Any attempt to dissociate a vernacular language from Vedic Sanskrit is nothing more than Kalidas cutting the tree on which he sits.

Kannada, Tamil, Marathi, Telugu, Bangla, Bhojpuri, Marwari, Gujarati, Maithili, Braja, Awadhi, Malayalam, Asamiya, Odiya, Haryanavi, Punjabi, Konkani etc etc – I love them all because they are my family. But if they disown the mother Vedas – they remain nothing more than some sound waves that any computer can make these days.

Without getting into debate of which is older or how Tamil has not evolved from Sanskrit (because I believe this debate is inherently flawed) I would assert that:

1. Sanskrit forms the mother of Tamil culture, if not language. The spiritual foundation of Tamils, just like other Hindus, is sourced from Vedas. And hence Vedic Sanskrit is mother that cannot be sidelined.

2. Tamil may be older than classical Sanskrit. But to claim that it is older than Vedas (or Vedic Sanskrit) has no basis whatsoever. The anti-Hindus and communists may argue this way. But when Hindus argue this just to prove superiority of Tamil language, I can only pity.

A. Agastya Rishi is said to be father of Tamil language. The same Agastya Rishi is also a Rishi who revealed meaning of several Vedic Mantras. He is said to have migrated from North India.

B. There is no evidence of a version of Tamil that is totally dissociated with Sanskrit.

C. If Tamil be older than Vedas, then Hinduism reduces to a tribal religion. The foundation of Hinduism is that Vedas are Apaurusheya (timeless and not created by humans). Vedas are eternal knowledge that comes through inspiration of Rishis.

Now this assumption cannot be refuted by anyone. Because there is no evidence of Vedas being evolved at any time. And if you still do, you open gates for conversions and invasions.

Because then you admit that while Christians have a Holy Bible and Muslims have a Holy Quran, we have nothing Holy and hence we are always available for adjustments and change.

3. The whole Dravida movement was based on two blatant lies:
– Aryans invaded India and Dravida are original people.
– Aryans use Sanskrit and Dravida speak Tamil.

Today these lies have become so widespread in TN that even devout Hindus want to put extra emphasis on Tamil – Sanskrit divide.

My stand on this is clear:
– The study of origin of languages as analyzed today is inherently flawed. Tamil is definitely older than Classical Sanskrit (that of Kalidas). But it does not predate Vedas (Vedic Sanskrit). Nothing in world does.

– Tamil may have developed as an independent language. Many languages have. Esperanto for example. But there was never a period when Sanskrit did not influence Tamil.

– To date languages based on written records is foolishness because this is also written that for ages languages and wisdom was transmitted orally.

– Most of these studies of Tamil vs Sanskrit are driven by those influences by communist or evangelical mindsets. And hence spurious.

– Tamil must be nurtured just like other vernacular languages. Tamil must be given special importance because it is the oldest spoken language today.

– But any attempt to dissociate Tamil from Sanskrit, or to pitch the two languages against each other, or remove Sanskrit words from Tamil is a naughty foolish attempt that must be thwarted.

– On contrary, Sanskrit must be made national language and used as a a unifying agent for entire India. Deprive India of Sanskrit, and nothing but saga of Mughal and British loots remain. And to honor the core of Sanskrit, Vedic Sanskrit, instead of classical Sanskrit, must be revived.

This is possible today because we will be starting from scratch. Let the Sanskrit of Vedas become lingua-franca. It is the easiest, most intuitive, and most binding language of universe.

I respect Tamil. It is my heritage that I am proud of. Vedas is the mother.

It is sad to see some Hindu leaders claiming Tamil to be older than Sanskrit. The only 2 proofs are Dravidian regional politics and JNU brand anti-Hindu allergy. Vedic Sanskrit is oldest and that’s why even Tamils adopted it for worship. Tamil was created by Agastya – Vedic rishi. And is awesome.

Tamil is far older than Kalidas type classical Sanskrit. But not Gayatri Mantra and Mahamrityunjaya. Moment you sideline Vedas to prove Tamil old, you break foundation of Hinduism and bring it to level of later religions. Good for politics, blunder for nation. And total lie.

The entire drama of Tamil being older than Sanskrit started with Dravida politics that demanded separate nation like Pakistan. Concocted by separatist haters like Periyar. Soon it became blasphemy in Tamil Nadu if you say Tamil is not oldest.

The entire drama of Tamil being older than Sanskrit started with Dravida politics that demanded separate nation like Pakistan. Concocted by separatist haters like Periyar. Soon it became blasphemy in Tamil Nadu if you say Tamil is not oldest.

Irony is that Sanskrit and Sanskrit based Hinduism is still mainstay of Tamil spiritualism. Tamils never found a reason to compete with Sanskrit till 20th century. Everyone knew Vedas are mother and hence Tamils preserved Vedas more than other regions of India.

Yes Tamil is the oldest spoken language today. It is almost as old as Ramayana that mentions Agastya in south India. But there is no evidence of it being older than Vedic Sanskrit except anti-Hindu Dravidian politics and JNU brand anti nationalist history.

Of course, Tamil is a beautiful language. It must be proactively spread as our shared legacy. It has its own unique framework. It is by sheer grace of Prabhu that it got preserved because Jihad could not impact there much. It’s pristine purity makes it a wonder of world.

Classical Sanskrit is derived from certain narrow rules from Vedic Sanskrit. All other Indian languages derive that path. Vedic rishi Agastya – of Ramayana era – created Tamil with a different rule base after he moved south. This helped preserve Vedic culture without dilutions.

So yes, Tamil is not derived from classical Sanskrit. Classical is different from Vedic Sanskrit – the mother. Tamil has its own independent standing, is our great heritage, was created by a Vedic rishi whose name appears in Vedic compilations. Hence not older than Vedas.

There is this belief of Tamil created from Lord Shiva. Perfectly acceptable considering the way it has thrived and richness it possesses. Same Shiva is hailed as preserver of Vedas. In Hinduism, Vedas and Vedic Sanskrit are eternal. Tamil is divine but not older than Shiva.

For more, follow Shri Sanjeev on twitter –  Shri Sanjeev Newar on Twitter

On Origin of Languages – Shri Sanjeev Newar Agniveer

Ted Talk on reality of caste system having origins in Hindu scriptures by Shri Sanjeev Newar

Learn Conversational Sanskrit – (Video Lessons)

– Shri Sanjeev Newar


Learn Sanskrit in simple manner –
1. Video Tutorial – Youtube Playlist
2. Lessons in Hindi, English

Spend few minutes daily on one of these and you will be able to learn basics of conversational Sanskrit in simple manner.

Nothing Found

Reviving Sanskrit

Facebook Comments

Liked the post? Make a contribution and help bring change.

Disclaimer: By Quran and Hadiths, we do not refer to their original meanings. We only refer to interpretations made by fanatics and terrorists to justify their kill and rape. We highly respect the original Quran, Hadiths and their creators. We also respect Muslim heroes like APJ Abdul Kalam who are our role models. Our fight is against those who misinterpret them and malign Islam by associating it with terrorism. For example, Mughals, ISIS, Al Qaeda, and every other person who justifies sex-slavery, rape of daughter-in-law and other heinous acts. For full disclaimer, visit "Please read this" in Top and Footer Menu.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here