- Dr Zakir Naik’s fraud exposed
- Zakir Bhai, MBBS defends Halal meat – Answering Zakir Naik
- Test of secularism
- Kaba or Idol Worship?
- Answering Zakir Naik – Quran says there is no compulsion in religion
- Science and IRF
- Don’t Judge Car by Its Driver!
- Zakir Naik’s Peace TV Banned in India
- The Curious Case of Dr Zakir Naik- A Muslim’s View
- Agniveer effect: NIA scanning Zakir Naik’s speeches
- Zakir Naik on Polygamy
- Why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much?
- Zakir Naik – the mentor of terrorists
- Zakir Naik on Hijab – Islamic Veil
- Why Non Muslims Are Not Allowed In Mecca – Zakir Naik
- Zakir Naik – Patriot or Traitor?
- Islam and Hinduism Debate
- Punishment for Blasphemy
- Quran and Vedas
While I have always been critical of his approach and conclusions, I always admired Dr Zakir Naik’s sincerity and loyalty to Muslims. I was impressed by his gigantic efforts in studying thousands of pages of scriptures and selecting verses that could be used to derive whatever crazy interpretations he has derived to prove Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in all world scriptures. I always used to wonder how he could gain all the time and energy to do so despite such a busy schedule of lecturing world around!
But suddenly I came across a book “Muhammad in World Scriptures” by Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi written in 1936. And I was shocked to find that Dr Zakir Naik has done NOTHING MORE THAN simply copying-pasting from this book, mostly word-to-word and cooked up his own ‘original’ research which he uses to claim that he is an expert in ‘Comparative Religion’. This is blatant plagiarization! And that too from a source that his followers consider worse than Kafirs.
So all Dr Zakir Naik has done is copying from works of another person, memorizing those and claiming all the fame for himself! And he did this so blindly that he did not bother even see the background of the original writer or how he has backstabbed his followers in the process.
Because Maulana Adbul Haque Vidyarthi was not an ordinary Muslim.
On contrary, he belonged to a cult which almost the entire Muslim world, and especially the sects which believe in ideology of Dr Zakir Naik considers as non-Muslim. They are in fact banned in Pakistan and many other countries. Ask any Muslim scholar, and he would start hurling abuses on them for disgracing Islam and Muhammad.
Yes, I am referring to the Ahmadiyya or Qadiyani cult. Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi was a disciple of its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed who is considered worse than a Kafir by all Muslims who are fan of Dr Zakir Naik.
The reasons why Muslims hate Ahmadiyyas and refuse to consider them as Muslims are because they hold certain beliefs that no Muslim and follower of Dr Zakir Naik would dare to agree. Some are as follows:
a. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed was a Prophet or Messenger, and this is ‘shirk’ – unpardonable sin as per Muslims
b. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed continued to receive new revelations
c. Ahmadiyyas believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Messiah
d. Ahmadiyyas believe that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were also Prophets
e. Ahmadiyyas believe that Kalki Avatar would also be the final Prophet
and most importantly, the founder of Ahmadiyya cult is alleged to have hurled abuses and even cursed to Hell those who refused to believe in his prophethood!
The concept of Avtar is a ‘shirk’ as per Islam. All Islamic Madarsa teach books of Maulvi Md Ismail which specifically states that anyone believing in Avtars or further Prophets or Avtars as Prophets is doing ‘shirk’.
Dr Zakir Naik knows all this – that is why in FAQ on Hinduism, he refused to accept that Vedas can be revelations.
But he forgot that the material he has used to write other articles are directly lifted from Maulana Abdul Haque’s writings who agrees that Vedas are revelations. Thus proving Prophet in Vedas or Bhavishya Puran is fine with Ahmadiyyas because that is how they justify prophethood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also.
But for all other Muslims, on whose faith popularity of Dr Zakir Naik rests, this is ‘kufra’.
While these writings do not affect Hindus or even Buddhists, Christians etc much, they definitely backstab a devout Muslim, especially when source of reference is not being quoted.
In summary, Dr Zakir Naik is guilty of :
a. Copying directly, even word to word, from works of Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi, an Ahmadiyya without even quoting his references. This is blatant plagiarism.
b. Using his own name instead to falsely proclaim that he is expert on comparative religion
c. Cheating with other Muslims who consider Ahmadiyya and their beliefs to be worse than those of Kafirs
d. Backstabbing his blind followers who quote his works without realizing that Dr Zakir Naik has made them follow ideology of Qadianis/ Ahmadiyyas.
e. Trying to prove Vedas and Puran contain revelations of Muhammad but also refusing to clear admit Vedas as revelations. Thus he has deliberately not made clear whether in reality Dr Zakir Naik is a Qadiyani or not.
Only Dr Zakir Naik knows what is the real truth and what is his true mission. But his backstabbing has left his blind followers nowhere. Either they will have to admit to Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is the complete foundation of his writings and ‘research’ or regret their faith in Dr Zakir Naik being a Muslim.It seems obvious that Dr Zakir Naik is actually a Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya in disguise trying to fool common Muslims. But why does he need to put this disguise? Is it because Ahmadiyyas are persecuted in all Muslim countries? Or is it that he is a spy with some other hidden agenda. Or perhaps, the way he claims to have discovered new researches in Quran that even Allah, Muhammad, Ali et al could not discover, he is laying foundation of his own Prophethood!
And as per Islamic Criminal Law, that Dr Zakir Naik is such a great fan of, he himself can decide what should be the most appropriate punishment for him. Sharia says that a thief’s hands should be chopped off. Hadiths say that one who deserts his faith or community should be killed. This is time to test how sincere are Dr Zakir Naik and Muslims who have followed him so far, to the teachings of their own divine texts.
I am attaching the scan of the book with this post so that everyone can see Dr Zakir Naik’s fraud with his own people themselves. You can download original here.
You can view (not-so) original article(s) of Dr Zakir Naik at IRF website: http://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128 to compare with the original.
To know more about Qadiyanis, please visit:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophethood_%28Ahmadiyya%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmadiyya_Muslim_Community
or any Qadiyani site for that matter.
Addendum:
————————————————————————————————
Here I provide comparison of work of Dr Zakir Naik and Maulana Vidyarthi, as explained by a Qadiyani Zahid Aziz.
1. Zakir Naik’s article gives various prophecies under four headings. Under the first heading (I) are three prophecies from the book Bhavishya Purana. The first of these is given as follows:
“A malecha (belonging to a foreign country and speaking a foreign language) spiritual teacher will appear with his companions. His name will be Mohammad. Raja (Bhoj), after giving this Maha Dev Arab (of angelic disposition) a bath in the Panchgavya and the Ganga water (i.e. purifying him of all sins), offered him the present of his sincere devotion and showing him all reverence said, I make obeisance to thee. O Ye! The pride of mankind, the dweller in Arabia, Ye have collected a great force to kill the Devil and you yourself have been protected from the malecha opponents.”
This is also the first prophecy in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi’s book. It is identical with the quotation in Zakir Naik’s article. Except that in the Maulana’s book the word malecha is spelt as malechha, and his quotation has the following extra words at the end: “O Ye! The image of the Most Pious God, the biggest Lord, I am a slave to thee, take me as one lying on thy feet.
2. After quoting the prophecy, Zakir Naik’s article draws out six points from it. The Maulana, after quoting the prophecy, lists ten points. We find that Zakir Naik’s first three points are the same as the Maulana’s first three points, and his points (4), (5) and (6) are the same as numbers (10), (7) and (6) respectively of the Maulana. The wording is also very similar.
For example, point (3) in both begins with the words: Special mention is made of the companions of the Prophet”.
3. Following these six points, there are two further comments in Zakir Naik’s article. The first is in answer to the objection that Raja Bhoj lived in the 11th century C.E. The objection and its answer as given in this article are exactly as in the Maulana’s book, namely, that there was not just one Raja Bhoj. The article says:
The Egyptian Monarchs were called as Pharaoh and the Roman Kings were known as Caesar, similarly the Indian Rajas were given the title of Bhoj.”
while the Maulana’s book has:
Just as the Egyptian monarchs were known as Pharaohs and the Roman kings were called Kaisers, similarly, the Indian rajas were given the epithet of Bhoj
4. The second comment relates to the part of the prophecy about giving the promised one a bath in the Ganges, and the article says:
The Prophet did not physically take a bath in the Panchgavya and the water of Ganges. Since the water of Ganges is considered holy, taking bath in the Ganges is an idiom, which means washing away sins or immunity from all sorts of sins. Here the prophecy implies that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was sinless, i.e. Maasoom
The same comment is found in the Maulana’s book in the following words:
“Another point which requires elucidation is the Prophet’s taking bath in ‘Panchgavya’ and the water of the Ganges. This did not, of course, actually happen as it was only a vision; so we give it the interpretation that the Prophet will be purged of and made immune from all sorts of sins.”
5. The second prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik’s article is also the second prophecy in the Maulana’s chapter. It begins with the words:
The Malecha have spoiled the well-known land of the Arabs. Arya Dharma is not to be found in the country.
The wording of the entire prophecy (of which about one-tenth is given above) is identical in the article and the book.
6. Following the prophecy, Zakir Naik’s article makes ten points about it, while the Maulana’s book makes twelve points. Naik’s first two points are the same as the Maulana’s first two points. His 3rd to his 10th point are the same as the Maulana’s points (5) to (12), in the same order.
7. The third and final prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik’s article begins as follows:
Corruption and persecution are found in seven sacred cities of Kashi, etc
In the Maulana’s book also, this is the next prophecy, and is given in almost the same words.
8. We now reach the second heading (II) in Zakir Naik’s article. Under this are given three prophecies from the Atharva Veda. In the Maulana’s book also, these are the prophecies that occur next.
Each and every point noted in the article about these prophecies is to be found in the Maulana’s book, in the same order. Below I list the chief aspects of these prophecies as mentioned in Zakir Naik’s article and place in parenthesis the page number in Muhammad in World Scriptures where the same is mentioned:
Kuntap, which is the name of some chapters of the Atharva Veda, stands for Bakkah, a name of Makkah.
The word Narashansah means ‘the praised one’ and refers to the Holy Prophet.
The Holy Prophet is prophesied as the camel-riding rishi.
He is called Mamah Rishi and given certain signs such as a hundred gold coins, ten chaplets, etc.
He is called Rebh, which means the same as the name ‘Ahmad’.
The battle of the Allies of the Holy Prophet’s time is described and the word karo refers to the Holy Prophet.
The conquest of Makka is prophesied and the Holy Prophet is termed as an abandhu, meaning a helpless man.
9. Coming now to the third heading (III) in Zakir Naik’s article, under it one prophecy is briefly mentioned, to the effect that the Sanskrit word sushrava in the Rig Veda applies to the Holy Prophet. The same is in the Maulana’s book.
10. The fourth and final heading in Zakir Naik’s article gives one prophecy, which is from the Sama Veda, and it is translated as follows:
Ahmed acquired from his Lord the knowledge of eternal law. I received light from him just as from the sun.
This prophecy is found in similar words in the Maulana’s book.
11. Zakir Naik’s article then makes three points about this prophecy. The first of these is that the word ‘Ahmad’ here has been read by previous translators not as a name but as Ahm at hi and therefore they translated the mantra as alone have acquired the real wisdom of my father”. These three points under this prophecy are found in the Maulana’s discussion.
12. At this point Zakir Naik’s article comes to an end — and so does the chapter ‘The Prophet in the Hindu Scriptures’ in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi’s book.
It can be seen that the article by Zakir Naik is nothing at all more than a greatly compressed version of certain parts of the Maulana’s treatment of the subject, following exactly the same order as in the Maulana’s book.
No doubt a later author can make use of the work of an earlier one, but if he benefits substantially from it then integrity requires that he must acknowledge the source.
In this case, the later author has merely repeated the results of the earlier work without any contribution at all by himself, and with no mention of the earlier work.
Do Hindu scriptures contain any Divine revelations?
The research by the Maulana was based on the teaching of Islam that prophets from God had appeared among all nations before the Prophet Muhammad. Muslim scholars had generally limited this to the Israelite prophets and a few others.
Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad revived and laid stress on this unique teaching and concluded from it that the great sacred persons of the Hindu religion must have been true prophets and its scriptures must have been Divine revelations originally. It was on the basis of this belief that the Maulana found prophecies about the Holy Prophet Muhammad in Hindu scriptures. This is why, in explaining the second prophecy given above, the Maulana writes:
The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith.
However, Dr Zakir Naik has stated, in a different place, that the Vedas may not be revealed scriptures. Answering the question, whether we can consider the Vedas and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God?, he replies:
There is no text in the Quran or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelation that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptures are no where to be found in Quran and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure that they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may not be the revelation of God.
If nothing at all in them was revealed by God, then how did prophecies about the advent of the Holy Prophet come to be in these books? If they may not be revelations at all, then it is also possible that the quotations from them given by Dr Zakir Naik may not be prophecies about the Holy Prophet Muhammad revealed by God.
Interestingly, in his article Dr Naik has actually copied the Maulana’s statement above: The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith, which means that the Holy Prophet confirmed that those scriptures were originally revealed by God. Perhaps Dr Naik did not realise that this contradicts his own belief expressed elsewhere.
This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/2971/naikexposed-hi/
This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/2971/naikexposed-hi/
AS FAR AS WE KNOW AS A MULIMS ..FROM DIFFERENT COUNTRIES,WE DON’T NEED ANY PROOVE OF WHAT HAVE BEEN WRITTEN THIS WEBSITE, BECAUSE WE ARE 1000% SURE ABOUT DR. ZAKIR NAYIK ,WHAT HE IS,WHAT HE SAYS…ALL ARE TRUTH.
AND WE DON’T NEED FROM A STONE ,ANIMALS WORSHIPERS , TO TELL US WHAT DR. ZAKIR IS .
@GMX
Oh you, think all that zakir nalayak is truth and you dont need we stone and animal worshipper to tell you what zakir nai is?
Well, get ready for a holocaust, because that is what zakir nalayak is doing to us hindus ok? He is spreading hatred against hinduism , and in turn making us hate islam, know where this will lead to?
Apni kabar khod ke rakhna.
[…] to be a true Muslim but preaches the Qadiyani ideology through Qadiyani literature, please see http://Satyagni.com/645/naikexposed/). Qadiyanis are known for twisting the verses of any holy book in order to prove Muhammad or Mirza […]
THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION ACCEPTABLE IN THE SITE OF GOD & THAT IS SUBMIT YOUR WILL TO GOD
Namaste umar
I like the Gabbar Singh style of Allah 🙂
And of course your Sambha style too 😉
@ Vajra:
hahahahahahaha.. Gabbar Singh!!! :D…. you are unbelievable!!!
& dats true as well… allah miyaan wants us to believe in his non sense Quran even before reading it!!!
Kitne allah the?
allah ek? Aur tum teen? fir bhi laut aaye? Khaali haath?
Bahut na insafi hai yeh.
ek allah se nibatne ke liye mai akela gabbar singh kaafi hoon. ;))
No, it is Kaliya style. Sambha only says: Poore 72 Hoor!
@ Umar: Yes, submit the will to be free, the will to think independently and the will to think rationally & indulge in the iconoclast of Muhammad and his alter ego called Allah, right?
@Rushmore
Brother, please check your mail, I replied.
@Umar
Quote,”THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION ACCEPTABLE IN THE SITE OF GOD & THAT IS SUBMIT YOUR WILL TO GOD” Unquote
I REFUSE to submit to false god allah, kya ukhad lega?
@ Umar
Quote,”THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION ACCEPTABLE IN THE SITE OF GOD & THAT IS SUBMIT YOUR WILL TO GOD” Unquote
See here itself you prove that your god doesn’t provide you your own will to do anything ,even if you do good and bad its all ALLAH ‘s will , So Stupidity
How can a god take all rights and will of a man , today most of Muslims are terror for this whole world this because they have submitted their will to Allah .. I can’t submit my will to ALLAH , he will make me a terrorist very soon..
Let me remind you that the Qur’an is not a book of Science, ‘S-C-I-E-N-C-E’ but a book of Signs ‘S-I-G-N-S’ i.e. a book of ayaats. The Qur’an contains more than 6,000 ayaats, i.e. ‘signs’, out of which more than a thousand speak about Science. I am not trying to prove that the Qur’an is the word of God using scientific knowledge as a yard stick because any yardstick is supposed to be more superior than what is being checked or verified. For us Muslims the Qur’an is the Furqan i.e. criteria to judge right from wrong and the ultimate yardstick which is more superior to scientific knowledge.
But for an educated man who is an atheist, scientific knowledge is the ultimate test which he believes in. We do know that science many a times takes ‘U’ turns, therefore I have restricted the examples only to scientific facts which have sufficient proof and evidence and not scientific theories based on assumptions. Using the ultimate yardstick of the atheist, I am trying to prove to him that the Qur’an is the word of God and it contains the scientific knowledge which is his yardstick which was discovered recently, while the Qur’an was revealed 1400 year ago. At the end of the discussion, we both come to the same conclusion that God though superior to science, is not incompatible with it.
@peace:
(With a username like that what are you doing trying to defend Islam? Islam and peace are mutually incompatible. Are you completely oblivious to history of the world since 700 AD? This is what your religion is really about!)
Here you go.
Meaning of Islam
> Islam is derived from the word salaam meaning peace.
@ahad:
Wrong. Islam means submission. Salaam (Peace) and Islam (Submission) originated from the same root but they diverged after 700 AD. Read this.
My first question to the atheist will be: “What is the definition of God?” For a person to say there is no God, he should know what is the meaning of God. If I hold a book and say that ‘this is a pen’, for the opposite person to say, ‘it is not a pen’, he should know what is the definition of a pen, even if he does not know nor is able to recognise or identify the object I am holding in my hand. For him to say this is not a pen, he should at least know what a pen means. Similarly for an atheist to say ‘there is no God’, he should at least know the concept of God. His concept of God would be derived from the surroundings in which he lives. The god that a large number of people worship has got human qualities – therefore he does not believe in such a god. Similarly a Muslim too does not and should not believe in such false gods.
If a non-Muslim believes that Islam is a merciless religion with something to do with terrorism; a religion which does not give rights to women; a religion which contradicts science; in his limited sense that non-Muslim is correct to reject such Islam. The problem is he has a wrong picture of Islam. Even I reject such a false picture of Islam, but at the same time, it becomes my duty as a Muslim to present the correct picture of Islam to that non-Muslim i.e. Islam is a merciful religion, it gives equal rights to the women, it is not incompatible with logic, reason and science; if I present the correct facts about Islam, that non-Muslim may Inshallah accept Islam.
Similarly the atheist rejects the false gods and the duty of every Muslim is to present the correct concept of God which he shall Insha Allah not refuse.
@ahad=peace:
If you want to be your own sock puppet it is up to you. But atleast use a different email id because that way the pictures/images next to your username will be different. That way you can carry out your Al Taqqiya or whatever in a more covert fashion.
Namaste ahad
And my question to you Qadiyanis is that why you believe a liar Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiyani?
@ahad:
it is not incompatible with logic, reason and science
Do you believe this crap?
Brother KalBhairav
Jihadis know nothing more than Al Taqiyya and circular logic. Now he/she will say Allah is above all and He performed miracle which was a SIGN and not SCIENCE. And then interestingly he/she will provide us with few links confirming SCIENTIFIC proofs of UNSCIENTIFIC moon splitting 🙂
@Vajra:
Allah is God coz it says in Quran and Quran is divine because Allah made it…repeat 300 times. 🙂
@Muslims:
Guys, I am hoping there are some intelligent ones amongst your lot who visit this website but dont choose to comment. Seriously, are folks like Ahad the best that you guys can muster? Can there be any good defense of Islam you guys can come forward with? Each of your comments here gets trashed and the logic inherent (lack of it) exposed threadbare. How can you go on with your day when the religion that you so hold dear to your heart is unable to withstand some basic scrutiny? I will grant that many religions have made up stuff that may not be able to withstand scrutiny. But you guys are the worst offenders because (a)you guys get to carve out geography for yourselves in places around the world (Pakistan, Bangladesh, etc.) and (b)you guys impose Shariah where non-Muslims are treated beneath dirt. All because of the fallacious circular logic that you employ that cannot withstand some simple scrutiny.
Keep your stupid religion to your own home and convert all Islamic republics in the world to secular ones.
Mr
we Muslims people don’t says about your relegion so who give u rights that you open your mouth and says about Islam every thing that come to your mind
are you a human that you are saying a words which you don’t know that what i am telling so first learn formality
Rigveda
A similar prophecy is also found in Rigveda Book I, Hymn 53 verse 9:
The Sanskrit word used is Sushrama, which means praiseworthy or well praised which in Arabic means Muhammad (pbuh).
Samveda
Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is also prophesised in the Samveda Book II Hymn 6 verse 8:
“Ahmed acquired from his Lord the knowledge of eternal law. I received light from him just as from the sun.” The Prophecy confirms:
The name of the Prophet as Ahmed since Ahmed is an Arabic name. Many translators misunderstood it to be Ahm at hi and translated the mantra as “I alone have acquired the real wisdom of my father”.
Prophet was given eternal law, i.e. the Shariah.
The Rishi was enlightened by the Shariah of Prophet. Muhammad. The Qur’an says in Surah Saba chapter 34 verse 28.
“We have not sent thee but as a universal (Messenger) to men, giving them glad tidings and warning them (against sin), but most men understand not.” [Al-Qur’an 34:28]
@peace aka ahad
This will be enough for all your copy pasted crap from idiot Naik’s website.
http://agniveer.com/528/prophet-vedas/
http://agniveer.com/series/zakir-hindu/
@ Peace ,
As you are using some copy pasted material of Zakir naik let me tell you that Bhavishya Purana Parv 3 Khand 3 says Mahummad was evil who came to establish a evil religion by his force and he himself accepted Sanatan Dharma to be the true religion and wanted to establish a creed of meat eaters among the best religion …. plz open your eyes and see Bhavishya Purana and don’t just copy paste from rebutted articles…..
Namaste.
I apologise for the offtopic comment, but I have a request for Agniveer.
As you may know, many Tamils to this day believe in the dravidian lie. This is one of the main reasons why extremely corrupt and incompetent anti-Arya, anti-Sanatana Dharma and anti-Bharat parties like the dmk have been coming to power numerous times in Tamil Nadu.
The dravidian lie also acts as a major barrier between Tamils and other ethnic groups in Bharat being united.
This is also a major issue when it comes to Sanatana Dharma as some of the Tamils who believe in the dravidian lie also believe in the lie that Aryas are foreign invaders and therefore consider Sanatana Dharma to be ‘foreign’ and reject it just for that reason alone.
So can Agniveer please make an article debunking the dravidian lie? This is one of the biggest problems faced by the Tamil community today. Tamils need to learn the truth.
I’m half Tamil by the way and I reject the dravidian lie.
Please think about my request.
Thanks in advance. 🙂 Keep up the wonderful work!
Namaste 108Eternal
Agree with you. Aryan Invasion Theory needs to be discussed on Agniveer.
Can any body answer me that what is the purpose and reality of life. What is the purpose of our existense on the earth? Where is our origin and where we have to go?
It is surprising that a disciple cum follower of Dr. Zakir Naik is asking this question !
But then Dr. Zakir Naik seems to know everything. Perhaps he does not want to enlighten you with this information.
Please ask Dr. Zakir Naik, he will satsify your query.
Why can’t u answer that????
@Muslim:
I think I can help. How does trying to convert the entire world to Sunni Islam and if that fails kill everyone else who doesnt (Shia/Ahmadi/Sufi/Hindus/Jews/Biologists who study evolution/Physicists who study the big bang)? Thats the purpose of life my dear.
We all came about from Adam and Eve. Adam ate the apple and his organ grew in size. Eve was afraid, tried to resist but was helpless as she was weaker than Adam. After all she was made from just one single rib of Adam. The rest, as they say, is history.
We are all going to encounter Judgement day when Sun will rise from the West instead of the East. At that time all those who shouted Allahu Akbar/La Ilaha Il Allah Mohammed Rasool Allah will enjoy 72 you know whats. The rest will encounter boiling oil at 200 degree celcius 🙁
Good luck!
It seems that you are a shia or Qadiyani so you are so confused that you don’t ever know the purpose of your life. From which book you qouted the wrong story of Adam and eve?
You mean to say Shia and Qadiyani are not Muslims? Only Sunnis are Muslims? You fool wahabis. Why you want everyone else except you to be called Kafirs? Agniveer is pro-Shia that is why you call him anti-Islam.
Namaste a muslim
Will you leave Islam if we help you understand purpose of life better than Quran and Hadith? Or you are here just to spread the message of *peace* and give Hidayah to Jaahil Kafirs?
Can you tell us for what sin, Allah THREW OUT your ancestors Adam and Eve from those heavens which are supposed to be PERMANENT ( 🙂 ) dwelling for the Momins? If Islamic heaven is not permanent even for Adam and Eve, how can it be everlasting for you later day Momins?
Its surprising that a follower cum disciple of Dr. Zakir Naik is asking these questions !
Have you asked Dr.Zakir Naik ? Did he refused to reply in this regards ?
Please request Dr. Zakir Naik to enlighten you , its my advice.
Thanks brother. Hope we get to see an excellent article (as always) on the subject soon. 🙂
By the way, I’ve got another suggestion. Why not make a quotes section in the site where quotes from Vedas are available? It will really help more people become aware of not only Agniveer, but Sanatana Dharma too, as these quotes tend to spread, through Facebook for example (people make these quotes their status’, etc). To be honest, I myself would love to have some quotes which I can use as my status.
Another suggestion I have is to get the Agniveer site on the first page for Google’s results for ‘Vedas’, ‘Sanatana Dharma’ and ‘Hinduism’. It would really help more people learn the true Hinduism.
Hope you guys at Agniveer find these suggestions helpful. 🙂
@Muslim:
It seems that you are a shia or Qadiyani so you are so confused that you don’t ever know the purpose of your life. From which book you qouted the wrong story of Adam and eve?
Lol 🙂
What part do you disagree with? The purpose of life is to convert everyone to Sunni Islam. The Kufr Shia and Ahmadi are the worst form of Kufrs. If you dont believe me, see this.
Also, we need to kill every Momin who believes in Darwinism which goes against our great faith in Adam (PBUH) and Havva (PBUHer). Those Momins are a Zionist plot to weaken the faith. If you dont believe me read this to clear your confusion.
You have asked me that which part of that I disagree, now I am asking DO YOU AGREE WITH ALL THAT YOU HAD QOUTED? Do you believe ,you should cut down the heads of shias,qadyanis,hindus or the followers of darwinism. If not why did you said that?
@Muslim:
Dear Momin. Please dont answer a question with a question. I gave you examples where upholders of the Islamic faith talked about killing the Ahmadi and Darwinists. Either you agree with them, in which case my original post stands vindicated.
You could disagree with them. Then my request to you would be to wage a jihad against these people (like the Indonesian preacher and those who issued death threats against Darwinists) first. Before that an apology may be in order by you and other so-called “moderate” Muslims (correct me if I am wrong and you are not a “moderate” Muslim) to all non-Muslims world over for having allowed your beautiful faith to be hijacked by the “extremists”. Apologize for your complete impotence in dealing with bad apples in your lot. Work towards improving on these deficiencies.
I had asked all of you only purpose of our lives. Now you are saying sunni tells that,sunnis did that, what is this. If there is no answer in your vedic, shiaism, qadyanism, darwinism and kafirs viewpoints. All of you have no any purpose of life. What do you say to atheists.
Namaste a muslim
Will you leave Islam if we help you understand purpose of life better than Quran and Hadith? Or you are here just to spread the message of *peace* and give Hidayah to Jaahil Kafirs?
Can you tell us for what sin, Allah THREW OUT your ancestors Adam and Eve from those heavens which are supposed to be PERMANENT ( 🙂 ) dwelling for the Momins? If Islamic heaven is not permanent even for Adam and Eve, how can it be everlasting for you later day Momins?
Hey all of you I am still awaiting for the answer of my question. Hav’nt you, clear this that your vedic terminology has no answer for this.
purpose of life is to attain ‘moksha’ — liberty from the circle of life and death.
this is clearly and throughly explained in vedic scriptures…. you can ask details if needed!!
@ a muslim – Plz stop your stupid and idiotic comments. We want to know why are yoy asking this question ? why dont you talk to Zakir Naik ? why dont you refer to Quran ? Seems either there is no answer or you have never refered to it. What did Zakir Naik say in this regrad ?
Vedas are very clear on this but people like you are not interested in learning from Vedas. People like you just want to waste their as well as others’ time and energy.
Please stop such stupid and idiotic antics.
Namaste a muslim
This is the third time I have replied you because you did not take notice of my previous comments.
Will you leave Islam if we help you understand purpose of life better than Quran and Hadith? Or you are here just to spread the message of *peace* and give Hidayah to Jaahil Kafirs?
Can you tell us for what sin, Allah THREW OUT your ancestors Adam and Eve from those heavens which are supposed to be PERMANENT ( 🙂 ) dwelling for the Momins? If Islamic heaven is not permanent even for Adam and Eve, how can it be everlasting for you later day Momins?
http://www.timescrest.com/society/atheism-still-under-cover-5418
….truths….hurt.
Agniveer ji, continue ur excellent efforts…God is with you..
http://www.timescrest.com/society/atheism-still-under-cover-5418
lets hear more of this stuff….
@ashammanath:
The first few words of the article is: When Farukh Qureshi (name changed)
It is completely expected that one (if he was an ex-Muslim) has to change his name so as to be quoted in a news article on apostasy from Islam. That is the vice like grip this 7th century ideology has on its adherents.
I hope our Marxist liberal elites in JNU, NDTV, TimesOfIndia, Vir Sanghvi etc. can take note and condemn Islam. I mean, dont they also have a stake in keeping India safe and secure? Didnt their avatar of God, Marx say that religion is the opiate of the masses? Or is their hatred of Hinduism so great that they are striking a tactical alliance with the Mozlies?
It amazes me that it is only upto us Hindu “revivalists” to protect Hinduism and India from Christian and Muslim fundamentalism. Where are the Barkha Dutts, Arundathi Roys and Mahesh Bhatts? Dont they care about India at all? 🙁
What is meant by liberty from the circle of life and death?
@a muslim
Hindus believe soul i.e the consciousness inside the body takes birth after death of the body previously held. The process of death and birth keeps repeating untill one gets moksha. liberty from the circle of life and death is synonym for moksha.
yeah, when a person dies his soul remains in state as of ‘coma’ for 13 days and then acc. to the deeds he had done whole his life he gets a new life in some new species. this is popularly known as rebirth theory which is accepted by most all religions.
then again it dies and again takes birth. when one’s good deeds and intellect increases a lot and his knowledge of god continues increasing then after reaching a certain level he attains moksha and never takes birth again for a long long long time.
“when a person dies his soul remains in state as of ‘coma’ for 13 days and then acc. to the deeds he had done whole his life he gets a new life in some new species. this is popularly known as rebirth theory which is accepted by most all religions.”
Here I have a problem as you said acc. to dead’s deed that had done whole his life he gets a new life in some new species, in new life it not clear he will be mankind or other animal. If his new life is in the form of a cockroch how it can repent aka rebirth in the form of mankind.
plz dont feel that I am hurting you, I only want to clear these types of misconceptions.
a muslim:
There is no point discussing theories of after life as we do not know it in detail. The 13 days period is not acceptable as there is no evidence.
But evidence for rebirth exits, though not many people can remember their previous life.
>> his new life is in the form of a cockroch how it can repent aka rebirth in the form of mankind.
How do you know that cockroach does not think and does not have feelings? But why is repenting required at all? Has not prophet talked to ants? What will ants speak if they dont have feelings?
“when a person dies his soul remains in state as of ‘coma’ for 13 days and then acc. to the deeds he had done whole his life he gets a new life in some new species. this is popularly known as rebirth theory which is accepted by most all religions.”
Here I have a problem as you said acc. to the deeds he had done whole his life he gets a new life in some new species, you mean to say it is not necessary that his rebirth will be in the form of mankind. If anybody’s rebirth took place in the form of cockroch, how its rebirth return in the form of mankind and what will the fact that will help him in this reformation.
plz don’t feel that I am hurting you, I only want to clear these types of misconceptions..
apa la keling… cibai la keling
IF HE SAYS SOMETHING,THEN HE PROVES IT.IF PATEL WRITES A VERY LENGTHY COMMENT TO DENY DR ZAKIR,IT SHOWS THAT HIS KNOWLEDGE IS VRY WEAK AND HE JEALOUSES FROM A GREAT DR.PATEL TRIED TO SPIT ON SUN,BUT THIS MADE HIS OWN FACE DIRTY.
IF DR SB SAYS THAT USAMA IS NOT A TERRORIST,THEN WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS.NO ONE CAN GIVE ME A SINGLE PROOF WHICH CAN PROVE THAT HE WAS A TERRORIST.IF AMERICA SAYS THAT USAMA IS TERRORIST,IT CANNOT BE A PROOF AS AMERIC IS THE KILLER OF HUMANITY.AMERICA IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LACS OF DEATHS OF MUSLIMS IN IRAQ,AFGHAN,PAKISTAN,LIBIA,AND SOMALIA.
SO,DR ZAKIR SB IS GREAT HERO AND TRUE PEOPLE REALLY RESPECT HIM.IF SOMEONE IS JEALOUS LIKE MR PATEL,THEY ARE REMOTE CONTROLLED BY OTHERS AND DONT HAVE THIER OWN THINKING AS THEMSELVES ARE GREAT FOOLS.
AOA
SATYAGNI BHAE!IF YOU DONT KNOW,THEN DONT COMMENT ON DR ZAKIR.HE IS A GREAT SCHOLAR.YOU CANNOT PROVE HIM WRONG.
YOU PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO KEEP AWAY PEOPLE FROM THE GREAT ISLAM. ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE,BUT IF SOMEONE ATTACKS ON ISLAM THEN ISLAM HAS RIHGT TO DEFEND HISELF.AND THEN ISLAM,LIKE ALL OTHER RELIGEONS,ALLOWS TO DO JIHAD.
AFTER VISITING THIS SITE AND SEENG COMMENTS OF YOU PEOPLE,I AGREE WITH THE COCEPT OF JIHAD,AND NOW I LOVE JIHAD.
@ Abdullah : Sir, Dr. Zakeer Nayak has been exposed many a times. All his theories have been proved many a times. Still you are saying he is a great scholar. It shows you are blind.
When you read bad comments regarding Islam you got very angry and justified Jihad. Then know the other truth, muslims killed crores of HIndus, they destroyed world’s 1st International University, they raped many Hindu women, then Jihad is also justified against muslims.
If in your eyes bad comment is worse than killing, then you are sure mad.
My dear, Islam is not a religion, its a cult. Read Koran and Hadith in an unbiased way, and put question after each verse, “If the same will be done by a non-muslim with the muslims, will it be justified ?”. You will get the answer. Even after that, if you don’t find any blunder in Koran, then you are simply blind of ego.
पाकिस्तान में बंटे पोस्टर, कहा अहमदिया मुस्लिमों की हत्या करो
| Last Updated 16:14(09/06/11)
इस्लामाबाद. पाकिस्तान के पंजाब प्रांत में बड़ी संख्या में पंपलेट बांटे जा रहे हैं, जिसमें मुस्लिम धर्म के ही एक संप्रदाय अहमदिया मुस्लिमों की हत्या करने को कहा गया है। अहमदिया संप्रदाय के लोगों की हत्या को पोस्टरों में जेहाद बताया गया है और कहा गया है कि यह सवाब का काम है। इससे इलाके में तनाव व्याप्त है। पोस्टरों में कहा गया है कि अहमदिया संप्रदाय के लोग वाजिब-उल-कत्ल, याने हत्या करने के योग्य हैं। पोस्टरों में अहमदिया संप्रदाय के लोगों के नाम और पते ठिकाने भी दिए गए हैं।
पाकिस्तान में हिंदू, ईसाई और सिख अल्पसंख्यकों के तो अधिकारों का हनन तो आम है, लेकिन वहां मुस्लिम भी सुरक्षित नहीं हैं। फैसलाबाद में बांटे गए पोस्टरों में अहमदिया संप्रदाय के प्रतिष्ठित उद्योगपतियों, डॉक्टरों और दूसरे प्रतिष्ठित लोगों का विवरण दिया गया है। इनमें सबसे उपर क्लाथ हाउस का नाम है, जहां रहने वाले तीन लोगों को पिछले साल मौत के घाट उतार दिया गया था।
ये पंपलेट ऑल इंडिया स्टूडेंट्स खत्म-ए-नुबुवात फेडरेशन बांट रहा है। इन्हें पूरे शहर में चिपका दिया गया है।
http://www.bhaskar.com/article/INT-pakistan-posters-2173707.html
Mr Satyagni if you are true and you are allegations are founded with reliable base then why cant you attempting the Public Debate with Dr. Zakir Naik to prove that he is defrauder. I think you people are with fanaticism with your baseless religion and fearing of losing luxury life which you got by in the name of religion. and hiding the truth to the people, and misguiding the from the factual one, if you are not, you must support your allegations by attempting a public debate with Dr. Zakir Naik
@Sri Bala
Read this to know why we SHOULD NOT debate Zakir Naik
http://satyagni.com/5083/islam-and-hinduism-debate/
And this to know why Zakir Naik DID NOT debate when we challenged him
http://satyagni.com/789/zakir-scared/
Respected Bala Ravi Prasad,
can you please stop hiding behind hindu names, they are too pious for jihadi fanatics like you. By the way, I know who you are, so before I expose you on this page, comment with your islamic name next time.
Actually when i started to read your article, i thought, despite of all ma doubts, that you wil present an arguement that is based on some wisdom and well planned lies, but towards the end i was just wondering wether this page as where i can realy place ma comments to realy enlight you if your embecileness and shallow mindedness!!
please note these first:
1. Muslims are not followers of Dr. zakir Naik, rather is, just like anyother islamic scholar, a knowledgeable man who is trying to pass the massage to lost ones like you!
2. The word “SHIRK” means asscaiting other beings with Allah, in His power and kingdom! So note that you realy missused that word making your arguement realy baseless!
3. in studies and researches, it is leggle to seek knowledge even from ur direct enemy!
4. The Quran doesnt realy need any elllaboration, discovery or reform within it, and Zakir has never claimed to have discovered anything but rather just took his time to explain many people of today, who blindly wouldnt want to see like you, the science in the Quran. When you say Zakir claims to have “discovered” what Allah n Mohammad and the rightly guided khalifs couldnt, then i pet u reconcider you opinion! Allah knows every thing, and the Quran being his words, you dont even need to think someone would ever claim more knowledge on your word (unless you r too foolish too keep track of your words, of which you r now), what do you think of Gd?
5. Lastly, even by law, some is innocent unless proofen guilty, and by that it means the judge shoud have direct contact with the defendent and allow him prresent his side oof the story! Your telling us counts of cases which you said, the Sheikh realy commited, did you sit with him and questioned him? did you realy make him feel guilty of those commitions and ommitions??
CORRECTION TO REPLY U GAVE TO A CERTAIN COMMENT: about saying: Sallalahu aleihi wassalam, to after the prophet Mohammad’s (PBBUH). Arabic is a broad language with suffecience and eloquence! Dont misguide people with your…
@Mohamoud
Brother, we have nothing against you peaceful Qadiyanis. But you should understand that Wahabi preacher Naik has stolen your scholar’s literature and presented it as his own research. Many of your Ahmadi scholars have also raised questions against Naik. So it is better to expose such frauds that have cheated you as well as other Muslims.
ASsalamualaikum,
Kya mai keh sakta hun ki mere navi(SWA) sabse barde hai tamaam ambiyo mai?
manniy sri riyaz ji , apke navi kaise bade hai? jara yah bhi to batlaiye ?vah to ummi [anpadh] the, ek anpadh ko mahan rup me kyo pesh karna chahate hai ?
Dear Sir,
Vo eik mahan aur behtar saks hai aur uske liye mujeh certificate nahi lena, Par aap ke refrance ke liye vo ambiyo ke Imaam, Vo khatman umbiya, vo rehmatul alameen, aap par deen finshed hua jo aadam se lekar chal raha tha. aur hun anpadh aur parda hua ki jarurat nokri ke liye hoti naki islam mai aap parde ho ya unpard islam mai isse koi fark nahi parta yahan ilm ka hona jaruri hai naki certificate ka.
Dear mera sawal hai kisi ilm wale se ki kya quran aur sahi hadeesh ki najar se mai unko ambiyo mai sabse bada aur behtar keh sakta hun.
param adarniy shri riyaz ji ishvar ka jo siddhant hota hai vah kabhi samapt nahi hota ? jaise ishvar samapt nahi hota hai ! isliye agar nabuvat chal rahai hai,to samapt bi kabhi nahi ho sakti ! keval kahane se kuch nahi hota muhamamd ji agar anpadh the to ap sabhi muslim unke raste par chalte huye kyo nhi anpadh rahate hai ? muhammad ji ne to apni mata saman ek vidhva se apna pahala nikah kiya tha kitne muslim unke raste par chalte huye kisi mata saman vidhva se apna pahala nikah karte hai ? muahamamd ji ne darjan bhar nikah karke bhi 50 sal ki umr me poti saman 6-7 sal ki aysha ji se nikah kiya tha ? muslim kyo nahi isi tarah ka nikah karte hai ! muhamamd ji ne apni god liye huye zaid ki patni se bhi sex ka rishta joda tha , kitne muslim aisa acharan karte hai? muhammad ji ne is ke bad anek bandiyon [laundiyo] se bhi sex kiya v usse bachha bhi paida kiya kitne muslim bhi aisa karte hai? kya karan tha muhammd ji apne jite ji koi santan nahi bacxha sake ek fatima ji ke siva ? lekinvah bhi “bhari javani” me muhammd ji ke marne ke kuch mah bad khuda ji ko pyari ho gayi ? batlaye muhammd ji ko kaun se karmo ki saja allah ne di ? batlaye kitne muslim apni ankho ke samne apni santanio ko martebhuye dekhnna chahte hai ? kya apko yah sab pasand ayega ? fir muhammad ji to allah ke rasul hone ka bhi dava karte the fir aisa julm allah ne unke sath kyo kiya aur bahut se muslimo ko ke parivar me aisa nahi kiya ? yani unke shagirdo ko choda aur unke guru ke sath julm kita kya yah allah ki” andhergardi ” nahi hai ? isliye kuran v islm ki sbhi bate jhuth par adharit hai ! btlaye kuran ki ayte farishto ke madhyam se bhejne me allah majbur kyo kyo nahi usne “dairect” sandesh de diya farishte ki sahayta kyo li ? kya allah kamjor tha kya hamare apke v sabhi ke dimag me dayrect koi “aidiya” nahi aya karta ?
here is the biggest evidence that he’s a fraud : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk5q9TeGo14
dear friends
why you poeple are fighting with each other
to hindu brothers that if u poeple not intrested in Islam so please dont talk against you are not like so leave it.
and another thing that dont talk against my prophet Muhmmad first see in your selves that how you are?
what you are?
how much Education you have in your own hindu books?
Dear Hassan
Perhaps you forgot to read the article you just commented on. It is Zakir Naik himself who claimed a demon called Mahamada of Bhavishya Puran to be Muhammad of Quran. It is he who stole from Qadiyani books and presented it as his own research. It is he who claimed that Vedas have errors. It is he who started mocking Hindu beliefs. It is he who demands for death penalty for apostasy. So better you go to his page and ask him to stop talking non sense about Muhammad and Hinduism.
dear brother
so can you menshion qaydani books which zakir naik stolen
Brother Hassan
Did you read the article? If no, read it first.
then talks against Islam
dear muslim brothers
Aslamoalikum warahmatullahi wabrakatu ho.
Brothers dont fight with poeple if you dont have information and konwlede about Quran and Haith’s completley and if you poeple dont know transalion of Quran .
so please dont fight with them coz in this compatation The poeple home against Islam they are making more propoganda
Dear Hassan:
Welcome to Agniveer.
we Muslims people don’t says about your relegion
Really? Does not the Quran mention people of other religions – Jews, Christians, Pagans, Polytheists, etc. and what is in store for them in the afterlife?
Salam Aleykoum dear brother.
I read most of the article, but couldn’t find why you were so upset about Dr Zakir Naik, if he plagiarised (which need conformation) does it take anything out of the person?
Do he plagiarise when he appear on tv, debates, expose lies etc?
Please answer my question dear brother for I still don’t know what is your motive in stirring people mind like that.
Peace be upon you all dear brothers/sisters
So whats wrong.. He also copied most Quotes from Quran and Sahih Hadith.. Which is in fact better for a authentic source..
Truth will not change even if it is copied.. DR Zakir Naik always said..he is student of compariative religion.. And he is picking facts and highlighting them for our own better understanding.. If there is any wise man out there just get the truth , DR Zakir naik not doing this otherwise to be famous
Dear All,
Its good to see all of the comments mention above most of them fighting to each other who is right & who is wrong. But the point is since not about who whom you following. No idea what motto of Dr. Naik & Mr. Aginesh.
What important for me what i am, what i m exactly doing for the society & for the family. If i m wrong in obeying the almighty i myself responsible for it. I feel we should fight each difference. If Hindus feels the way they worship is right as per their teaching. All are have equal rights to follow & same as for muslim’s. All of us knows only after death come to know which religion or good deeds stand out. So both Mr. Dr. Zakir naik & Mr. Agineesh ji.. better not spread hatred among our self.
Sorry in advance if i said wrong.
Dear sir ,In terms of Islamic belief ,that if one can prove himself from a religious cult by his gesture/appearance shall be treated as the member of same cult in spite of his belief in Islam ,accordingly Dr. Naik shall be treated as christian due to his gesture i.e. wearing of a tie publicly which is execution sign (highly religious)(Webster Dictionary ).Another false hood and his cruelty against Islam is that he recommends/begs Zakat tax to sponsoring TV program,This sin shall not ever be forgiven by the Lord due to distortion of an obligatory 5th pillar of Islamic belief by Naik .The Zakat can be used by very poor orphans,or widow etc those have no means of subsistence .Naik has accumulated millions of dollars through Zaqat soon he will be punished by the Lord he may be the first person who will meet fire of hell in which decade he expires.He is distorter of Islamic faith and a wealth accumulator materialistic person .He has none religious over all.
@faruq, why are you posting with a fake name to show yourself as muslim, any muslim can easily understand that you are not muslim you know y because you yourself dont know that in which way or cause we can give zakat? can u explain from quran where poor orphan and WIDOW is mention? hahaha…. poor faruq please go and study about zakat then enlighten us about ur esteemed study.
agniveer yeh kiya kar raha jhoot pe jhoot phela raha hai.apne dusro bhi duba raha hai yeh website bandh kar
manniy shri amerapne yah to batlaya nahi ki isme jhuth kya hai bas vyarth me isko band karo ki “narebaji”jarur karne lage! agar koi bat jhuthi usko sabke samne to laiye ?
abe teri ma ka bhosada tu kown hota hai website band karne keliyekehne wala.. sale behenchod yahakoi jhuth bool raha hai to sirf zakir nalayak islam muhammad aur islami mulle.
Please shut your mouth… Say Sorry to Every One… Which type of you word are using… So Shame… Naam Kharab Kar dia Humsab ka… Say Sorry.
bakwas band karo aapni samjhe. kis baat ka sorry jake aapne yaar zakir nalayak ko bool hinduo se sorry bole. aur un chutiye musalmano se sorry bole jo unhe chutiya banata rehta hai..
aurmuh tu aapna dafa ho yaha se .. ye sari bateki agniveer anti muslim etc hai ye zakir suar kepafe ya sitepe jake likh samjhe.
fake id.
aag Mein Jaloge Shreemaan…….
is website ka naam jhoota veer rakhna chahiye
DR ZAKIR NAYAK IS A TRUE MUSLIM . AND HE PRESENT THE REALITY OF THE ISLAM.
PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOT A GOOD MIND HE CAN NOT UNDERSTAND HIM.
THEY ALWAYS TALKING WITH PROOF THAT IS VERY GOOD.
OTHER PEOPLE ONLY TALK AND HAVE NO ACCURATE PROOF, THEY ALWAYS DONE WORK
WHICH IS DONE BY THEIR ELDERS , AND THEY NEVER TRY TO FIND THE TRUTH.
THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SAYING DR. ZAKIR NAYAK IS NOT A TRUE MUSLIM .
ACTUALLY THAT PERSONS HAVE NO FULL KNOWLEDGE OF ISLAM BECAUSE
THEY ARE MUSLIM BCOZ BY THEIR PARENTS AND HAVE NO ACCURATE KNOWLEDGE ABOUT ISLAM. SO THEY SHOULD TRY TO IMPROVE THEIR SELF .
Satya ek mukta aakash ke jaisa hai,jaha koi asahajata nahi,dharma vahi hai jo tumhe mukta karta hai sabhi se aur chode deta hai aghyat main… Taki tum vahi jano jo hain tumame aur sarva main…noor to hai bas aankh ki taraf eshara jo dikha de ….dharm keval eshare hai satya ki taraf jane ke,isiliye to dharm aanek hai aur satya ek….
I think this whole website is a fraud just to create misunderstandings between those in the light and others.
yeah u r right.We all r brothers.
I think Agniveer is anti of muslim and again and again negative finding in the person of Dr. Zakir Naik…. i suggest to you Team Agniveer pls do you work for our Culture.. dont see outside.. we have lots of problem… why you posting about muslim muslim why? tell me rest of everytime attacking negative thoughts about this person… i think you have to find positive think then you will known about tha actual scene of any person….
behenchod aapna muh badn rakh samjhe..yahi baat us kutte zakir nayak ko samjha samjhi..
aur yaha ladakiyo ki salah to chahiye hi nahi bcz tum ladakiya murkh hoti ho.
aur agniveer to sirf zakir nayak kajhuth samne la rahi hai to kyu nayak hamesha jhuth bolta rehta hai..
its our Duty to answer or clarify whatever mis understanding people are having about our Dharma.
@Agniveer
>>Is Dr. zakir naik forcing u to convert u to muslim or to practice islam religion???surely not.
Forcing non-muslim person to convert to islam is haraam written on holy quran. so u better stop criticizing zakir naik n try to read n analyze ur holy books …
>>.is there written to worship only one god
>>no images or statue of god
>>alcohol is haraam
if u find anything wrong after reading ur holybook regarding these statements ..then why dnt ugo to zakir naik’s program n open challenge him> if he can not answer n show u these things in ur holybook,plz u record that video n upload in this site u will be much more benefitted rather u wasting time only by criticizing him n writting paragraph>> go n challenge zakir naik..i want to see debate clip
haan wo dusaro ko convert hone ke liye force karte hai jab wo dusare ke dharm ke bare me fake bate batata hai..
zakir ek suar hai..
pisslamis shit religion.
zakir nalayak ko bahot loog challenge kar chuke hai lekin wo debate ke liye nahi aay aur nahi kisis sawal ka jawab deta hai.. jake pucho kyu nahi aata.
1 god ka meaning yeh nahi hua ki Islaam he uss god ke kareeb hai……….. Muslims kyoon Makka Madina ka pic apne ghar aur dukaan main lagaate hain……………… more than 80% muslims bhi Alcohol consume karte hain…………… Zakir naik ko chaiye ki woh sirf Islaam ki khoobiyon ko highlight kare naa ki other dharms ki buraiyaan kare………….. yaha naik bilkul galat hai kyoon ki kissi bade ya sache dharam ko promotion ki koi jarurat nahi hai………… naik ko itni bhi samajh nahi hai………… meine kai program dekhe hain jisme woh other dharams ko galat kahta hai………….. koi dharam kissi dharam se bada ya chota nahi hota………… agar 1 ko jhota kahoge to sabhi jhote hain
@Agniveer
whatever question u ask about islam or hindu or christian he will give the answer..@
whatever statement he mention 4m ur holy book with refference ur chpter n0. Verse n0. Sloka n0 with meanings.. . If u find anything wrong zakir saying ,Then why dont u take ur holy books n ask Zakir naik to show u 4m ur holy book. . If he cant then take action. .. Even i will like that. . Bcoz i hate liers n frouds… Ok do dat challenge… .
yes we know zakir naik is a liar but he keeps saying na tasya partima asti but i cant find this anywhere even when i use unauthentic grifths vedas translation
you muslim say the only religion is Islam and you all are true but every other religion is false and every pope,pundit,rishi,jew priest who are at their divine post are kufr…what the ___!! you think of yourself…Your quran is nothing but the words of Muhammad that he used to get the advantages of illiterate,ignorant,poor,backward villagers who now they called them muslims.Your muhammad was also an illiterate person so how come and illiterate person gets divine words from God but not to the one meditating years for divinity.You perverts.
lol dr zakir naik did not copy from anyone.. he got his knowledge from Ahmed Deedat who was his teacher
dr.zakir naik sach me agar vad-vivad karna chahta hai to use main hara sakta hu..dekho agar praman ki baat aayegi to pratyaksha,aanuman,aagam ye 3praman mukhya hote hai. Ab dekho islam ke paas pratyakshya praman allah ka nahi hai.allah ko kisi ne pratykshy nahi dekha khud muhammad ne bhi nahi dekha.is karan allah ek soch rah jata hai .ek sapna rah jata hai,quran ka aur hadis satya hai is ka bhi praman kahi bhi nahi milta.ab sirf aanuman praman ki jaha dhua hai waha agni hai vaise ye praman bhi allah par thik nahi beithta,kyoki allah ka anuman ki wo kaisa hai to dayalu,krupalu,shaktiman,sab jannewala.pal bhar me kuch bhi karnewala is se allah ka anuman nahi lagta kyoki koi bhi sadharan aadmi me ye gun paye jate hai to wo kya allah ho sakega? Bilkul nahi.Phir aata hai aagam arthat shastra praman to allah ka varnan na to bible me hai,na toraht,engil me hai,na kisi anya dharma ke shastra me allah ka naam hai .to ye siddha hua ki allah ek man ka vichar hai, jo muhammad ke tatkalin nirantar soch ka parinam tha.siway muhammad ke allah ka koi bhi praman nahi milta is liye islam ko sarvamanya ya jagatmanya dharma nahi kaha jayega.dr,zakir naik ki halat vaisi hai jaise koi chor khud ko chor na kahe.ye sabit nahi karta ki chor chor nahi hai,praman do dr.zakir naik kuch to praman do.khud muhammad bhi praman dene se chuke tum kya khak praman doge?
@jaishankir, kiya tum bata sakte ho ki tum kis Ishwar mein vishwas rakhte ho aur rakhte bhi ho ya nahi?
kiya shiv,vishnu aur brahma ki trinity/trishool mein wishvas rakhte ho?
agar tum koi baat manoge hi nahi to kisi ko bhi hara doge tum to kehdoge mere paas koi praman nahi hai Ishwar isliye aap mujh se nahi pooch sakte.
chutku bhai aapko maloom hona chahiyye ki zakir naik kehte hain ki jo admi kam se kam 10000 log ikatha kar sakta sirf apne naam se us se debate ya dialogue karoonga to pehle tum apni pramanikta sabit karo ki 10,000 log kisi programme mein ikathe karo apne naam se tab Allah ki pramanikta mangna. ok jao jab tak munh dhoke soaye raho..
han agar mere se dialogue karna chahte ho bata dena.
eik baat bata deta hun ki jab tum apne samne ka computer dekhte ho to kiya sochte ho ki khud bana ya kisi ne banaya? lekin agar kisi ne banaya to bhi usne duniya mein paayi chezein hi use karein bhale hi develop karin to woh creator to nahi hua par keyboard/table kisi to banai hain….ab yeh batao ki jab yeh sara brahmand dekhte ho yeh zameen dekhte ho to kiys sochte ho ki itna systematic system khud ban gay ya koi creator hai? jab eik chappal bhi khud nahi ban sakta to duniya kaise ban sakti hai? buss yeh suniya aur sare sansaron ka creator hi Allah/GOD hai.
mujhe ummed ab apko koi argument nahi chahiyye hoga
@truth seekar, ek doha jo bahut kuch kahta hai, “BUND” SAMANA SAMUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Ye sadharan chit ki awastha hai, par jaise Vishwas mukta hota hai chit to ye hota hai,”SAMUND” SAMANA BUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Pahle to main aapko ek baat batata hu VISHWAS YA BELIEF YE SABSE BADE JAHAR HAI.main eshwar ko manta nahi JANTA HU. Aur tum jaise samjte ho ki eshwar ke bare me vaise eshwar ko maine kabhi bhi dekha nahi hai,kisi ko bhi wo aajtak mila nahi NA HI MILEGA YE MERA VACHAN HAI.Ha devtapurush huye hai jinko hi galti se bhagwan,eshwar man liya gaya hai.Yatra kaise hoti hai,Pahle purush ,bad me devtapurush aur akhir me bhagwan. Yahi itihas hai tum dyan ki aankh se apne bhitar dekho to tumko sab par avishwas bana hi rahta hai ki samne bhagwan khada hai ye sach hai ya mere man ka khel? Ex.deta hu Ramkrushna ko kali mata ke darshan hote the,saint namdev krishna se bolte the,par vaise hi inko ye sab man ka hi khel lagta tha.inka bhram tab tuta jab inone aapne aap ko dekha jo ki ek matra satya hai.Tum bhagwan par bhi shaq kar sakte ho par tum khud par shaq nahi kar sakte ki tum nahi ho.TUM NAHI HO IS KO BHI JANANE KE LIYE TUMRA HONA JARURI HAI.KYA TUM APNE NA HONE KO JANTE KO,BHAWAN YA ESHWAR YE MULLYAWAN HAI PAR JO INKO DEKH RAHA HAI WO UNSE BHI ADHIK MULLYA KA HAI.JANANEWALA AUR JANA JANEWALA EK JAB HOTE HAI TAB SAMUND HI BUND ME GIRTA HAI.PAR JAB TAK YE ALAG RAHTE HAI TAB TAK BUND HI SUMAND ME GIRTI HAI.JANNEWALA AUR JANA JANEWALA DO DIKHAI DENA HI AGYAN HAI.ISLIYE MAIN ESHWAR KO MANTA NAHI JITA HU.ESHWAR EK PARAM ANUBHAV KI BAAT HAI.SHABD SE,TARK SE DEVTAPURUSH KO SIDHA KAR SAKTE HO ANUBHAV KO NAHI.DR.JAKIR NAIK KO MAIN AKELE HI 10000 KE BARABAR HU AAB YE UNKI DURSTI KA DOSH HAI KI MERE SAAT TO JO LOG ,FARISTE,ANGILS,DEVTA UNKI JO FOUJ HAI WO ITNI JYDA HAI MAIN GINTI BHI NAHI KAR SAKTA MAIN JINDA LOG RAKHTA HU APNE SATH AMRUT PIYE HUYE LOG MERE PAAS HAI AUR DR. Zakir ke paas jo aadmi ka jakhira hai wo sab murda log hai,unka khud ka koi bhi vajud nahi hai, lakir ke fakir ,kolu ke bail hai. Jis ke piche logo ki bhid hoti hai wo bhed hai aadmi ka.SIHA AKELA HOTA HAI.BAS EK BAAR DAHADTA HAI TO SARA JANGAL KANPTA HAI.DR.ZAKIR NAIK DARA HUA HAI WO APNA DAR LOGO SE NAHI KAHTA WO WOHI BAAT KAREGA JO QURAN ME HAI,HADIS ME HAI ,AUR ALLAH SE MEL KHATI HAI.JAISE USE KOI BATA DETA HAI KI QURAN ,HADIS,ALLAH KE KHILAF KOI BAAT JA RAHI HAI TO PAHLE DARTA HAI.AUR USI KARAN WO ISLAM KA BADA SPEEKAR BAN GAYA HAI (ARTHAT AISA TUM SAMJTE HO) DAR KAHI ISLAM GALAT NA HO JAYE IS KARAN HI WO BRILIIYANT BHI BANA HUA HAI COMPUTER KE JAISA DIMAG SMRUTI KA KACHRA INKA SATYA SE KOI LENA DENA NAHI HAI YE WO JANTA NAHI.ANUBHAV CHAHIYE ANUBHAV HAI SAHAS KE HA MAIN JANTA HU ALLAH KO AISA KAH DE.NAHI MANANE KO BOLO SIRF KAMJOR DIMAGWALE KA HI YE KAM HOSAKTA HAI.TUM KO THODA KAHA HAI SAMAJ HAI TO JYADA SAMJOGE……..ATTA DIPA BHAV KHUD KE DIYE KHUD BANO……..
I will kill bladdy dog face buddest monk’s in the rest of my life o Allah make my due my wish my LORD come true in this life Ameen
Bhagwan kisi ko bhi gali dene ko nahi kahta hai,Galiya aadmi ki ijad hai,bhagwan ki nahi, gali ke akshar me bhagwan hai par wo akshar bolnewale me nahi.Shabd aadmi ke upyog ke liye hai,bhgwan ke liye nahi.bhawan koi bhi shabd nahi janta shabd ke piche chipi bhavna ko to hargis nahi.bhagwan to unko hi janta hai jo unke jaisa ho jaye.aadmi ka aur bhawan ka kabhi milan nahi hota.aadmi aadmi se aur bhagwan bhagwan se hi baate karte hai.Truth seeker ne id banaya hai rapist,pedophilia profet of islam,PAHLI TO YE BAAT JAN LO KI YE KEVAL ID HAI,SATYA NAHI.YE FAKE PROFET KE BAARE ME HAI.IS ID ME MUHAMMAD KA NAAM NA HOKAR BHI TUM KHUD APNE HI JAAL ME FANS GAYE.TUM KHUD RAPIST AUR PEDOPHILIA YE SHABD MUHAMMAD PAR HI FIX HOTE HAI YE SIDDHA KAR RAHE HO.NAHI GOUR SE JANO JO FAKE PROFET HO USKO HI YE SHABD KAHE HAI MUHAAMD TUMARI NAJAR ME FAKE HAI? NAHI HAI TO TUM KYO FIKR KAR RAHO HO BHAI.JO BURA HAI USKO HI BURA KAHNA SAHI RAH DIKHANA HAI.BHAGWAN TO WO HAI JO SAHI RAH DIKHATA HAI ,TUM AGAR SAHI RAH PAR HO TO DAR NAHI HOGA AGAR SAHI RAH NAHI HAI TO DAR HOGA.TUM AAGE KAHTE HO MUSALMAN BHAI YAHA SE BHAG JAYE WAHI TO MAIN CHAHTA HU.ARE JARA TUM UNKA BHI KHAYAL KARO WO AGAR SAHI HAI TO AAPNA MAT,VICHAR RAKH SAKTE HAI .TUM UNKO BHAGAKAR APNA DAR TO NAHI CHIPA RAHE HO.AAJ KE IS ADHUNIK DUNIYA SE BHAGNA BADA HI MUSHKIL HAI.KNOWLEDGE AAKHIRI SIMA PAAR KAR RAHA HAI.KABHI NA KABHI TO SAMANA KARNA HI PADEGA ,TO AAJ HI IS WEB SITE KE JARIYE WO SAMNA KAR RAHE HAI TO TUM FAKE ID BANAKAR UNKO HI NAHI SABKO BHAGA RAHE HO.PAR MAIN TUM SE KAHTA HU MAN SE KAISE BHAGAOGE.MAN ME JO SAHI KYA HAI ISKA ZAGDA CHALTA HAI USKO KAISE MITAOGE? PRAGTI BAHAR HI NAHI BHITAR BHI HO RAHI HAI,MAN ROJ VIKASMAN HO RAHA HAI.AAJ AADMI KE SAMNE DO HI RASTE HAI YA TO WO AATMHATYA KARE YA PAGAL HO KAR JIVAN BITAYE.JIVAN SE KOI SAMJOTA NAHI HO SAKTA.JAB TAK AADMI BHITAR SE PEACEFUL NAHI HOTA TAB TAK WO IS DO RASTE KE BAHAR NAHI AAYEGA.TUM NE KABIR KE BAARE ME KAHA USKA JAWAB DETA HU TUM ABHI BAHAR HO IS LIYE TUME BAHAR KI AJAN DIKH RAHI HAI,KABIR BAHAR KI AJAN KE BAARE ME NAHI KAH RAHE. BHITAR KI JO AJAN HAI USKE BAARE ME KAH RAHE HAI.YE SHARIR JO HAI WO MASJID HAI,AUR MAN JO HAI USME EK AJAN DE RAHA HAI,AUR DUSRA JIS KE LIYE AJAN HO RAHI HAI.AJAN JIS KE LIYE HO RAHI HAI WO KHUDA HAI AUR AZAN JO KAR RAHA WO AADMI.Tum asli namaj ko nahi jante isliye ye gadbad ho gayi.KHAIR KOI BAAT NAHI. BACCHO SE GALTI HO JATI HAI.
Adan jo hai wo bahut hi miss-understanding se bhari hai.Allahu Akbar -god is great matlab allah mahan hai.ye sabit karta hai ki allah mahan pahle nahi tha ab mahan hai.ex.deta hu taki samaj me aasani hogi, jab hum chote bachhe ko jab bada hua to kahte hai aadmi hua ab baccha nahi raha.Admi ko hum bada kahte hai is liye ki kabhi wo chota tha us ke mukable me. TO YAHA ALLAH IS GREAT KAHNA KI KABHI WO SIMIT KABILE TAK RAHA HO AUR AB MAHAN HO GAYA HO.KABHI WO BHI MAHAN NAHI THA AISA SIDDHA HOTA HAI.AUR EK BAAT PUKTA HAI KI ALLAH MAHAN NAHI HAI WO KAISE DEKHO ‘ALLAH MAHAN HAI ‘AUR ‘MAHAN JO HAI WO ALLAH HAI ‘ IN DONO ME BHED KYA HAI PAHLE ME SIRF ALLAH KI AURO KE SAAT TULNA HUI,AUR BHI MAHAN HO SAKTA HAI YE NA DIKHANE KE LIYE. PAR DUSRE ME JO JO BHI MAHAN HOGA WO ALLAH HOGA.TULNA KE LIYE KOI BHI NAHI BACHA.TO ADAN KA PAHLA SENTENCE HI GALAT HO RAHA HAI MAHAN JO HAI WO ALLAH HAI AISA AGAR KAHA HOTA TO BAAT SAHI THI.AUR IS ME EK KHAMI HAI JO NAJAR NAHI AATI.ALLAH AGAR MAHAN HO GAYA TO JO CHOTA HAI AANU KE JAISA HAI WO KOUN HAI ? YE MANA KI ALLAH MAHAN HAI TAB SAWAL UTHTA HAI KI CHOTE SE AANU ME KOUN HAI?YAHA SARE MUSLIMO KO HAAR MANNI PADTI HAI.PAR HINDU KAHTE HAI AANU RENU SE BHI CHOTA AUR MAHAN SE BHI MAHAN WO HAI.(ANURENUYAT MAHTOMAHT ) AB TUM HI SOCHO KOUN SAHI HAI AUR KOUN GALAT.ADAN KA PAHALA VAKYA HI AADHA HAI TO BAKI SAB KAISE PURNA HOGA. JAGO MUSLIMO JAGO HINDU TUMSE KAHI AAGE JA CHUKE HAI AUR TUM ABHI BHI SOYE HO.SUBHAH HO CHUKI HAI AUR TUM CHADAR ODH KE MAT SO O !
🙂 ok say he copied that things but he is very brilliant one in making use & preaching what he copied & secondly he is very active in answering different kind of questions on the issue. So no matters where he get it from as long as he is trying his best to teach people what he knows, can u do it u z one who posted this thing, can u not u or z ur generation that comes after u do it coz it’s a miracle ( grace ) his speech his everything he can convince 1 million like u sorry but this is z truth.
CHALLENGES OF DR.ZAKIR NAIK-ISLAM KI SACCHAI 2- 1)ALLAH JO HAI USKO KOI BHI DEKH NAHI SAKTA,JO DIKHAI NA DE SIRF US PAR BELIEF KARE YE ISLAM HAI.TO PHIR JO JO DIKHAI NA DE UNKO BHI MANO EX.DETA HU TAKI AASANI SE SAMAJ ME AAYE- ULLAH,JULLAH,KULLAH YE BHI DIKHAI NAHI DETE TO KYA INKO BHI MANANA PADEGA.2) ALLAH AKELA HAI USKA KOI SANGI-SATHI NAHI HAI.JAB ALLAH AKELA HOTA TO DUNIYA KE BAHAR HAI YA DUNIYA KE ANDAR?BAHAR HAI TO DUNIYA SE USKA KYA SANBAND,KYA LENADENA HAI?DUNIYA KYO BANAI?ANDAR HAI TO AKELA KAISE HOGA? YE AKELA HAI ,ISKO KAISE PATA CHALA KOI DUSRE ALLAH KO DEKH KE, KI KOI INSAN KO DEKH KE?WO APNE KO AKELA KIS KO SAMNE RAKH KAR TOUL RAHA HAI?AGAR WO INSAN SE TOUL RAHA HAI TO BILKUL HI CHOTA HO GAYA AUR KISI AUR BADE ALLAH SE TOUL RAHA HAI TO AKELA NA RAHA.3)ALLAH DUNIYA BANATE WAQT BAHOT SHAKTIWAN THA SIRF US NE HO JA KAHA AUR HO GAYI,TO PHIR YE QURAN KO SATYA KITAB HAI AISA BAR BAR KYO KAH RAHA HAI EK BAR HI KAHTA KI YE SATYA HO JA AUR HO GAYI HOTI.YE AADMI KE SAMNE BUJDIL KYO HO RAHA HAI?4) YE ALLAH MIRACLE KARTA HOTA TO PAHLE PROFET KE LIYE MIRACLE KARE ,LAKDI SE SAAP,PANI KO BEECH ME SE TODA,UPAR SE SHOLE BARSAYE.MURDE KO ZINDA KIYA.PAR LAST PROFET KE LIYE KOI MIRACLE NAHI KIYE,KYO USKI TAQAT KHATM HO GAYI KYA?
ISLAM KI SACCHAI 3-KOI BHI HINDU DR.ZAKIR NAIK KO YE SAWAL KARE 1) ALLAH NE SABKO BANAYA,IS ME INSSAN KO BHI BANAYA TO YE ALLAH AADMI KO KYA SAMAJTA HAI? “BODY” “MIND” YA “SOUL” AADMI KI BODY 5 WAYS SE KNOWLEDGE LETI HAI ,AANKH,KAAN,NAAK,ZIB,CHAMDI AUR BRAIN JO HAI WO KNOWLEDGE COLLECT KARTA HAI,MEMORY STORE KARTA HAI.MIND JO HAI WO CHINTAN, SOCH,MANAN IS KA KAM KARTA HAI AUR JO IN SABKO MAI MAI KARKE JODTA HAI USE SELF YA EGO KAHTE HAI .TO ALLAH AADMI KE IN SAB TATVA SE JUDA HAI.AB AADMI IN ME SE KIS KE SAATH JUDA HAI.JAB AADMI KO PUCHA JAYEGA TUM KOUN HO TO WO YAH NAHI KAHTA KI MAI AANKH,KAAN,NAAK,ZIB,CHAMDI HU.WO KAHATA HAI MAI INSAN HU.TO YE SIDDHA HUA KI WO BODY NAHI HAI,NA HI US KE 5 GYAN-INDRIYA.HOTA TO KHUD KO AANKH,KAAN,NAAK SAMJTA PAR WO MERI AANKH,MERE KAAN AISE KAHTA HAI IS SE SIDDHA HUA KI WO US SE ALAG HAI.TO AADMI KHUD KO TO EK MAN MANTA HAI SELF MANTA HAI AUR ALLAH AADMI KO BODY MANTA HAI TO YE ALLAH MIND KE BAARE ME CHARCHA KYO NAHI KAR RAHA?JO KI KHUD AADMI APNE KO MIND HI SAMAJTA HAI.QURAN ME MIND CONTROL KE BAARE ME AUR USKI VRUTTI KE BAARE ME KYO BAAT NAHI KARTA?AADMI JO MAN CHAHE WOHI KARTA HAI TO YE MAN KO SHANT AUR ZERO BANANE KA UPAY KYO NAHI BATAYA? YE ALLAH MAN KI SHANT AWASTA KO JANTA HAI YA MAN KI ASHANT AWASTA KO JANTA HAI?BHARE MAN KO JANTA HAI KI KHALI MAN KO JANTA HAI? VIKALP SAHIT JANTA HAI KI NIRVIKALP SAHIT JANTA HAI? PRDGYA SAHIT JANTA HAI KI PRDYA RAHIT JANTA HAI?AGAR WO MAN KE BHITAR KO JANTA HAI TO MAN KE BHITAR HI GYAN KYO NAHI DE RAHA HAI? JAB MUHAMMAD KA JANM BHI NAHI HUA THA TAB,VASISTA,ASTAVAKRA,VYAS,KRISHNA ,PATANJALI,MAHAVEER,GUTAM BUDDHA,AADI SHANKARACHARYA.IN SAB NE MAN KO AVIDHYA ARTHAT AAGYAN KAHA HAI.TO YE MAN HI ZUTH HAI TO YE ALLAH KISKO GYAN DE RAHA HAI?????AASLI SATYA SE ALLAH WAKIF HAI TO MAN KI GAHARAI KI AUR MAN KI LAYERS KI BAATE KYO NAHI KAR RAHA? JAB TAK BHITAR KA DRASTA HAI TAB TAK HI BAHAR KA JAGAT DRUSHYA HAI .DRASTA NAHI HOGA TO JAGAT BHI NAHI HOGA.ISLIYE PAHLE DRASTA HAI PHIR DRUSHYA HAI,FIR ALLAH IS DRASTA KI BAAT CHOD KE BAHAR KE JAGAT KI BAATE HI KYO BATA RAHA HAI?DRASTA KI BAAT KYO NAHI KAR RAHA KI WO KYA HAI AUR KAISA HAI? DR.ZAKIR NAIK KO YE SAWAL KARO AUR DEKHO USKI HALAT KAISE HOTI HAI.JIS ALLAH KO MAN KE BARE ME KOI BHI GYAN NAHI HAI ,AUR HINDU NE JAHA MAN PAR SABSE JYADA KHOJ KI ,WORLD KA PAHLA MANAS SHASTRA PAIDA KIYA JISE HUM YOGSHASTRA KAHTE HAI WAHA PAR YE MAN KE GULAM,MAN SE PIDIT AUR SABSE ASHANT LOG JAGAT ME MUSALMAN HI HAI.JISNE BHI MAN JANA WO SHANT HO GAYA .KYOKI MAN KA SHODHAN KARNA HI SATYA KI KHOJ KARNA HAI.JISNE MAN KA SHODHAN KIYA AADHA MUKTA TO TABHI HUA AISE AADI SHANKARACHARYA VIVEK -CHUDAMANI ME KAHTE HAI .”ARYA DHARM ME JO HAI WO BAKI DHARM ME NAHI HAI,AUR BAKI DHARM ME JO HAI WO ARYA DHARM HAI”
CHALLENG TO DR.ZAKIR NAIK 2- koi bhi hindu dr.zakir naik se ye sawal kare -ALLAH EK HAI YA ANEK? EK HAI TO ANEK KO KYO BANAYA? ANEK HAI TO BAKI KE ALLAH KAHA HAI? ALLAH EK HAI TO DUNIYA KIS SE JUDI HAI? ALLAH SE JUDI HAI TO WO EK NA RAHA AUR NAHI JUDI HAI TO BINA ALLAH SE KAISE BANI? ALLAH EK HAI TO DO CHIZE KYO BANAI?MALE-FEMALE,ZANNAT -JAHANNAM,JANAM-MRUTU,AKASH-ZAMIN,PAAP-PUNYA,ANDHERA-UZIYARA,DIN-RAAT,AWWAL-AAKHIR.ALLAH AKELA HAI TO SABKI ALAG-ALAG KHABAR RAKTA HAI?KI EKSAATH KABAR RAKTA HAI? ALAG-ALAG KHABR RAKHTA HAI TO KAISE AKELA HUA.KYOKI ZAB MUZE GARMI LAGTI HAI TAB MAI THAND LAG RAHI HAI AISA KYO NAHI KAHTA? EK HI KABAR RAKTA HAI TO ALAG-ALAG LOG EK HI KAAM KAR RAHE HAI AISA MANANA PADEGA HATYA KARNA AUR HAAJ KARNA EK HO JAYEGA.AALAH EK MAN KA HAI KI ANEK MAN KA? EK MAN KA HUA TO ANEK MAN KE AADMI KO KAISE BANAYA? ANEK MAN KA HAI TO EK ALLAH ME ANEK MAN KAISE HONGE?AADMI MERE ANDAR SE HAZAR MAN BOL RAHE HAI AISA KYO NAHI KAHTA?ALLAH SABKA HAI TO EK KA KAISE HOGA?ALLAH SABKA NAHI HAI TO ANEK KA KAISE HOGA?ALLAH KA KOI AAKAR HAI KI NAHI? AAKAR,BUT NAHI HAI TO BOLTA KAISE HAI?YE BUT JAISE AADMI KO APNI HI SHKAL ME KYO BANAYA?BUT KE JAISI DUNIYA KYO BANAI? AAKAR HAI TO DHIKHAI KYO NAHI DETA?
@pagal-shankar, ajeeb aadmi hai? itni si baat nahi samjh sakta? jis doctor ne tera operation kara hoga wohi to janega ki tere paas dimagh hai ya nahi??
maine thore hi kiya tera operation?/hahaha
kiya hum us doctor par vishwas kar lein ? yeh to andhvishwas hua na aur tere kehne k hisab se kisi bhi andheki cheez ko nahi manna chahiyee? to vedon k ishwar ko tune dekha hai kiya? agar nahi dekha aur manta hai to phir tu bhi to andvishwasi hua na??
kiya tune 4 rishiyon ko dekha hai jinko ved diye gaye the? agar nahi aur tu manta hai to tu andhvishwasi hua na?
waise yeh saare arguments tere se upar ki cheez hain nahi samajh payega.
main tere dimagh ki baat kar raha hun ki hum kaise maan lein bina tere dimagh ka operation kare ki tere paas hai bhi ya upar ka mal khali hai? kiya yeh andhvishwas na hoga?
yeh shankar kon hai jiski tu jaijaikar kar raha hai? kiya tune dhekha hai shankar ko? agar han to kahan dekha hai? moorti mein?
tu samajh bhi pa raha hai ki mein kiya pooch raha hun?
@rsdfgg
_______ajeeb aadmi hai? itni si baat nahi samjh sakta? jis doctor ne tera operation kara hoga wohi to janega ki tere paas dimagh hai ya nahi??___
Jab shakar pagal hai to Allah ne isse banaya qyo. Allah ne isse Mohammed jaisa dimag qyo nahi diya. Sara dosh Allah ka hai.
________vedon k ishwar ko tune dekha hai kiya________
Vedo ka Ishwar pagal Allah ki tarah nahi jo logo se kahata hi agar mujhe nahi poojoge to mai tumhe narak me jla-jla kar marunga. Allah ko bas apni pooja chahiye. Uski pooja hogi to think varna wo logo se badla lega.