While I have always been critical of his approach and conclusions, I always admired Dr Zakir Naik’s sincerity and loyalty to Muslims. I was impressed by his gigantic efforts in studying thousands of pages of scriptures and selecting verses that could be used to derive whatever crazy interpretations he has derived to prove Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) in all world scriptures. I always used to wonder how he could gain all the time and energy to do so despite such a busy schedule of lecturing world around!

But suddenly I came across a book “Muhammad in World Scriptures” by Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi written in 1936. And I was shocked to find that Dr Zakir Naik has done NOTHING MORE THAN simply copying-pasting from this book, mostly word-to-word and cooked up his own ‘original’ research which he uses to claim that he is an expert in ‘Comparative Religion’. This is blatant plagiarization! And that too from a source that his followers consider worse than Kafirs.

So all Dr Zakir Naik has done is copying from works of another person, memorizing those and claiming all the fame for himself! And he did this so blindly that he did not bother even see the background of the original writer or how he has backstabbed his followers in the process.

Because Maulana Adbul Haque Vidyarthi was not an ordinary Muslim.

On contrary, he belonged to a cult which almost the entire Muslim world, and especially the sects which believe in ideology of Dr Zakir Naik considers as non-Muslim. They are in fact banned in Pakistan and many other countries. Ask any Muslim scholar, and he would start hurling abuses on them for disgracing Islam and Muhammad.

Yes, I am referring to the Ahmadiyya or Qadiyani cult. Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi was a disciple of its founder, Mirza Ghulam Ahmed who is considered worse than a Kafir by all Muslims who are fan of Dr Zakir Naik.

The reasons why Muslims hate Ahmadiyyas and refuse to consider them as Muslims are because they hold certain beliefs that no Muslim and follower of Dr Zakir Naik would dare to agree. Some are as follows:
a. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed was a Prophet or Messenger, and this is ‘shirk’ – unpardonable sin as per Muslims
b. Ahmadiyyas believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmed continued to receive new revelations
c. Ahmadiyyas believe Mirza Ghulam Ahmed to be a Messiah
d. Ahmadiyyas believe that Ram, Krishna, Buddha, Ashoka and Guru Nanak were also Prophets
e. Ahmadiyyas believe that Kalki Avatar would also be the final Prophet

and most importantly, the founder of Ahmadiyya cult is alleged to have hurled abuses and even cursed to Hell those who refused to believe in his prophethood!

The concept of Avtar is a ‘shirk’ as per Islam. All Islamic Madarsa teach books of Maulvi Md Ismail which specifically states that anyone believing in Avtars or further Prophets or Avtars as Prophets is doing ‘shirk’.

Dr Zakir Naik knows all this – that is why in FAQ on Hinduism, he refused to accept that Vedas can be revelations.

But he forgot that the material he has used to write other articles are directly lifted from Maulana Abdul Haque’s writings who agrees that Vedas are revelations. Thus  proving Prophet in Vedas or Bhavishya Puran is fine with Ahmadiyyas because that is how they justify prophethood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad also.

But for all other Muslims, on whose faith popularity of Dr Zakir Naik rests, this is ‘kufra’.

While these writings do not affect Hindus or even Buddhists, Christians etc much, they definitely backstab a devout Muslim, especially when source of reference is not being quoted.

In summary, Dr Zakir Naik is guilty of :
a. Copying directly, even word to word, from works of Maulana Abdul Haque Vidyarthi, an Ahmadiyya without even quoting his references. This is blatant plagiarism.
b. Using his own name instead to falsely proclaim that he is expert on comparative religion
c. Cheating with other Muslims who consider Ahmadiyya and their beliefs to be worse than those of Kafirs
d. Backstabbing his blind followers who quote his works without realizing that Dr Zakir Naik has made them follow ideology of Qadianis/ Ahmadiyyas.
e. Trying to prove Vedas and Puran contain revelations of Muhammad but also refusing to clear admit Vedas as revelations. Thus he has deliberately not made clear whether in reality Dr Zakir Naik is a Qadiyani or not.

Only Dr Zakir Naik knows what is the real truth and what is his true mission. But his backstabbing has left his blind followers nowhere. Either they will have to admit to Ahmadiyya beliefs, which is the complete foundation of his writings and ‘research’ or regret their faith in Dr Zakir Naik being a Muslim.It seems obvious that Dr Zakir Naik is actually a Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya in disguise trying to fool common Muslims. But why does he need to put this disguise? Is it because Ahmadiyyas are persecuted in all Muslim countries? Or is it that he is a spy with some other hidden agenda. Or perhaps, the way he claims to have discovered new researches in Quran that even Allah, Muhammad, Ali et al could not discover, he is laying foundation of his own Prophethood!

And as per Islamic Criminal Law, that Dr Zakir Naik is such a great fan of, he himself can decide what should be the most appropriate punishment for him. Sharia says that a thief’s hands should be chopped off. Hadiths say that one who deserts his faith or community should be killed. This is time to test how sincere are Dr Zakir Naik and Muslims who have followed him so far, to the teachings of their own divine texts.

I am attaching the scan of the book with this post so that everyone can see Dr Zakir Naik’s fraud with his own people themselves. You can download original here.

You can view (not-so) original article(s) of Dr Zakir Naik at IRF website: http://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128 to compare with the original.





To know more about Qadiyanis, please visit:

or any Qadiyani site for that matter.


Here I provide comparison of work of Dr Zakir Naik and Maulana Vidyarthi, as explained by a Qadiyani Zahid Aziz.

1. Zakir Naik’s article gives various prophecies under four headings. Under the first heading (I) are three prophecies from the book Bhavishya Purana. The first of these is given as follows:

“A malecha (belonging to a foreign country and speaking a foreign language) spiritual teacher will appear with his companions. His name will be Mohammad. Raja (Bhoj), after giving this Maha Dev Arab (of angelic disposition) a bath in the Panchgavya and the Ganga water (i.e. purifying him of all sins), offered him the present of his sincere devotion and showing him all reverence said, I make obeisance to thee. O Ye! The pride of mankind, the dweller in Arabia, Ye have collected a great force to kill the Devil and you yourself have been protected from the malecha opponents.”

This is also the first prophecy in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi’s book. It is identical with the quotation in Zakir Naik’s article. Except that in the Maulana’s book the word malecha is spelt as malechha, and his quotation has the following extra words at the end: “O Ye! The image of the Most Pious God, the biggest Lord, I am a slave to thee, take me as one lying on thy feet.

2. After quoting the prophecy, Zakir Naik’s article draws out six points from it. The Maulana, after quoting the prophecy, lists ten points. We find that Zakir Naik’s first three points are the same as the Maulana’s first three points, and his points (4), (5) and (6) are the same as numbers (10), (7) and (6) respectively of the Maulana. The wording is also very similar.

For example, point (3) in both begins with the words: Special mention is made of the companions of the Prophet”.

3. Following these six points, there are two further comments in Zakir Naik’s article. The first is in answer to the objection that Raja Bhoj lived in the 11th century C.E. The objection and its answer as given in this article are exactly as in the Maulana’s book, namely, that there was not just one Raja Bhoj. The article says:
The Egyptian Monarchs were called as Pharaoh and the Roman Kings were known as Caesar, similarly the Indian Rajas were given the title of Bhoj.”

while the Maulana’s book has:
Just as the Egyptian monarchs were known as Pharaohs and the Roman kings were called Kaisers, similarly, the Indian rajas were given the epithet of Bhoj

4. The second comment relates to the part of the prophecy about giving the promised one a bath in the Ganges, and the article says:
The Prophet did not physically take a bath in the Panchgavya and the water of Ganges. Since the water of Ganges is considered holy, taking bath in the Ganges is an idiom, which means washing away sins or immunity from all sorts of sins. Here the prophecy implies that Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) was sinless, i.e. Maasoom

The same comment is found in the Maulana’s book in the following words:
“Another point which requires elucidation is the Prophet’s taking bath in ‘Panchgavya’ and the water of the Ganges. This did not, of course, actually happen as it was only a vision; so we give it the interpretation that the Prophet will be purged of and made immune from all sorts of sins.”

5. The second prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik’s article is also the second prophecy in the Maulana’s chapter. It begins with the words:
The Malecha have spoiled the well-known land of the Arabs. Arya Dharma is not to be found in the country.

The wording of the entire prophecy (of which about one-tenth is given above) is identical in the article and the book.

6. Following the prophecy, Zakir Naik’s article makes ten points about it, while the Maulana’s book makes twelve points. Naik’s first two points are the same as the Maulana’s first two points. His 3rd to his 10th point are the same as the Maulana’s points (5) to (12), in the same order.

7. The third and final prophecy from the book Bhavishya Purana in Zakir Naik’s article begins as follows:
Corruption and persecution are found in seven sacred cities of Kashi, etc

In the Maulana’s book also, this is the next prophecy, and is given in almost the same words.

8. We now reach the second heading (II) in Zakir Naik’s article. Under this are given three prophecies from the Atharva Veda. In the Maulana’s book also, these are the prophecies that occur next.

Each and every point noted in the article about these prophecies is to be found in the Maulana’s book, in the same order. Below I list the chief aspects of these prophecies as mentioned in Zakir Naik’s article and place in parenthesis the page number in Muhammad in World Scriptures where the same is mentioned:
Kuntap, which is the name of some chapters of the Atharva Veda, stands for Bakkah, a name of Makkah.
The word Narashansah means ‘the praised one’ and refers to the Holy Prophet.
The Holy Prophet is prophesied as the camel-riding rishi.
He is called Mamah Rishi and given certain signs such as a hundred gold coins, ten chaplets, etc.
He is called Rebh, which means the same as the name ‘Ahmad’.
The battle of the Allies of the Holy Prophet’s time is described and the word karo refers to the Holy Prophet.
The conquest of Makka is prophesied and the Holy Prophet is termed as an abandhu, meaning a helpless man.

9. Coming now to the third heading (III) in Zakir Naik’s article, under it one prophecy is briefly mentioned, to the effect that the Sanskrit word sushrava in the Rig Veda applies to the Holy Prophet. The same is in the Maulana’s book.

10. The fourth and final heading in Zakir Naik’s article gives one prophecy, which is from the Sama Veda, and it is translated as follows:
Ahmed acquired from his Lord the knowledge of eternal law. I received light from him just as from the sun.
This prophecy is found in similar words in the Maulana’s book.

11. Zakir Naik’s article then makes three points about this prophecy. The first of these is that the word ‘Ahmad’ here has been read by previous translators not as a name but as Ahm at hi and therefore they translated the mantra as alone have acquired the real wisdom of my father”. These three points under this prophecy are found in the Maulana’s discussion.

12. At this point Zakir Naik’s article comes to an end — and so does the chapter ‘The Prophet in the Hindu Scriptures’ in Maulana Abdul Haq Vidyarthi’s book.

It can be seen that the article by Zakir Naik is nothing at all more than a greatly compressed version of certain parts of the Maulana’s treatment of the subject, following exactly the same order as in the Maulana’s book.

No doubt a later author can make use of the work of an earlier one, but if he benefits substantially from it then integrity requires that he must acknowledge the source.

In this case, the later author has merely repeated the results of the earlier work without any contribution at all by himself, and with no mention of the earlier work.

Do Hindu scriptures contain any Divine revelations?

The research by the Maulana was based on the teaching of Islam that prophets from God had appeared among all nations before the Prophet Muhammad. Muslim scholars had generally limited this to the Israelite prophets and a few others.

Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad revived and laid stress on this unique teaching and concluded from it that the great sacred persons of the Hindu religion must have been true prophets and its scriptures must have been Divine revelations originally. It was on the basis of this belief that the Maulana found prophecies about the Holy Prophet Muhammad in Hindu scriptures. This is why, in explaining the second prophecy given above, the Maulana writes:
The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith.

However, Dr Zakir Naik has stated, in a different place, that the Vedas may not be revealed scriptures. Answering the question, whether we can consider the Vedas and the other Hindu Scriptures to be the revelations of God?, he replies:

There is no text in the Quran or Sahih Hadith mentioning the name of the revelation that was sent to India. Since the names of the Vedas or other Hindu scriptures are no where to be found in Quran and Sahih Hadith, one cannot say for sure that they were the revelations of God. They may be the revelation of God or may not be the revelation of God.

If nothing at all in them was revealed by God, then how did prophecies about the advent of the Holy Prophet come to be in these books? If they may not be revelations at all, then it is also possible that the quotations from them given by Dr Zakir Naik may not be prophecies about the Holy Prophet Muhammad revealed by God.

Interestingly, in his article Dr Naik has actually copied the Maulana’s statement above: The coming prophet will attest the truth of the Aryan faith, which means that the Holy Prophet confirmed that those scriptures were originally revealed by God. Perhaps Dr Naik did not realise that this contradicts his own belief expressed elsewhere.

This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/2971/naikexposed-hi/

This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/2971/naikexposed-hi/

Facebook Comments

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help bring change.

Disclaimer: By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. For full disclaimer, visit "Please read this" in Top and Footer Menu.
Previous articlePolygamy in Hinduism
Next articleScience in Vedas
Agniveer symbolizes the efforts of a soul marching towards the ultimate goal through destruction of ego and falsehood. With focus only on right knowledge, right actions and right devotion. In other words, Agniveer stands for compassion, character, tolerance and rational humanism. Agniveer believes in One World, One Humanity, One Family.

Join the debate

734 Comments on "Dr Zakir Naik’s fraud exposed"

Notify of
A great thanks to DR.INEGBEDION the man that help me when i was very sick, i and my husband where HIV positive and my little daughter had it too, I have try all my possible best to get cured but I couldn’t come up with anything, am from Congo married… Read more »

i say something Simple ,,,,

Agniveer (and others), please read about Political Islam. It has everything to do with Islams plans for non-Muslims such as Hindus http://www.politicalislam.com/principles/pages/five-principles/ This site and the articles and books are vital for all non-Muslims to understand. “Mission Islam is a cultural, religious and political system. Only the political system is… Read more »
We know your mission very well Fatima to destroy all civilizations not Muslim. You don’t get it. No one cares if you call god Allah, and pray five times a day. We have no interest in abolishing that. If that was all Islam was about there would be no issue… Read more »
Hari Padmanabhan
Dear Brother AGNIVEER. YOU are REALLY AGNIVEER!!!!! FIRE HERO!!!!! May the holy Rishis Bless you and Protect you. As a fellow Sanathan Dharmi I am thrilled and overwhelmed by the Grand Magnificent work you are doing. I humbly join my little strength with your GREAT STRENGTH in contributing towards protecting… Read more »
Hari Padmanabhan
Muslims are the biggest image worshippers. Muslims are frauds and hypocrites when they do not admit this truth. When they say the name “Mohammad”, automatically the image of a man comes to the mind. The image of a 7th century Arab comes to mind. When you say “mountain”, automatically the… Read more »

For your kind information if u r a literate person then u must know that images r not worshiped……. They r not kept in front of us like hindus and we don’t bow in front of anything except Allah and we do not worship Muhammad…….

Kaetan-Hitz Bhatt

You said you bow only to allah and no one else….so how come Satan was punished for this? he refused to bow to adam, who allah created with his own hands from mud/clay…why was satan thrown out of heaven and deprived of his 72 virgins and rivers of wine?


Satan was thrown out because he went against the commands of Allah……. Angels were made to do whatever Allah says but he refused to follow the commandments of Allah that’s why he was thrown out…..

@Fatima: Then why is it important to say “i bear witness that Allah is the only god and MUHAMMD IS HIS MESSENGER” can one become Muslim by Saying only “I bear witness that there is no god but Allah ” and leave the second part out…? Even in Azaan you… Read more »

Because we love our Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and whoever doesn’t believe oh him is not a Muslim….. By saying the kalma we enter in Islam and if we do not practice it we r not muslims


you believe in GOD, ANGELS or MUHAMMAD..

jai shankar
SATANIC VERSES KI SACCHAI – aaj tak satanic verses ki sacchai samne nahi aayi thi,pahli baar raj khul raha hai.sabhi budhimani logonko ye baat samaj me nahi aayi ki,jo aayate allah ke 3 beti,bete ka zikr karti hai,us me do ayte pahale thi aur bad me,nikali gayi.uska khulasa ki, wo… Read more »
U r trying to refer out of context and there is nothing like this written in Surah Furqan Ayat 4-5 ……….. Quran are the words of ALLAH thats why till now it is the same as revealed 1400 yrs back and their is no interference in Holy Quran like other… Read more »
Kaetan-Hitz Bhatt

Did you just say quran is the word of allah? – so allah wrote this book?


Allah revealed this book…… i m saying this if u can understand…….

@Fatima the root word of Islam is NOT salam. See explanation below. Sad you don’t even know that. That you continue to use the derogatory word Kaffir reveals a lot about your cheap character and what Islam teaches you. You are no better than the white racist who uses the… Read more »
Kaetan-Hitz Bhatt
I asked you a simple question, why is there so much hatred in your words? if someone wants to clarify something about your religion, is this how you talk to them? Do i seem like an illiterate to you??! I want to know: 1. why mohammed had so 12 wives… Read more »
jai shankar
@fatima,Ye MARZI ka kya arth hai??? Kaydekanun ki bina kaydekanun? Dekho Uski marzi hui to hindu ko zannat dega aur muslims ko jahannam???uski marzi hui to isai aur yahudi ko zannat aur muslim ko jahannam??uski marzi hui to muhammad par naraj jejus par khush??uski marzi hui to quran mananewale ko… Read more »
jai shankar
@fatima,kyo bechare allah ko pareshani me dal rahi ho.?hahaha allah ko Bina smruti ke iska khayal kaise aaya? duniya uski smruti me thi to pahale ki duniya kaha hai?aur aise hi duniya banata aur mitata to wo kya pagal hai?mitana hai to banaya kyo? duniya banate waqt powerful tha sirf… Read more »
jai shankar
jab aadmi sapna dekhta hai,tab wo aapne bhitar pura jagat nirmit karta hai.jaisa jagat bahar hota hai vaise hi bhitar hota hai.bahar,chand,suraj,aakash,zamin,diwar achal hai to us ke sapne me bhi wo achal hote hai.is ka arth hua wo jo duniya banata hai wo apni man ki shakti se banata hai.koi… Read more »


ALLAH PAK ney ye dunia banaya aur wo ALLAH PAk ki marzi hai k jab chaye isay destroy karey aur jab chaye banaye usey koi rokhney wala nhi hai…..


murkhta se purn ans ..allah ne duniya kab banai yeh batao pehle kya adam, ko kun fiyakun kahne se aadam nahi ban sakta tha …aur kis chiz se duniya banai ..kya material use kiya

param pujya bahan fatima ji , jarayah bhi sath me batlaiye aur sochiye bhi allah me yah duniya kyo banayi agar uski marji hai to marji ka bhi koi karan bhi hona chahiye kya kurani allah koi atankvadi ,pagal, moodi, tana shah adi hai jo uski marji chalegi , koi… Read more »

Firstly my language is urdu not hindi if u can write in english or urdu then i will answer u…


mahamahim bahan Fatima ji ,agar ap urdu- hindi me likhe to jyada behatar rahega ! apke uttar ke intjzar me ?

jai shankar
@rsdfgg,pagalonme awwal,tu pahale apne chitt ko saf kar,shudh kar sab vishwas se mukt ho ja swikar kar ki allah ek mithak hai,false concept hai,muhammad ki dimagi soch hai.fir tuze mai ved ka gyan dunga….ha.ha.ha..bina allah ka vichar liye ved ka gyan nahi mil sakta tu quran chod .ved ka eshwar… Read more »
@pagal-shankar, tu isliye answer nahi de raha kiyunki tu de hi nahi sakta. is ka answer dene mein dar gayakiya? pol khulne ka darr hai kiya ki tu bhi bina dekhai cheezon ko manta hai??? teri asani k liye phir likh deta hun …hahahaha //vedon k ishwar ko tune dekha… Read more »
jai shankar
@rsdfgg,paglonke seertaj allah ne duniya banayi ye uske smruti se ki bina smruti se??? kyo ki bina memory ke aadmi kuch samaj nahi pata,bina memory ke aadmi kuch bhi bana nahi sakta ye siddha hota hai to allah ki smrti kya hai??? Allah to akela hai phir use smriti bhi… Read more »
@pagal-shankar, tu isliye answer nahi de raha kiyunki tu de hi nahi sakta. is ka answer dene mein dar gayakiya? pol khulne ka darr hai kiya ki tu bhi bina dekhai cheezon ko manta hai??? teri asani k liye phir likh deta hun …hahahaha //vedon k ishwar ko tune dekha… Read more »

ved ka arth hai gyan ! ved ek hai, uske 4 kahnd hai, rigved , yajurved, atharvved ,sam ved!uske nam hai !

jai shankar
I piss on the Kaaba. I don’t worship it. I WORSHIP ALLAH ALONE. I piss on the Quran. I don’t worship it. I WORSHIP ALLAH ALONE. I piss on the prophet Muhammad (may shit be upon his head). I don’t worship him. I WORSHIP ALLAH ALONE. I piss towards Mecca.… Read more »
@pagal-shankar, edon k ishwar ko tune dekha hai kiya? agar nahi dekha aur manta hai to phir tu bhi to andvishwasi hua na?? kiya tune 4 rishiyon ko dekha hai jinko ved diye gaye the? agar nahi aur tu manta hai to tu andhvishwasi hua na? yeh shankar kon hai… Read more »
jai shankar
ISLAM KI SACHHAI 4- ISLAM ME YE BAATE NAHI HAI1) chitt ya mind aur uske nirodh, thahrna,shant hona is koi gyan islam me nahi hai 2) atmagyan hona aapne andar ke aatma ka sakshat karna 3) sab ki jad man hai ,ye man hi dukh ka karan hai aur man… Read more »
jai shankar
@pagal-shankar, ajeeb aadmi hai? itni si baat nahi samjh sakta? jis doctor ne tera operation kara hoga wohi to janega ki tere paas dimagh hai ya nahi?? maine thore hi kiya tera operation?/hahaha kiya hum us doctor par vishwas kar lein ? yeh to andhvishwas hua na aur tere kehne… Read more »
Truth Seeker
@rsdfgg _______ajeeb aadmi hai? itni si baat nahi samjh sakta? jis doctor ne tera operation kara hoga wohi to janega ki tere paas dimagh hai ya nahi??___ Jab shakar pagal hai to Allah ne isse banaya qyo. Allah ne isse Mohammed jaisa dimag qyo nahi diya. Sara dosh Allah ka… Read more »
jai shankar
jai shankar
🙂 ok say he copied that things but he is very brilliant one in making use & preaching what he copied & secondly he is very active in answering different kind of questions on the issue. So no matters where he get it from as long as he is trying… Read more »
jai shankar
Adan jo hai wo bahut hi miss-understanding se bhari hai.Allahu Akbar -god is great matlab allah mahan hai.ye sabit karta hai ki allah mahan pahle nahi tha ab mahan hai.ex.deta hu taki samaj me aasani hogi, jab hum chote bachhe ko jab bada hua to kahte hai aadmi hua ab… Read more »
jai shankar
Bhagwan kisi ko bhi gali dene ko nahi kahta hai,Galiya aadmi ki ijad hai,bhagwan ki nahi, gali ke akshar me bhagwan hai par wo akshar bolnewale me nahi.Shabd aadmi ke upyog ke liye hai,bhgwan ke liye nahi.bhawan koi bhi shabd nahi janta shabd ke piche chipi bhavna ko to hargis… Read more »

I will kill bladdy dog face buddest monk’s in the rest of my life o Allah make my due my wish my LORD come true in this life Ameen

jai shankar
@truth seekar, ek doha jo bahut kuch kahta hai, “BUND” SAMANA SAMUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Ye sadharan chit ki awastha hai, par jaise Vishwas mukta hota hai chit to ye hota hai,”SAMUND” SAMANA BUND ME,HERAT HERAT HE SAKHI RAHYA KABIR HERAI. Pahle to main aapko ek… Read more »
jai shankar
dr.zakir naik sach me agar vad-vivad karna chahta hai to use main hara sakta hu..dekho agar praman ki baat aayegi to pratyaksha,aanuman,aagam ye 3praman mukhya hote hai. Ab dekho islam ke paas pratyakshya praman allah ka nahi hai.allah ko kisi ne pratykshy nahi dekha khud muhammad ne bhi nahi dekha.is… Read more »
Truth Seeker/Satyakijai
Truth Seeker/Satyakijai
@jaishankir, kiya tum bata sakte ho ki tum kis Ishwar mein vishwas rakhte ho aur rakhte bhi ho ya nahi? kiya shiv,vishnu aur brahma ki trinity/trishool mein wishvas rakhte ho? agar tum koi baat manoge hi nahi to kisi ko bhi hara doge tum to kehdoge mere paas koi praman… Read more »

lol dr zakir naik did not copy from anyone.. he got his knowledge from Ahmed Deedat who was his teacher

ravi arya
you muslim say the only religion is Islam and you all are true but every other religion is false and every pope,pundit,rishi,jew priest who are at their divine post are kufr…what the ___!! you think of yourself…Your quran is nothing but the words of Muhammad that he used to get… Read more »

yes we know zakir naik is a liar but he keeps saying na tasya partima asti but i cant find this anywhere even when i use unauthentic grifths vedas translation

@Agniveer whatever question u ask about islam or hindu or christian he will give the answer..@ whatever statement he mention 4m ur holy book with refference ur chpter n0. Verse n0. Sloka n0 with meanings.. . If u find anything wrong zakir saying ,Then why dont u take ur holy… Read more »
@Agniveer >>Is Dr. zakir naik forcing u to convert u to muslim or to practice islam religion???surely not. Forcing non-muslim person to convert to islam is haraam written on holy quran. so u better stop criticizing zakir naik n try to read n analyze ur holy books … >>.is there… Read more »
1 god ka meaning yeh nahi hua ki Islaam he uss god ke kareeb hai……….. Muslims kyoon Makka Madina ka pic apne ghar aur dukaan main lagaate hain……………… more than 80% muslims bhi Alcohol consume karte hain…………… Zakir naik ko chaiye ki woh sirf Islaam ki khoobiyon ko highlight kare… Read more »

zakir nalayak ko bahot loog challenge kar chuke hai lekin wo debate ke liye nahi aay aur nahi kisis sawal ka jawab deta hai.. jake pucho kyu nahi aata.


haan wo dusaro ko convert hone ke liye force karte hai jab wo dusare ke dharm ke bare me fake bate batata hai..
zakir ek suar hai..

pisslamis shit religion.


its our Duty to answer or clarify whatever mis understanding people are having about our Dharma.

Anjana Singh
I think Agniveer is anti of muslim and again and again negative finding in the person of Dr. Zakir Naik…. i suggest to you Team Agniveer pls do you work for our Culture.. dont see outside.. we have lots of problem… why you posting about muslim muslim why? tell me… Read more »

behenchod aapna muh badn rakh samjhe..yahi baat us kutte zakir nayak ko samjha samjhi..
aur yaha ladakiyo ki salah to chahiye hi nahi bcz tum ladakiya murkh hoti ho.

aur agniveer to sirf zakir nayak kajhuth samne la rahi hai to kyu nayak hamesha jhuth bolta rehta hai..


I think this whole website is a fraud just to create misunderstandings between those in the light and others.


yeah u r right.We all r brothers.

Satya ek mukta aakash ke jaisa hai,jaha koi asahajata nahi,dharma vahi hai jo tumhe mukta karta hai sabhi se aur chode deta hai aghyat main… Taki tum vahi jano jo hain tumame aur sarva main…noor to hai bas aankh ki taraf eshara jo dikha de ….dharm keval eshare hai satya… Read more »

is website ka naam jhoota veer rakhna chahiye


agniveer yeh kiya kar raha jhoot pe jhoot phela raha hai.apne dusro bhi duba raha hai yeh website bandh kar


abe teri ma ka bhosada tu kown hota hai website band karne keliyekehne wala.. sale behenchod yahakoi jhuth bool raha hai to sirf zakir nalayak islam muhammad aur islami mulle.

Anjana Singh

Please shut your mouth… Say Sorry to Every One… Which type of you word are using… So Shame… Naam Kharab Kar dia Humsab ka… Say Sorry.

bakwas band karo aapni samjhe. kis baat ka sorry jake aapne yaar zakir nalayak ko bool hinduo se sorry bole. aur un chutiye musalmano se sorry bole jo unhe chutiya banata rehta hai.. aurmuh tu aapna dafa ho yaha se .. ye sari bateki agniveer anti muslim etc hai ye… Read more »
Anjana Singh

aag Mein Jaloge Shreemaan…….


manniy shri amerapne yah to batlaya nahi ki isme jhuth kya hai bas vyarth me isko band karo ki “narebaji”jarur karne lage! agar koi bat jhuthi usko sabke samne to laiye ?

Dear sir ,In terms of Islamic belief ,that if one can prove himself from a religious cult by his gesture/appearance shall be treated as the member of same cult in spite of his belief in Islam ,accordingly Dr. Naik shall be treated as christian due to his gesture i.e. wearing… Read more »
@faruq, why are you posting with a fake name to show yourself as muslim, any muslim can easily understand that you are not muslim you know y because you yourself dont know that in which way or cause we can give zakat? can u explain from quran where poor orphan… Read more »
Dear All, Its good to see all of the comments mention above most of them fighting to each other who is right & who is wrong. But the point is since not about who whom you following. No idea what motto of Dr. Naik & Mr. Aginesh. What important for… Read more »
So whats wrong.. He also copied most Quotes from Quran and Sahih Hadith.. Which is in fact better for a authentic source.. Truth will not change even if it is copied.. DR Zakir Naik always said..he is student of compariative religion.. And he is picking facts and highlighting them for… Read more »
Salam Aleykoum dear brother. I read most of the article, but couldn’t find why you were so upset about Dr Zakir Naik, if he plagiarised (which need conformation) does it take anything out of the person? Do he plagiarise when he appear on tv, debates, expose lies etc? Please answer… Read more »

Dear Hassan:

Welcome to Agniveer.

we Muslims people don’t says about your relegion
Really? Does not the Quran mention people of other religions – Jews, Christians, Pagans, Polytheists, etc. and what is in store for them in the afterlife?

dear muslim brothers Aslamoalikum warahmatullahi wabrakatu ho. Brothers dont fight with poeple if you dont have information and konwlede about Quran and Haith’s completley and if you poeple dont know transalion of Quran . so please dont fight with them coz in this compatation The poeple home against Islam they… Read more »

then talks against Islam

dear friends why you poeple are fighting with each other to hindu brothers that if u poeple not intrested in Islam so please dont talk against you are not like so leave it. and another thing that dont talk against my prophet Muhmmad first see in your selves that how… Read more »
Dear Hassan Perhaps you forgot to read the article you just commented on. It is Zakir Naik himself who claimed a demon called Mahamada of Bhavishya Puran to be Muhammad of Quran. It is he who stole from Qadiyani books and presented it as his own research. It is he… Read more »

dear brother
so can you menshion qaydani books which zakir naik stolen


Brother Hassan

Did you read the article? If no, read it first.

Truth Hurts

here is the biggest evidence that he’s a fraud : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk5q9TeGo14

Mohd Riyaz

Kya mai keh sakta hun ki mere navi(SWA) sabse barde hai tamaam ambiyo mai?


manniy sri riyaz ji , apke navi kaise bade hai? jara yah bhi to batlaiye ?vah to ummi [anpadh] the, ek anpadh ko mahan rup me kyo pesh karna chahate hai ?

Mohd Riyaz
Dear Sir, Vo eik mahan aur behtar saks hai aur uske liye mujeh certificate nahi lena, Par aap ke refrance ke liye vo ambiyo ke Imaam, Vo khatman umbiya, vo rehmatul alameen, aap par deen finshed hua jo aadam se lekar chal raha tha. aur hun anpadh aur parda hua… Read more »
param adarniy shri riyaz ji ishvar ka jo siddhant hota hai vah kabhi samapt nahi hota ? jaise ishvar samapt nahi hota hai ! isliye agar nabuvat chal rahai hai,to samapt bi kabhi nahi ho sakti ! keval kahane se kuch nahi hota muhamamd ji agar anpadh the to ap… Read more »
Actually when i started to read your article, i thought, despite of all ma doubts, that you wil present an arguement that is based on some wisdom and well planned lies, but towards the end i was just wondering wether this page as where i can realy place ma comments… Read more »
@Mohamoud Brother, we have nothing against you peaceful Qadiyanis. But you should understand that Wahabi preacher Naik has stolen your scholar’s literature and presented it as his own research. Many of your Ahmadi scholars have also raised questions against Naik. So it is better to expose such frauds that have… Read more »
Sri. Bala ravi prasad
Sri. Bala ravi prasad
Mr Satyagni if you are true and you are allegations are founded with reliable base then why cant you attempting the Public Debate with Dr. Zakir Naik to prove that he is defrauder. I think you people are with fanaticism with your baseless religion and fearing of losing luxury life… Read more »

Respected Bala Ravi Prasad,

can you please stop hiding behind hindu names, they are too pious for jihadi fanatics like you. By the way, I know who you are, so before I expose you on this page, comment with your islamic name next time.


@Sri Bala

Read this to know why we SHOULD NOT debate Zakir Naik


And this to know why Zakir Naik DID NOT debate when we challenged him


truth seeker
पाकिस्तान में बंटे पोस्टर, कहा अहमदिया मुस्लिमों की हत्या करो | Last Updated 16:14(09/06/11) इस्लामाबाद. पाकिस्तान के पंजाब प्रांत में बड़ी संख्या में पंपलेट बांटे जा रहे हैं, जिसमें मुस्लिम धर्म के ही एक संप्रदाय अहमदिया मुस्लिमों की हत्या करने को कहा गया है। अहमदिया संप्रदाय के लोगों की हत्या… Read more »
@ Abdullah : Sir, Dr. Zakeer Nayak has been exposed many a times. All his theories have been proved many a times. Still you are saying he is a great scholar. It shows you are blind. When you read bad comments regarding Islam you got very angry and justified Jihad.… Read more »