- Dr Zakir Naik’s fraud exposed
- Zakir Bhai, MBBS defends Halal meat – Answering Zakir Naik
- Test of secularism
- Kaba or Idol Worship?
- Answering Zakir Naik – Quran says there is no compulsion in religion
- Science and IRF
- Don’t Judge Car by Its Driver!
- Zakir Naik’s Peace TV Banned in India
- The Curious Case of Dr Zakir Naik- A Muslim’s View
- Agniveer effect: NIA scanning Zakir Naik’s speeches
- Zakir Naik on Polygamy
- Why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much?
- Zakir Naik – the mentor of terrorists
- Zakir Naik on Hijab – Islamic Veil
- Why Non Muslims Are Not Allowed In Mecca – Zakir Naik
- Zakir Naik – Patriot or Traitor?
- Islam and Hinduism Debate
- Punishment for Blasphemy
- Quran and Vedas
Zakir Bhai MBBS has been among the most hated public figures of today. Deoband recently issued a fatwa against him. There is no doubt that Zakir Bhai is among the most smartly marketed religious celebrity of last few years. He claims to represent and propagate Islam. He considers himself a servant of Muhammad (PBUH). Yet it is the Muslims and Islamic clerics who hate Zakir Naik the most. In this chapter, we shall briefly list out reasons why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much that many claim that he would be the first person to enter Dozakh (Islamic hell).
Background – 72 Muslim sects
Let us provide a brief background. Most people consider Islam to be the religion propagated by Prophet Muhammad and narrated in Quran. On the surface, it appears all so simple. Quran proclaims that one who submits to the word of final messenger of Allah shall achieve Heaven. But things are not so simple for a layman, and even a scholar. Because while there is only one Quran and one Prophet Muhammad, there is tremendous variety in the types of interpretations that so-called Muslims make out of this book and this great social- reformer.
In short, Islam is not as monolithic as it appears to be. The number of sects in Islam is more than 72, and they are as different from each other as dry is from wet and cold is from hot. All these sects have different customs, different levels of tolerances for non-Muslims, different food habits, different interpretations of Quran, different level of importance given to Muhammad and his associates and different descriptions of Heaven and Hell. The Shia-Sunni war is clearly known.
What makes the things even more confusing is the belief of these more than 72 Sects. Only one is on the path of truth and hence only one will go to Heaven. Rest of the sects will go to Hell. Thus, it is not sufficient to just be a Muslim to achieve Heaven; you need to follow only the right sect. Now each sect fights to prove that they are the genuine sect. Some sects are liberal enough to allow even non-Muslims to Heaven. Some Muslims are even promoters of vegetarianism. Some consider nation ahead of everything else. But there are some who believe that all except those who fully believe in their sect and its practices without questioning anything, alone will go to Heaven. Rest of all will be in Hell forever.
Zakir Naik’s Wahabi sect – The most fanatic
Among the most fanatic of these cults is the Wahabi cult. This is supposed to be the producer of the largest number of terrorists including ISIS, Osama, Al Qaeda since its inception in the 18th century and has been a cause of disgrace for rest of the peace-loving Muslims. Zakir Naik belongs to this Wahabi cult, believes that only this Wahabi version of Islam can bring anyone close to Heaven, and rest of all will go to Hell. And things are not as simple. Further, he mixes his Wahabism with material from other scholars of different sects to create his own Zakirism that in the process blatantly insults and disgraces the vision of Islam as per other sects, including the more tolerant ones.
Zakir Naik humiliated Wahabis
Zakirism goes to such extent that he does not even spare Wahabis from humiliations. Zakir Naik claims to be an expert on comparative religions. In his site, he has put lots of articles on comparative religions under his name. But in reality, they are merely a word to word copy of texts from Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya sources. So what is wrong if one refers to Qadiyani or Ahmadiyya sources? Perhaps nothing, except that:
Qadiyanis/ Ahmadiyyas are considered Kafirs and they are prosecuted by most Muslims for their radical beliefs.
Wahabis have been greatest enemies of Qadiyanis
The content of the Qadiyani writings that Zakir Naik has swindled under his own name are blatantly against core beliefs of rest of the Muslims including Wahabis.
For example, Zakir Bhai MBBS tries to prove that Vedas prophesize about Muhammad. (This has been completely refuted by Agniveer) Now this belief gels with the Qadiyani belief that Vedas were also revelations. But Wahabis and other sects refuse to believe so. Hence even Zakir Bhai MBBS writes in another article that he is not sure if Vedas are revelations. He conveniently forgets that he himself has proved that Vedas reveal Muhammad in another article! (Perhaps because he forgot to read it before asking his henchmen to copy from Qadiyani book and paste under his name on his site and in books.)
In summary, Zakir Bhai continues to use Qadiyani sources to show his scholarly capabilities but refuses to accept Qadiyanis as Muslims because he claims to be Wahabi and is funded by Wahabi militants. Or is he a Qadiyani spy in Wahabi disguise? Only Zakir Bhai knows the reality, but his acts suffice to invite hatred of Qadiyanis as well as other Muslim sects.
Progressive Muslims hate Zakir Naik
Zakir Bhai justifies non-vegetarianism as a scientific Islamic trait. While he does acknowledge that even a Muslim can be vegetarian, he attempts to justify meat-eating on crazy arguments including research by some farmers. (Agniveer has already busted this lie). This catches ire of several progressive Muslims, who refuse to believe that meat-eating has any association with religion. Many progressive Muslims have even started a Muslim Vegetarian Society that is among the most powerful protagonists of Vegetarianism and opponents of Halal meat. They have severely condemned Zakir Naik and his spurious research for disgracing Islam to justify the lust of his own tongue.
Deoband issued a fatwa against Zakir Naik
Being a Wahabi he has a soft corner for Osama Bin Laden. When someone questioned him on his views on Osama, he replied that he admires him because he has terrorized America! He shied away from criticizing terrorist activities of Osama.
Deoband even issued a Fatwa against him probably because his use of literature of Qadiyani sect – considered worst by Deoband – to further Islamic cause.
Reason why Zakir supports Osama is – the money that funds Osama and money that funds Zakir Bhai have allegedly the same sources. Many terrorists caught in recent times involving the ones of Dhaka attacks, Chief of Hyderabad ISIS Module, first Indian ISIS fighter have allegedly accredited Zakir Naik to be their inspiration.
Devout Muslim hates Zakir Naik for wearing Kafir dress code
While on the surface, he claims to be a conservative Muslim; he wears a non-Islamic dress which as per Islamic hadiths would lead one to be treated as a non-Muslim during Judgment Day. Many devout Muslims thus consider their dress very seriously and hate Dr. Zakir Naik for setting wrong examples by wearing Kafir dress of tie, suit, and coat. Zakir Naik teaches fanaticism to others but himself adopts conveniences as per his own will.
Sufis and graves worshippers hate Zakir Naik
Wahabis have destroyed many Sufi shrines and the even house of Prophet Muhammad because they believe these to be signs of idol worship. They killed many Muslim men, women, and children in their campaigns to destroy tombs and holy places. In the same footsteps, Zakir Naik severely condemns these practices to be anti-Muslim and hence is hated by those who worship graves, Sufis and tombs.
Shias hate Zakir Naik
Shias obviously have a reason to hate Zakir Bhai MBBS because of his staunch anti-Shia stance, being a Wahabi. But his admiration of Yazeed, considered to be the culprit for the massacre of Prophet’s family in Karbala has been a strong point of contention for other Muslims. So much is the hatred against Yazeed that many people curse by the name of Yazeed. But Zakir Naik respects Yazeed in similar way as Prophet Muhammad by stating ‘Peace be Upon Him’ or something similar after his name. This PBUH/similar words are restricted only for the most revered people in Islam.
Progressive Muslims hates Zakir Naik for his ultra-fanaticism
Zakir justifies the ban on the worship of other religions in Muslim countries. He however also justifies that Muslims should be allowed in other countries to promote their religion. The logic is curious — as per Zakir Bhai, in matters of religion, Muslims are the best. So they should be allowed everywhere — Muslim or non-Muslim countries. But non-Muslims should not be allowed to build places of worship in Muslim countries because their religions are inferior to Islam!
Such ultra-fanaticism irks the most progressive Muslims, who want to integrate with rest of the world and rise above religious dogmas and hatred.
Muslims hate him for being ultra-conservative
Being an ultra-conservative, he propagates that despite a person being as much good or noble, unless they unconditionally accept his version of Islam, they will go to Hell and Hell alone and forever. This goes against beliefs of more progressive Muslims, who believe that all who act with genuineness, regardless of their religion will go to Heaven and not Hell.
Muslim women hate Zakir Naik
Muslim women obviously have all the reasons to hate Zakir Bhai because in the name of pseudo-science he is simply restricting their freedom that has been ordained by the Creator. For example, he states that Muslim women should always wear Hijab and Burqa and cover their entire body always. Medical researchers are worried that such unreasonable practices cause dreaded diseases due to lack of Vitamin D in Muslim countries which enforce such beliefs on women. More liberal Muslims see such insistence as dangerous dogma harming the cause of Muslims and Human Rights.
He further states that Muslim women should not work in offices because they may have a chance to be alone with men even for a second. The only men that a woman is allowed to be alone with are her husband and those who have suckled her. Taking this crazy dogma of Zakir Bhai further, the Head of Hadith Department of the most reputed university of Islam in the world recently issued a fatwa that Muslim women should allow their male colleagues to suckle their breasts five times. This will allow them to work with these men, even when alone. Because after this, they will be like mothers to them!
Zakir Bhai debars women from being any doctor except gynecologists because that is haram as per his version of Islam. Women should not take part in sports as well!
He further defends polygamy by furnishing false data on population but disallows polyandry.
He justifies the belief that women are less intelligent than men, and hence evidence of two women equals that of one man!
He thus also justifies that women cannot inherit equally to their male counterparts!
He also believes that majority of hell dwellers will be women.
No wonder, he agrees to the dogma that to prove rape, a woman should bring an ample number of witnesses who have witnessed actual penetration!
Wahabis calls Zakir Naik a Shaitan
The list of people who hate Zakir Naik can go on and on. So much that now even Wahabis have started calling Zakir Bhai a Shaitan.
Other sects who do not receive as much funding as Osama or Zakir Naik try tooth and nail to debunk his fraud through all means.
They are even more upset by the fact that Zakir Naik does not even know how to read Arabic and merely imitates Ahmed Deedat, another preacher considered deviant by many scholars.
Conclusion
The process of seeking truth demands process of elimination. One may not be sure and continue to debate on which of the 72 or more sects of Islam would lead one to Heaven, or whether Quran itself is the authentic Quran and not the new Quran as created recently. One may not be sure whether a permanent Hell or Heaven or Angels or Genies exist in first place. One may doubt if Muhammad was a great non-divine social -reformer or actually a Messenger of Allah’s word. One can debate if Quran deserves to be the final word of Allah and what should be its interpretation. Or what new good concept Quran provides that was not present in previous books.
But one fact is sure. There is not even a scope for debate – Certain persons should be out-rightly banished to Hell or hell-like place for the benefit of rest of the peaceful, civilized society. They include:
• people who dare not condemn terrorists like Osama Bin Laden. And instead say “Every Muslim should be a terrorist”. “Every Muslim must terrorize America.”
• people who consider that all except their sect will burn in permanent Hell despite how-so-much good they do in their lives
• people who cannot tolerate others but want themselves to be tolerated everywhere
• people who believe that women are inferior or bereft of intelligence
• people who justify inferior rights and curtailment of freedom for women
• people who refuse to change their stands despite the presence of factual information proving the opposite
• people who do not clear their stand and purely use material prepared by someone else to claim scholar status for self and yet condemn the source
Such terrorism sympathizers are a threat to any civilized society. Progressive and even conservative Muslims have shown the right way by criticizing Zakir Naik so severely. The first and foremost religion of humans is humanity. The way noble-minded Muslims have shown courage and mettle to condemn the dangerous frauds of Zakir Naik that are detrimental to entire humanity is warmly welcomed. Such steps in right direction pave the way for right direction for seekers of true knowledge.
This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/3293/hate-zakir-hi/
[mybooktable book=”every-muslim-is-not-a-terrorist” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”][mybooktable book=”complete-works-agniveer” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]
I dnt only think that u are hate monger,, but u r the biggest dumb I have ever seen.. we cant expect any better here in this website… but all the verses u quoted did u notice anything strange? does ur corrupted brain need an anti-virus to clean the germs from ur brain? dnt u miss anything on those verses?????????????
forget it !!!!
I dnt expect u to use ur borrowed brain (If u have any)… do u see that except 1 all the verses ends without full stop? try use ur common sense if u have that those hate mongers internet ghosts has not been quoted even the full verse..coz they knew that the answers are there.. oh maybe i am telling to the wrong person.. maybe u have done the job… but if u have i want ask one question.. did u forgot to download ur common sense at that time while u were doing so??
i have something to say that all you hatemongers are spineless and Impotent that are so ashamed to claim your real identity.. you are appearing in different name and as representative of different religions distorting Muslims to prove that all the religions hate muslims… this is the money trick of agniveer and his girly cheerleaders…i dnt know when u agniveer’s will man-up.. i dnt expect u to become like a real man, i am just asking u to be atleast a man like someone who can say what he is…..”Agniveer” name sounds but as i said “Barking Dog Never Bites”.. Agniveer claims that they does researches,, and they are acting like scholars… if this is what comes from ur direction agniveer,, and u claim that this is what scholar is… u r really putting the scholars in shame….u dnt qualify to be a local train hawker even.. what about vegetable vendor?? thats better for u…
islam is a religion of peace and tolerant which is a biggest lie and fraud , muslims are the most intolerant creatures in the world , daily violence against hindus ,christians and other ethnics continuing on . islam is a religion of peace showed in pakistan,afghanistan,nigeria ,iraq,syria and somalia , within a decade 19,000 souls have became peaceful, in india everywhere muslims make violence against hindus , muslims are same at everywhere stupids,criminals,rapists,liars
http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HkPage.aspx?PAGEID=16183&SKIN=C
Love Jihad, Conversions, and counterfeit currency for destroying Kerala http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HkPage.aspx?PAGEID=16183&SKIN=C
May Almighty Allah reward for brothers and sisters who speak for Islam..
MAy Allah give them Paradise and status of matryr.
Jazakallah!!!
IT IS BETTER FOR EVERYBODY TO UNDERSTAND THAT AT THE END OF THE DAY WHOS IS THE WINNER NOT I OR YOU IT IS THE SHAITAN – THE DEVIL .SO KINDLY READ BOOKS OF RELIGIOUS WHETHER IT BE QURAN OR VEDA OR UPANISHED BUT READ NA -EVERYBODY CAN ARGUE BUT WITHOUT KNOWING THE BASE HOW CAN ANYBODY TALK . THIS FIGHTING IS NOTHING BUT MISGUIDANCE SOMEBODY IS TRYING TO PUT THE LEFT INDICATOR AND TURN RIGHT .ME OR YOU HAVE LESS KNOWLEDGE WHY DONT WE KEEP OUR MOUTH SHUT AND ASK THE SCHOLARS.
Dear john! from your comment, you are trying to prove that Muslims are trying to convert non muslim to islam through violence and by killng them….you are wrong brother..half knowledge is always dangerous…An article in Reader’s Digest ‘Almanac’, year book 1986, gave the statistics of the increase of percentage of the major religions of the world in half a century from 1934 to 1984. This article also appeared in ‘The Plain Truth’ magazine. At the top was Islam, which increased by 235%, and Christianity had increased only by 47%. May one ask, which war took place in this century which converted millions of people to Islam? Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe is Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?
The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India are non- Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the sword.The Muslims ruled India for about a thousand years. If they wanted, they had the power of converting each and every non-Muslim of India to Islam. Today more than 80% of the population of India are non- Muslims. All these non-Muslim Indians are bearing witness today that Islam was not spread by the sword.
And Quran says:
““Let there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from error” -[Al Qur’an 2:256]
“Invite (all) to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious.”-[Al Qur’an 16:125] .
Islam doesn’t permit Muslims to convert Non Muslim to islam by Killing or by violence…Allah knows best!
May Allah guide you in a righteous path !!!!
Oh Agneiveer ji
You are just another of those hard-working non-Muslim, to taint Islam and Muslims! To abuse n insult Muslims!
This is nothinh new for us
We expect all these from many non-Muslims. Such attempts were done in Mohammed’s (saw) time, where all the Arabs then were Christians, Jews or idol-worshippers. Look at the Arab world now. All are Muslims
Let all Muslims do sincere dua for you that you too become Muslim! Or your generation become! SubhanAllah. Allah can make all things possible
An MLA in Assam has recently abandoned her husband and daughter to marry a Muslim boy. There was no force. She converted. When she did, as per Islam,she automatically is freed from her first husband. Her father is still a staunch Hindu and hates Muslims like anything! Look what Allah made his daughter to do! SubhanAllah if not Agniveer, let his future generation get the hedaya (divine intervention from Allah to change life)
We can pray this surely. Prayer is the most powerful tool for the Muslims
Dear Muslim bros and sisters, lets do this kind of dua for Agniveer as what had happened to the MLA’s father in Assam 1 month back
SubhanAllah
manniy shri azim ji , asam ki ki ek M.L.A mahila ne apne pati se bagair talaq liye kaise muslim yuvak se nikah ho gaya ?kya islam apne pati se bagair talaq liye dusre nikah ki izazat deta hai? fir kaise kisi muslim mulla ne uska nikah karvaya / us mahila ne quran ko padh kar ya samajhkar islam me nahi ayi balki us muslim yuvak ke prem zaal me fans karke usme ayi hai! ap us ghatna ki kaise tarif karna chahte hai ?
manniy shri azim ji, kya islam ko dharm hai ya “giroh” hai ? quran me anek jagah muslim kahe jane valo ko giroh kaha gaya hai ? islam me kaun si ek maulik [buniyadi] sachhai hai ? padhe likhe , samajhdar manvatavadi muslimo ko to Quran ki sangati hi chod deni chahiye? kyo ek ummi [anpad] vyakti ke piche chalne ki kyo koshish kare?
@raj.hyd.. first I request u to read the quran and bring forth ur argument with reference, thats what an literate scholar does,, bring one thing that cant be truth.. please do not argue with the things that u heard from anyone,,, the Quran is available free of cost in internet u can read..
2ndly no muslim will say that our beloved prophet wrote the Quran, it was relieved to him by Allah through angel Gabriel. and yes prophet was illiterate,, but dnt u think if almost 1/4 of world population of the world are muslim becoze of what that illiterate person said 1400 years ago then his words carries much more wait than anyone? according to a book released which was written by a christian writer among the 100 most influential personalities in of the millennium Mohammed(PBH) ranked 1.. dont u think this is amezing? maybe u may think all the people in the world are crazy only u and some people like u are most literate and intellectual, no problem..western world are now accepting islam in huge number do u think u are more educated and intelligent than them..maybe..
regarding ur question of that Asam lady who married a muslim guy before taking marriage.. according to u this was unislamic and yes this was unislamic but why do u assume everything from 1000s mile away? why dnt u go there and inquire what is the case..if i still consider that the women did not take divore but still maybe she lied to the moulana and if the moulana knew the fact then definitely he did wrong so becoz of that moulana will u blame islam? are u suggesting me that becoz of some hindu guru and baba like,, nirman baba asaram bapu, swami nittyananda i should blame the hindu religion? as I hope u r a literate person I expect u to pass ur comment carefully.. furthermore read the quran and challenge the quran as an educated person.. for ur informations thousand of non-muslims arround the world are doing research on quran to find a mistake in it but for last 1400 years none of them has been able to do so.. we welcome u too to join them…
hamne to quran ko “nangi ankho se” anek bar padha hai . kripya aap bhi isko ek kitab ki tarah “nangi ankho se” padhiye !andhvishvasi mat baniye aur dekhiye is quran me kitna jahar bhara huya hai uske manne vale ” kuch” muslim aaj kai lakh islami atankvadi[jehadi] bankar kai lakh [muslim sahit] manushyo ki hatya kar chuke hai aur bhi kar rahe hai ! duniya me to sexy filme, sharab ,nashile padartho ka sevan suwar ka mans, jahilta kuriti andh vishvas bimariya adi bhi bahut fail rahi hai, iska yah arth nahi hai ki vah sab bhi achhi ho gyi hai ! dekhe Quran4/24 jisme vivahit mahilao se “nikah ” karna mana hai ! fir bhi asam ki mahila rangi nath se muslim yuvak ka nikah kisi mulla ne karvaya , batlaiye kya islam kiis bhi parivar ko barbad karta hai ?
jab asam ki vidhayak rangi nath aur muslim yuvak ka “niakh ” unislamik hai to us” nikah ” ka radd [shuny] kyo nahi kar diya jaya hai ? kyo usko quran panthi dho rahe hai hai ?
@raj.hyd
Muhammad was illiterate because if founder wouldn’t illiterate people considered that he himself concoct the Quran. So these chances became vanish. He himself couldn’t concoct the whole Noble Quran as he was illiterate.
Quran says that Allah taught him (PBUH) the whole Quran in (27:6) & (55:2).
Neither did you (O Muhammad SAW) read any book before it (this Qur’ân), nor did you write any book (whatsoever) with your right hand. In that case, indeed, the followers of falsehood might have doubted. (Al-ankabut:48)
Arabic word “Wahi”, in the sense of revelation, refers to Allah’s guidance for people that was sent down via the prophets,any prophet must have received the revelation through 1 of the following means:
1. Inspiration, for example, in a dream as that which Ibrahim received while asleep, to sacrifice his son.
2. Words (speech) sent from Allah through a special messenger as the Angel Gabriel was sent to the Prophet . That is the common way of wahi.
However i don’t understand your language, by reading the comments of other commentator i came to know about your misconceptions.
@raj.hyd
Muhammad (PBUH) was illiterate because if founder wouldn’t illiterate people considered that he himself concoct the Quran. So these chances became vanish. He himself couldn’t concoct the whole Noble Quran as he was illiterate.
Quran says that Allah taught him (PBUH) the whole Quran in (27:6) & (55:2).
Neither did you (O Muhammad SAW) read any book before it (this Qur’ân), nor did you write any book (whatsoever) with your right hand. In that case, indeed, the followers of falsehood might have doubted. (Al-ankabut:48)
Arabic word “Wahi”, in the sense of revelation, refers to Allah’s guidance for people that was sent down via the prophets,any prophet must have received the revelation through 1 of the following means:
1. Inspiration, for example, in a dream as that which Ibrahim received while asleep, to sacrifice his son.
2. Words (speech) sent from Allah through a special messenger as the Angel Gabriel was sent to the Prophet . That is the common way of wahi.
However i don’t understand your language, by reading the comments of other commentator i came to know about your misconceptions.
Actually mistakes have been found
“Samples of Quranic Contradictions, Inconsistencies and Errors. ”
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/SKM/contradictions.htm
Easy to find where mistakes in the Koran have been discovered. Google mistakes, or errors in koran and plenty come up.
@Raj,hyd: apne nangi aakho se quran ko kahi bar padha… good.. then why dont u quote some poisonous verse from quran..and wait for our reply? u cant.. u know why? coz apne quran nangi aankho se nahi padha..aapne khud nanga hoke padha… thats what ur religious scripture teaches… always nude sense in all over..U said Andh biswas? the most superstitious people on the face of the earth live are the indian hindus and u say we r superstitious? worshiping snake,, rats, monkeys, taking anyone as god.. like satya sai, nirmal baba.. jo log nanga hoke sadhu banke jawan ladkiyo k sath dance karte hain unse kiya ummid kare..and which mental sick reads their religious book without respect? it seems like aap ek number ki zaheel ho jo ki education k baat karte hain.. go and read ur own religious book in “nangi ankhe” and tell me whats in their..pornography? how to undress droupadi, how krishna stole cloths of the ladies and watched then nude from behind the tree? how 6 pandab ganbang 1 wife? drinking? ganja, nasedi, charshi, bhang peena, suar ki meet khana yeh apki religion sikhti hain mera nahi…
i suggest u to get a life!!!!!!
dekhe Quran5/51 jisme Qurani allah muslimo se kahate hai ,ki tum isaio aur yahudiyo se mitrta mat karo! dekhe Quran 5/5 jisme Qurani allah muslimo se kahate hai tum isaiyo aur yahudiyo ki mahilao se bagair majahb badle unse nikah kar sakte ho ? yani sex ke liye isai v yahudi mahilaye achhi hai unke purush bhale hi rishtedar banjaye , par unko mitr n banao ? kya yah doharapan Qurani allah ka nahi hai ?kya yah samajik bhed bhav ki bate nahi hai? muslim apni mahilaye in dono samudayo ko n de parantu un samudayo ki mahilao se nikah karke sex kare aur jab chahe takaq ka rasta to khula hua hai hi jab ichha ho unko talaq bhi de sakte hai ! isko bhi” jahar” kaha jata hai ! dekhe Quran 2/65 jisme kisi giroh ko adesh n manne ke karan Qurani allah fitkare huye v dhikkare huye ” bandar” banane ka dava karte hai ! batlaiye qurani allah ne” kis tarike se ” unko bandar banaya ! Quran ko aye huye is duniya me karib 1450 sal ka samay ho gaya , iske bad bhi abhi 75% manushy Quran ke adesh nahi mante usko pasand nahi karte ! jara batlaiye kitne manushyo ko Qurani allah ne bandar v suwar bana diya hai ? aisi jhuthi bate jis Quran me ho vah” jaharili” kitab bhi usko kaha jayega ! dekhe Quran 2/67-73 jisme Qurani allah kisi giroh ko ek hatyare ka nam pata karne ke liye ek vishesh gaay ki hatya karne ko kahate hai aur uske mans ke lothde se us murda sharir se chulane ko kahate hai , fir vah murda sharir jinda hokar us hatyare ka nam batla dega , bad me vah fir mar jayega ?jara batlaiye kya aisa sambhav hai ? jab Qurani allah ke pas farishto ki fauz hai tab kyo nahi kisi farishte ko bhij karke us hatyare ka pata batalane ke liye bhij diya ? kya gaay ke mas se kisi hatyare ki khoj ki ja sakti hai? jis kitab me aisi jhuthi bate ho usko jaharili kitab kyo nahi kaha jayega? yah to ishwar ke gyan ki” tauheen” karti hai ! agar yah kahani sachhi hai to kyo nahi islami desho ki sarkare apni polise se kyo nahi kahati hai” is Qurani tarike se ” hatyaro ka pata lagao? pakistan me benazeer bhutto ki hatya isami atankvadiyo ne kar di thi! kyo nahi vishesh gaay ki hatya karke un islami hatyaro ka pata laga liya gaya ? kya yah quran ki “in ayato” ki” tauheen”nahi hai ? dekhe Quran 8/65 jisme Qurani allah muhammd ji se kahate hai ki tum muslimo ko jehad ke liye ubharo agar 20 muslim us jehad me jame rahe to vah 200 [gair muslimo ] par prbhavi rahenge jara agli ayat bhi dekh lijiye Quran 8/66 jisme Qurani allah kahate hai ki muslimo ki “kamjori” hamko maloom huyi hai isliye hamne unka bojh halka kar diya hai, ab 100 jehadi muslim 200 [gair muslimo] par prbhavi honge . jara batlaiye ki Qurani allah keval ek ayat pahale muslimo ki “kamjori ” nahi jan paye ?fir kyo aise allah ko mana jaye jo matr do ayto me itna “Bhari antar ” rakhta ho usko kaise gyani kaha jaye? ek jehad ka mukhiya bhi itna gyan rakhta hoga ? dekhe Quran 9/123muslimo se Qurani allah kahate hai ki apne aspas ke kafiro se lado aur vah tumse sakhti paye ! dekhe Quran 33/61 jisme qurani allah kahate hai ki “fitkare huye [gair muslim] jahan kahi paye jayenge buri tarah katl kiye jayenge ?kya yah Qurani ayte samajik dushmani ko janm nahi dete ? fir inko jaharili adesh dene vali kitab kyo n kaha jaye ? jo sarp, hathi adi ki puja karte hai vah jarur andh vishvasi hai ! aj is barat desh me adhikansh muslim barelvi samuday ke hai jo dargao me jakar “mannate” mangte hai phool chadhate hai agarbatti jalate hai aur chadar chahate hai ? kyo nahi muslim jakar ke un dargao ko tod dete jaise talibano ne buddh ji ki vishal murti todi thi ? kya yah muslimo ka andh vishvas v kurti nahi hai ? ham koi bhi kisi bhi prkar ki murtipuja nahi kiya karte hai ! Qurani allah ke rasool hone ka dava karne vale ” muhammad ji 50 sal ki umr hokar bhi anek patniya hone ke bavjud apne param mitr abu baqar ki kanya6-7 sal ki aysha ji se nikah karne “mansikata” banate hai aur ladai me pakdi huyi anek mahilao se sex karte hai ? apne god liye putr zaid ki ki patni se bhi qurani alalh muhammad ji ka “nikah” karvata hai ? jara batlaiye zainab ji v muahmmad ji ka “nikah” qurani allah ne kahan karvaya tha satve asman me ya is jamin me nikah karvane allah aye the ?muhammd ji fatima ji ke alava koi santan apni ankho ke samne jivit nahi bacha paye !aur fatima ji bhi “bhari jawani ‘ memuahammd ji ke marne ke kuch mah bad hi vah khuda ji ko pyari ho gayi thi ! jo allah ka rasool hone ka dava karta ho iske bavjud vah apni santano ko nahi bacha paye ? vah any muslimo ki raksha allah se kya kar payega ? muhammad ji ki jisne bhi jyada sangati ki usko apna nuksan karvana pada jaise abubaqar ji ki hatya jahar se huyi hajarat umar ji jo sasur ban gaye the unki bhi hatya muslimo ne ki unke do damad usmanji ki hatya bhi muslimo ne ki[jinke zamane me Quran ki “betarteeb”kitab bani ] hajarat ali ji ki hatya muslimo ne namaz padhte huye masjid me ramzanke mahine me muslimo ne ki muahmmad ji ke navase god me khelne vale husain ji ki hatya bi muslimo ne ki ?muahammd ji ke marne ke bad anek patniyo ko bhi v18 sal ki” bhari jawani ” me aysha ji ko bhi vidhwa hona pada! isliye islam ko dhyan se samajhiye padhe likhe muslim, samajhdar muslim ,manavta vadi muslim”turant ” quran ki sangati chod de ! isi me musllimo ki samajhdari jyada kahalayi jayegi !
Mr agniveer,
If you are sooo concerned about zakir naik and all that he tells about Islam ,Vedas etc is wrong then challenge him publicly .BE A MAN agniveer.you Guys have no clue about your own religion.do u guys know atleast what your pandits chant?or what the Sokas mean.But you have sooo much of arrogance,you need someone from some other religion to enlighten about your Vedas what a pity.
You guys keep barking ,it cannot stop good from happening.
Hi,
This post is totally biased and a shameful effort to spread hate against Muslims and Islam. There is nothing like wrong about Dr Zakir Naik or any other Islamic Scholars but offcourse difference in opinions are always present among some.
I invite all the non-muslim brothers to Islam with love and peace.
Thanks,
Irfan
manniy shri irfan ji, Quran me kaun si buniyadi sachhai hai jo islam ko svikar kiya jaye ? kya ap batlayenge ?
That is the typical desert Abrahamic monotheistic behavior, Islam and Christianity alike. Can’t stand that there are different religions in the world, Sickly believing that everyone who does not believe in your faith goes to hell. No thanks, to the desert Arab version of Judaism, Islam, and no thanks the the precursor of Islam, the desert religion of Christianity (another version of Judaism). We have our own ancient faith much older than yours, and have long been familiar with the divine we don’t need an Arab bedouin version of Judaism.
The founder of modern Turkey, Kemal Ataturk:
“This is Islam, an absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, a rotting corpse which poisons our lives.”
Manushya ke dyan ki seema hai,jab wah naak se sugngta hai,kaan se sunta hai,aankh se dekhta hai,chamdi se sparsh karta hai,aur jibh se swad leta hai, tab tak wo seemit sharir main hai, arthat uski panch dyan ke sadhan simit hai. Ex.. Aadmi raat ko sota hai par neend kab aati hai use pata nahi hota.sapna dekhta hai par ye jutha hai ye bhi bhool jyata hai. Raat main sab dharm ke mananewale log koun se neend main kho jaate hai kisi ko nahi pata hai???? Deen main me dharm aalag aalag hai par raat me dharm ko to chodo aadmi khudh ko bhi bhool jyta hai ki wo kab soya,kaisa soya,kaha soya, tab to use dharm ki koi baat yaad nahi aati.Saare jagat main 98% log eesi neend sote hai. Dharm se unko koi prem nahi hota koi pyas nahi hoti, koi jidghysa nahi hoti bas neend main kuch ka kuch kahe chale jaate hai. “Satya ki aag kahati hai tumse waha na raat hoti hai na deen hota hai” lekin tum kaise samjoge kyonki tumhare 98% dyan ke sadhan simit hai. Satya ki aag kahati hai “Jab sab so jaate hai tab bhi wo nahi sota, Wo sokar bhi jaga hua hota hai” Manushya ke man ki teen prakar ki aavasthaye hai , 1)jagrut 2)sapna, aur 3)shshupti arthat gahri neend. Lekin ek chouthi Awasta ke baare me kisi ko pata nahi hai,Sirf 2% Log hi Isko jan pate hai.Unka koi bhi dharm se sambandh na hote huve bhi wohi dharmik hote hai.Wo dharm ki charcha nahi karte balki dharm ko jeete hai.Satya ki aag kahati “Un thodese logonki aatmaye upar uthti hai jiske prakash main ye baki ke log jinda hai”
(1). Quran 5.5. Made lawful to you this day are At-Tayyibat [all kinds of Halal (lawful) foods, which Allah has made lawful (meat of slaughtered eatable animals, etc., milk products, fats, vegetables and fruits, etc.). The food (slaughtered cattle, eatable animals, etc.) of the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) is lawful to you and yours is lawful to them. (Lawful to you in marriage) are chaste women from the believers and chaste women from those who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians) before your time, when you have given their due Mahr (bridal money given by the husband to his wife at the time of marriage), desiring chastity (i.e. taking them in legal wedlock) not committing illegal sexual intercourse, nor taking them as girl-friends. And whosoever disbelieves in the Oneness of Allah and in all the other Articles of Faith [i.e. His (Allah’s), Angels, His Holy Books, His Messengers, the Day of Resurrection and Al-Qadar (Divine Preordainments)], then fruitless is his work, and in the Hereafter he will be among the losers.
Quran: 5.51 O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya’ (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya’ to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya’, then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers and unjust.
See the difference between the 2 verses… first verse is talking about those christian and jews believers to whom Allah revealed the Torah and Gospel and those who believed in oneness of god. they are the true followers of Jesus and Moses and we love them. The 2nd verse is talking about the hypocrites those who distorted the gospel and torah and now they believe in Trinity that is 3 god.. so Allah is talking about the polytheists chirstians and jews.. Allah already mentioned in the quran many times about the true followers of jesus and moses and also warned us about the corrupters of the Scripture. “nangi aankho” se padne ki result aisa hi hota hain..
here is the explanation: 2.62 Verily! Those who believe and those who are Jews and Christians, and Sabians, whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and do righteous good deeds shall have their reward with their Lord, on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve .
(2) 2.65 And indeed you knew those amongst you who transgressed in the matter of the Sabbath (i.e. Saturday). We said to them: “Be you monkeys, despised and rejected.”
the verse is talking about those jews who corrupted the matter of sabath and Allah did not make them monkey, Allah called or regarded them as monkey and despised and rejected them. is it too difficult to understand? maybe ur hindu mythological story stuck in ur brain that a rishi will curse someone and he will become monkey..
u said its been 1400 years Quran came and still 75% people hate it… u forgot that islam is the 2nd largest religion and fastest growing religion with 235% increse rate whereas chritianity has 45% increse rate.. although Islam is the youngest of all the major religions but it is going to exceed chritianity very soon…and what about ur hinduism? dont u say that it is most ancient religion? how many people follow it in the world? i simply dont understand why do u hindus try to point fingers to others when u know that u r smelling so badly?
(3) 2.67 And (remember) when Musa (Moses) said to his people: “Verily, Allah commands you that you slaughter a cow.” They said, “Do you make fun of us?” He said, “I take Allah’s Refuge from being among Al-Jahilun (the ignorants or the foolish).”
2.72 And (remember) when you killed a man and fell into dispute among yourselves as to the crime. But Allah brought forth that which you were hiding.
2.73 So We said: “Strike him (the dead man) with a piece of it (the cow).” Thus Allah brings the dead to life and shows you His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) so that you may understand.
so do u understand english? these verses talking about when moses called his people to sacrifice cow, they did not believe inspite of giving many signs but when they killed a person and justice has to be done Allah ordered Moses to stirke the dead man with a piece of sacrificed cow.. and Allah did this to prove his the significance of sacrificing animal. Allah does not need any help from anyone to know who killed but it was for those jews and Moses Allah helped them in that way.. and again this is not a Tarika for finding the murderer this was a sign for moses and his people of that time, the verse is very clear.. dnt use ur hindu tarika and retuals, jaribooti connection with quran..
(4). u r right u read the quran with naked eyes? its just after 1 verse Allah came to know the weakness of muslims!!!? do u know the history of rise of islam? do u know that Quran was revealed during the period of more than 3 years? do u know by the time when Allah is revealing verse 66 already a war has taken place? plz read when these 2 verses were revealed… what was the time difference… i am surprised u r talking about education i dnt see anything in u.
(5) 33.60 If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease (evil desire for adultery, etc.), and those who spread false news among the people in Al-Madinah, cease not, We shall certainly let you overpower them, then they will not be able to stay in it as your neighbours but a little while.
33.61 Accursed, wherever found, they shall be seized and killed…
why dont u quote the previous verse?? is that u who is among those hypocrites?
Islam is not a mythology.. its justice… and if criminals like u dont like the justice then its ur fault not Allah’s.. 2ndly this verse is not talking about muslim or non muslim its talking about the hypocrites, rapist and criminals…if u want to make friendship with the person who may rape ur daughter or sister or wife u can forgive and befriend with him but islam gives justice. no doubt why in india 98% rapist are walking free. coz people like are their Savior.
rest of the arguments that u brought by Allah we all muslims have the answers but its seems like it will be wastage. u said our beloved prophet married so many in the age of 50.. answer has been given by Dr Annie Besant (Dr Annie Besant in ‘The Life and Teachings of Mohammad,’ Madras, 1932)…”But do you mean to tell me that the man who in the full flush of youthful vigour, a young man of four and twenty (24), married a woman much his senior, and remained faithful to her for six and twenty years (26), at fifty years of age when the passions are dying married for lust and sexual passion? Not thus are men’s lives to be judged. And you look at the women whom he married, you will find that by every one of them an alliance was made for his people, or something was gained for his followers, or the woman was in sore need of protection.”
about the marriage of Ayesha (ra)…Ayesha(ra) was engaged to someone else before she got engaged to Muhammad(saw):
Lady Ayesha(ra) was already engaged to a non-Muslim man named Jober Ibn Al-Moteam Ibn Oday. Back then, the people of Mecca did not object to Ayesha(ra)’s engagement to Jober because she was physically mature enough to be considered for marriage. Her parents saw that and they engaged her to Jober.
The only reason why Ayesha (ra)’s father, Abu Baker Al Siddeek, broke her engagement with Jober is because he was a non-Muslim. Later, a woman named Kholeah Bint Hakeem suggested for Muhammad (saw) to marry Ayesha(ra), because Muhammad (saw) and Abu Baker became best friends. Muhammad (saw) engaged Ayesha(ra) for 2 years before he married her.
Abû Bakr (ra) is also recorded to have spoken these words: “There are three things I cherish most: a look at your face, to spend my wealth on you and that my daughter is thy wife.”
for ur kind information Ayesha (ra) was 7 when she was engaged and married after the age of puberty that is 9. ask any doctors what is the puberty time for women in hot climet, and show me one verse fro ur hindu scripture where it mentions any minimum age for marriage but islam atleast makes it an article for minimum age of puberty. show me any evidence that out prophet had sex with any women who lost war… ur bankrupt lusty mind thinks that way…
about the death of children of our beloved prophet… who have not got hardship in life who were honest? Rabindranath Tagore lost his children, Charlie Chaplin made the world laugh but he also had to loose his children… every prophet of Allah had face hardship… oh come on dont give me story of ur false Babas, gurus who claim to save people from hardship.. like eat panipuri and wealth will start comming.. use plastic and iron tounge cleaner and u Kripa will start comming… comeone give me a break.. neither our prophet nor we muslim sale faulse power or kripa of god like hindus.. so dont compare ur brankrupt mindset with the Islamic intellect..
Mohammed wanted to be the prophet of the Jews and Christians. So he said the religion he created Islam where he placed himself in a key role was the real version of Judaism and Christianity according to Mohammed. This was a way to get Jews and Christians to convert and follow his version of Judaism/Christianity by calling the faith of Jews and Christians corrupted versions.
As far as the Jews and Christians are concerned their scriptures are NOT corrupted, and their practices have been consistent, and Mohammed was not a prophet of God.
He only waited until she was 9 to have sexual intercourse. Between the ages of 6-9 Mohammed “thighed” Aisha. He had other forms of sexual intimacy with her as a child.
Here is a fatwa that shows Mohammed thighing Aisha
“Fatwa (religious sanction)
Number 41409 dated 7/5/1421
August 8, 2000
Praise is to God and blessings on the prophet that is the last of all prophets.
The permanent committee for scientific research and religious sanctions has looked onto the request of Abu Abdallah Mohammed Al Shamry which was sent to the committee from the general secretariat of the Committee of Higher Scholars number 1809 date 3/5/1421. The requester asked the following:
Lately, It has spread on a large scale, especially in weddings, the habit of thighing little boys; what is the ruling of the Quran on this? Especially, that God’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) has thighed Ayesha (may God be pleased with her)
The committee, after studying the request, has ruled the following:
It is not the true guidance of Muslims throughout centuries to resort to the use of these unlawful practices, which were imported to our countries through the immoral videos that are being sent by the infidels and enemies of Islam. As for the thighing of the messenger of God to his fiancée Ayesha, she was six years old and he could not engage in sexual intercourse with her because of her young age, therefore he used to place his penis between her thighs and rub it lightly. In addition, the messenger of God had full control of his penis in contrary to the believers….” http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/muhammad-thighied-aish/
The Jewish Princess Safiya was one woman who was a booty of war. Mohammed and his people killed her father, tortured his husband, and she was married off to Mohammed after witnessnessing all the men folk killed.
“…After securing paragon beautiful Safiyaah daughter of Huyayy Prophet Muhammad has had sex with this young Safiyya in the tent, on their way back to Medina on the same night. Here is the precarious story: Merciful Prophet asked Bilal, the Negro crier of prayer to fetch Safiyyah to his (Muhammad’s) camp. Bilal brought Safiyyah and her cousin straight across the battlefield strewn with dead and close by the corpses of Kinana and his cousin. The two cousin sisters of Safiyyah shrieked in terror when they witnessed the grotesque scene of the slain dead bodies of their dearest relatives that they had to cross over. They tremulously begged a stone-hearted Bilal for mercy but to no avail. When they were brought to Muhammad, he cursed the panic-stricken cousins as devilish and cast his mantle around Safiyyah indicating that she was to be his own. Muhammad consoled a frustrated Dhiya by giving him Safiyyah’s cousin sisters. According to Ibn Sa’d Prophet Muhammad purchased Safiyyah from Dhiyah for seven camels (around US$ 2,450). On the same night (during the day her husband and all relatives were slaughtered) that Muhammad took possession of Safiyyah, he hastened to his tent to sleep with her. This was of course a holy character of Prophet of Islam!
Here is what Ibn Sa’d writes: “-.when it was night, he entered a tent and she entered with him. Abu Ayyub came there and passed the night by the tent with a sword keeping his head at the tent. When it was morning and the Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him.” To hide the lascivious character of Muhammad, Muslim biographers often mention that he married Safiyyahh before he slept with her. But they forget to mention that Muhammad did not follow the rule of waiting period (three monthly periods) to sleep with Safiyyahh. He slept with her in the same day she was captured.
Above stories out of Sahi Hadiths clearly and undoubtedly have confirmed at least two things: (1) Prophet killed all those surrendered unarmed Jews in cold blood, (2) Prophet was attracted by Safiyya’s alluring beauty and he had sex with her (I really don’t care after marriage or before marriage) in a period when that poor Safiyya was in terrible grief by loosing her father, brother, husband and relatives and before the bloods of her relatives was even dry. By what yardstick can we measure the mercifulness and compassionateness of our Prophet? Could any Islamist tell me why Prophet of Islam had to set this terrible example?….” http://www.faithfreedom.org/articles/quran-koran/did-prophet-muhammad-order-killing-surrendered-jews-of-banu-quraiza-and-khaybar-a-historical-analysis/
corrections: Quran was revealed in the span of 23 years.. typing error.. first verse was revealed in time of battle of Badr and 2nd verse was revealed in time of battle of Uhud…
ap apna jawab hindi me dijiye tab ham uska uchit uttar bhui s de sake ? kya quran 33/60 -61kya afvah udane ki saza katl [hatya] hoti hai ? kitna zalim hai qurani allah? kya isse kam koi saza qurani allah ke pas nahi thi ? arop bhi muslim lagaye aur saza bhi muslim de ?
@raj.hyde “18 sal ki bhari jawani me aysha ji ko bhi vidhwa hona pada”
and guess what she was very very happy with her life almost 40% of hadith was narated by her. and she regarded our beloved prophet with so much deep and utmost respect.. she became widow and thats why u r becoming her advocate? who employed u? here is something u should know.. about satidaha pratha which u hindus made a custom to burn the widows with their dead husband..smell ur won shit raj… its stinking..
She was married off without her consent at the age of 6 to a 50 year old man who already had several wives. The marriage was consummated when she was a child of 9. She became a widow at 18, and Mohammed declared that no one else could marry his wives after he was gone. She was a sexually abused child by a 50 year old child rapist/molester her supposed “husband.” Stuck being a young widow unable to marry again. Yeah what a love story.
Muslims are too hasty in dismissing Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha. We can’t simply ignore a prophet’s marriage to a nine-year-old girl. Muslims view Muhammad as the highest example of a moral life, but his marriage to Aisha conflicts with that view. If they want to put Muhammad forward as the standard of morality, Muslims need to come to terms with the many questionable things Muhammad did, as well as the awful impact of these actions.
There is a simple, but highly explicit, way to evaluate the importance of Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha. We must begin by trying to get a mental picture of a morally perfect man. For Muslims, this will include all the things they have been taught about Muhammad. According to their picture, he is kind, generous, patient, humble, and trustworthy. He protects orphans and widows, endures persecution, helps the needy, and promotes justice. He prays faithfully, fasts regularly, and obeys God in everything. He is loyal to his friends and patient with his enemies. He never gives in when tempted with evil. Now we must picture that same man in a room with an innocent little girl. He takes away her doll, climbs on top of her, and puts his penis inside her. She doesn’t know what is happening because she is too young to know much about sex. Frightened and confused, she cries because of the pain and bleeds on her bed, but she tries to remain quiet out of respect for her new husband, who, in return, endangers her life.
If a person is able to keep the same vision of moral perfection throughout that description, he may have the faith necessary to be a Muslim. But if his vision of the perfect man is at odds with what Muhammad did on numerous occasions, he will need to look elsewhere for an ideal human being.
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAHI LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
I LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK , GREAT PERSONALLITY , MASHALLAH
can any one tell me why zakir is called as zakir “naik”.
where he word naik come from, it is not related to islam i think so……
i love dr.zakir naik.bro n sistrs pls c al his videos n get t truth of y u hv been creatd.LAA ILAAHA ILLALLAH MUHAMMDUR RASOOLULLAH
n pls dnt spread wrong info bro.al muslims,ALL HUMAN luv tat luvin personalty
@Raphael: “Now we must picture that same man in a room with an innocent little girl’
For ur inormation muslims will never pictureise that coz muslims are very aware about the situation and well aware about the history and custom of the society of that time. why dont u use ur brain to read the the social custom of arab as well as other countries of that time? u wont because ur bankrupt mind does not enjoy that… rather u enjoy pictureising something with ur lustly brain enjoys…and no wonder why child abuse, incest, rape, audultry is dominating ur so called western society. u talk about child abuse, go and find how many childs are being raped everyday in ur western country.. let me remind u that at that time islam had more enemy than friend in arab and if any christian or jews arabs would consider that marriage wrong they would talk about it.. now who r u the ambassador of morality? where have u learnt that? Ayesha (ra) was already engaged with another person but that person broke the engagement…. this shows that marriage in young age was custom of that time… now u r born in different culture, different time and u r judging the earlier custom? thats what we call hypocrisy…. throughout the history westerners have taken every weapon to distort islam coz islam is the threat for them that the churches have to close their shops if islam rises… and the same thumb-sucking is followed and copied by other religion to stop islam.. but by Allah all the corrupted religion will be washed out by Islam very soon..
You Muslims are quick to point out immorality around the world, especially in the West. It seems, then, that they are suggesting a very inconsistent message. When confronted with an immoral practice in another culture, Muslims cry out in one accord, “We condemn these practices, for they are against the eternal, perfect, and unalterable Law of God!” Yet, whenever the moral character of Muhammad is being scrutinized, Muslims suddenly say, “Don’t judge Muhammad! You should remember that he was from a different culture! Marrying young girls was common in Arabia, and it still is, thanks to Muhammad’s precedent. Different people have different moral standards, so no one should worry about Muhammad’s sexual relationship with a nine-year-old girl.”
This convenient switch from moral absolutism to moral relativism is logically unacceptable. If it is wrong to judge the practices of another culture, then both Muhammad and the Qur’an were wrong for condemning immoral practices in Arabia. But if condemning immoral practices is acceptable, then Muslim apologists need a better response to criticisms of Muhammad’s relationship with Aisha.
@Islam is the way
So the customs of the day dictate to the Qu’ran rather then the other way? thats bull crap! If the Quran was the word of God for all ages then why are you not following Muhammad and his companions you dumb f==k? Why are you not sleeping with little girls, dosent God know better and can see into the future and know that science proves that early pregnancy can have harmful consequences for both young mothers and their babies. According to UNICEF, no girl should become pregnant before the age of 18 because she is not yet physically ready to bear children. Babies of mothers younger than 18 tend to be born premature and have low body weight; such babies are more likely to die in the first year of life. The risk to the young mother’s own health is also greater. I thought Muhammad and his Book were in accordance with science.. couldn’t Allah have revealed to him that this common practice amongst Arabs was wrong as we know now and he could have eliminated this disgusting practice! I guess only your mind is bankrupt then haha 😀
I have one simple question for all the followers of so-called great religion…islam – What is the contribution of islam for the mankind…did you guys invented any medical treatment, any medicine, any technology. You people didn’t, and not even your mohmmad knew that you people have got a black gold (petroleum) deposits underground. It was a white man who discovered oil wells. Your prophet didn’t told you about this. Just compare your population to number of inventions and to the number of Nobel prizes. One more thing…just compare the civilization of middle east pre-islam and post-islam. Post-islam only wars and invasions and attacks killing innocent people who don’t believe your religion.
@Ankit.. u dumbshit can u give any evidence that Ayesha (ra) was pregnant? in those days there was no birth control pills. how come she did not get pregnant? why does not ur filthy mind think about that? u talked about medical science.. dont u know a girl after her puberty which starts around the age of nine for the girls, can be able to be pregnant? but still she never got pregnant? u dubmshits why always take it as for sexual purpose? why dont u use ur brain to know what was the reason for marriage? can u show me one evidence which states that Ayesha (ra) was unhappy with beloved prophet and her marriage?.. when all his other wives were either widows with children, the first wife Khadija (ra) was double of his age with children with whom he lived 25 years in his adult age now that person in his 50s when sexual desire dies married Ayesa (ra) out of lust? why dont u wash ur filthy brain with ganga jal?
yes we believe Quran is for all the ages.. but what do u mean by following Mohammed (pbuh) and his companion? r u talking or shitting? Quran and Mohammed (pbuh) both are same? we follow his teaching but r we supposed to copy everything of his lifestyle? most of the time he ate date palm to live, are we muslims supossed to eat date palm to live? he rode camel, are we muslims supossed to ride camel? he live in a desert, are we muslims supposed to leave our home and live in desert?
a little learning is a dangerous thing… thats the case with u.. we muslims are well capable to understand what should be copied and what not… many things beloved prophet did but can we muslims compare ourself with our prophet? we are not superstitious like u..we know whats our limitations are.. i suggest u get a life…
If the Qu’ran is for all the ages you dumb f==k then how was this not condemened by allah with his foresight that this was wrong . I know you cant do everything exactly like him and his companions, but Muhammad could receive so called prophecies about science so why culdnt he receive one predicting this filthy behaviour and regardless of whether pregnant or not child marriage robs a girl of her childhood-time necessary to develop physically, emotionally and psychologically. In fact, early marriage inflicts great emotional stress as the young woman is removed from her parents’ home to that of her husband and in-laws. Her husband, who will invariably be many years her senior, will have little in common with a young teenager. It is with this strange man that she has to develop an intimate emotional and physical relationship. She is obliged to have intercourse, although physically she might not be fully developed.
So just because he was nice with her does that mean we should all go get children and treat them nicely but sexually? do you think all paedophiles are abusive? fr you to get into jannah as 1 sect out of 72 you must do as muhammad and his companions do or do you not know your own quran you piece of shit! so this was not a book for all the ages…and you are a dumbass
@Garry Rai..
the number we use 1,2,3…..9 were invented by muslims of Arab. without which which no science can stand.. it seems u r interested in science so please suggest to do a little further study to verify the facts that i am placing here.. Algebra was the inventions of Musa al-Khawarizmi (Algorizm)… the father of Chemistry Jabir lbn Haiyan( Geber).
Name Years (C.E.) Description
Jabir Ibn Haiyan (Geber) Died 803 Chemistry (Father of Chemistry)
Musa al-Khawarizmi (Algorizm) 770 – 840 Mathematics, Astronomy, Geography (Algorithm, Algebra, Calculus)
Yaqub Ibn Ishaq al-Kindi (Alkindus) 800 – 873 Philosophy, Physics, Optics, Medicine, Mathematics, Metallurgy
Thabit Ibn Qurra (Thebit) 836 -901 Astronomy, Mechanics, Geometry, Anatomy
Ali Ibn Rabban al-Tabari 838 – 870 Medicine, Mathematics, Calligraphy, Literature
Al-Farghani (Al-Fraganus) 860 Astronomy, Civil Engineering
Zakariya al-Razi (Rhazes) 864 – 930 Medicine, Ophthalmology, Smallpox, Chemistry, Astronomy
Abu Abdullah al-Battani (Albategnius) 868 – 929 Astronomy, Mathematics, Trigonometry
Abu al-Nasr al-Farabi (Al-Pharabius) 870 – 950 Sociology, Logic, Philosophy, Political Science, Music
Abul Hasan Ali al-Masu’di Died 957 Geography, History
Abu al-Qasim al-Zahrawi (Albucasis) 936 – 1013 Surgery, Medicine (Father of Modern Surgery)
Muhammad al-Buzjani 940 – 997 Mathematics, Astronomy, Geometry, Trigonometry
Hasan Ibn al-Haitham (Alhazen) 965 – 1040 Physics, Optics, Mathematics
Abu al-Hasan al-Mawardi (Alboacen) 972 – 1058 Political Science, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Ethics
Abu Raihan al-Biruni 973 – 1048 Astronomy, Mathematics (Determined Earth’s Circumference)
Ibn Sina (Avicenna) 980 – 1037 Medicine, Philosophy, Mathematics, Astronomy
Omar al-Khayyam 1044 – 1123 Mathematics, Poetry
Abu Hamid al-Ghazali (Algazel) 1058 – 1128 Sociology, Theology, Philosophy
Al-Idrisi (Dreses) 1099 – 1166 Geography (World Map, First Globe)
Ibn Rushd (Averroes) 1128 – 1198 Philosophy, Law, Medicine, Astronomy, Theology
Ibn al-Baitar Died 1248 Pharmacy, Botany
Jalal al-Din Rumi 1207 – 1273 Sociology
Ibn al-Nafis 1213 – 1288 Anatomy
Ibn Khaldun 1332 – 1395 Sociology, Philosophy of History, Political Science
this is just a small list.. u may say u have never heard of them,,, because maybe u have not did a deep study on science of the medieval time..today is the time of science and technology and it belongs to the western world and we admit that… and the earlier pioneers are fade up now.. but any scientist or student of science will admit about those legends. and even if u see the short name of them in the bracket u may recognize them if u have any knowledge in the field of science…i give u another link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Muslim_scientists…
brother prophet Mohammed (pbhu) was a prophet not a scientist, not an inventor…but the contribution of our prophet and Quran can not be forgotten…
here are some statement of the famous personality in the field of science…
“Dr. T.V.N. Persaud, professor of Anatomy, says: ‘You have an illiterate person (Prophet Muhammad) making profound statements that are amazingly accurate, of a scientific nature…I personally can’t see how this could be mere chance, there are too many accuracies and like Dr. Moore, I have no difficulty in my mind reconciling that this is a divine inspiration or revelation which lead him to these statements’.
Joe Leigh Simpson, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the North Western University in Chicago in the United States of America. Professor Simpson said: It follows, I think, that not only is there no conflict between genetics and religion, but in fact religion can guide science by adding revelation to some traditional scientific approaches. That there exists statements in the Qur’aan shown by science to be valid, which supports knowledge in the Qur’aan having been derived from Allah.
Professor Alfred Kroner who is one of the world’s most famous geologists
“Thinking about many of these questions and thinking where Muhammad came from, he was after all a bedouin. I think it is almost impossible that he could have known about things like the common origin of the universe, because scientists have only found out within the last few years with very complicated and advanced technological methods that this is the
case.
“Medieval Islam was technologically advanced and open to innovation. It achieved far higher literacy rates than in contemporary Europe;it assimilated the legacy of classical Greek civilization to such a degree that many classical books are now known to us only through Arabic copies. It invented windmills ,trigonometry, lateen sails and made major advances in metallurgy, mechanical and chemical engineering and irrigation methods. In the middle-ages the flow of technology was overwhelmingly from Islam to Europe rather from Europe to Islam. Only after the 1500’s did the net direction of flow begin to reverse.” (pg 253) Jared Diamond a world renowned UCLA sociologist, and physiologist won the Pulitzer Prize for his book: “Guns, Germs, and Steel.”
I am forced to copy-paste some material to refute the claims made by you.
The number system was actually first developed in India. Aryabhatta developed the place-value notation in the 5th century and a century later Brahmagupta introduced the symbol for zero. The numeral system and the zero concept, developed by the Hindus in India slowly spread to other surrounding countries due to their commercial and military activities with India. The Arabs adopted it and modified them. Even today, the Arabs called the numerals they use ‘Rakam Al-Hind’ or the Hindu numeral
system. The Arabs translated Hindu texts on numerology and spread it to the western world due to their trade links with them. The Western world modified them and called them the Arabic numerals, as they learnt from them. Hence the current western numeral system is the modified version of the Hindu numeral system developed in India. It also exhibits a great similarity to the Sanskrit-Devanagari notation, which is still used in India. The earliest inscription of zero was a record on Sankheda copper plate found in Gujarat, India (585 – 586 CE).
The word geometry seems to have emerged from the Indian word ‘Gyaamiti’ which means measuring the Earth. Although Euclid (a Greek) is credited with its invention in 300 BCE, the concept of geometry developed in India from the practice of making fire altars in square and rectangular shapes. Also, the theorem now attributed to
Pythagoras (the square of the hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle equals the sum of the squares of the other two sides) was elucidated earlier by Baudhayana an recorded in the Treatise, Baudhayana Sulba Sutra (6th century BCE). The word trigonometry is similar to ‘Trikonamiti’ meaning ‘measuring triangular forms.’ The Sanskrit text, Surya Siddhanta (4th century CE) describes details of trigonometry which were introduced to Europe by Briggs in the 16th century. The ratio of the circumference to the diameter of a circle is known as Pi. The text Baudhyana Shulba Sutra mentions this ratio to be approximately equal to 3. Aryabhatta in 499 CE worked out the value of Pi to the fourth decimal place as 3.1416. In 825 CE the Arab mathematician Mohammed Ibna Musa says that “This value has been given by the Hindu (Indians).” Present day calculations give its value of Pi as 3.1415926535.
Acharya Charak has been crowned as the father of Medicine. His renowned work, the “Charak Samhita”, is considered as an encyclopedia of Ayurveda, the oldest known medicinal system. His principles, diagnoses, and cures retain their potency and truth even after a couple of millennia. When the science of anatomy was confused with different theories in Europe, Acharya Charak revealed through his innate genius and inquiries the facts on human anatomy, embryology, pharmacology, blood circulation and diseases like diabetes, tuberculosis, heart disease, etc. In the “Charak Samhita” he has described the medicinal qualities and functions of 100,000 herbal plants. He has emphasized the influence of diet and activity on mind and body. Susruta is known as the father of surgery and is the author of the book Susruta Saṃhita, in which he describes over 300 surgical procedures, 120 surgical instruments and classifies human surgery in eight categories. He lived, taught and practiced his art on the banks of the Ganges in the area that corresponds to the present day city of Varanasi in North India. The medical works of both Sushruta and Charaka were translated into Arabic language during the Abbasid Caliphate (750 AD). These Arabic works made their way into Europe via intermediaries.
In ancient India, chemistry was called Rasayan Shastra, Rasa-Vidya, Rasatantra and Rasakriya all of which roughly mean ‘Science of liquids’. The Iron Pillar at Delhi is verily a rust-less wonder. It has been standing in open for more than a millennium in the heat, dust and rain, but except for the natural erosion it has not caught rust. This kind of a rust-proof iron had not been smelted anywhere else in the world. Another instance of Indian metallurgy is the copper statue of Gautama Buddha found at Sultan Ganj in Bihar. The statue is 2.13 meters high and weighs nearly a ton. Methods for the extraction of metals like gold, silver, tin and copper from their ores and their purification are mentioned in Rasaratnakara of Nagarjuna. In his treatise, he has also listed the apparatus that was used by earlier alchemists. The process of distillation, liquefaction, sublimation and roasting were also mentioned. Nagarjuna also discussed, in detail, the possibility of transmutation of base metals into gold. But although he could not produce gold, these techniques did yield metals with gold like yellowish brilliance. Nagarjuna has also discussed methods for the preparation of mercury like calamine. Later Nagarjuna seems to have turned towards organic chemistry and medicine. He has written a text called Uttaratantra which is supposed to be a supplement to an earlier text the Shusrutasamahita which is said to have been written by Shusruta in the 8th century B.C. Only a few decades after Nagarjuna, India was invaded by the Mohammedans: Mahmud of Ghazni had raided and plundered Nagarjuna’s hometown of Somnath in 1020 A.D. It is possible that Nagarjuna’s texts fell into the hands of the invaders. While the invaders ruthlessly destroyed the architectural achievements of this country and imposed their despotic rule, they also transmitted Indian sciences to the outside world. Alongwith Mahmud of Ghazni came scholars like Al Beruni who studied Indian texts and translated them into Arabic. Many Indian ideas of medicine were incorporated into the Unani system of medicine of the Arabs. Nagarjuna’s works could not have escaped their attention. It is possible that the technique of alchemy was borrowed by the Arabs from India. In the ancient world there is no reference to alchemy. We first hear of it in the medieaval Europe. The homeland of the Arabs is not rich in metals, thus alchemy and the smelting of metals could not have been indigenous to the Arabs. Thus the Arabs seem to have borrowed the technique of transforming base metals info gold-like metals from India. The Arabs called the technique Al Kimia which according to the Oxford Dictionary literally means the ‘transformation of metals’. Al means ‘The’ and Khimia which is derived from the Greek term Khemia means ‘to transmute metals’. But westerners did not appear to have had the knowledge of the technique of alchemy. This is borne out by the fact that the term Alchemy which the westerners use for describing this technique was borrowed from the Arabs. The word A1chemy is obviously a corruption of the term Al Kimia which the Arabs gave to the technique of converting base metals into gold like substances which they culled out from Indian texts on the subject.
India has been reputed for its iron and steel since Greek and Roman times with the earliest reported finds of high-carbon steels in the world coming from the early Christian era, while Greek accounts report the manufacture of steel in India by the crucible process. Wootz is the anglicized version of ukku in the languages of the states of Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh, a term denoting steel. Literary accounts suggest that steel from the southern part of the Indian subcontinent was exported to Europe, China, the Arab world and the Middle East. In the 12th century the Arab Idrisi says ‘The Hindus excel in the manufacture of iron. It is impossible to find anything to surpass the edge from Indian steel’.
I will post more from relevant sources tomorrow.
India’s contribution to the field of astronomy has been unparalleled with seminal works done by legends like Aryabhatta, Varahamihir, Brahmagupta, Lalla, Bhaskaracharya, etc. The link given below is a brilliant presentation of the contributions of ancient indians to the field of sciences.
http://www.iisc.ernet.in/prasthu/pages/PP_data/105.pdf
Chanakya is traditionally identified as Kautilya or Vishnu Gupta, who authored the ancient Indian political treatise called Arthasastra. He is considered as the pioneer of the field of economics and political science in India, and his work is thought of as an important precursor to Classical Economics. Chanakya’s works predate Machiavelli’s by about 1,800 years.
The earliest history of music in India can be traced back to the Vedic ages, over two thousand years back. The concept of Naadbrahma is seen being manifest in the Vedic ages. All organised music traces its origins back to the Sama veda which contains the earliest known form of organised music. The earliest raga owes its origin to the Sama veda. The first reference to music was made by Panini in 500 BC and the first reference to musical theory was found in `Rikpratisakhya` in 400 BC. Bharata Natyashastra, which was written on 4th century AD, contains several chapters on music, which was probably the first clear written work on music that has divided music into octaves and twenty-two keys. The next important work on music was `Dathilan` that also mentions the existence of twenty-two srutis per octave. According to ancient notion, these twenty-two srutis are the only keys that can be made by the human being.
@Garry…You people didn’t, and not even your mohmmad knew that you people have got a black gold (petroleum) deposits underground. It was a white man who discovered oil wells…
looks like u r a racist.. anyways Mohammed (phbu) have not talked about the oil underground.. but definitely he talked about the future of the Arabs…
Sahih Hadith Volume 1, Book 2, Number 47: When the shepherds of black camels (Arabs) start boasting and competing with others in the construction of higher buildings. And the Hour is one of five things which nobody knows except Allah….
we will aslo admit that at a time you white people went every part of the world like a sniffer dog in search of wealth and steal them or taking over them forcefully… like british came to india, and all over the world and colonialization was their purpose…and and by the way ur white british torture and killed more people in the world than muslims ever could..which muslim countries called world war I and world war II? as a white person discovered the oil under Arabia is that why Bush and Tony Blair conducting war against Afganistan, Iraq and now they are planning to attack Iran ( all oil rich countries)..
ur statement.. just compare the civilization of middle east pre-islam and post-islam….. sorry to say that this time I have to consider u as an ignorant because u dont know the history at all…The pre-Islamic Arabia was commonly known as the age of jahiliyya, meaning the age of barbarism, darkness, and ignorance….
ur statement..
Post-islam only wars and invasions and attacks killing innocent people who don’t believe your religion….
who killed 6 million jews? who was Hitler? who was Mussolini? they were Christian..who called 3 consecutive Crusade? which killed millions of innocent people? ur Pope… who dropped atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? ur white America..who conducted 2 consecutive war that killed millions? ur so called white people..who killed thousand or Afgani and Iraqi by the excuse of fighting terrorism? to kill 2 guilty person they killed thousands…in this age of humanity we saw 2 war by the grace of Bush and Tony Blair.. Bloody white terrorist..Bush also initially called for crusade,, seems like spirit of pope was within him…
today more than 15 million Christian lives in Arabian peninsula… if we had to kill them then they should be washed away…but always church and politics controlled history, article and media have not left any effort to distort Islam because of the only reason that they cant sale the Indulgence to heaven.. they have to close their shop to stop Islam.. more than 5 millions books has been written against Islam by the order of the church in only 100 years of the medieval time and that bloody lies are stuck in ur mind or maybe ur heart of also filled up with the spirit of church…
here is what famous people replies
De Lacy O’Leary in ‘Islam at the Crossroads,’ London, 1923.
History makes it clear, however, that the legend of fanatical Muslims sweeping through the world and forcing Islam at the point of sword upon conquered races is one of the most fantastically absurd myths that historians have ever repeated.
Mahatma Gandhi, statement published in ‘Young India,’1924.
I wanted to know the best of the life of one who holds today an undisputed sway over the hearts of millions of mankind…. I became more than ever convinced that it was not the sword that won a place for Islam in those days in the scheme of life. It was the rigid simplicity, the utter self-effacement of the Prophet the scrupulous regard for pledges, his intense devotion to his friends and followers, his intrepidity, his fearlessness, his absolute trust in God and in his own mission. These and not the sword carried everything before them and surmounted every obstacle. When I closed the second volume (of the Prophet’s biography), I was sorry there was not more for me to read of that great life.
Sir George Bernard Shaw in ‘The Genuine Islam,’ Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936.
“If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam.”
James Michener in ‘Islam: The Misunderstood Religion,’ Reader’s Digest, May 1955, pp. 68-70.
“No other religion in history spread so rapidly as Islam. The West has widely believed that this surge of religion was made possible by the sword. But no modern scholar accepts this idea, and the Qur’an is explicit in the support of the freedom of conscience.”
Lawrence E. Browne in ‘The Prospects of Islam,’ 1944
Incidentally these well-established facts dispose of the idea so widely fostered in Christian writings that the Muslims, wherever they went, forced people to accept Islam at the point of the sword.
K. S. Ramakrishna Rao in ‘Mohammed: The Prophet of Islam,’ 1989
My problem to write this monograph is easier, because we are not generally fed now on that (distorted) kind of history and much time need not be spent on pointing out our misrepresentations of Islam. The theory of Islam and sword, for instance, is not heard now in any quarter worth the name. The principle of Islam that “there is no compulsion in
religion” is well known.
Another famous European writer, Thomas Carlayle, said: “Accusing [the Prophet] of relying on the sword for people to respond to his preaching is incomprehensible nonsense!”
Thomas Carlyle in ‘Heroes and Hero Worship and the Heroic in History,’ 1840
“The lies (Western slander) which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man (Muhammad) are disgraceful to ourselves only.”
Thomas Carlyle, in his book Heroes and Hero worship, refers to this misconception about the spread of Islam: “The sword indeed, but where will you get your sword? Every new opinion, at its starting is precisely in a minority of one; in one man’s head alone. There it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it, there is one man against all men. That he takes a sword and tries to propagate with that will do little for him. You must get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as it can.”
Muslims ruled Spain for about 800 years. The Muslims in Spain never used the sword to force the people to convert. Later the Christian Crusaders came to Spain and wiped out the Muslims. There was not a single Muslim in Spain who could openly give the adhaan, that is the call for prayers.
Indonesia is a country that has the maximum number of Muslims in the world. The majority of people in Malaysia are Muslims. which Muslim army went to Indonesia and Malaysia?
Today the fastest growing religion in America is Islam. The fastest growing religion in Europe is Islam. Which sword is forcing people in the West to accept Islam in such large numbers?
Rather Christian did this job, the British, Dutch, France… they conquered every part of the world and set up colony and spread Christianity but as they controls the media and writers they poses their dirty act on Islam..
Who refers to the pre-islamic Arabian period as the age of jahiliyya? The Muslims! What about the fact that it was widely considered to be the cradle of the earliest civilizations in history that were established in the region now known as the Middle East around 3500 BC by the Sumerians, in Mesopotamia (Iraq), widely regarded as the cradle of civilization. The Sumerians and the Akkadians (later known as Babylonians and Assyrians) all flourished in this region.
Login to facebook and watch all these videos.The page created by muslims itself. https://www.facebook.com/We.Hate.Zakir.Naik/videos
I am muslim, I don’t belong to Dr. zakir cent but I love him.
Cent has no importance over teaching of Quran & prophet. He is doing good to avoid miss understanding.
If some muslim give importance to their cent over Quran teachings they are wrong. We are open to identify mistake in our cent & correctify it in light of Quran & prophet teaching.
As creator of Hanfi cent “Abu hanifa” said himself, if you guys ever find my interpration against Quran & teaching of prophet Mohummad, through my interpration/translation/understanding/teaching on wall, and follow what correction you found in Quran & sunna
@SDC… are u drunk? u r talking about 3500 BC? do u understand what it means by pre-islam and post islam Arab? we r talking about ,5th and 6th century..wash ur brain… just for sake of argument u r trying to mix up things…
What are the evidences that you have at hand to prove that immediate pre-islamic period was a phase of ignorance and decadence?
WHY DO YOU WORSHIP IDOLS? Brief us on this SDC.
Is idol worship such a crime that it needs to be proscribed?
@SDC
Idol worship is a heinous crime. Why do you associate lords with real creator?
Is it? How? Please enlighten.
Nobody does that. How did you come to such a conclusion?
u call us idol worshippers…what are u ppl…u are the biggest idol worshippers of all times and u r idol is black box of mecca and stone inside it u always read namaz facing that u have its pic in ur homes isnt that idol worship….besides let me tell u the true purpose of idols it is to create a spiritual atmosphere around u. Its just like u will not do any unethical activity like sex if there is picture of ur parents lying around u..our idols have the same effects its just to create a clean state of mind….so bug off illetrates
@SCIENCE
We muslims do not have idols in mosques and we leave our businesses,errands and pray to Allah Almighty five times a day!
Have you seen a better example than this? Leaving aside money and worldly pleasures to pray to Allah Almighty to show our devotion ,respect, and humility
To pray for what? More money and more worldly and other worldly pleasures. Wow!!!
Allah hate Idol worship that is why he punishes Idol worshiper eternally. But I take pleasure to irritate Allah.
@SDC
Money must be an interest to you for you being an idolater have a dedicated goddess for this purpose, goddess of wealth.
Our prayers include:
All prayers are due to Allah Almighty the lord of the universe.
Besides – O Allah forgive us of our sins those we have committed, for you are the most forgiving and most merciful.
Coming back to you, if your prayers are that for wealth and worldly pleasures then you should indeed continue with them.
You can now expunge the WOW!!! you included for it will not be wonderful for you anymore, that as per your presumed logic and at par with your hindu philosophy ,we too would seek for worldly pleasures and wealth in our prayers.
@Truth Seeker
A good example for adamant like you –
You cannot irritate a teacher, by failing continuously in your exams. A good teacher does tolerate you and guides you for your success.
You are probably more into looting as this been ordained by your beloved prophet, the enlightened one, who gave you the concept of ghanimah or war booty. Worshiping is such a waste of time besides being boring and tedious when you have such a wonderful shortcut such as this. I just wonder what is sexual slavery, polygamy, concept of 72 virgins and pearly bottomed boys, etc., all about. Probably, a part of the penances for forgiveness of sins, isn’t it? Ugh! we are such losers. We only pray for wealth and worldly pleasures.
It is very individual and personal as to what one prays to God so people like SDC cannot just conclude whether one prays of sexual needs alone or one is just plainly grateful for all he has.
As to idol worship, let me share my experience. Apart from festivals, the only time one worships/prays to an idol is when they are in need of something. n then talking about temples, most of the temples that have a “high degree of holiness” like Tirupati and Thiruthani , and i know so many others which are so business like…The new term called “VIP Darshan” where if some big amount is paid then that person reaches the sanctum through a much cleaner and fast crowd free route, where as if one goes through the free route??….they have to wait sticking to one another for at least 2/3 days!!!….What kind of a prayer is it where one gets darshan in 10 minutes if paid….its more like business n not worship, that too one is pushed away within few seconds of the hard earned darshan!…next…the hygene!!!!…..don’t even talk abt it!….its absolutely pathetic the idol is poured with milk, oil, ghee, n what not as a ritual and then all the slag is given as prashad!!…n thus the amount of flies in the place…this happens in sooooo many temples!…i have seen big cockroaches running here n there…the ambulatory passage is always sticky with either oil spilled or some other thing!…Is this how one keeps their beloved Idols if they are that sacred?….is this what God asked to do?….That make me bathe with oil, n milk, n curd whilst naked, n then drink all of that and then dress me up????….if the idol has to be cleaned n kept safely then that means we are protecting it!…how can we in any way seek protection from it…something that can’t protect itself? you don’t say??…Its more than ridiculous!!!….During Ganesh chathurti we immerse these idols in water thereby contaminating the water…”contaminating the water” is an understatement!!! …what a sick practice!!…i can go on n on n on about all this…and then when i went to Masjids!!!…they are so clean…even the oldest masjids are so clean one enters them only after cleansing themselves, prays n leaves. and when prayer is done 5 times a day one will not every time ask for worldy pleasures, infact the very act of namaz makes one be grateful to God!…I have experienced!!!….God is beyond the limit of one’s imagination…cannot be created not destroyed….God is our creator, we are not God’s!…God is one of whom we know not the form!….Islam is a truth that has gracefully come to light for me….yes it is highly misunderstood!…even i had all these complaints!….but after truely knowing Islam i have known how beautiful it is!…
Grateful for what? For the means of enjoyments that were hitherto considered illegal and immoral being made legitimate by supposedly “divine” decrees through the prophet, is it?
While I do agree that temples today have become centers of business activity, but in sharp contrast your places of worship have always been infamous for being centers of hate propaganda. The shabby condition of the temples only goes to reflect the apathy of the Hindus, nothing else.
Have you truly known Islam? Had it been the case, you would have felt a deep sense of revulsion.
Sometime children hate parents for little reason….but that not means parents also hate our children…..thts why your allah hate idol worship…ad our god nevr hate ur vacant mosque
Air is evrywhere….so why u need a fan to feel it….plz anser…
not all muslims are bad or disrespect other beliefs but most do and muslim preachers like zakir naik are just liars who talk about peace then attack other religions dispite they are lying
Why a person who comes out in the open and quotes verses from all scriptures not only from hinduism but also from christianity, while your gurus and so called fake spiritual leaders cannot utter a single reference. I am sure you actually had wanted to say that Hindu gurus and spiritual leaders are the real liars. Typing errors are always there.
Well, to begin with there is no reference of Muhammad in Eastern religious scriptures but Zakir Naik goes on beating the drum that Muhammad has been mentioned in them. So, who is lying here?
The author of this article don’t even know the fact that, All the famous figures has the oppositions. I assume the author is brilliant enough and I do not need to explain more.
This article is nothing but the same tactice used by RSS, when a Hindu terrorist Killed Mahathma Gandhi but the false news was spread by RSS Hindu Shaba, that the killer was a Muslim. There are group of people (I hate to call them Hindus) just expecting and injecting a poison in the hearts of Innocent hindus. and now trying to do that in between muslims too.
I have seen and attended the programs of Dr. Zakir Nayek and what he speaks is truth and anti -islamic Hindu group try to stop his programs in many means and this is one of the attempt. Many hindus including me gaining lots of knowledge and we able to read what our Vedas says which is never told by the so called hindu swamijis, Gurus, preachers. We know they are busy with what?
I respect Dr. Zakir Naik and his enlighment. All the Hindu and Muslim Bother be united and do not listen to any evil deeds. There is no logic in this article but the intention of the article is clear.
If Agniveer is really worried about the society let him to go and save the people from the false Swamiji’s who commits the crime of rape, looting etc on a large sacle.
This article is just beacuse of just jeolous and you hate muslims, Are you able to face him face to face. Just forget to meeting a muslim scholor face to face. Do you have any one who is having caliber to conduct a live Q& A session with other community?. Just try quote the vedas like he quotes and give the contest of them? There are masters in backbiting which is the work of cowards.
you are fake hindu if you were real you would know zakir naik lies
i have crosschecked every reference he Zakir Naik has given…because i was a Hindu and had too many misconceptions, and i would not believe anyone who so strongly says that Islam is the truth. I have crosschecked all his references and found out that all are true!…He speaks the truth!…
Fake Hindu and Muslim proselytizer. Everyone instead read this truth about Mohammed exposed http://www.thecrescentorthecross.com/Robert%20Spencer%20-%20The%20Truth%20About%20Muhammad.pdf
I would like to agree with you on some counts. No doubt, he speaks the truth but the Islamic version of it and definitely not the generally accepted one. And, yes, there are glaring misconceptions about Islam about it being the religion of peace. The wickedness of the faith can be gauged from the fact that the adherents of the faith are known for their not-so-peaceful actions world over.
to eradicate moorti pooja we have to eradicate islam first. our innocent hindus are converting to islam because they dont know sanskrit so they can not read and understand vedas. we have to spread vedas and teaching of vedas. most of the time i become desperate when i see that no Hindu is interested in Veda, he is happy his life and all that.
islam ko janne ke liye pahle wo kis paristhiti me bana.us jamane me log kya karthe the,kaise sochthe the,kaise dharm ko karte the,unki samajik,aarthik,bhogolik,dharmik manodasha kaisi thi ye sab thik se soch ne par hi,Islam thoda bahut samaj me aayega.Sabhi musalman budhimani aksar galti karte hai ki islam ko bewajah vartman samay se toulte hai..uska samay 1400 saal purana hai aaj 100 saal ke pahale ka koi bhi dhyan thik nahi lagta yaha dharm aur science roj badalte ja rahe hai aur 1400saal purana islam jo ki ek vishista log aur jaati ke liye tha ek kabile tak simit tha use saare vishva par lagu kaise hoga . Quran vishva ko saamne rakh kar nahi bana balki sirf arab me hi chote chote jo kabile the unko saamne rakh kar bana tha,wo aanek devta ki upasana karthe the iski tulna wo hindu se karte hai, ye BILKUL HI GALAT HAI KYOKI HINDU JAB AANEK DEVTA KI UPASANA KARTA HAI TO WOH US SE PREM KARTA HAI NA KI BHAY.HINDU KE SAARE DEVTA PREM SE NIRMIT HUYE HAI NA KI BHY SE BHAKT KE PREM KE KARAN BHAGWAN BHI BHAKT KI BHAVNA JAISA BANA.HINDU JAB AANEK DEVTA KO PUJTA HAI TO WO SABHI BAKI KE BHAGWANO ME US KE AARADHYA DEVTA KO HI DEKHTA HAI.HINDU JAB AANEK DEVTA KO PUJTA HAI TO WO YE BHALI BHATI JANTA HAI KI SAKAR KE PICHE NIRAKAR HAI.WO YE BHI JANTA HAI YE AANEK DEVTA EK HI SATYA KE AANEK ROOP HAI.par jab arab me koi murti puja karta hoga to wo ye bate nahi janta tha kyoki uski dharna bhahot hi nichale darje ki thi wo bhay khatha khouf khata tha.muhammad ke jamane ki murtiya bhahot hi darawani aur bhay khane wali thi unme PREM jara bhin NAHI THA NA DEVTA ME NA BHAKT ME.MAGAR HINDU KI DEVTA PREM SE BHARI PURI THI AUR HAI.allah jo muhammad ka khud ke kuresh kabile se aata hai wo ek bhay dhikhane wala hi hai.lekin ek BAAT MUSALMAN BUDHIMAN NAHI SAMAJTE KI WO AKSAR KAHTE HAI KI QURAN ME LIKHA HAI ALLAH BAHOT HI DAYALU AUR SHAMA KARNE WALA HAI.LEKIN WO YE BAAT BHULTE HAI KI ALLAH ME SACH ME PREM HAI? WO APNE MUSLIMO SE PREM KARTA HAI?YAKI SIRF USKO MAN NE WALO KE SIVA DUSRO SE WO NAFRAT KARTA HAI AISA ALLAH VISHVA KA HO SAKTA HAI?JO PREM JANTA HO WO PREM HI SIKHAYEGA EK BHI QURAN ME AYAT NAHI HAI MUJASE PYAR KARO AISA ALLAH NE KAHA HO.TO TUMARA ALLAH DAYALU AUR KRIPALU KAISE HOGA WO KISI ANYA KARAN SE HAI.PREM WO KARAN NAHI HAI.QURAN KA ALLAH EK ARAB KE 360 JO DEVTA THE UNKO NICHA KARNE KE LIYE BANAYA GAYA EK MUHAMMAD KA VICHAR HAI,
dr.zakir naik sach me agar vad-vivad karna chahta hai to use main hara sakta hu..dekho agar praman ki baat aayegi to pratyaksha,aanuman,aagam ye 3 praman mukhya hote hai. Ab dekho islam ke paas pratyakshya praman allah ka nahi hai.allah ko kisi ne pratykshy nahi dekha khud muhammad ne bhi nahi dekha.is karan allah ek soch rah jata hai .ek sapna rah jata hai,quran ka aur hadis satya hai is ka bhi praman kahi bhi nahi milta.ab sirf aanuman praman ki jaha dhua hai waha agni hai vaise ye praman bhi allah par thik nahi beithta,kyoki allah ka anuman ki wo kaisa hai to dayalu,krupalu,shaktiman,sab jannewala.pal bhar me kuch bhi karnewala is se allah ka anuman nahi lagta kyoki koi bhi sadharan aadmi me ye gun paye jate hai to wo kya allah ho sakega? Bilkul nahi.Phir aata hai aagam arthat shastra praman to allah ka varnan na to bible me hai,na toraht,engil me hai,na kisi anya dharma ke shastra me allah ka naam hai .to ye siddha hua ki allah ek man ka vichar hai, jo muhammad ke tatkalin nirantar soch ka parinam tha.siway muhammad ke allah ka koi bhi praman nahi milta is liye islam ko sarvamanya ya jagatmanya dharma nahi kaha jayega.dr,zakir naik ki halat vaisi hai jaise koi chor khud ko chor na kahe.ye sabit nahi karta ki chor chor nahi hai,praman do dr.zakir naik kuch to praman do.khud muhammad bhi praman dene se chuke tum kya khak praman doge?
If u are that great then go to his conference and bindass chalenge him!!…Go and show how great you are there that saying the tu use hara sakta hai….Ja…aur karke dikha!….Hum bhi dekhte hai!…i am serious….
If u are that great then go to his conference and bindass chalenge him!!…Go and show how great you are there than saying “tu use hara sakta hai”….Ja…aur karke dikha!….Hum bhi dekhte hai!…i am serious….don’t just blow your trumpet for nothing!
Dr. ZAKIR NAIK is a true and honest muslim.He always says true things about islam he gives references.All other sections hate him due to his intelligence and committment about islam he is trying to propagate muslim religion in a proper manner….If any one has doubts about it check out references…He says everything right about islam but now a daz people want flexiblity they dont love islam they love their choices…what they feel is right and other things r not good..Many muslim people and others humiliating him.they all are showing d negative image of zakir naik in front of the world.but zakir is a rising sun of islam…all other are jealous him because their shops r closed..Zakir is not famous in India but all over the world…he is working hard to propagate islam.he is confident allah will help him
Naik is banned from the UK and Canada. Such is the criminal you follow.
ek doha jo bahut kuch kahta hai, “BUND” SAMANA SAMUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Ye sadharan chit ki awastha hai, par jaise Vishwas mukta hota hai chit to ye hota hai,”SAMUND” SAMANA BUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Pahle to main aapko ek baat batata hu VISHWAS YA BELIEF YE SABSE BADE JAHAR HAI.main eshwar ko manta nahi JANTA HU. Aur tum jaise samjte ho ki eshwar ke bare me vaise eshwar ko maine kabhi bhi dekha nahi hai,kisi ko bhi wo aajtak mila nahi NA HI MILEGA YE MERA VACHAN HAI.Ha devtapurush huye hai jinko hi galti se bhagwan,eshwar man liya gaya hai.Yatra kaise hoti hai,Pahle purush ,bad me devtapurush aur akhir me bhagwan. Yahi itihas hai tum dyan ki aankh se apne bhitar dekho to tumko sab par avishwas bana hi rahta hai ki samne bhagwan khada hai ye sach hai ya mere man ka khel? Ex.deta hu Ramkrushna ko kali mata ke darshan hote the,saint namdev krishna se bolte the,par vaise hi inko ye sab man ka hi khel lagta tha.inka bhram tab tuta jab inone aapne aap ko dekha jo ki ek matra satya hai.Tum bhagwan par bhi shaq kar sakte ho par tum khud par shaq nahi kar sakte ki tum nahi ho.TUM NAHI HO IS KO BHI JANANE KE LIYE TUMRA HONA JARURI HAI.KYA TUM APNE NA HONE KO JANTE KO,BHAWAN YA ESHWAR YE MULLYAWAN HAI PAR JO INKO DEKH RAHA HAI WO UNSE BHI ADHIK MULLYA KA HAI.JANANEWALA AUR JANA JANEWALA EK JAB HOTE HAI TAB SAMUND HI BUND ME GIRTA HAI.PAR JAB TAK YE ALAG RAHTE HAI TAB TAK BUND HI SUMAND ME GIRTI HAI.JANNEWALA AUR JANA JANEWALA DO DIKHAI DENA HI AGYAN HAI.ISLIYE MAIN ESHWAR KO MANTA NAHI JITA HU.ESHWAR EK PARAM ANUBHAV KI BAAT HAI.SHABD SE,TARK SE DEVTAPURUSH KO SIDHA KAR SAKTE HO ANUBHAV KO NAHI.DR.JAKIR NAIK KO MAIN AKELE HI 10000 KE BARABAR HU AAB YE UNKI DURSTI KA DOSH HAI KI MERE SAAT TO JO LOG ,FARISTE,ANGILS,DEVTA UNKI JO FOUJ HAI WO ITNI JYDA HAI MAIN GINTI BHI NAHI KAR SAKTA MAIN JINDA LOG RAKHTA HU APNE SATH AMRUT PIYE HUYE LOG MERE PAAS HAI AUR DR. Zakir ke paas jo aadmi ka jakhira hai wo sab murda log hai,unka khud ka koi bhi vajud nahi hai, lakir ke fakir ,kolu ke bail hai. Jis ke piche logo ki bhid hoti hai wo bhed hai aadmi ka.SIHA AKELA HOTA HAI.BAS EK BAAR DAHADTA HAI TO SARA JANGAL KANPTA HAI.DR.ZAKIR NAIK DARA HUA HAI WO APNA DAR LOGO SE NAHI KAHTA WO WOHI BAAT KAREGA JO QURAN ME HAI,HADIS ME HAI ,AUR ALLAH SE MEL KHATI HAI.JAISE USE KOI BATA DETA HAI KI QURAN ,HADIS,ALLAH KE KHILAF KOI BAAT JA RAHI HAI TO PAHLE DARTA HAI.AUR USI KARAN WO ISLAM KA BADA SPEEKAR BAN GAYA HAI (ARTHAT AISA TUM SAMJTE HO) DAR KAHI ISLAM GALAT NA HO JAYE IS KARAN HI WO BRILIIYANT BHI BANA HUA HAI COMPUTER KE JAISA DIMAG SMRUTI KA KACHRA INKA SATYA SE KOI LENA DENA NAHI HAI YE WO JANTA NAHI.ANUBHAV CHAHIYE ANUBHAV HAI SAHAS KE HA MAIN JANTA HU ALLAH KO AISA KAH DE.NAHI MANANE KO BOLO SIRF KAMJOR DIMAGWALE KA HI YE KAM HOSAKTA HAI.TUM KO THODA KAHA HAI SAMAJ HAI TO JYADA SAMJOGE……..ATTA DIPA BHAV KHUD KE DIYE KHUD BANO……..
Dr.zakir naik ka man kamjor ho gaya hai.Jo kamjor man ka hota hai use hi sidhant,tark,vichar ka sahara lena padta hai,taki kamjori ko chipa sake.Manyshya ka man aisa hi hai, sahara pakadene ki aadat janmo janmo se lagi hui hai,bina sahare ke admi ka man ek pal bhi rahneko taiyar nahi hota. Man ko kuch na kuch sahara chahiye.nahi hai to izzad karo,dhund nikalo aur usko chati se lagaye rakho.dr.zakir naik khud nahi janta ki quran ya allah usko kab tak sahara denge,zannat me to na koi masjid hai,na koi quran hai.sab akhir chodna hai to ye deh,ye zamin ye sab kuch chodna hai,jab aadmi sab chod deta hai to wo kya islam ka hota hai? Kaise hoga kyo ki islam hone ke liye pahle kisi muslim ke ghar me janmana padega,phir quran ko hadis ko padna padega,phir namaz ada karni padegi,phir muhammad aur allah ko yaad karna padega ye sab jab hoga tab saccha muslman hoga.Lekin jab janma tha tab koi sahara inmese pas nahi tha,marega tab bhi pas nahi hoga.To bina matlab ke jo chij saath nahi denewali usko zindgi bhar dhote rahna koun si bhudhimani hai?Quran ko mat padho par jo quran ko padh raha hai usko jano.allah ko mat dekho par jo allah ko dekh raha hai usko dekho.ektarfa mamla nahi hota dharm me.isi karan hindu jo dharm hai wo bhitar ki aur mudne ko kahta hai ,bhar kuch bhi dikhai pad raha wo bhitar ke karan hai isliye bhitar ka sabse pahle hai bad me bahar ka.Bhita na quran hai na allah bhitar to sirf aadmi hai.Akela aadmi yahi sacchai hai par is sacchai ko koi nahi janega.HIMMAT AUR TAKAT KI JARURI HAI KAHNE KE LIYE KI “ANHALAK” “MAIN KHUD ALLAH HU” MANSUR NE KAHA THA YE. Wo saccha tha,himmatwar tha.aise hi himmatwar logo ki aaj zarurat pad gayi hai duniya ko.
@jai shankar (fake id banane wala),manushya yudh karta hai to wo bahar ke khshetra me jeet jata hoga par aksar ye paya jaata hai ke wo antas ke khshetra me hara hua hi paya jata hai, sikandar mahan bahar to jeeta par bhiter ki ladai wo haar gaya, jaate waqt dono haat khali chod gaya,hara hua mara.Is liye ye maat samjana jo bahar jeet jata hai wo bhitar bhi jeet jayega.Tum abhi mera fake id bananewale,bahot hi kacche ho,kunkune ho.Dr,zakir naik kya kahta hai is se kya sabit hoga,koi pagal sannipat me bukhar me badbadata hai to bhudhimani usko dekhte nahi balki haste hai,aur uske nadani par taras khate hai, karuna se usko dekhte hai ki ye abhi tak bhimar kyo hua hai balki swastya ki aushadhi to uske bhitar hi padi hai.uska upyog na kar ke wo bhimar hi hone ko raji hai.VED ME YA PURAN ME ZIKRA HONE SE KOI MAHAN HOTA HOGA TO VED ME RAKSHASONKA BHI VARNAN HAI,TO WO BHI KYA MAHAN HO GAYE? Keval varanan hone se ya naam hone se koi bhi praman satya siddha nahi hota,ex. Deta hu maine ek quran ke jaisi kitab likhi aur usme likha ki bachho tum raat me bahar der tak ghumne mat jana BHAHAR BADA HI KHUNKAR OSMA LADEN tumko pakad lega.To kya koi mere kitab KO OSAMA LADEN KI KITAB KAHEGA,YA FIR MERE KITAB ME OSAMA KA ZIKRA HAI TO OSAMA MAHAN HOGA KYA? Tum socho ki osama ko tum mahan kahoge to tumara dimag kharab nahi ho gaya hai.DR.ZAKIR NAIK JAB VED AUR PURAN KA HAWALA DETA HAI TO HINDU HASTE HAI KI DR.ZAKIR NAIK KA DIMAG KHARAB HO GAYA HAI.BIMARI ME KUCH KA KUCH BADBADA RAHA HAI.Ravi shankar jab zakir naik se dialogue karne gaye to peace peace kahne lage.tumara matlab phir kya unko khoon khoon ,maro maro kahna tha kya? Zara socho agar wo dr.zakir naik ko ek ZORDAR GAL PAR TAMACHA MARTE TO KYA HOTA KHUD DR.ZAKIR NAIK PEACE PEACE KAHTE TALIYA BAJATE AUR BAKI KE LOG USKA SWAGAT KARTE KI DEKHO DR.ZAKIR NAIK PEACE PEACE KAH RAHE HAI.Tab sharam se pani pani hone ka bhi khyal unko na aata log bhala itni tarif kar rahe hai aur main sharam se pani pani ho raha hu,kaisa kanbakt hu.AB KITAB TO LIKH CHUKE AUR LAKHO NE PADHA TAB USKO GALAT SABIT KAR NE KYA HOGA .LOG KAISI GALATI KI HAI YE DEKNE KE LIYE PAHALE HINDU HI USKO PADHTE THE PAR MUSALMAN BHI PADH RAHE HAI,DEKHE TO KOUN SI GALTI HAI IS ME.TAB BEWAKUF KOUN BANA RAVI SHANKAR KI DR ZAKIR NAIK.HINDU KI KOI BHI KTAB KHASKAR DHARMIK SOCH VICHAR SE NAHI LIKHI JATI.MOUJ SE ,AANAND SE, MASTI SE,PREM SE LIKHI JATI HAI.SOCH VICHAR SE TO KOI MASHIN ,YANTRA KE MAN JAISA ,JADBUDDHI WALA HI KAR SAKTA HAI JISKO APNA ULLU SIDHA KARNA HO WOHI AISE KAAM KAREGA.HINDU TO MAJE LETE HAI,ANAND ME DUBTE HAI AUR TUM UNKO BEWAKUF KAH RAHE HO. Abhi bhi der nahi hui jaag jao Atta dipa bhav khud ke diye khud bano.
@Brother John
I’m was not the one showing the ugly parts from your Christianity. But now I have to do so because YOU URGED ME. I’m sorry I have to point out all these, my aim isn’t mere to disrespect or condemned but to show you that all your claims are false . And I feel you didn’t read the whole Bible so I should help you. Now carefully read all these mentioned below.
==> Bible: All who curse his mother or father must be put to death LEVITICUS 20:9. (And you always point out that why are people stoned to death as per Islamic shariya law when they commit adultary )
==> AS PER CHRISTIANITY & JUDAISM
The punishment for blasphemy in most of the major religions is death. It is stated in the Old Testament of the Bible, which is the authority for both the Jews and the Christians:
And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him: [Book of Leviticus 24:16].
==>Bible: To “If your wife isn’t a virgin take her to her father door & the whole
town must stone her to death “. DEUT 22:20-21.
==> Bible: To “Kill the whole town if one person worship other God.” . DEUT 13:13-19.
==> Bible:But those enemies of mine who did not want me to be king over them–bring them here and kill them in front of me.'” Luke 19:27
==>Bible:Lot and his Daughters [Genesis 19:31-36]
And the elder said to the younger Our father is old, and there is no man left on the earth, to come in unto us after the manner of the whole earth. Come, let us make him drunk with wine, and let us lie with him, that we may preserve seed of our father. And they made their father drink wine that night: and the elder went in and lay with her father: but he perceived not neither when his daughter lay down, nor when she rose up. And the next day the elder said to the younger: Behold I lay last night with my father, let us make him drink wine also to night, and thou shalt lie with him, that we may save seed of our father. They made their father drink wine that night also, and the younger daughter went in, and lay with him: and neither then did he perceive when she lay down, nor when she rose up. So the two daughters of Lot were with child by their father. ( you said that a prophet can’t marry a girl of 9 this is not an attribute of a prophet, now see what does your Bible say about the attributes of Prophets, Lot was a prophet according to even your Bible, now see what did Lot do)
“And there is no man left on the Earth” is the reason. Muhammad, marry a child when there are boys on the Earth, whom one of them can marry the child when she grow older? This is the difference.
These are in Old Testament. Read Romans 7:6. It tells Christians serve God by following Jesus Christ. This is why Christians don’t kill those who believe other than God(like Hinduism or other than Christianity). Comparing with the era(Old Testament) where God shows Himself, this era, most people have no personal experience that God exist. Have you any personal experience God exist?
Romans 7:6 tells Christians follow Jesus Christ to serve God, no need to follow Old Testament as mentioned by you. About Lot, “there is no man left” is the reason. While Muhammad married with a child when there are boys who are same as the child’s age and can marry her when she grow up. There’s no need for Muhammad to marry a child or vice versa. Are you going to prove Islam is truth or just attacking other beliefs?
@faukka,sdc and all others who are contributing there comments; you guys seems to be intelligent people, isn’t it irrational to argue on something that is the story of past.
Be it hinduism or islam or christanity or others thes religions were created scores of yeras back by intelligent people to the prevelant society of that period. These people knew that to guide a society you got to use gods name so that people can follow the pricipled life, but than we need to realize that these social laws were suitable for that society and not the 21st century.
I am born Hindu but hey how does that matter if i was Muslim or Jew. I don’t need to follow a religion to be a good man. I am aware that if i stick to humanity than I don’t need my behaviour to be driven by religion. I do not have to think where I am going to go after my death because I will be burned down and nothing except the ash will remain.
I don’t need to cat fight over which religion is better or I do not need to carry my religion on my sleeves I do not need to be proud of my religion or be critical about some one elses religion because I have no contribution over setting the fundaments or rules.
I believe in power that created and runs the universe but i do not have to believe in god guided by religion. I can not be fooled by the scriptures who proclaim that god belongs to them or there community and I am not at alll convinced the theory of reincarnation or the theory of going to heaven or hell.
I also realise that most of the past or present confrontaion in the world is because of peoples in tolerance over others religious belief hence the major reason for worldwide discontentment is Religion..
I also believe dinasaurs existed on the earth before human beings and that also raises a question in my mind if there is a god as described by religions than why god chose to bring dinasaurs on planet before mankind.
I also believe if god exists as prescribed in religion than he is so unkind to people who are killed mercilessly or people dying due to no food and water.
How come the kind god has such a big ego that people who do not follow him or do not please him by chanting his name he is very very unhappy about them people.
You are greatly mislead .why is it that science has proven all the scientific facts in the quraan (which was revealed 1200+ years )when no scientific instruments were non existing and the quraan still remains intact ,memorized by millions of people around the globe ,majorly by kids.why dont you be that intelligent to come up with such a non contradicting religion with even the help of the so called powerful scientific instruments.
WE MUSLIMS LOVE DR ZAKIR NAIK !
THOSE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEGUN FEARING HIM HAVE STARTED THIS WORDPRESS BLOG AS THEY CANNOT CHALLENGE HIM FACE TO FACE. POOR FELLOWS
.
@Muslim
Yup! you are absolutely right!
All muslims bear the testimony that there is no God but ALLAH and that prophet mohammad sal-lallahu-alaihe wa sallam is his last messenger.
Anyone who testifies this shall go to jannah.
Yeah so. That is your myth. Christians believe anyone who believes in Jesus (and him alone, sorry Mohammed does not cut it) goes to heaven. Your Mohammed according to Christians is burning in hell for all eternity and so will you for following this fraud instead of Jesus alone. You Muslims and Christians are so alike in your narrow mindedness and deserve each other.
Hi I think this site is just rubbish. As the kalima that i read clearly states that there is no GOD but the one and only Allah talla. So but obvious I can only worship him and respect his messengers. As for the this site and other new channels in this time – Islam is at war not only with non muslims – but also with the media as these so called channels and websites are direclty at war with Islam – their job is to present such things which produce a bad name for Islam and cover such things that suits their agenda. Zakir Naik is right and we should all be united and need to support him. Allah o- akbar…
Muslims are doing a good job producing a bad name for themselves all on their own. There have been 19,000+ Islamic attacks since 9-11 http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
So what if your Arab Middle Eastern kalima says that. Only by blind belief do you consider the Arab kalima to be it.
Save your Jerusalem from Jews.
@JAY
D’ont become blind to pose every attack responsibility on Muslim k, Open Your eyes investigate, dont walk on lines of Media after Western’s they are biggest culprits for making muslims name malicious. Even the 9-11 was Inside job by Americans itself!! Get to know urself first correctly Read it>>
http://newsflavor.com/politics/us-politics/breaking-911-was-an-inside-job-obama-says/
Bin Laden himself took credit for 9-11. Typical Muslim on the one hand rejoices when Muslims commit acts of terrorism and kill infidels, then the other hand because they don’t want to look bad pretend no Muslim did any act of terrorism. All those counts of Islamic attacks is from news reports from all over the world including Muslim majority countries. All that site http://www.thereligionofpeace.com is doing is tally them up. No need for infidels to make Muslims look bad, they do that themselves with their never ending killing in every country they populate.
I can see from the article that whoever has written it has done so based on pure jealousy and it lakes all the aspects of academic writing and are based on personal perceptions. I won’t go for all the points and even didn’t bother to read it till the end what from what i read, can you please provide the evidence where he himself says that he is a WAHABI and can you also please provide the him article along with the original Ahamdiya article that you claim has been copied from so that the readers can compare them and judge themselves. As long as the Ulemas in the video are concerned, they cannot be a mere proof to get someone down because I can provide you dozens of renowned ulemas who have appreciated zakir’s work. By the way these ulemas are not the best ones but i would call them Mullas instead.
I hope i get the clarification.
Thanks
MASHA ALLAH ABDUL HAKEEM BHAI . GOOD REPLY
@Muslim
________Your god Ram was not daring enough to rescue his own wife alone from the clutches of Ravana._______
Are u not Indian? You are taking very much interest to demean Indian legendary like Rama, Krishna, Hanuman etc.. It is matter of shame the person like Rama, Hanuman etc who are considered noblest men in world but some Indian like you trashing their own ancestors.
_______Your god Ram__________
Does Ram not belong to your country that you are writing “your”.
________Ram was 16 years old when he married Sita, and Sita was only 14 years old __________
Have you read Ramayan.
When Sri Ram reached Mithilapuri along with Vishwamitra ji then King Janak told Vishwamitraji in 24th sarg of Balkand, As per Valmiki Ramayan Ram looks like a Devta. He is like elephant, lion and bull and warrior is very active. His eyes are like lotus. He is holding sword, bow and quiver. In beauty he is handsome like Ashwani Kumar. He is full of youth i.e., he is quite young. In the matter of youth, Valmikiji has used the word-
“Samupasthityowvanau”
Meaning being “entered in full young stage”. According to Vedas, minimum age of marriage for a boy is 25 years and all Ayurvedic granths etc., clearly state that full young age starts from 25 years. So, Shri Ramji went with Vishwamitraji at the age of 15 years. He served and looked after Shri Vishwamitraji, who was doing his pious Yajyen. In this process, when Shri Ram reached Mithilapuri i.e., Janak’s Kingdom, he became 25 years of age and Sita Mata, at that time was of 18 years.
I agree that you might have been deeply hurt to know that your prophet was a terrible womanizer, a pedophile, a rapist, a looter, a murderer, etc; but then you do need to throw muck on others.
Refer to the link above and you will get to know how Zakir Nalayak twisted the meaning to suit his agenda. There is no evidence of Ravana having sex with Sita. Your frustration is now out in the open. I can only feel pity for you. Of course, the custom of child marriage did exist in the Hindu society; but the fact of the matter is it has been recognized as a social crime and has been criminalized. Child molestation having divine sanction in Hinduism is another figment of your wildest imagination. Sita’s age being a forgery is yet to be proved, just another wild allegation with no evidences backing it up. In any case, Manu’s laws are not inviolable, and the Hindu society is not frozen in time as the Islamic society is.
@SDC
(Reply to post August 25, 2012 at 2:37 pm)
So was this learning curve linear or parabolic with time for Ram? Did he ever become Bhagawan or his learning curve came to a standstill midway. In that case you have lost a bhagawan who failed to imbibe all the mentioned qualities within the passage of time. But don’t lose heart for you have plenty of other gods whom you can ask for wealth, fame and so on. By the way, you have also mentioned Shankaracharya, an addition in your list.
You say Ram being a king was duty bound to his subjects. And there’s no doubt to be cast that for the king his wife is also his subject who needs to be taken care of and has equal rights for justice. The king has the responsibility of administering fair justice. But instead of administering the justice Ram violates it. His will I suppose is to get rid of Sita and have sex with other women.
Whether Sita left voluntarily or was banished, in both cases she was denied justice!
I do not know why Ram is a special person for you to emulate for there are so many people round the corner of the world who love their fathers and mothers and obey them. The law breakers for this natural phenomenon can be of course many.
Fluidity should be achieved if you had a constant composition of elements. Take the case of water, its elements are H and O and 2 H atoms and 1 O atom makes water molecule. Have you seen water flowing through a pipe, whatever be the number of folds or turns in a pipe water can easily maneuver through them maintaining its intrinsic quality of being constant. A lesson for you – Never corrupt your holy book in the name of betterment for fluidity can be achieved if these are never injected with your suggestions.
God forever has given the capability to mutate. It’s the person who needs to apply it. A person walking on a slippery surface can either slip onto the ground or apply his brain immediately to resist the fall. God has always given you brains to apply.
Regarding interpolations in Manusmriti , the big names in Hinduism as Swami Dayananda Saraswati and A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami, have accepted the laws as authentic and authoritative. Refer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manusm%E1%B9%9Bti (Some prominent Hindu figures, such as Swami Dayananda Saraswati[54] and A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami,[55] hold the text to be authentic and authoritative.)
Few more from Manusmriti –
It is the nature of women to seduce men in this world; for that reason the wise are never unguarded in the company of females. 2/213.
Wise people should avoid sitting alone with one’s mother, daughter or sister. Since carnal desire is always strong, it can lead to temptation. 2/215.
Girls are supposed to be in the custody of their father when they are children, women must be under the custody of their husband when married and under the custody of her son as widows. In no circumstances is she allowed to assert herself independently. 5/151.
Another proof that Ram was meat eater from your authentic book Valmiki Ramayan
Krośamātraṃ tato gatvā bhrātarau Rāmalakṣaṇau z
Vahun medhyān mṛgān hatvā ceturyamunāvane zz (Ayodhyā/55/32)
Then Rama and Lakshman, by advancing hardly a couple of miles, arrived the forest on the bank of the River Yamuna, killed many animals and ate their meat.
It will be a good idea to look for similarity in all the forms you have mentioned and without a need for research it is to be asserted that hindus worship them all.
Z N School of reasoning accepts only Phd level of students, so don’t do a half hearted research on this school.
Regarding learning curve for me, it should be easy for you to comprehend that to add two numbers I don’t need to be Phd in mathematics. Similarly, a simple reasoning does not require me to achieve higher level of skill in reasoning supposedly a doctorate.
Did this simple logic fit into your mind or you are still scratching your head? Don’t make me feel pity for you another time!
The pattern is immaterial as long as the objectives are achieved. In any case, they are not going to be uniform varying from person to person. Well, to my mind, he did meet the criteria or else he should not have achieved a cult status, and, hence, the loss theory is falsified. At least, praying for wealth to a million gods is a zillion times better than looting, I guess, in case you do not have a contrarian take on this. So, what if I mentioned Shankaracharya after all Bhagavan is a title bestowed on the one worthy of it.
We are definitely not talking of medieval Arabian societal norms here. As a queen, Sita was also supposed to be accountable to her subjects just like Ram. Probably, Ram was not as crafty as Muhammad was and that is why he did not marry a second time as he was vowed to monogamy.
No, they are not the same. She did not ask for any to begin with.
But not to the extent that he did. In any case, that is not the only reason that he is accorded such veneration.
Thanks for that lesson on fluid dynamics but it seems that the doctoral student from ZN university is having problems in grasping the gist of the comment and hence the digression. This time of course your trajectory went off on a tangent. BTW, fluidity can be achieved when there is less of viscosity, i.e. resistance to reform/betterment. A lesson for you – Try to be less of viscous to allow for more fluidity.
So, then start applying your brains and do not get stuck because of high viscosity which is off course an intrinsic quality and hence at times incorrigible but keep on trying still.
In any case, laws of Manu were advisory in nature and to err is human goes the saying. If some of his views are reprehensible, then they are to be condemned and fit to be ignored.
Even if he was a meat eater, that does not make him a villain.
As I said, worshiping a million gods is at better than eulogizing a barbarian.
The credibility of the ZN school is in serious doubt. See above in the fluid dynamics section.
Forget about doctoral studies in mathematics, your mentor needs to know about elementary maths to begin with. He needs to be told that 3 plus 1 and 4 plus 0 will also yield 4.
Have some pity on that bearded fellow the next time around.
any body who hate dr zakir naik , infact he hates his own holly books .because dr.zakir naik only coat from there holly books .that kind of people suppose to go to a doctor .of course dr. zakir naik .
Please fix your spelling/grammar. What is ‘coat’?
He Means QUOTE ,
Dude, Please write readable english :P.
[…] questioning him openly. Even his erstwhile supporters started dissociating themselves from him. Many Islamic Scholars from major sects issued Fatwa against him. But it took time. And we feel so guilty that we could not speed up our efforts. Due to this delay, […]
[…] questioning him openly. Even his erstwhile supporters started dissociating themselves from him. Many Islamic Scholars from major sects issued Fatwa against him. But it took time. And we feel so guilty that we could not speed up our efforts. Due to this delay, […]