We are attaching the Urdu translation of Noor-e-Haq (Satyarth Prakash in Hindi) for public consumption. No book has influenced the direction of modern Hindustan than this magnum opus by Prophet Rahmanurrahimi (Swami Dayanand Sarswati) published first in 1883. Some of the practices and trends of today that seem so ordinary were in fact initiated in recent times from inspirations of this book. Some of the examples are: Equal Social, Religious and Political Rights for women, Rejection of birth-based caste discrimination, Cow Protection Movement, Concept of Swadesh and Freedom Movement and establishing that True Deen and Science go hand in hand. Not to say about Back to Vedas or original Quran message!
Ram Prasad Bismil wrote in his autobiography that Noor-e-Haq overturned his life!
This Urdu translation has been done by Atmaram Amritsari While it is impossible to translate such a deep meaning work in Urdu, the translator has done a commendable job. However there are certain areas where the translator has not been able to adequately represent the views of the author. In fact I personally believe that a revised translation cum commentary on Noor-e-Haq as per modern life and language is much needed. Nonetheless we request all serious lovers of Deen to read this book at least once.
Prophet Rahman (PBUH) says that: Just as Allah has infinite potentials, similarly He has infinite names. But all these names refer to same One and Only One Omnipotent Omnipresent Omniscient Just Kind Unborn Undying Perfect Allah. – Noor-e-Haq Chapter 1
May we conduct noble deeds to seek blessings of Allah for self and world. Love all, Hate none. Peace Be Upon All.
Urdu-Noor-e-Haq Light of Truth
About Agniveer
I personally feel that those Muslims who revert to their mother religion i.e Hinduism in Shuddi programmes must be presented with a copy of this book. Muslims are good in Urdu and the book in Urdu would show them the true Dharma and also convince them how miserable their living was until they returned to their mother religion. Agniveer must think over this. Funds necessary for this purpose must be raised from Public who are sympathetic to Vedic cause.
@Agniveer,
As the comment by Aryaveer, I opine that this book be presented to all the families reverting to the Vedic dharma. I think acopy for a family should be good enough and economical too compared to distributing it to every person reverted. It will help consolidating their faith in the Vedic religion and safeguarding them from reverting to Islam again as the Fanatics will try their level best. Moreover, it will help in bringing back more brothers and sisters to their ancestrol home i.e. Hinduism.
Krinvanto Vishvamaryam
Hi Agniveer,
I think the Shuddi force should not be limited to the sub-continent. People of all races and places need this movement. I can tell you there are many in America that are interested in Vedic Hinduism. Many Whites, Blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and people from all backgrounds. Please start the movement in America as well. It is our duty as Dharmic brothers and sisters to bring anyone who is interested in the Dharmic faith to help them come in. We are committing a great sin if we don’t make this happen. Also this will provide a group amount of resources of people to help with the Shuddi movement in India.
Dhanyavad,
Krishna
Dear KalBhairav,
“There is no need of regular prophets from time to time which the latest prophet being more correct than the previous prophet.”
I couldn’t have said it better myself. The Dharmic belief perspective of the world is vastly different than the weak and false perspective the abrahamic view. Dharmic view is more universal. Unlike the abrahmic people who believe in prophets while the Dharmic people believe in Rishis. The clear difference is prophets are history centric while Rishis are not. This probably is the hardest thing for abrahmic people to understand. And that is why you have so called scholars, but I call them weirdios and fools from the abrahmic side that mistranslate Sanskrit words because they don’t understand the actual meaning behind the words.
Most people know that prophet is someone who comes that one time a long freekin time ago with a so called message of god and that becomes the word. No else can be that prophet except that particular person. More important, no one else can experience the same thing that so called prophet experience. Good example would be, if a so called prophet made a fantastic claim like, I received the word of god and it will be delivered to me by this fairy/angel for a length of twenty years and I will put it in a book and everyone must believe it because it is the message of god, people must believe in this fairy tail. There is no way for them to check it out for themselves. This so called prophet does not teach other people how to receive this same message through an angel as well. Because it is limited to the prophet. Making the prophet concept a very limited and unverifiable concept.
With the Rishi concept, which is the Dharmic view of everything is much different. If there is a fantastic claim that a Rishi makes, he or she knows it all comes down to experience. What that Rishi experienced must be re-experienced by others so it maybe proved for every single individual. If a Rishi claims that he or she received a message from a fairy or…
If a Rishi claims that he or she received a message from a fairy or angel, than he will show all his followers how to reproduce that same experience. This also goes for the Vedas. Depending on which Hindu group you ask, it was produced by at least four different Rishis. Some might say many more. That means the ideas in the Vedas were reproduced by different people who experienced the same thing and it was verifiable. And again it depends on which group of Hindus you ask this too. But many Hindus do believe there is no such thing as the word of god. Only the inspired word of God. For God does not talk to man, but God only inspires man. That is key point to understand. And that is the Dharmic way to look at things.
Another good example from another Dharmic brother is Buddha. The word Buddha means awakened. And Buddha points out that there were many Buddha before me and will be many Buddhas after me. What I have achieved and experience has been experienced by many many before me and will be experience after me. The difference is, the abrhamic view is exclusive while the Dharmic experience is inclusive when it comes to the experience of major characters of the faith. And this is probably the most important thing that most abrahamic religions do not understand about Dharmic religions. Many followers of the abrhamic view are caught up so much in history centrism and arguments with historical proofs and ect, but forget the ultimate proof is for us to experience the the same thing the person claiming to make extraordinary achievements and experiences is making. If we can’t experience the same thing and that means to receive the so called word of god for ourselves so we can independently check it for ourselves then the so called prophets are bullshit. That is why I go with the Rishi view of the world. At least there is a chance for me to be inspired by God myself and independently check the experience myself and see if the Rishis are telling the truth. And in ancient India that Rishis encouraged that. Even Buddha,…
And in ancient India that Rishis encouraged that. Even Buddha, who was a great Rishi, encouraged his followers to do the same thing. Experience it for yourself brothers and sisters. That is the only truth that can be.
To all my abrahmic brothers and sisters, ask yourself this, can you still follow your faiths if you removed the history from you faith. I mean everything. Better way to put it, can you be a good christian without jesus and reach god. Can you be a good muslim with out mohammed and still reach god. This is very important thing to keep in mind. Because in the Dharmic tradition we remove all the history and historical figures and still reach God. It is the methods and techniques that are important. Not the historical characters of our faith. We can remove Krishna and Rama and still achieve God. That is the power of Dharam.
Dhanyavad,
Krishna
I must say….great minds are at work behind Agniveer.com. Kudos.
Dear All,
You will find befitting response to all the false allegations laid by Agniveer, on http://www.islamhinduism.com. Please go through both the sites and decide yourself what is truth and what is falsehood. Don’t be biased please. Thanks. Your wellwisher
Dear Anusyed!
I have seen both the websites and after detailed analysis, am here. That Mushafiq Sultan – site creator very beautifully promotes violence as per Quran. We Hindus aren’t blind followers of Agniveer. Many people here claim to be Hindu but are against some of points of Agniveer. But Muslims like Sultan are blind followers of Quran. This was clear from his post on Quran. In one post, he pointed commentary by Patanjali to show Atharvaveda is interpolated. Patanjali himself mentions in beginning that he only took those shlokas which he found important. So, Sultan only took commentary just to decieve Vedas / agniveer. I commented the same there — 5 times. He deleted –> this proves that he is none other than Satan. Regarding his credibility, please ask the same to knowledgeable champions like KalBhairav, Apollo Reach, Truth Seeker etc. Their many comments were deleted just because Sultan did not know the answer. Sultan was told to directly challenge Agniveer but he refused being afraid of his lies getting exposed – so he created his own website & doing so there. Forget Sultan, his own favorite ZN’s teacher Abdulla Tariq was defeated in Arya Samaj debate.
In the short run, people like Sultan are winners but in the long run, peace supporter Agniveer is true Muslim & not these idiots who claim to know Islam. May be this can guide you.
Dear Anusyed,
I have gone thorough both the sites and decided that there is no point in reading the articles of a jehadi and an intellectual dishonest (mushfiq)man.
Thank You.
@Anusyed
Could you please ask them to answer these questions
1. Is guru nanak a prophet?, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad a prophet?
2. if yes does that mean last words of muhammad is wrong? If no why?
Thanks
Strange Story of a the cow:
This is an ex-muslim site on youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/user/CEMBadmins
They are located in England.
There is another excellent video channel on youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/user/FightIslamToday?feature=watch#p/u/9/CoeQ8qWdT34
At the very bottom, they have the links for “CHANNELS WITH GREAT VIDEOS AND / OR INFO”. MUST SEE …
Their job is eliminate non human faiths – for example: Islam.
All interested can also visit
prophetofdoom.net
Namaste Agniveer & all Veer Hindus,
I am studying Islam and Vedas since a decade and has came to the conclusion that indeed Quran contains the Vedic teachings and presents it in a more standard and subtle form. Afterall Muhammad is a tonne year senior than Dayanand!
Here people are speaking bad of the Islamic concept of God and Prophet and vis-s-vis referring Allah as the God in Vedas (see Agniveer’s facebook page also) that is but only their kid’s approach of mental gratification. I am sure your these dichotomous approach will win nothing but hatred against you only. Yet I am sure you people are not having a missionary zeal but you are there only to count the convert’s figure so to report your NRI fund-givers/donors (so that you may exploit the name of your poor barren million years old dharma for your evil ends). I found you as fearful of Zakir Naik for whom I must tell you that he is stale now, better to check for Zaid Hamid. He is a one over your millions Pandits if you are bothering of the growing Muslim intelligentsia all over.
And yes, last but not the least, this Rajput Hindu has proudly accepted your ‘brutal Islam’ (as you illiterates used to refer). Afterall, it is the best religion I found who teaches to be ever ready to die for the truth and not to merely shouting a cowardice at the bank like you Hippocrates.
May the zeal of ALLAH be with you.
ALLAH hu Akabr.
Wassalam,
Rahil (Rahul) Bhadoria
@Rahil
I am studying Islam and blah blah….totally crap. You have not cited even a single reason of your believe in nonsense. perhaps, you are afraid that your 10 year research will get expose here.
Jokers like Zahil Hamid are in plenty in our country, many of them perform in circus. Let me know if you or your ustad wants to join them.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=86770&Cat=6&dt=1/10/2012
and read the above link. Help this guy(pakistani) in saving his kid from your ‘ever ready to die’ monsters. Fucking barbarians!
Shravak brother!
Have you noticed one thing. This is copy pasted to everywhere of Agniveer. This is a typical style of a Muslim NOT of a Hindu. I doubt whether this Rahul Bhadoria is Muslim with Hindu name. If idiot Muslims don’t know any method to challenge us, they do something like this.
If Rahul is a Rajput, read this true incident:
Muhammed Ghori was a Muslim ruler who wanted to rule Prithviraj Chauhan. Prithviraj defeated Muhammed Ghori but since he was brave – he did not believed in killing a captive. He only put Muhammed in jail from where Ghori ran away. Then he invaded once again which continued for 16 times. Muhammed then bribed commander in chief Jaychand to know the weakness of Muhammed as love towards cow. He then had cows marching ahead of his army. Prithviraj was afraid that he might injure a cow and surrendered. Muhammed immediately executed him & his followers. As a celebration, he butchered those cows too. If Prithviraj could have executed Muhammed well before, Islam may not have appeared in India. Only 1 message to those who think Islam is true – विनाशकाले विपरीत बुद्धी:।
wow islam taqiyyah in action. i cannot believe any word of a muslim since he speaks it out of ignorance , innocence , arrogance , inelegance .
if islam was really that great as per you , why did the muzzies invaded countries , waged meaningless wars , slaughtered , annihilated , enslaved , tortured , humiliated people and that too in the name of god allah and his creator mo-. dont tell me they were bad muzzies , they were devout muslims.
so the tell me why islam , the great religion of peace couldnt stop these atrocities.
maybe this site will enlighten ur soul >> http://www.oocities.org/hindoo_humanist/
and dont say its not true since it is all recorded by you muzzies. and since 9/11 there are about 15000 terrorist attacks all over the worlds and islam produced them and only it can produce so many. now what should we call this religion. and 15k is only after 911 and there are thousands of these even before. and all of them were inspired by quran.
and dont even compare quran with veda . its an insult to vedas. quran/hadiths is guide books to life for barbarians to lead a barbaric life in barbaric society where things like slavery , infidel killings, minority persecution seems pretty normal and its part of their life and they dont even feel a tiny bit of guilt.
quran : -
of the barbarians
by the barbarians
for the barbarians
Hi Rahul (If that is your real name),
I find it interesting you posted after I had posted the videos about someone leaving islam and the link to the council of exmuslims. I must have really boiled your blood to see both those posts so you respond back with this post. And honestly, I highly doubt you were even a student of Vedas and quran. I say this because if you were a student of the Vedas you would know Sanskrit. And I don’t think you are a Sanskrit scholar nor are you even knowledgeable in Sanskrit. And if you claim you are, post a video of yourself with your Sanskrit teacher talking in Sanskrit for several minutes about the detail contents of the Vedas. And after that, in that same video claim you are a muslim. During that video also state the Sanskrit school you are in and state the curriculum you learned. If you can’t do that, you are a clear fake.
I also find it interesting that you referenced caste. You said, “……this Rajput Hindu……” If you knew anything about the Vedas you will also know it does not support caste. And the word Rajput is not even in the Vedas. So you have also exposed yourself by referencing caste. I suggest you really study the Vedas and stop this nonsense.
I really find it suspicious of posting this post after the posting of my videos about exmuslims. I really think you were pretty pissed off that with the internet, Agniveer and the rest of the Dharmic community are hearing people who were once muslim leaving islam around the world. Like the African American gentlemen who has stated his views. Also, if you really understood the Vedas, you would also know, as mentioned in my previous statements, the key part about the Vedas, it is not history centric. It does not believe in the prophet concept at all. A mistake naik and others make about the Vedas is they try and tie history centrism to it. The Vedas state any individual have the ability to be enlightened by God and if someone makes fantastic claims, we as individuals must be able to confirm those experiences by…
Continued…..
The Vedas state any individual have the ability to be enlightened by God and if someone makes fantastic claims, we as individuals must be able to confirm those experiences by experiencing those same claims for ourselves. That is a very important part of the Vedas. So if a Rishi makes a claim he or she must show the us how he achieved those claims so we can experience it for ourselves. If a so called weirdo prophet made a claim that an fairy/angel came to him over a twenty year period then he must show everyone how he achieved it and so everyone else can receive the same thing from that fairy/angel and prove it to themselves. If so called weirdo prophet doesn’t show us how to do that, he is a charlatan. And I’m sorry, but your boy Mr. Mo did not show his followers how to receive the so called message of god from an fairy/angel to everyone. He kept that secret to himself so he can have all the power. Shows to me he is a big fat charlatan.
Take your hoodna takiyah self out of here.
Good video by another exmuslim and why he left:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra9QQ58b7JY&feature=plcp&context=C30abc1eUDOEgsToPDskJmWV2zq54ZtHZqbcokBd_a
Dhanyavad,
Krishna
Salam to all,
I am indebted to ALLAH who showed me the way of Paighambarshree Muhammad (pbuh) and is amazed with the modes-operandi of this agniveer’s bravery. Infact it is only a platform where the poor Hindus who dreamt of having their Hindu homeland with all the varnashrama vyavastha elements that they strive to establish with the inspiration from Israel comes just to SATISFY THEIR VENGEANCE only.
The first thing is that they lacks is the enthusiasms of sacrifice. They can only shout and could speak a bad of others that clearly reflects their silly attitude.
The second thing is that they accuse Muslims of being terrorist but are themselves spreading intellectual terror on this site and one another as Satyangi. (In Satyartha Prakash, Dayanand spoke a bad against Jainism, Budhdhism, Christianity and Islam and thought it as his mental superiority! Amazing!)
The last but not the least, Arya Samaj is a shhudhi movement and can never represent the vast Hindu society as they themselves lacks in the basic tenets of Hinduism of worshiping multiple gods. They are trying to design it so to present it as a competitor against Abrahamic religions without regretting that this is but only their fool’s play.
I am happy after accepting Islam last year. Afterall I am able to claim now that I am the part of the society who never speaks the bad of other’s (Give me an instance of any bad words against Hindu icons from an Official Muslim website) but believes in defending their faith only without hurting other’s sentiments.
Abhi, Vedic…. & all, you people can only do one thing- you can only satisfy your vengeance by speaking the bad for others without realising that you yourself are uprooting your mission’s root. Indeed the truth has ever prevailed and will ever be.
P.S: No Aurengzeb or Muhammad pressurized me to accept Islam in the shadow of a sword but the jealous attitude of you people did! I am still to learn quranic verses by heart so as to give you the best reply but will do it soon on future,…
I suggest you watch Hassan Radwan’s Videos. If you are really as comfortable with your faith as you claim you are, you would also be comfortable to watch videos by good well meaning exmuslims who have stated clear claims as to why they left islam.
And for your information Hassan Radwan has a masters in English and Arabic. He used to teach at the school started by yusuf islam in England. He used to be part of the Dawah society. And he also wrote four books on islam for kids. Even after doing all that, he later decided to leave islam because he found too many inconsistencies and errors in the quran.
Here is the website with all his videos:
http://www.youtube.com/user/CEMBadmins
And here is his last video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra9QQ58b7JY&feature=plcp&context=C30abc1eUDOEgsToPDskJmWV2zq54ZtHZqbcokBd_a
Last video states why he left islam in a short 6 plus minute post.
Krishna
@ Rahul Bhadoria
Mian Mawali-e-Arab, Maahir-e-Taqqiya-e-Khaas, Shahenshah-e-Fareb-e-Muqaddas!! Why don’t you use your real name instead?
“The first thing is that they lacks is the enthusiasms of sacrifice”
Well, your “peaceful” lot obviously has an insatiable zest for sacrifice (of innocent infidel people and mute,defenseless animals, that is)!
“The second thing is that they accuse Muslims of being terrorist but are themselves spreading intellectual terror on this site and one another as Satyangi. (In Satyartha Prakash, Dayanand spoke a bad against Jainism, Budhdhism, Christianity and Islam and thought it as his mental superiority! Amazing!)”
Sorry buster! These allegations of terrorism on Islam are unfortunately being proved correct day by day with each passing day. Alas, it is the (genuinely) good Muslims who suffer humiliation due to the depraved attrocities perpetarted by yiur criminal lot. Also, why don’t quote genuine references where Dayanand actually insulted other religions? Also, you must remember that unilke your Rangeela Rasool who claimed himself to be the sole propreitor of God’s will, Dayanand never made any such claims. Never did he ever say that his word is Law!
“The last but not the least, Arya Samaj is a shhudhi movement and can never represent the vast Hindu society as they themselves lacks in the basic tenets of Hinduism of worshiping multiple gods. They are trying to design it so to present it as a competitor against Abrahamic religions without regretting that this is but only their fool’s play”
Buddy, this is where you go wrong. The basic tenet of Hinduism is that it has no basic tenet! Hinduism has no central node of full, total and final authority whatsoever. Yes, it did arise from the Vedas, but even the Vedas cannot control Hinduism; it is way beyond anybody’s grasp and control! Thats why besides the Vedas-accepting (astik) schools of Hindu philosophy, there are the Vedas-rejecting (nastik) schools of Hinduism too.
Unlike the dogamtic, monotheistic,…
@Rahul Bhadoria
Unlike the dogamtic, monotheistic, intolerant and exclusivist Abrahamic cults, HInduism is transcendental, omni-theistic, tolerant and inclusivist. it is rightly said that the audacity of a Hindu to go against Hinduism comes from WITHIN Hinduism itself, not OUTSIDE it.
Anyways, I realize that it is just too futile to say all this to you!! Your thick skull is embedded deep within your posterior, where you can experience only darkness (and fetid odor). You’ll have to pull that sorry skull of yours out of that unfortunate place to see any sense or sensibility.
“Give me an instance of any bad words against Hindu icons from an Official Muslim website”
the quran itsef talks bad about non-believers and obviously their followers who are loyal to quran do the same thing.
the sick mentality of muslims all around the world is like this …. they do all sorts bad things(offend/hurt/humiliate others) and when their victims fight back , they act like victims. when you guys do conversions of hindus to muslims we have to shut our mouths and when we do bring them back to hinduism you guys shout like crazy like the world is falling apart. and you are a fine example of this aspect.
“Give me an instance of any bad words against Hindu icons from an Official Muslim website”
in the name of comparitive religion u denigrate other religions. pull down others to your primitive desert religion. do deliberate misinterpretations of other religions’ texts just to satisfy your needs i.e. mislead gullible hindus/xians/buddhists/jains etc etc and convert them to your religion . some even openly insult others and preach hatred towards others
when you say ours(abrahamic religion) is true religion or way to god gives rise to intolerance/arrogance , and by saying so you are actually insulting other religions. there are many good religions in the world except abrahamic religions. they have done nothing but damage to humanity.
” it is only a platform where the poor Hindus who dreamt of having their Hindu homeland”
india is a hindu country no matter what our constitution or our sickulars say and it should be and it will be. i dont want india to become another s**thole like pakistan or any islam country.
“… can never represent the vast Hindu society as they themselves lacks in the basic tenets of Hinduism of worshiping multiple gods…. ”
where is your 10 years research of vedas gone ? this shows loads that your are not a hindu but muslim disguising as hindu and using taqqiyyah on us. ok lets say were a hindu , u read(???) vedas for 10years and still talk non-sense , this…
contd….
this questions ur credibility.
“I am still to learn quranic verses by heart so as to give you the best reply but will do it soon on future,…”
so u converted to islam without knowing what quran is ??(assuming u were a hindu earlier). do need to byheart quran to give a best answer?? this again questions ur credibility.
“Abhi, Vedic…. & all, you people can only do one thing- you can only satisfy your vengeance by speaking the bad for others without realising that you yourself are uprooting your mission’s root. Indeed the truth has ever prevailed and will ever be.”
what is wrong in saying bad as bad. should i sugarcoat it and say “islam is bad in good way” ?? look at all those islamic countries who uses quran as pascal’s wager and question yourselves. remove the arab petro dollars and see what happens. the whole islam empire collapses.
all muslims can only do one thing act like ostriches when faced with hard truth. u just deny it.
“you yourself are uprooting your mission’s root” look who’s talking . centuries of islam supremacy in india and muslims still in minority. have they managed to uproot hinduism?? no. even if we try to uproot it , it wont happen.
muslims are showing all their ills in quran and their frustations/angst/jealousy/over-zealousness/greed through their stereotypic/intolerant/ignorant behaviour . the world will not sit quiet and see the melodrama of muslims .the world is getting fed up with muslims.
and rahul/rahil u havent given answers to my questions and u r just evading my questions.
EXCELLENT WORK ABHI BROTHER,
The best thing is that you have trapped this pseudo Hindu in his own words. Followers of Satan (I mean ISLAM) wants to defame Hindu – Maqbool Fida Hussain had nude pics of Hindu Devi. The system which we follow today is Muslim way of wedding. Hindu Vedic wedding system is “Swayamvar” if you could recall. From my Knowledge of Vedas (Sorry! not a decade unlike this pseudo Hindu.) – it was clear that Vedas spoke for entire humanity as such NOT of any religion in particular. From his comment it is clear that this pseudo Hindu read Vedas by Max Muller / Griffith – nothing more than that.
Well, I don’t know what Mohammed actually wanted to say but this is what his followers (Muslims) interpret
1>> Kaffir means NON muslim (should ideally mean non believer instead)
2>> All Non muslim should be either killed or converted (Taliban, Lashkar – e – Taiyyeba, Al Qaeda agreed with that)
3>> What Quran says is only truth despite others don’t agree (That’s why Islam is most backward. Please tell Muslims to count great Islam scientists.)
4>> It is legal to kill a Non Muslim for no reason (Not all terrorists are Muslims but definitely, 89% terrorists are Muslims)
5>> Terrorism is the only way of living (as said by Sheikh Muhammed – Al Qaeda member.)
Continuing,
6>> Allah favours only a Muslim (Accepted by Idiot Rascal Fundamental head ZN)
7>> It is illegal to kill any Muslim but legal to kill a Non Muslim (Taliban & Al – Qaeda said this is Quran’s order)
8>> Mohammed wanted us to support peace & told us by killing Pagans, Christians & Jews.
9>> Mohammed hated Non Muslims and as a follower, we should do the same.
10>> World must accept Islam either willfully or forcefully (Read statements by Mullahs)
Many more such assumptions. I again repeat – I don’t know what Mohammed actually wanted to say. Followers – I mean Jihadi terrorists travel on path of Satan. If Mohammed is indeed last prophet – he should have stopped all crimes which he in fact started. If the followers are terrorist – I blame the leader – Mohammed aka Satan.
And pseudo Hindu Rahil, intellectual terror only forces to think – if you know the truth – no power can change your decision. Muslim terrorism kills (if you don’t convert). If I disagree with Satyagni – none will kill me. If I disagree to accept Islam – a Muslim terrorist definitely will.
“Jazakallah Khair”!! Finally, the Original Kitab-e-Tafsir (Noor-e-Haq) of the original Quran (Vedas) by one of the original great seers of humanity (Maulana Rehman) in the lingua franca of the subcontinental Muslims, the biggest victims of this violent dogma from the Levant!!
Hi Everyone, Don’t worry about what that fake so called former Hindu says. I already proved he is a fake. He just came on here because his blood was boiling when he saw the videos about exmuslims. He felt like he had to respond because what I put on here was so powerful he couldn’t control himself and decided to lie. He also claimed he studied the Vedas for 10 years. So I asked him to prove it with a serious of steps. He acted as if he was some kind of Vedic scholar. And Sanskrit scholar. Clearly he is making stuff up. He gave himself away as a muslim acting as a Hindu acting as a muslim the moment he said he studied the Vedas for 10 years and acted like a Vedic Sanskrit scholar. He is full of the end of a pig. And he knows it too.
Krishna
Hahahahhaaa Krishna,
I expct the same frm U people. And wat can b xpectd frm the followers of a rascal Mr. Clement Cock (who originally was infct Mr. Rootshankar b4 realizng that he is a dick lover to acquire the name of DayaLund!)
Now that I m writng this in shrtst possble english, U people as usual wl start blamng Islam as wat Ur Mahrishi Claimantcock taught U. I m nt a 1 whose blood boils frm d crap U people r writng/postng here. I m well aware of the promise of my real LORD ALLAH wen he says,’ Allah is the ally of those who believe. He brings them out from darknesses into the light. And those who disbelieve – their allies are Taghut. They take them out of the light into darknesses. Those are the companions of the Fire; they will abide eternally therein. Holy Quran 2:277
Ur Mahachutia Claimant Cock’s (who wz infct a schizophrenic guy) philosophy is filled only with criticizing other philosophies whether it is Jainism, Sikhism,Buddhism or any other.The words used by Mahachutia Claimant Cock in his book Satyarth prakash are really very disrespectful but that does suits to a personality of his stature. An entire chapter he has written in his book to criticise the other Indic philosophies and then another chapter dedicated to criticize western philosophies.And another imporatant thing is that he has made his on assertions on these faiths and answered on his own wish, which many a times were miles away from the reality. Poor illiterate Claimant Cock.
One of my sikh frend told me that Mahachutia swami hz has criticized Sri Guru Nanak ji 2. How stupid ws dat dick lover stupid! And all his contention was dat baba Nanak sahib was ignorant of sanskrit. I finds a need to quote an observation of Mahachutia Claimant Cock regrdng Sri Baba Nanak from a website that My frend recommnded me. it is http://www.sikhspectrum.com/022008/dayanand/ch2.htm
Here are the words in which Dayanand Saraswati criticised Guru Nanak ji——>
> >
> > We have no evidence in place of Nanak composing â€ŔSanskrit…
Mr Rahul (If that is your real name),
I now know you were never Hindu. From the way your writing, I can tell you were always a pissed off muslim that saw the video of ex-muslims on this sight and was infuriated. This is true because you started posting right after I posted the videos of ex-muslims on this sight. You claimed you studied the Vedas for tennnnn years. You are acting like you are some expert on the Vedas because you studied it for tennnn years. Well you just need to prove it. Make a video of yourself talking in Sanskrit and I mean pretty close to perfect sanskrit because you are this expert in the Vedas. Have a conversation with someone in Sanskrit talking about the school you went to, who your teacher was, and the curriculum and state you are muslim in near perfect sanskrit because you are the expert. Everything should be said in Sanskrit not Hindi or Punjabi or anything else, but Sanskrit because you are the expert now, aren’t you. And also bring your professor into the video to show he was the one who taught you.
You came on here making all these might allegations now it is time for you to prove it big boy.
Krishna
ps Honestly, you might have convinced some people if you just said you were a hindu that decided to convert to islam. But you got way to greedy. You wanted to act like an expert, and that’s where you shot yourself in the foot. You picked the wrong sight to make your claims. And tell you the truth, most of us won’t claim we are some experts in Sanskrit or the Vedas. Only Agniveer’s group and a few that post here can actually do that. Seriously, go get a life. I’ve seen this game over and over again and it really doesn’t help you cause at all.
cont…2
> > We have no evidence in place of Nanak composing â€ŔSanskrit hymns
(satotras).†First, Swami tells us unequivocally that Nanak was ignorant
of Sanskrit. This is followed by two examples which negate totally his first
supposition. This feat of irrationality and flawed logic is accomplished in the
same paragraph within the confines of a few lines.
> >
> > Additionally, Swami throws more jabs at Guru Nanak and the Punjabi people.
In this process the Swami commits blunders by resorting to logical flaws. If
Nanak wanted to show off his knowledge of Sanskrit as Swami
alleges then there must have been audiences who were listening to Nanak
and that particular audience must also known the Sanskrit language. How else
would the audience be awed by Nanak’s knowledge of that language?
Differently put, if Nanak didn’t know Sanskrit and wanted to show off to
his village listeners, who themselves knew no Sanskrit, then is it really a show
off? Wouldn’t it be silly for Nanak to resort to such fruitless
deception? One may ask how is it possible for any person to attain fame, glory,
and applause by speaking Sanskrit or even showing off to the ignorant masses of
Punjab who knew nothing about Sanskrit?
> >
> > Had there been an encounter between the Swami and Guru Nanak, the Guru would
have politely reminded him that people of Punjab don’t speak Sanskrit; in
fact Sanskrit is a foreign language for them. Let alone Punjab, if we think
rationally it will dawn upon us that not a single regional language of the
sub-continent has ever been Sanskrit.
> >
> > Regarding the absurdities of Swami’s direct quotes of the two verses
from Sukhmani, I will ask the reader to read other critical commentaries
incorporated in this e-Symposium. I might just make one comment here
thatSukhmani was authored by Guru Arjan and not by Guru Nanak. This simply
points to the fact that Swami’s knowledge of Guru Granth is negligible,
and in all likelihood…
Cont. 3…
This simply
points to the fact that Swami’s knowledge of Guru Granth is negligible,
and in all likelihood he relied on someone else for information related to the
Sikh scripture.
> >
> > I am aware of Udasis, Nirmalas, and Akalees, mostly fringe groups outside
mainstream Sikhs, and I am at a loss as to who are Suthreshahees? Moreover, what
is Nanak Chandrodaya? Didn’t Swami forget to mention Nihangs who had
threatened to kill him upon his uttering disparaging remarks about Sikhism while
in Amritsar? There are many such examples of Dayanand’s mindless
ramblings, but I will now take a closer look at his comments on Guru Gobind
Singh.
> >
> > (Guru Nanak & Sikhs as Perceived by Swami Dayananda
> >
> > A Commentary
> >
> > – G.B. Singh)
taken from—–> http://www.sikhspectrum.com/022008/dayanand/ch2.htm
Anodr argumnt dat Krishna, d gud boy of Arya Samaj here hs put dat I m no more here 2 reply bak ‘coz I m a fake Muslim in d disguise,,,, I m again havng a point 2 laugh and will say- Yes, I m nt going 2 b here any more, aftrall I hve 2 invite other people 2 d truth that I ve got. InshaALLAH soon my elder brothr wl b d next 1 2 recite the kalima. U cn do this thing that is 2 make any person wat Ur heart says to as U usd 2 refer all muslims as pakistani and all neo-muslims as Muslims in disguise or practicing takia, as wat Ur Mahachutia Swami Cocksucker ws havng d practice a century bak. Some of U r speaking hre thinking that U people r Pandit by putting sme videos frm Youtube and some othr sites, I cn but only laugh at ur foolishness and stupidity. Mahachutia Claimant Cock wrote his crap in 1875 and since then the hindi muhawara of ‘khisiyani billi khamba noche’ is running in itz full bloom in the community of U jokers. Mahachutia Claimant Cock thought that he may covr a large hindu audience by molding his definitn of Dharma in Abrahamic design, but was totally unsuccessful & faild. He faild 2 realise d caliber of wat a relign is! If he wz successful,…
Cont.4…
Mahachutia ClaimantCock thought that he may covr a large hindu audience by molding his definitn of Dharma in Abrahamic design, but was totally unsuccessful & faild. He faild 2 realise d caliber of wat a relign is! If he wz successful, nearly 85% of hindus wd ve been freed of idol worshiping 2day, but Lo! a lot anodr sprangd up in d latr days. Aftrol, banishng Gita, Ramayan and superimposng vedas upon all was his short sightdness and thus he achievd a handfull of Mahachutias like as U cowards presnt ovr here.
The reason why I dint chose 2 reply Ur’s silly clamors is dat I think I hve 2 utilise my energy to invite other Muslims and non-Muslims equally so that they may realise the truth in spreading of wich, the followers of Mahachutia ClaimantCock r becumng helpful. It becums easy 4 me 2 show U people’s wrath only against Islam of whose reaction I ve fnd 2 b +ve & in support of my purpose only. (My Bro-in-law aptly remarkd this evening that agniveer’s site looks more of anti- zakir naik than a pro DayaLand’s vedic mission. Evry1 surprises frm the way of Ur’s invitatn to the vedic dharma coz U people urself r showng dat Dr. Naik has more audience power dan ur silly banal 5000 yrs old craps.)
And yes, U may speak/write a lot bad of me and cd satiate Ur vengeance and ur people frm 2day as much as U cn coz Rahul Bhadoria is, ALLAH b praizd, not gonna waste his energy in searching contents from the google or you-tube 2 reply U stupids frm 2day rather wl b engagd in inviting more n more people to the fold of Islam. One idiot here askd me 2 show a video whre I shd b recitng sme sanskrit shlokas so dat he may confirm that the one who reads sanskrit can’t accpt anoder religion. I must suggst 2 see Dr. Naik as a gud sanskrit shloka recitr but he z nt a Hindu!!
I really wonder as that aftr Muslims, how wl U counter christians and then Sikhs and then Jains, Budhists and then of-course Jews and Baha’i and then these ISKON and akin hindu cult as well as neo-religious movmnts??? But Ur dick lover…
Cont.5 (i.e the 70101st and my last comment of this post)
…….But Ur dick lover Mahachutia ClaimantCock’s inspiratn wl guidng U in spoilng Ur’s life & then ur’s coming generatns, ol I cn submit @ d last.
P.s: I ve used the english translation of DayaLund’s name as ClaimantCock where I knowingly have mis-spelled ‘CLAIMANT’ which rather will be CL……” . I will no more come here to meet the Pundit who first realised mine this mistake and has read the entire story by putting DayaLund’s english translated name as “Mr. Cle……Cock”.
ALLAH hu Akbar
Rahil (frmrly Rahul) Bhadoria
Mr. Rahul (If that is your real name),
I find it interesting you talked about insults and keep posting “Ur dick lover.” Sounds to me like someone is a hypocrite. I guess you figured it was okay to be a hypocrite because that is acceptable in accordance islamic teachings. Your whole post is filled with disgusting and hateful remarks.
And for your information I have actually read the quran. But unlike you, I won’t make a claim that I studied it for 10 years. Nor will I claim I know arabic. But I did read it in English. And I looked over the controversial verses by three different scholars. Seriously, that book has to be one of the most incoherent books in the world. And some of the most ridiculous stories in the world. Read Qur’an 2:67-73. Hilarious. Talks about the way to solve a murder is to sacrifice a cow and than cut a part of it out and hit the dead person with it. What kind of twisted god would think that is every ok or if it is even hygienic. DISGUSTING. Seriously, if you really believe in absurd stories like that, you have a major problem.
Krishna
“…. And wat can b xpectd frm the followers of a rascal Mr. Clement Cock…”
what can v xpect from a muslim , all he does is run along the corners. u cannot even handle criticism.
“criticizing other faiths”
nobody is perfect and nobody is closed to criticism.and thats y v criticize all religions, v criticize hinduism too. dayananda may hav criticized sikhism , buddism , jainism but v still hold respect for their founders because all of these founders struggled to uphold dharma. this is not the case with islam or christianity who live in a delusions thinking that their way is highway. and v respect the character “jesus” (whether he really existed or not) but not christianity/bible and hence v see people worshipping jesus and still remain a hindu . even if v reject krishna as god v still hold some respect to gita.whether hindus accept buddha as an avatar of vishnu or not , v still respect him and (v still criticize him).one of the basic tenets of hinduism is 2 b skeptic of one’s own belief(s) , and thats why atheists also come here . even if v dont believe in god v’ll follow dharma . what about muslims who are asked to never doubt quran or allah or his creator??. can u remain a muslim if u doubt the basic tenets of islam?? i dont think so . nobody remains a follower of abrahamic religions after doubting their holy scripts. ur close minded belief will never accept this kind of attitude.
v’ll reject everything which is bad or try 2 reform those bad stuff and accept only truth and that is mission of agniveer and his followers. what about u , can u reject the hateful verses of quran. i guess u cannnot , since u consider every verse of quran as holy and when u reject them u cannot remain a muslim.
v’ll make a new veda if v want to, which is composed of good/noble/wise qoutes of gr8 personalities , afterall knowledge/wisdom is infinite and v want the hindus to accept good things not bad things and that was exactly how vedas were formed.and ofcourse v dont bother whether god is included in it or…
contd….
whether god is included in it or not. if theists want god we might as well include him.vedas hav no single founder and it is not possible to have wast amount of wisdom in a single lifetime. a verse which is considered noble in one sage’s lifetime may undergo correction /expansion / interpolation in another’s lifetime and ultimately resulting in absolute truths and thats how vedas were formed .even though buddha was founder of buddhism there were many of his follower who contributed a lot 2 make buddhist scriptures/wisdom. but this is not the case with islam.and is definitely not possible with quran which is framed as the last message from allah/mo- to its followers and hence addition / expansion / correction / revision /reformation of quranic verses is not possible with islam. even bible has many interpolations , but interpolated according to the needs of its followers and unfortunately many bad verses/ideologies crept in and fell prey to creed/greed of bad people.
so just shut ur mouth , v know what to criticize/give-credit-for and what not to. v r not narrow minded people like u where only belief goes into ur brain and not criticism too.
i guess all of the above seems unacceptable 4 ur retarded brain. and u who act like an ostrich will never accept the truth and only go gaga over others criticizing u. and u’ll never reform islam and continue to follow that 7th century primitive dogmatic desert religion .u/muslims r afraid of experiencing congnitive dissonance and hence hide in ur cocoon shell of islam. if this is the case and i can see definite end of islam in future. almost all religions undergo reformation and change accordingly to modern society except islam. and thats y there r so many ideological conflicts , terror attacks of muslims with/on other non believers , violence by other believers seems miniscule when islamic violence is taken as measuring scale.remove apostasy , remove unrelenting hatred towards other beliefs , stop persecuting other believers and see how many leave islam.
contd…
–u prove urselves as a frustrated muslim over and over. u say u dont get agitated by criticism and yet your language/attitude shows u r actually getting agitated by the content here.
honestly i dont mind if muslims/xians just practice their beliefs without hurting others and not act like stereotypic idiots.and i dont care whether u follow gud/bad religion , but i do mind when u are imposing ur beliefs on others and when u preach hatred towards other beliefs and directy or indirecty denigrating others(inherent quality of abrahamic religions). this has been going over for centuries .
–all u can think of is increasing ur numbers .u speak of idolatry as if its a sin and doesnt talk abt sins by muslims who consider themselves as non-idolators and justify them with quran . idolatry or non-idolatry when u dont follow proper dharma whats the point. and u shud know abt it , if u were really a hindu earlier . for a hindu it doesnt matter whether he is idolator or non-idolator .and why does it offend u? oh yeah it was one of the salient features of muslims to get offended even when there is nothing to be offended.
same is the case with mono or poly or heno or pan theistic. because it doesnt follow ur belief system u get offended and start to attack others verbally & physically. where is ur rational mind gone.i guess when u r too immersed in those desert dogmas and when u see the world with ur quranic lenses, u fail 2 see the realilty.
–joker nalayak is not a sanskrit scholar and he cannot recite a sanskrit verse properly. he is a fraud fooling muslims and non-muslims. he just mugs up everything. his mind is clouded by ignorance and he can never properly interpret vedas.
–people of iskcon , jain , sikh ,buddism, bahai are a lot better than muslims/xians , even if they dont comply with vedas.
–i support dayananda since his words tells us to question our beliefs and look at them with a skeptic/critic mind.
Namaste Abhi,
Very nice post on here. The problem is many muslims are like the boy who cried wolf. They lie and make up so much stuff that when they actually tell the truth, no one will ever believe them. People like rahul (if that is his real name) is a perfect example of that. Many of them lie so much and have no problem with it. People aren’t stupid and they figure it out. And human nature is, once we have been lied to we stop believing the person or group. Muslims have created a reputation of being liars and they did it to themselves. I actually don’t even know what rahul (if that is his real name) is even doing on here. He should know by now that no one believes him and every time he posts he throws more wood to his funeral pyre. He hasn’t fooled a single person on here.
All he showed everyone on here is he is a liar, hypocrite, and plainly a jerk. He came on here to be talk S**T. And I guess that’s what he seemed to be successful at because he takes his teaching right out his islamic education. I guess religious brothers taught him well that’s why in his holy book it educated him to make statements like “Ur dick lover.” Bravo, the real teachings of the muslims has been exposed to the world to see. I think he should keep posting comments like the ones he did earlier, he really is doing a good show for the rest of us.
Dhanyavad,
Krishna
I gree with the fact that some persons are really having severe mental problems.This Roldia Bhata needs some serious checkups.Roldia Bhata has left control from his tongue.His tongue is running like a car with no breaks at a speed of 200 km/s.And also with an aceeleration of 10 m/s^2.It may be due to failure of nervous system.The neuron motors from tongue to CNS(Central nervous system) have died or have been affected by mutagen.Yes,Roldia Bhata jee ,you should certainly go from here and please visit a doctor.
The problem with Roldia Bhata is not only this much.He says Dayanand as Dayalund.It is due to mutagens sent into his cells by Mullas.The DNA sequence has been severly altered.Genetic code has been reversed.For a man to speak the right name,such as Dayanand,the genetic code should be AUG(suppose).But Mullas have changed it to GUA.So,Shri Roldia Bhata jee you need to go to a scientist,so that he can restore your genetic code(s).
Thank you!
Vinay brother!
The tongue of that pseudo Hindu would run by the speed of a tachyon (much faster than light too) as he is affected by Muslim terrorists. But he cannot be blamed alone for Indian government being pseudo secular – this pseudo Hindu became Muslim just to get benefits of polygamy & free sex. Same was true for Bollywood Actor Dharmendra too who converted to Islam just to marry twice. Now, this pseudo Hindu considers Islam superior to Vedic view. He claims to have known Vedas – if you support evil – what is the use of your knowledge of Vedas? So, his comment is full of jokes. I don’t think any scientist or doctor will do – his disease is totally incurable. We can only hope that he does not end up being a terrorist.
P.S.: 89% terrorists are Muslims and they follow what Mohammed told. This implies that Mohammed = Satan.
“In heaven if Allah provides hoors to have a sex in full as one wants. Whats the problem?” Does Allah also provide the dwellers of heaven with choices like blonde, brunette etc & what about vital stats’ of these hoors? And does Allah also supply crack cocaine there? What about cialis or viagra for those mullahs that do not have an erection? Will allah say Kun”erection” and the erection happens for these guys? And finally is Allah a pimp? Given Allah stays right above the other layers of heaven, will he be having an oversight of the “action” happening below him? I cannot picture allah being any better than a California based porn movie director that oversees group orgies and enjoys people getting sodomized.
@Alpha:
Basically, Allah is confused. The genius prevents and calls immoral activities on earth – like screwing many women, having drinks, etc., YET provides the same opportunities as gifts in heaven!
I am guessing even a Californian porn movie director will have a better sense of right and wrong than Allah and not confuse people in this fashion!
Verily, Allah is the best of deceivers!