First, we bid tearful farewell Dr APJ Abdul Kalam – role model for every patriot of world.

Second, and even more disappointing was the glorification of the “traitor” mentality against which Dr APJ stood till his last breath. These culprits of this glorification form a significant chunk of Indian population. It includes even you and me who saw this insult passively and were busy next day reviewing the new film releases.

I am talking about the massive media coverage given to Yakub Memon who was hanged for his “glorious” contribution in killing 257 innocents in 1993. I am talking about the massive funeral procession that followed this terrorist to his grave. I am also talking about the “hero” made out of this terrorist even after death as media continues to create propaganda from every silly detail of his life – what he said on last day, what clothes he wore, when he woke up, which soap he used for bath and all other nonsense that could glorify the “traitor” mentality.

But my loyalty lies with my nation and all innocents who continue to be killed due to soft-pedaling with rascals. My loyalty lies with the Missile Man. My loyalty lies with “ruthless destruction of those forces that make hero of ruthless fanatics”.

I am unambiguous in my belief. Anyone who attended the funeral of this terrorist is a potential terrorist. Anyone who glorified this terrorist is a potential threat to humanity. Agniveer has no mercy for such threats.

Here are the hollow arguments of Yakub lovers and our reply. (Warning- Keep burnol with you while reading this if you happen to be a fake-liberal without logical or emotional reasons to love the country.)

1. Yakub was innocent, there wasn’t enough evidence against him. Intellectuals like Sagarika Ghose have established it.

a. So lets shut down all session courts, High Courts and Supreme Court because a former BA- History undergraduate has delivered her judgement. Lack of evidence? Or lack of grey matter in someone’s head?

b. Interestingly these are the same people that call India a banana republic when illiterate Khaap Panchayats pass judgement on something without going through due process of law.

2. Yakub only retaliated against the demolition of Babri Masjid and killing of Muslims in 1993 riots

a. If retaliation is justified, Indian Judiciary retaliated against killing of 257 innocents. Don’t cry.

b. Didn’t Maya Kodnani, Babu Bajrangi etc retaliate against the burning of 58 Ram Sevaks in Godhra? Why get Diarrhea every time over post-Godhra riots?

c. Wasn’t Babri demolition the reaction of demolition of Ram Mandir at the same site? So is Babri demolition justified? If yes, Yakub was a terrorist who killed innocents to oppose a justified action. If no, Yakub was a terrorist because killing innocents in name of retaliation is never justified. In both cases, he remains a terrorist.

3. Yakub killed people but he surrendered and facilitated the investigation process

a. This is great. So this is the recipe to kill innocents and then get saved. Start shooting people indiscriminately like Gurdaspur. When the cartridges get empty, surrender. And rest will be done by human rights activists. Logic is- if you surrender, you should be saved.

b. Dare to think of a man who raped your mother and is now assisting police in finding her because she is missing. Will you forgive him? No! Remember, Yakub cold-bloodedly orchestrated the blasts that killed 257 innocents and ruined their families forever. These were people like you and me. Their lives cannot come back.

4. Yakub was guilty but death punishment is wrong 

a. So if a terrorist comes to kill you, you must surrender because death punishment is wrong. Killing the terrorist is wrong. But getting killed is right. Allowing terrorist to kill my family is right. Encouraging future terrorists to kill my countrymen in future is right. Sending this global message is right – “We welcome all bombers and shooters of the world. Please come and kill us. If our security forces catch you, we will pay for your boarding, lodging & entertainment for rest of your lives. And if we feel you are getting bored, we will release you on humanitarian grounds. If they are unable to catch, then you can come again to kill us!”.

b. Disband all armed forces that work on the principle of punishing enemies by death. Let ISIS, Taliban, LeT and Jaish e Muhammad attack us. Fake-liberals will take care of them! 

c. If killing a killer is wrong, so is abusing the abuser. So now I can shout the filthiest abuses on fake-liberals”. And they should not yell back at me!

5. Yakub was hanged because he was a Muslim 

a. And Dr APJ Abdul Kalam was made President and given grand farewell because he was a Jew!

b. Interestingly, terrorists have no religion while committing terrorism but they develop religion like donkey’s horns as soon as they are jailed/convicted! 

c. Now some facts- 72 Muslims have been hanged against 1342 Hindus/Non Muslims in India till date which form less than 5% of total executions.

Of the 25 hanged in Delhi, only four were Muslims.

Of the 103 hanged in Haryana, there was only one Muslim.

Of the 39 hanged in Karnataka, only three were Muslims.

Of the 78 convicts hanged in Madhya Pradesh, only five were Muslims.

Of the 56 hanged in Maharashtra, there were only five Muslims.

Of the 366 prisoners who went to the gallows in UP, only 45 were Muslims.

Of the 32 convicts who were hanged in West Bengal, only seven were Muslims.

Now continue with the hollow victim card. Facts are straight.

6. Yakub was hanged but Sadhvi Pragya and Colonel Purohit were not. Hang them first. 

a. Few minutes ago, death punishment was the worst thing to happen in world. Now liberal’s Diarrhea! Hang Sadhvi. So logic is- hang Sadhvi, save Yakub.

b. Another logic is- hang accused, don’t hang convict! Hang Pragya Thakur no matter she is yet to be convicted!

c. Yakub‘s case was in 1993. Pragya’s case happened in 2008. Again logic is, give Yakub 22 years to prove himself innocent. But don’t give Pragya Thakur even 7 years. Hang her to maintain Secular Fabric of India. 

d. Logic is : Courts should do what I say. After all I am Sarpanch of this fiefdom called India.

7. All people protect terrorists of their religion. Sikhs protected killer of Beant Singh. 

a. And mosquitoes bite us. So let dogs bite us? Is this the point? Just because some nonsense happened, it becomes a justification for another nonsense?

b. Terrorists of other religions? Joke? Find out the top 100 terrorist groups in world. Top 100 terrorists of the world. Last 100 terror attacks on earth. Last 100 beheadings. Last 100 rapes in name of religions. Last 100 suicide attacks. Then come to me. No other religious group is producing terrorists today except one. Period.

8. This is a ploy of Hindu fundamentalists to associate Islam with terrorism. All Muslims are not terrorists. All terrorists are not Muslims. 

A. Yes, all Muslims are not terrorists. Muslims like APJ Abdul Kalam are in fact heroes. So are legends like Ashfaqullah Khan and Abdul Hamid. But these are the facts:

– No Muslim organization or Islamic expert even takes name of these patriots. They don’t even consider them as Muslims. Muslim organizations did not even contribute for maintenance of their memorials. Agniveer is author of the most popular web-page on Ashfaqullah Khan!

– When APJ Abdul Kalam died, every Hindu wept. So called right Hindu wings wept the most. But no Owaisi or Zakir Naik had any wet eyes.  They did not even issue a statement of condolence.

– The funeral of APJ Abdul Kalam was flooded with so called Hindu fundamentalists. The funeral of Yakub Memon was flooded with “peace-lovers”.

B. Refer previous point. Islam is the exclusive source of entire religious terrorism of today. And religious terrorism is exclusive source of entire terrorism today. This has remained the case since suspicious death of Prophet.

C. No one can deny that there is a lethal fanatic terror force within Islamic world that continues to nurture and get stronger. It is scary that such terror forces get such hero’s funeral. And real heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam remain completely ignored.

9. Bal Thackeray was a mass-murderer. He was given state honor in funeral. Yakub was buried where dogs used to shit. 

a. Again Kangaroo-court’s decision. Which court said Bal Thackeray was a mass-murderer? Rajdeep Sardesai’s Khaap Panchayat? Where is the proof? Why haven’t you moved to court?

b. Thackeray’s stand against fanatic elements will always be remembered by patriots. That is why the state gave him the honor. And Yakub was buried alongside dogs. It is his Karma. Live with it.

I have used harsh words – almost on verge of being abusive. But this alone is the right thing to do with those who are so shameless as to make mockery of death of 257 innocents by making him a “hero”. This is the right way to deal with the greatest threat we face today.

July 30 highlights a huge threat for future of nation and humanity. More dangerous than attacks by invaders like Ghori, Ghazni and Babur. More dangerous than even partition of India under threat of direct action by “peace-lovers”. It is more dangerous because now we are glorifying our enemies. We are making hero out of those rascals that killed our brothers and sisters.

ISIS, cross-border terror, Boko Haram continue to rise rapidly. All Islamic terror groups have clearly put India as their ultimate agenda because they believe that doors of Heaven will open only after India is conquered and idol-worshippers are destroyed.

So far, while these terrorists continued to attack Hindustan for last 1000 years, there were also forces that would fight against these rascals. Sometimes as Pratap, sometimes as Shivaji, sometimes as Guru Gobindji and countless many.

But now we are offering milk to snakes like Yakub. We are now totally unprepared to face the even graver threats that loom upon us.

We cite Supreme Court judgment to defend our “fundamental right” to watch porn and clog the drains. But we question the same Supreme Court and judicial system for meting justice to a terrorist. 

Agniveer is committed to live the legacy of missile-man by being a nemesis of terror and terror-sympathizers. Join us in this spirit if you too love the nation. There is no other way.

Nothing Found

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help revive Dharma.

Disclaimer:  We believe in "Vasudhaiv Kutumbakam" (entire humanity is my own family). "Love all, hate none" is one of our slogans. Striving for world peace is one of our objectives. For us, entire humanity is one single family without any artificial discrimination on basis of caste, gender, region and religion. By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. Please read Full Disclaimer.
  • Dear Vashi,
    You are either ignorant or trying to spread hatred with poor understanding of International Scenarios.

    Who Created Al-Qaeda and Why?
    Who helped Pakistan to destabilize India via Kashmir?
    Who Helped Saddam to fight Iran and Later attacked?
    Who supported Kashmiri by Aram/Logistics/Money??

    You need to understand that Rich emperors of Middle East are Spreading the Extremism for their Regime and International Politics of Oil is leading to Extreme deaths globally and Especially in Middle East.

    Muslims have been kept deprived of “education” (M not talking of India) by So called “Islamic Regimes”.

    Crime is crime-Be it Gujrat Pre/Post Godhra or anything and there should be Diarrhea and Vomitting in defending either of these to a true Human.
    I hope, instead of undue explanation, you with ur knowledge, will try to spread Harmony not Hatred.

    Look on Middle East-They all belong to one religion but the “Differences/Hatred created by their Mullah/Kings have led to killing on day to day basis with no development.

    Only that country will grow which allows and believe in Tolerance/Co-existence.

    Rest-Your’s choice

    • Lets not make it hindu muslim please. Lets 1st examine how muslims treated muslims from history that i could easily recollect. From the so called golden era of islam to ottoman empire.

      • The Quran describes Muslims as being nice to each other and harsh against the unbelievers (Q. 48:29 “Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves…”). Some may argue that it is wrong and unfair to look only at the Muslims’ harsh side and make a judgementThe Rashidun (the rightly guided) Era

        There are conflicting reports about the nature of Muhammad’s death. Some Muslims insist it was a natural death while others (including Muhammed himself ) believed he was poisoned by a Jewish woman (probably a convert to Islam). Some even accuse Abu Bakr and Omar of plotting to assassinate Muhammad towards the end of his life. Muslims’ split regarding succession surfaced immediately after their leader’s death and remains unresolved up to the present day. Abu Bakr’s era was marked with the a blood bath ( the Ridda wars) on a scale Arabia never experienced before.*
        The third rightly guided Caliph Uthman, was badly tortured and murdered in a horrific way by fellow Muslims in the year 656 AD. The uprising against Uthman was instigated by Ayesha, who accused him of becoming a kafir who must be killed! Ironically, she later used Uthman’s murder to instigate another uprising against the next Caliph, Ali, whom she accused of being not harsh enough against the murderers.

        * In 656 AD, Ayesha led a failed rebellion against Ali, the fourth rightly guided Caliph. As a result, over ten thousand Muslims were killed by fellow Muslims in the battle of ‘the Camel’.

        * In 657AD, around seventy thousands Muslims were killed by fellow Muslims when Mu’aweya led a rebellion against the fourth rightly guided Caliph Ali.

        * In 659 AD, the fourth rightly guided Caliph Ali had to suppress another rebellion by fellow Muslims at ‘the Nahrawan’ battle. Again, thousands of Muslims were killed by fellow Muslims.

      • * The fourth rightly guided Caliph Ali was murdered by fellow Muslims in 661 AD while praying in a mosque in Kufa (in Iraq)

        * Caliph Al Hassan Ibn Ali ( Muhammad’s grandson) was in effect forced to abdicate only six months after his reign and was poisoned (instigated by Mu’aweya) and died in Medina in 670 AD

        * Imam Al Hussain Ibn Ali ( Muhammad’s youngest grandson) was killed with vengeance, and beheaded, in 680 AD, by Muslim troops acting on the orders of Yazid Ibn Mu’aweya. Seventy three members of his family ( almost all of Muhammad’s descendants) were also murdered that same day.

        The Umayyad’s Era

        * In 683 AD, 11,000 Muslims were killed by fellow Muslims in Medina. Yazid Ibn Mu’aweya, the Umayyad Caliph, dispatched his ruthless military General Muslim Ibn Ukba to suppress an uprising in Medina. The general “istabaha” (an Islamic term that means “to allow” with no consequent punishment) the city for three days, allowing his soldiers to do whatever they wished of killing, looting etc. Muslim Ibn Ukba converted Mohammed’s mosque, which is the second holiest mosque in Islam, to a stable for his horses to eat, drink, urinate and defecate (imagine what would happen in the world all over if America does that!!).

        * In 684 AD, the Umayyad army proceeded to Mecca. The Kaaba was bombarded with ‘manjaniq’ (a projectile throwing device, or catapult, used to destroy castles and walls) and was burnt.

        * In 685 AD Caliph Marwan Ibn Al Hakam was killed by fellow Muslims.

        * Again in 692 AD, the Umayyad Caliph Abdul Malik Ibn Marwan sent his ruthless General Al Hajjaj Ibn Yousif who surrounded the city of Mecca and bombarded the Kaaba with ‘manjaniq’.

        * In 692 Abdulla Ibn Zubair, who was a great Sahabi and highly esteemed figure, with many followers in Medina and Mecca (who recognized him as the true Caliph), was killed by fellow Muslims.

        * In 720 AD, the Umayyad Caliph Omar Ibn Abdul Aziz was killed by fellow Muslims.

      • In 740 AD, the Umayyad Caliph Hisham Ibn Abdul Malik ordered the killing of Zaid Ibn Ali (a direct descendant of Mohammed ). The body was crucified and placed on the gallows completely naked, some say for years.

        * In 744AD, the Umayyad Caliph Al Waleed Ibn Yazid was killed by fellow Muslims.

        * In 750 AD, the Umayyad Caliph Ibrahim Ibn Al Waleed was killed by fellow Muslims

        * In 750 AD, The last Umayyad Caliph, Marwan II was killed by fellow Muslims.

        What? Its not even 100 years since start of islam… The abbasid history i havent started yet. I havent written any rhing of during mohammeds time otherwise i would have to take pain killers for days for my typing fingers already have started hurting.
        I can see no version of peace any where. Not even between muslims and muslims.
        Ok, lets say you ask me 1 century when muslims were peaceful… just guess it or say it. I will show you a thousand reasons why you are wrong about that century.
        You know what, i would love to be a muslim.
        Why dont you join me on faithfreedom.org and convert me. This site has too many restrictions. Brother, its your duty as per allah to present your dawah to non muslims. So plz come there. There are many people who want to convert to islam. May peace be upon you.

  • You make yourself ridiculous. If they are deleting your comments, then how come this one in which you are expressing your true nature has not been deleted? The world has changed now, we don’t need any burak to go to heaven.

    • This site gives limits to how much you can write, what you can write and is not that user friendly. Many comments are not allowed which are considered to be inappropriate by the editors of this site. This isnt freedom of expression or freedom of speech, for freedom actually means THE RIGHT TO OFFEND. If some one doesnt like it, he can go to some other page. So my dear muslim friends, as you have rightly pointed out, this site seems to be biased? So, why dont you present your dawah on faithfreedom.org where people will listen to everything you say without restriction and may even convert to islam. Where nothing, no matter how offensive or absurd it is not deleted. Its freedom to express your faith at the best. So plz go there, as this is a predominantly hindu nationalistic site.

  • इन बेवकूफों को अपनी पागलों की जन्नत में जीने दो शब्बीर साहब। इनको अपनी नफरतो में जलने दो। इनके पास कुछ पॉजिटिव नही यह बहुत ही ज़हरीला ग्रुप हे। इन पागलो के हिसाब से ट्रेन बाहर से बन्द हो सकती है और अंदर के लोग जल जायेंगे लकिन बाहर नही आएंगे बल्कि ढेर बने मिलेंगे।

  • Rajan agniveer and raj.hyd
    plz post the contents in English ,that is better learn the topics for all members of this site, i am from kerala ,i don’t know much about the Hindi…… And plz post ur [email protected] stand ,blindly posting stuff not make a sense……
    Thanka u….

  • , मैंने कुरान से मात्र 3 हवाला दिया है जो सूरा अयरफ =आयत = 54 =सूरा =सिजदा =आयत =4 =और सूरा =युनुस =आयत 3 =को लिखा हूँ और भी कई जगह मौजूद हैं, जैसा = सूरा हूद =आयत 7 = सूरा =फुरकान =आयत =59 = सूरा =हदीद =4 =कहाफ़ =आयत= 38 = में भी यही बताया गया है | मैंने अरबी =उर्दू =अंग्रेजी = और हिन्दी चार {4} भाषा में दिया हूँ पूरा पता भी दिया हूँ, कोई भी मिला कर देख लें | यह सभी प्रमाण कुरान से मिलने पर भी कोई कहें अल्लाह निराकार है तो दुनिया के अकलमंद लोग ही विचार कर सकते हैं, की इनलोगों का दिमागी सन्तुलन ठीक है

    • kuran 38/75 me to yah bhi aya hai ki kalpit kurani allh ne apn e”dono hatho ” se adam ko banaya hai ! arabi bhasha me ek vachan, do vachan aur bahu vachan hota hai isme dono hatho ka jikar hai
      kuran 39/67 me to kalpit kuran allah ” daye haath” me asman ko lapetne ka bhi daava karate hai
      isse bhi siddh hota hai ki kalpit kurani allah ek simit hai aur sharir dhari bhi hai ! jo sharir dhari ho vah kabhi ishvar nahi ho sakata hai !

      • raj you can’t understand anything so what is the benefit repeating same question for years? If u know Quran u must know that Quran says about Allah that laisa kamisli shayei ie no one is like Him or You can’t compare Him. Then how could we give u exact detail about how He looks?

  • ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﯽ ﻧﮩﮟ a ( ٢ ‏) ﮐﺎ ﺍﺱ ﭘﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﺗﻢ ﻧﺼﺤﺘﺪ ﺣﺎﺻﻞ ﻧﮩﮞﺶ ﮐﺮﺗﮯ
    Allah is the One who created the heavens and the earth and all that is between them in six days, then He positioned Himself on the Throne. Other than Him, there is neither a guardian for you, nor an intercessor. Would you then not observe the advice?
    अल्लाह ही है जिसने आकाशों और धरती को और जो कुछ दोनों के बीच है छह दिनों में पैदा किया। फिर सिंहासन पर विराजमान हुआ। उससे हटकर न तो तुम्हारा कोई संरक्षक मित्र है और न उसके मुक़ाबले में कोई सिफ़ारिस करनेवाला। फिर क्या तुम होश में न आओगे?
    ﺍِﻥَّ ﺭَﺑَّﻜُﻢُ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱْ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤٰﻮٰﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﺭْﺽَ ﻓِﻲْ ﺳِﺘَّﺔِ ﺍَﻳَّﺎﻡٍ ﺛُﻢَّ ﺍﺳْﺘَﻮٰﻯ ﻋَﻠَﻲ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ﻳُﺪَﺑِّﺮُ ﺍﻟْﺎَﻣْﺮَ ۭﻣَﺎ ﻣِﻦْ ﺷَﻔِﻴْﻊٍ ﺍِﻟَّﺎ ﻣِﻦْۢ ﺑَﻌْﺪِ ﺍِﺫْﻧِﻪٖ ﺫٰﻟِﻜُﻢُ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺭَﺑُّﻜُﻢْ ﻓَﺎﻋْﺒُﺪُﻭْﻩُ ۭ ﺍَﻓَﻠَﺎ ﺗَﺬَﻛَّﺮُﻭْﻥَ Ǽ ۝ ﺑﻼ ﺷﺒﮧ ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﺍ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻧﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺯﻣﻨﻰ ﮐﻮ ﭼﮫ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﮞﺐ ﭘﺪَﺍ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺎ ﭘﮭﺮ ﻋﺮﺵ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺍ ‏( ١ ‏) ﻭﮦ ﮨﺮ ﮐﺎﻡ ﮐﯽ ﺗﺪﺑﺮْ ﮐﺮﺗﺎ ﮨﮯ ‏( ٢ ‏) ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﺍﺟﺎﺯﺕ ﮐﮯ ﺑﻐﺮﺍ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﭘﺎﺱ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺵ ﮐﺮﻧﮯ ﻭﺍﻻ ﻧﮩﮟَ ‏( ٣ ‏) ﺍﯾﺴﺎ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﺍ ﺭﺏ ﮨﮯ ﺳﻮ ﺗﻢ ﺍﺱ ﮐﯽ ﻋﺒﺎﺩﺕ ﮐﺮﻭ ‏( ٤ ‏) ﮐﺎ ﺗﻢ ﭘﮭﺮ ﺑﮭﯽ ﻧﺼﺤﺘﯽ ﻧﮩﮞﮏ ﭘﮑﮍﺗﮯ۔
    Surely, your Lord is Allah, the One who created the heavens and the earth in six days, and then He positioned Himself on the Throne. He governs all affairs (of His creation). There is no one who could intercede before Him, except after His permission. That is Allah, your Lord. So, worship Him. Would you still pay no heed?
    निस्संदेह तुम्हारा रब वही अल्लाह है, जिसने आकाशों और धरती को छः दिनों में पैदा किया, फिर सिंहासन पर विराजमान होकर व्यवस्था चला रहा है। उसकी अनुज्ञा के बिना कोई सिफ़ारिश करनेवाला भी नहीं है। वह अल्लाह है तुम्हारा रब। अतः उसी की बन्दगी करो। तो क्या तुम ध्यान न दोगे?
    और भी कई जगह अल्लाह ने कुरान में ज़िक्र फ़रमाया है, मैंने कुरान से मात्र 3 हवाला दिया है जो सूरा अयरफ =आयत = 54 =सूरा =सिजदा =आयत =4 =और सूरा =युनुस =आयत 3 =को लिखा हूँ और भी कई जगह मौजूद हैं, जैसा = सूरा हूद =आयत 7 = सूरा =फुरकान =आयत =59 = सूरा =हदीद =4 =कहाफ़ =आयत= 38 = में भी यही बताया गया है | मैंने अरबी =उर्दू…

  • || कुरानी अल्लाह निराकार नही है प्रमाण देखें ||
    कुरान के मानने वाले इसलाम मतावलम्बी, मानते हैं कुरान का अल्लाह निराकार है, जो कुरान के ही खिलाफ हैं,देखें कुरान में ही अल्लाह ने क्या कहा है |
    ﺍِﻥَّ ﺭَﺑَّﻜُﻢُ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱْ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤٰﻮٰﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﺭْﺽَ ﻓِﻲْ ﺳِﺘَّﺔِ ﺍَﻳَّﺎﻡٍ ﺛُﻢَّ ﺍﺳْﺘَﻮٰﻯ ﻋَﻠَﻲ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ﻳُﻐْﺸِﻲ ﺍﻟَّﻴْﻞَ ﺍﻟﻨَّﻬَﺎﺭَ ﻳَﻄْﻠُﺒُﻪٗ ﺣَﺜِﻴْﺜًﺎ ﻭَّﺍﻟﺸَّﻤْﺲَ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻘَﻤَﺮَ ﻭَﺍﻟﻨُّﺠُﻮْﻡَ ﻣُﺴَﺨَّﺮٰﺕٍۢ ﺑِﺎَﻣْﺮِﻩٖ ۭﺍَﻟَﺎ ﻟَﻪُ ﺍﻟْﺨَﻠْﻖُ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﻣْﺮُ ۭ ﺗَﺒٰﺮَﻙَ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺭَﺏُّ ﺍﻟْﻌٰﻠَﻤِﻴْﻦَ 54 ؀ ﺑﺸﮏَ ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﺍ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﺳﺐ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻧﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺯﻣﻦً ﮐﻮ ﭼﮫ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﮟّ ﭘﺪﺗﺎ ﮐﺎﻕ ﮨﮯ ‏( ١ ‏) ﭘﮭﺮ ﻋﺮﺵ ﭘﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺍ ‏( ٢ ‏) ﻭﮦ ﺭﺍﺕ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻥ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﭼﮭﭙﺎ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﻭﮦ ﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺱ ﺩﻥ ﮐﻮ ﺟﻠﺪﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺁ ﻟﯿﺎﻥ ﮨﮯ ‏( ٣ ‏) ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﺝ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭼﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﺮﮮ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻭﮞ ﮐﻮ ﭘﺪ ﺍ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﮐﮧ ﺳﺐ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺣﮑﻢ ﮐﮯ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﮨﮞﯽ ۔ ﯾﺎﺩ ﺭﮐﮭﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﯽ ﮐﮯ ﻟﺌﮯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﮨﮯ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﮨﻮﻧﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺣﺎﮐﻢ ﮨﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﮍﯼ ﺧﻮﺑﻮﺩﮞ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﺮﺍ ﮨﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺟﻮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﮐﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﮨﮯ۔
    Surely, your Lord is Allah who created the heavens and the earth in six days, then He positioned himself on the Throne. He covers the day with the night that pursues it swiftly. (He created) the sun and the moon and the stars, subjugated to His command. Lo! To Him alone belong the creation and the command. Glorious is Allah, the Lord of all the worlds.
    निस्संदेह तुम्हारा रब वही अल्लाह है, जिसने आकाशों और धरती को छह दिनों में पैदा किया – फिर राजसिंहासन पर विराजमान हुआ। वह रात को दिन पर ढाँकता है जो तेज़ी से उसका पीछा करने में सक्रिय है। और सूर्य, चन्द्रमा और तारे भी बनाए, इस प्रकार कि वे उसके आदेश से काम में लगे हुए है। सावधान रहो, उसी की सृष्टि है और उसी का आदेश है। अल्लाह सारे संसार का रब, बड़ी बरकतवाला है
    ﺍَﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱْ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤٰﻮٰﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﺭْﺽَ ﻭَﻣَﺎ ﺑَﻴْﻨَﻬُﻤَﺎ ﻓِﻲْ ﺳِـﺘَّﺔِ ﺍَﻳَّﺎﻡٍ ﺛُﻢَّ ﺍﺳْﺘَﻮٰﻱ ﻋَﻠَﻲ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ۭ ﻣَﺎ ﻟَﻜُﻢْ ﻣِّﻦْ ﺩُﻭْﻧِﻪٖ ﻣِﻦْ ﻭَّﻟِﻲٍّ ﻭَّﻟَﺎ ﺷَﻔِﻴْﻊٍ ﺍَﻓَﻠَﺎ ﺗَﺘَﺬَﻛَّﺮُﻭْﻥَ Ć ۝
    ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﻭﮦ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻨﮏ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﻮ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻣﻦ ﮨﮯ ﺳﺐ ﮐﻮ ﭼﮫ ﺩﻥ ﻣﮞﻢ ﭘﺪﮞﺎ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺎ ﭘﮭﺮ ﻋﺮﺵ ﭘﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺍ ‏( ١ ‏) ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﮮ ﻟﺌﮯ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺳﻮﺍ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﻣﺪﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﯽ ﻧﮩﮟ a ( ٢ ‏)…

  • TODAY HINDU FOLLOW POLYTHEISM (ITS ACTUALLY A DUPLICATE HINDUISM)
    ORIGINAL HINDUISM PROMOTE MONOTHEISM

    Worship is for whom? For God! Who will define about God? God himself! Does God define himself in his revealed scripture? YES – this is the most fundamental part of the revelation. Vedas are considered to be ish-wani or God’s word by hindus. They are considered apaurishya i.e. not humane but divine. Now what God has said about him? A true hindu should ponder over these mantras and introspect their practice:

    * Na tasya pratima asti yasya namah mahaddashah : “Of him (The God) there is no image. Remembering him is itself great act” Yajurved 32:3

    * God can not be grasped in any direction” Yajurved 32:2

    * Sah akayam: “He is bodiless” Yajurved 40:8

    * Andhatm pravishanti ya asambhti upaste… – “Those who worship asambhuti – they enter into darkness of tamas (part of hell). Those who worship sambhuti – they enter more into darkness of tamas (part of hell)”- Yajurved 40:9

    The Sanskrit word asambhuti when loosely translated into simple language will refer to Natural things e.g. Sun, air, water, moon, tree, river, mountain, man, woman, animal.
    The Sanskrit word sambhuti when loosely translated into simple language will refer to man made things e.g. idol.
    The Sanskrit word “tamas” as per Sayanaacharya – the Vedic Scholar – refers to one of part of hell which is also described in Shrimadbhagwad Puran.

    So yajurved 40:9 tells that those who will do shirk (Associate partner with Almighty GOD) will enter hell. This is similar to what Quran says in 4:48; 4:116; 5:72

    * “That GOD alone is ONE without any partner.” – Atharv ved – 13:4:12

    * “GOD is the master of all creatures. He is the master of heavens and the Earth. Except him whom do you worship?”- Rigved 10:121:1

    * “GOD is the Ruler of living and non living worlds. He is the Lord of man kind and animal kingdom – Except him whom do you worship?” Rigved 10:121:3
    SO I WELCOME TO ALL HINDUS TO THEIR…

    • || कुरानी अल्लाह निराकार नही है प्रमाण देखें ||
      कुरान के मानने वाले इसलाम मतावलम्बी, मानते हैं कुरान का अल्लाह निराकार है, जो कुरान के ही खिलाफ हैं,देखें कुरान में ही अल्लाह ने क्या कहा है |
      ﺍِﻥَّ ﺭَﺑَّﻜُﻢُ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱْ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤٰﻮٰﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﺭْﺽَ ﻓِﻲْ ﺳِﺘَّﺔِ ﺍَﻳَّﺎﻡٍ ﺛُﻢَّ ﺍﺳْﺘَﻮٰﻯ ﻋَﻠَﻲ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ﻳُﻐْﺸِﻲ ﺍﻟَّﻴْﻞَ ﺍﻟﻨَّﻬَﺎﺭَ ﻳَﻄْﻠُﺒُﻪٗ ﺣَﺜِﻴْﺜًﺎ ﻭَّﺍﻟﺸَّﻤْﺲَ ﻭَﺍﻟْﻘَﻤَﺮَ ﻭَﺍﻟﻨُّﺠُﻮْﻡَ ﻣُﺴَﺨَّﺮٰﺕٍۢ ﺑِﺎَﻣْﺮِﻩٖ ۭﺍَﻟَﺎ ﻟَﻪُ ﺍﻟْﺨَﻠْﻖُ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﻣْﺮُ ۭ ﺗَﺒٰﺮَﻙَ ﺍﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺭَﺏُّ ﺍﻟْﻌٰﻠَﻤِﻴْﻦَ 54 ؀ ﺑﺸﮏَ ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﺍ ﺭﺏ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﯽ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﺳﺐ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻧﻮﮞ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺯﻣﻦً ﮐﻮ ﭼﮫ ﺭﻭﺯ ﻣﮟّ ﭘﺪﺗﺎ ﮐﺎﻕ ﮨﮯ ‏( ١ ‏) ﭘﮭﺮ ﻋﺮﺵ ﭘﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺍ ‏( ٢ ‏) ﻭﮦ ﺭﺍﺕ ﺳﮯ ﺩﻥ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﭼﮭﭙﺎ ﺩﯾﺘﺎ ﮨﮯ ﮐﮧ ﻭﮦ ﺭﺍﺕ ﺍﺱ ﺩﻥ ﮐﻮ ﺟﻠﺪﯼ ﺳﮯ ﺁ ﻟﯿﺎﻥ ﮨﮯ ‏( ٣ ‏) ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻮﺭﺝ ﺍﻭﺭ ﭼﺎﻧﺪ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺩﻭﺳﺮﮮ ﺳﺘﺎﺭﻭﮞ ﮐﻮ ﭘﺪ ﺍ ﮐﺎﺭ ﺍﯾﺴﮯ ﻃﻮﺭ ﭘﺮ ﮐﮧ ﺳﺐ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺣﮑﻢ ﮐﮯ ﺗﺎﺑﻊ ﮨﮞﯽ ۔ ﯾﺎﺩ ﺭﮐﮭﻮ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﮨﯽ ﮐﮯ ﻟﺌﮯ ﺧﺎﺹ ﮨﮯ ﺧﺎﻟﻖ ﮨﻮﻧﺎ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺣﺎﮐﻢ ﮨﻮﻧﺎ ﺑﮍﯼ ﺧﻮﺑﻮﺩﮞ ﺳﮯ ﺑﮭﺮﺍ ﮨﻮﺍ ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺟﻮ ﺗﻤﺎﻡ ﻋﺎﻟﻢ ﮐﺎ ﭘﺮﻭﺭﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﮨﮯ۔
      Surely, your Lord is Allah who created the heavens and the earth in six days, then He positioned himself on the Throne. He covers the day with the night that pursues it swiftly. (He created) the sun and the moon and the stars, subjugated to His command. Lo! To Him alone belong the creation and the command. Glorious is Allah, the Lord of all the worlds.
      निस्संदेह तुम्हारा रब वही अल्लाह है, जिसने आकाशों और धरती को छह दिनों में पैदा किया – फिर राजसिंहासन पर विराजमान हुआ। वह रात को दिन पर ढाँकता है जो तेज़ी से उसका पीछा करने में सक्रिय है। और सूर्य, चन्द्रमा और तारे भी बनाए, इस प्रकार कि वे उसके आदेश से काम में लगे हुए है। सावधान रहो, उसी की सृष्टि है और उसी का आदेश है। अल्लाह सारे संसार का रब, बड़ी बरकतवाला है
      ﺍَﻟﻠّٰﻪُ ﺍﻟَّﺬِﻱْ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺴَّﻤٰﻮٰﺕِ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺎَﺭْﺽَ ﻭَﻣَﺎ ﺑَﻴْﻨَﻬُﻤَﺎ ﻓِﻲْ ﺳِـﺘَّﺔِ ﺍَﻳَّﺎﻡٍ ﺛُﻢَّ ﺍﺳْﺘَﻮٰﻱ ﻋَﻠَﻲ ﺍﻟْﻌَﺮْﺵِ ۭ ﻣَﺎ ﻟَﻜُﻢْ ﻣِّﻦْ ﺩُﻭْﻧِﻪٖ ﻣِﻦْ ﻭَّﻟِﻲٍّ ﻭَّﻟَﺎ ﺷَﻔِﻴْﻊٍ ﺍَﻓَﻠَﺎ ﺗَﺘَﺬَﻛَّﺮُﻭْﻥَ Ć ۝
      ﺍﻟﻠﮧ ﺗﻌﺎﻟﯽٰ ﻭﮦ ﮨﮯ ﺟﺲ ﻧﮯ ﺁﺳﻤﺎﻥ ﻭ ﺯﻣﻨﮏ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺟﻮ ﮐﭽﮫ ﺍﻥ ﺩﺭﻣﺎﻣﻦ ﮨﮯ ﺳﺐ ﮐﻮ ﭼﮫ ﺩﻥ ﻣﮞﻢ ﭘﺪﮞﺎ ﮐﺮ ﺩﯾﺎ ﭘﮭﺮ ﻋﺮﺵ ﭘﺮ ﻗﺎﺋﻢ ﮨﻮﺍ ‏( ١ ‏) ﺗﻤﮩﺎﺭﮮ ﻟﺌﮯ ﺍﺱ ﮐﮯ ﺳﻮﺍ ﮐﻮﺋﯽ ﻣﺪﺩﮔﺎﺭ ﺍﻭﺭ ﺳﻔﺎﺭﺷﯽ ﻧﮩﮟ a ( ٢ ‏)…

    • @Shabeer,
      Stop quoting here and there from Vedas. It does not prove you to be a ‘know er’ of lot of stuff. If you have the balls, go to faithfreedom.org and show your ranting there. Before you even get qualified to talk about great things like Vedas or Hindu Dharma, do not expose your ignorance. Keep away and go to the link I mentioned above, if you have the balls.

    • @shabeer.
      as for yajur veda which you quoted to prove that we hindus are going against th Vedas and that we r idol worshippers, i ould urge you go go through the first verse:
      AGNI is That; the Sun is That; Vâyu and Chandramâs are
      That.
      The Bright is That; Brahma is That, those Waters, that
      Prajâpati.
      2 All twinklings of the eyelid sprang from Purusha,
      resplendent One.
      No one hath comprehended him above, across, or in the
      midst.
      3 There is no counterpart of him whose glory verily is great.
      In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, etc. Let not him
      harm me, etc. Than whom there is no other born, etc.
      4 This very God pervadeth all the regions; yea, born aforetime,
      in the womb he dwelleth.
      He verily born and to be born hereafter meeteth his offspring,
      facing all directions.

      the very first verse says that THAT(refering to God,since God is beyond senses) is agni,sun,waters,etc. This is related to the all pervasiveness of God; since he is all pervasive,every manifestion of nature, and mind, reflects an aspect/quality of God in a limited form.e.g., sun /agni represents God as light destroying darkness.since God is all pervasive as i said, he encompasses all these conceptions/manifesttions.thus when a person meditates on a form, he is meditating on an aspect encompassed by God (in a form, limited to our senses.).ths is like,to call a person i just tap one part(say,a finger) encompassed by that man.thus, when a person worships a form, he is worshipping God in an aspect pervaded/encompassed by God.
      coming to verse 3. the verse 3 does not say God has no images.if it said God has no images,then the previous verses cannot say ht God is waters,sun.etcbecause all these are forms/images. when you put the verse within the context which you understand from reading the previous two verses), the meaning is that God cannot be limited to one single form/manifestation, since he is all pervasive, all manifestations are rolled into him.as in, h has aspects that are within…

      • our sense of imagintion and beyond that-this is the meaning of “all pervasiveness” of God.thus the verse simply means that he cannot be fully represented by one image/manfestation and has aspects even beyond our imagination and manifestations representing those aspects.all these-aspects/nature/qualities of Godhead and manifestations representing them(like the examples of sun/agni as manifestations representing the aspect of light destroying darkness,which is an aspect of Godhead)are encpmpassed/pervaded by God.thus ONE CAN WORSHIP/MEDITATE on God in any of these forms/manifestations that represent an aspect of God.in Rig Veda,we find Agni eing worshipped as an earth based symbol of Godhead.

        thus, the verse whch you misquoted(yajur veda 32/3) does not prohibit image/form worship to God, it simply means hat God cannot be fully represented by one image,for his aspects exist beyond our conceptions also.what we see around can be taken as manifestations that represent those aspects which we can perceive/experience.nd since we are limited,we fix our minds an meditate on a limited form bearing in mind that it is a form that is encompassed by God,not an image that fully represents God.

        thus, bearing these above key points in mind, hiduism dosent really prohibit worship of God in forms-the only neccessity is that the forms in which you worship God should reflect an aspect of Godhead that you can perceive atleast in a limited quantity.

        most hidus fall prey to people like Zakir Naik when he shouts about “no idol worship in Vedas” because they do not know the basic ideas of God as per hinduism/vedic dharma. in the real Vedic dharma, God is represented in a million forms,each form representing an aspect of Godhead.thus all these manifestations/conceptions are disintegrated manifestations of God,in our field of perception.
        So when you quote the verses,read what is above it and understand it in the light of Vedic understanding of God as an all pervasive/all…

      • the remaining verse you quoted (i.e.Rig Veda 10/121/2,3 and atharva Veda 13/4/12) does not contradict what basic hindus even today belive.if you read what i have written above,all the forms are not distinct “gods”.but disintegrated manifestatios of the same supreme being.

      • Read my reply to Shabeer please. You have to understand when you are debating a muslim, his psyche on monotheism and the concept of “shirk” or having partners with allah is a ridiculous stupidity.
        God as per vedas is neither whimsical, nor partial, nor does he lack commonsense. It is immaterial whichever way humans worship him although vedic way is the most scientific, because he is supremely intelligent and can see through our intentions. This concept doesnt get into the head of muslims, whose god is narcissistic socio-psychopath and is merely an alter ego of Mohammed.
        Even in Bhagwad Gita Krishna says, that he assumes any name or form a devotee puts his faith into, and he himself delivers through that name and form. Look at the supreme conviction and confidence of Krishna and compare it with the narcissistic Allah who says ‘slay the disbelivers and idolators ‘and ‘strike out their heads’
        The difference between vedic and muslim monotheism is that, vedic literature focuses on SELF REALISATION, it is the humans who are in ignorance and need to get out of the misery and god helps in every and which way he can, to those who try to achieve it. In Islam, Allah is merely an alter ego of mohammed and cant stand any scrutiny or innovation. His name is only for namesakes and he is least concerned about self realisation of the soul, instead he is concerned only in propogation of his name and rule over the entire planet, whichever heinous or violent way, it doesnt matter. He is Muhammads blood and power lust, to rule all over world, not at all concerned about liberating souls or maintaining harmony in humanity, nature and animals. He is just a figment of imagination of Muhammad, deliberately created by him to justify his lust and violence. This has to be made clear and brought to the attention of muslims, after all they are humans too and need to get out of the misery imposed by Islam.

    • Every building rest on a foundation and before the invention of concrete all buildings were made of stone and they had at least four corner stones. However no one circumambulates around them touches them and kisses them. The Islamic ritual of hajj is stone worship, the most primitive form of idolatry.Animal worship is not irrational. It is not the animal that people worship but what they represent. Since life is considered to be the breath of God, all living beings are regarded as manifestations of God. Reverence for life is one way to worship God. If you love someone, you place his or her picture in a place you can look at. It is not the picture that you revere, but the person that it represents. The picture is a reminder of your loved one. It is a way you communicate with that person mentally and spiritually.

      • @shabeer No one, except perhaps Muhammad and his followers, is so dim witted to think a statue made of clay or wood or an animal is intrinsically sacred. The sacredness is in what they represent. Let me explain this with an example. Gold has intrinsic value, whereas paper money has no intrinsic value. The value of paper money is in what it represents. Likewise, the animals that some people regard as sacred are avatars. They are not considered to be intrinsically sacred. They are revered for the breath of God in them. The statues also are not deemed to be sacred. They represent a god much like a picture that reminds you of a loved one…

      • @shabeerWhat does the black stone in Ka’ba represent? Nothing! It is worshiped because it is believed to be intrinsically sacred. This is idolatry.

        The irony did not escape Umar. “Abdullah ibn Sarjis reported, “I saw the bald one, i. e. ‘Umar ibn Khattib (Allah be pleased with him), kissing the Stone and saying: By Allah. I am kissing with full consciousness of the fact that you are a stone and that you can neither do any harm nor good; and if I had not seen Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) kissing you, I would not have kissed you. [Muslim: 7: 2914]

        As you see, with a bit of rational thinking and commonsense, what Muslims lack miserably, we can conclude that Hindus are not idolaters, while Muslims are.
        If the black stone represented God, revering it would not have been idolatry. Worshiping an image of God does not negate His oneness. Since the Black Stone is not an avatar of God and is sacred in its own right, revering it is idolatry.

        When you face a stone during your prayer you worship that stone. God is everywhere. Why limit him to a place? If God is formless doesn’t it also mean that He is not restricted to one place? And why should the house of God’s be black? Shouldn’t it be at least white to represent his light and splendor? Black represents darkness, often associated with Satan.

      • Does it offend God if someone worships His avatars? We assume that God has more commonsense than humans. Will you be offended if you find out that in your absence your children had hung your picture on a wall, decorated it with flowers and every day stood in front of it speaking to you in their minds? Unless you are insane, not only you would not be offended, you would be pleased that they remembered you. God is not insane. Muhammad was. That is why he thought it is shirk to worship the avatars and images of God.

        Is it wrong to depict God? The nature of God is spirit and spirit is formless. But God can manifest Himself in any form he pleases and to us humans he often manifests Himself as a human.

  • @All Islamic terror groups have clearly put India as their ultimate agenda because they believe that doors of Heaven will open only after India is conquered and idol-worshippers are destroyed………
    THAT BIG FAT LIE , ISLAM EVER PROMOTE THE FORCED CONVERSION & BELIEF …..IS,BOKO,TALIBAN ARE NOT ISLAMIC ORGANISATION ,99% CONDEMED THEY R TERRORIST, SOME WESTERN POLITICIAN CONTROLLED ORGANISATION ,BEC’S FOR FEARING OF MASS CONVERSION TO ISLAM …………..
    WHO ARE NOT FORCED TO BELIEF?
    2:256 Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error.
    2: 272. Not upon you (Muhammad SAW) is their guidance, but Allah guides whom He wills. And whatever you spend in good, it is for yourselves, when you spend not except seeking Allah’s Countenance. And whatever you spend in good, it will be repaid to you in full, and you shall not be wronged.
    4:28 “If then they turn away, We have not sent thee as a guard
    over them. Thy duty is but to convey (the message).
    5: 92. And obey Allah and the Messenger (Muhammad SAW), and beware (of even coming near to drinking or gambling or Al¬Ansâb, or Al¬Azlâm, etc.) and fear Allah. Then if you turn away, you should know that it is Our Messenger’s duty to convey (the Message) in the clearest way.
    WHO ARE FORCED TO BELIEF?
    “Indra abides, humbling the neglecters of holy rites, in favour of those who observe them, and punishing those who turn away from his worship, in favour of those who are present with their praise).” [Rigveda 1/51/9]
    “Around us is the Dasyu, practicing no religious rites, not knowing us thoroughly, inhuman, following other laws. Baffle, you Slayer of the foe, the strength of this Daasa.” [Rigveda 10/22/8]
    Atharva Veda 11:2:23 Homage be paid him with ten Sakvari verses who stands established in the air’s mid-region, slaying non-sacrificing God-despisers!

    • dasyu is actually a metaphor of ignorance that makes one “brahmadvesha”,or”hate of God devotion”.for this ,read my post regarding the nature of dasyu from Rig Veda5/14 which i have explained in the comment section of the article “Aryan Invasion Theory, Vedas and Dravidians” in this website.the comment is dated 23 november 2015.in the light of the explanation to the word dasyu,dasyu represent the ignorance of man tha is destroyed by the light of agni(agni is the earth based reprsntation of the supreme being, and also as paramathma within the heart guiding a man with wisdom).integrating this understanding of dasyus with the verses above, indra destroys the dasyus within. the verses are not literal killing.

  • Muslims in India believed if yakum meman was a criminal ,judgment being moral ,but hanging only Muslim not make a sense ,eg) during gurarath riot (actually its not riots ,its a ” communal elimination ” ) 2000+ muslim died ,no punishment given to hindu terrorist group ,some brain dead fools people says to Muslim ,so what about the godra ? 1) Public people no right to punish the people (by law) ,terrorist broken all the limits ,so they no love the law and order,if something was happens ,govt ,police,court,law is there ,they will punish the criminals.
    2) godra attack there 254 Hindus died ,is it was a legal right to burn 2000+ muslim men/women/children……….?
    3)It is alleged that, on 27th February 2002, the fire in which 58 people were burnt alive in the S6 coach of the ill-fated Sabarmati Express was started from inside by pouring over 120 litres of petrol and alighting it as part of a pre-planned conspiracy. Jan Sangharsh Manch (JSM) has always maintained that the Godhra train burning incident was an unfortunate accident because of a spontaneous fire and was not a pre-planned conspiracy as alleged.
    –Read More http://www.truthofgujarat.com/did-the-fire-in-s6-coach-start-because-someone-poured-petrol-and-ignited-it/
    LIKE NO MORAL PUNISHMENT FOR:
    2008 Malegaon blasts
    Ajmer Dargah attack
    2007 Samjhauta Express bombings
    1999 Burning alive of Australian Christian missionary and his children
    2013 Muzaffarnagar riots
    Kandhamal riots
    Naroda Patiya massacre

  • Thanks Vashi bhaiya.I am from Bihar and I want to spread this movement in Bihar and Jharkhand on huge level.I am totally fluent in Bhojpuri,magahi and khortha.
    .
    .
    I am student of History and I can write many articles which will help this movement. I think you know,Even Hitler said that no movement can be succeeded without deep and true History whether it’s about patriotism or Reforms.Thank for reply again.

  • Also all muslim nations in the world need to become secular, pluralistic, and democratic. And any muslim in the muslim world who wishes to leave islam and convert to Hinduism or Arya Samaj or Yoga philosophy, or Christianity or Jewish, or become buddhists or Sikh or Jain, or Athiest should have the right to do so openly. Also they should have the right to spread their new non-muslim religion or philosophy or ideology openly in the muslim world.

  • “I am unambiguous in my belief. Anyone who attended the funeral of this terrorist is a potential terrorist. Anyone who glorified this terrorist is a potential threat to humanity. Agniveer has no mercy for such threats.”

    – I agree with you 100%. All those people going to his funeral and journalists glorifying him should be put in jail.

  • Perfect reply as usual. As you mentioned that the biggest worry now is that we have come to a stage where we are glorifying our killers. I hope Dawood is not brought to India. If they, I wont be surprised if he becomes a MLA or MP. You might know that a Muslim member of Samajwadi Party requested Mulayam to make Yakoob’s wife a MLA. Dont be surprised if she becomes on in the next elections. I guess, there will be more than only party for her to choose from.

    • @Sarfaraz

      1. Babu Bajrangi is in jail. Get the facts straight. He was not hanged because court did not give him death sentence. If you have problems w/ courts, refer point 1 of article.

      2. Next time before you comment on this site, make sure you have read disclaimer http://agniveer.com/about-agniveer/disclaimer/

      3. Next time before you comment, make sure you maintain difference b/w your mouth and gutter. Going to someone else’s place and hurling abuses shows poor upbringing and ill mental health. It will get you banned here. So take caution.

      • @vashi ,

        Ok sorry sir if you felt bad. But do u think the terrorists involved in gujrat roits should also be hanged who are responsible for killing of thousand of innocent Muslims.

        I dont see anywhere in this site talking against Hindu terrorist. Maoist also killed somany muslims but no where you talk againt them in this site. Only Muslims and Christians are being targeted in this site.

        Yaqoob or who ever kill innocent human being should be hanged, including hindu terrorists.

      • What about who caused the gujrat roits. The muslims who started it should be put in jail. You muslims always ignore the fact that the riots were started when a train full of Hindus were burned alive.

      • The instigation of roits was fully planned and it was revealed that the train was burnt from inside not from out side. Obviously this was planned by Hindu terrorist not muslims.

      • Actually the facts prove that the so called theory of burned from inside was made up by the congress party. The government just got one of the muslims responsible for burning the train. Also two of the leaders of the riots in Gujarat were muslims. They were attacking rival muslim groups. It was a turf war between muslims.

      • Also it is pretty suspicious that muslims come up with a convenient claim that the train burned down from inside, when it was Hindu pilgrimages that were on it, and it happened right next to a mob of muslims. Think about that one. You guys cannot even admit your wrongs. That is the problem. Look at all your muslim nations. Not one is secular, pluralistic, and secular. Not one. All of them are centers of hate.

      • Vashi- You are just trying to be Self Proclaimed Only Knowledgable person and rest of all who don’t agree with you are either traitor/fool/person with no knowledge.
        What you can’t define or explain , you become intolerant.

        Who is Yaqoob?? Planner of Murder and Hanged at last.
        Why Govt of India allowed him to be buried?? Ask the court and would you like to say the court a traitor/Anti National?? So, the peoples who were part of last journey were neither potential terrorist nor traitor.

        You will explain it for your satisfactions.
        Have some tolerance. Have balances or it will be clear that you are suffering from Obsessive-Compulsive disorder.

      • Aman, i cant understand your logic. This isnt an islamic country, where burying of non muslims or traitors is forbidden. Here, even if it is a terrorist or a pakistani, the constitution provides for a proper last rites according to the beliefs of a person. Also, courts cannot condemn the loved ones of yakoob for no reason, so he was allowed burial. What pertubes me is that so many muslims die daily, i used to work in sion hospital and all these poor muslims who died, their dead bodies were managed by the municipality. No body comes for them. But for an established mass murderer and a traitor, such a large mob comes to express solidarity and sympathy. You aman wont go to another muslims procession in your own town if you dont know him, but then why such a large mob, many of whom came from far far away places and didnt know yakub or his family personally came for his janaza? What is the commonality, the sympathy, the solidarity that you are expressing at his death? He stood for terrorism. He stood for killing of hundreds of innocents. He stood for communal divide. He stood for black money. He stood for helping pakistan do its bidding against india. So you can see what this mob is expressing solidarity with.

  • Hey Vashi

    Thanks for your article. I fully support you. Terrorism do not belong to any religion. Every indian should wake up and should not tolerate terrorism of any type. Killing innocent people is the most cowardice action. It should be met with severe punishment. There should not be any doubt to eradicate terrorism and any support of it. In USA, just after 9-11, Collin Powell passed the statement that the US will target terrorists, those who harbor them and those who inspire them. Therefore, clerics are not allowed to get away with hateful incitement to vilify and kill people. Only a comprehensive zero tolerance campaign would help to eradicate it.

  • I want to talk with Sanjeev Agniveer..my mobile no. is 07280953896….Plz let him know about it,I am sure that he will talk with me.Thanks

  • I appreciate Agniveer stand…wherever I go I work for Agniveer by spreading consciousness in youth.I am true volunteer of you.#Rajan Agniveer