupt & destroy the knowledge emanates from Allah.
Veda are eternal & everlasting.
@kb what is your age when you die? how fool u r dear
@asman:
Thanks for not answering my question.
when they cant answer their own questions arising from their brains like
@ asman what is the shape of earth????
even my puppy points to a ball if questioned this
Brother fake asman, whats ur take on prostitute in heaven. You agree that the people who hav not got the message would go straight to heaven. The animals are going to heaven? The cannibels of africa hav not got the message. So they would also go to hevan. It is sure that they would not change their food habits. So when they wil b hungry they wil enjoy the flesh of momins. 😉 whats ur solution of it? Momins r so lucky that they ud get 72 virgins. Wil there not b over population? Wil there b production? What vl happen if momins fight wid each other for the most beautiful virgin? Final question- do u wet ur clothes thinking about those virgins? I hope u would answer. Dhanyawad
I dint liked it at all Agniveerji .I have read nearly all vital points of Indian History & hindu resistance against Muslims .Yes you are right in 1 point that Islam was indeed spread by sword ,But franlkly speaking U seem to ignore the valiant deeds of Lalitadaitya Muktapida,Mularaja(A teenage prince who defeated Ghouri),Khusrou Khan(A Hindu convert who brought an end to the Khilji DYnasty),Nagabhatta,NarsinghDeva & many more (the list being Endless)
And even after 1000 years of resistance by the Muslims(NOT RULE) we are 80% Hindus(excludin Bangladeshis),That means we must have put some resistance infront of them
Reply shall be appreciable
Namaste Vidhwansak
I think you missed second point under 4th heading of the article, which I reproduce here
———–2. The reason of survival of Hindus in India was the presence of warriors like Durgadas Rathore, Rana Sanga, Maharana Pratap, Shivaji, Guru Govind Dingh, Banda Vairagi, Chhatrasaal, Krishnadev Rai and innumerable Hindu warriors of North-East who used to show the path of Jannah to Ghazi invaders in the battlefields. Muslim historian of Akbar, Badayuni, who also took part in famous Haldighati battle wrote- “There is not even a single race among Pathans and Mughals which can equal Hindus in valor and martial arts.” Islamic historians such as Ghulam Ali and Murtaza Hussain write- “Ten Maratha soldiers are sufficient for more than twenty well built Pathan warriors” [Ref: Hindu Itihas: Veeron ki daastaan by Rajesh Arya]———-
Vajraji ,Mistake is mine ,ok but …
———-
Muhammad Bin Qasim writes to Hijaj Bin Yusuf, The Caliph- The forts of Siwistán and Sísam have been already taken. The nephew of Dáhir, his warriors, and principal officers have been despatched, and the infidels converted to Islám or destroyed.
—–
But Sir Do u know what Firishta states abt it ??? Firishta states even though it was a resounding victory for Bin Qasim ,but the resistance of the people of Sindh was so strong ,That even Bin Qasim had to pay 3% of the annual income of the royal treasure to the Hindu Pandits of the Temples(that was a practice continued from Raja Dahir of Rai dynasty)
—————————————–
though I havent read Tarikh-E-Firishta ,I quoted it from Heroic Hindu Resistance to Muslim
Invaders(636 AD to 1206 AD) written by Sitaram Goel & dont think he has favoured Hindus by exaggerating history like Muslims
http://www.scribd.com/doc/6493883/Heroic-Hindu-Resistance-to-Muslim-Invaders
Here is the link
But can u please link me [Ref: Hindu Itihas: Veeron ki daastaan by Rajesh Arya]..
I will be grateful to you
sir i m incapable of understanding ur point
[…] This article is contributed by Rushmore, active member of Satyagni. In the previous article, Was Islam Spread by Sword, we proved logically that Islam was indeed spread by sword in Indian subcontinent. In this and next […]
• Mopla Rebellion: ‘Swaraj within a year’
The most startling fact to come to light is probably Gandhi’s promise of “Swaraj within a year” to the Ali brothers in return for their support for his non-cooperation movement. What actually did Gandhi’s promise of ‘Swaraj’ entail, beyond forcing the British to leave India? What was to take its place, especially since Gandhi had redefined Swaraj to mean the Khilafat for the benefit of the Ali brothers? (Gandhi had also diverted a substantial sum of money from the Tilak Swaraj Fund to the Khilafat movement.)
There is at least one other major surprise. Annie Beasant tells us that the Mopla uprising began exactly a year later. In her words: “The Khilafat Raj is established there [in Malabar]; on August 1, 1921, sharp to the date first announced by Mr. Gandhi for the beginning of Swaraj and the Vanishing of the British Rule, a police inspector was surrounded by the Moplas, revolting against that Rule.”
The outbreak began on August 1, and by August 20 it had spread to the surrounding areas and become a full-scale rebellion. Civil authority broke down, and the Army had to be called in. According to Annie Beasant “From that date [August 1] onwards thousands of the forbidden war-knives were secretly made and hidden away, and on August 20, the rebellion broke out; Khilafat flags were hoisted on police stations and Government offices. …” By then civil authority had all but disappeared and anarchy prevailed. (This is confirmed by others, see Appendix. Incidentally, August 1, 1921 was also the first death anniversary of Tilak.)
All this indicates careful planning by the Khilafatists for the uprising well before its actual outbreak which took place on the exact date of expiry of Gandhi’s promise. Somebody or some organization had to be financing it — most likely the Khilafat Committee with wealthy patrons like the Aga Khan behind it. It was by no means a spontaneous outburst rooted in frustration as some historians claim.
This also had the effect of catching the victims unprepared, for they had no way of knowing beforehand what the promise of ‘Swaraj’ — and its failure — held for them. Gandhi had promised them that it was to be a ‘Nonviolent Non-cooperation’ movement. They had no reason to expect such a violent outbreak, let alone planned mutiny. Had the Ali brothers given Gandhi an ultimatum? At the very least, Gandhi had been reckless in his promise of Swaraj in one year. And those who trusted him paid a terrible price.
Again what was this Swaraj to be — the one which Gandhi had promised to the Ali brothers? Who would be the new rulers? Was it to be a ‘Khilafat Raj’ — as Annie Beasant called it — headed by the Ali brothers? Gandhi’s infatuation with the Ali brothers is hard for us to comprehend today. What did Gandhi hope to get in return? Uncontested leadership of the Congress, which was up for grabs following Tilak’s death on August 1, 1920? All these are questions begging for answers.
It is worth noting that the goal of Swaraj as complete independence did not return to the Congress agenda until 1929, long after the failure of the Khilafat. All this has been swept under the rug by historians. This alone is sufficient to justify the need for a re-examination of the history. There are probably many more skeletons in the closet waiting to be exposed.
-Sankaran Nair’s book, Gandhi and Anarchy”
Conclusion: need for historical revision
Gandhi’s ‘Bargain with the Devil’ — of compromising with reactionary and even anti-national elements — could serve as a useful starting point. Whether this proves to be the case or not, there cannot be much dispute over the need for such a re-examination.
It will probably take another generation before both scholars and the public can face up to the reality of Gandhi’s failures both as a national leader and as a unifier of Hindus and Muslims.
Sir ,I was asking abt the link of “Veeron ki Dastaan”
plz link me
Dear Vidhwansak
This book is probably not available online. However it can be obtained from
Vedayan Pariwar, Hudda 42, sector 11, Panipat, Haryana.
Vajra ji ,I know I m poking u time & again ,But plz do u have any phone,mobile # or email ID ..plz help me in this regard ….
I dont know how much valid it is to give links from Orkut ,in this website …but here is how I ripped the claim of 1000 yrs of Islamic rule point by point
http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#CommMsgs?cmm=2623078&tid=5647236731890608983&start=1
But I wanna know more
plz help me 🙂
Dear Vidhwansak
You can mail me at
v a j r a a r y a [at] gmail[dot]com
Please remove all spaces and replace [at] and [dot] by @ and . respectively. But better option would be to add me your friend on FB. Just search for Vajra Arya.
And thanks for the interesting and informative link. But that would be more useful if you give references side by side so that authenticity of the info is not questioned.
Please keep reading the articles on Satyagni and stay tuned for more. You can search for a book “Hindu superiority” by Harbilas Sarda, published sometimes around 1900. That book talks in details about the glorious past of Hindus including the heroic resistance by Hindus against foreign invasion. Just google it out and download.
Regards
Dhanyabaad Vajra ji !
[…] the previous article, Was Islam Spread by Sword, we proved logically that Islam was indeed spread by sword in Indian subcontinent. In this and next […]