Why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much?

This entry is part 12 of 19 in the series Zakir Naik Exposed

Zakir Bhai MBBS has been among the most hated public figures of today. Deoband recently issued a fatwa against him. There is no doubt that Zakir Bhai is among the most smartly marketed religious celebrity of last few years. He claims to represent and propagate Islam. He considers himself a servant of Muhammad (PBUH). Yet it is the Muslims and Islamic clerics who hate Zakir Naik the most. In this chapter, we shall briefly list out reasons why Muslims hate Zakir Naik so much that many claim that he would be the first person to enter Dozakh (Islamic hell).

Background – 72 Muslim sects

Let us provide a brief background. Most people consider Islam to be the religion propagated by Prophet Muhammad and narrated in Quran. On the surface, it appears all so simple. Quran proclaims that one who submits to the word of final messenger of Allah shall achieve Heaven. But things are not so simple for a layman, and even a scholar. Because while there is only one Quran and one Prophet Muhammad, there is tremendous variety in the types of interpretations that so-called Muslims make out of this book and this great social- reformer.

In short, Islam is not as monolithic as it appears to be. The number of sects in Islam is more than 72, and they are as different from each other as dry is from wet and cold is from hot. All these sects have different customs, different levels of tolerances for non-Muslims, different food habits, different interpretations of Quran, different level of importance given to Muhammad and his associates and different descriptions of Heaven and Hell. The Shia-Sunni war is clearly known.

What makes the things even more confusing is the belief of these more than 72 Sects. Only one is on the path of truth and hence only one will go to Heaven. Rest of the sects will go to Hell. Thus, it is not sufficient to just be a Muslim to achieve Heaven; you need to follow only the right sect. Now each sect fights to prove that they are the genuine sect. Some sects are liberal enough to allow even non-Muslims to Heaven. Some Muslims are even promoters of vegetarianism. Some consider nation ahead of everything else. But there are some who believe that all except those who fully believe in their sect and its practices without questioning anything, alone will go to Heaven. Rest of all will be in Hell forever.

Zakir Naik’s Wahabi sect – The most fanatic

Among the most fanatic of these cults is the Wahabi cult. This is supposed to be the producer of the largest number of terrorists including ISIS, Osama, Al Qaeda since its inception in the 18th century and has been a cause of disgrace for rest of the peace-loving Muslims. Zakir Naik belongs to this Wahabi cult, believes that only this Wahabi version of Islam can bring anyone close to Heaven, and rest of all will go to Hell. And things are not as simple. Further, he mixes his Wahabism with material from other scholars of different sects to create his own Zakirism that in the process blatantly insults and disgraces the vision of Islam as per other sects, including the more tolerant ones.

Zakir Naik humiliated Wahabis

Zakirism goes to such extent that he does not even spare Wahabis from humiliations. Zakir Naik claims to be an expert on comparative religions. In his site, he has put lots of articles on comparative religions under his name. But in reality, they are merely a word to word copy of texts from Qadiyani/Ahmadiyya sources. So what is wrong if one refers to Qadiyani or Ahmadiyya sources? Perhaps nothing, except that:

Qadiyanis/ Ahmadiyyas are considered Kafirs and they are prosecuted by most Muslims for their radical beliefs.

Wahabis have been greatest enemies of Qadiyanis

The content of the Qadiyani writings that Zakir Naik has swindled under his own name are blatantly against core beliefs of rest of the Muslims including Wahabis.

For example, Zakir Bhai MBBS tries to prove that Vedas prophesize about Muhammad. (This has been completely refuted by Agniveer) Now this belief gels with the Qadiyani belief that Vedas were also revelations. But Wahabis and other sects refuse to believe so. Hence even Zakir Bhai MBBS writes in another article that he is not sure if Vedas are revelations. He conveniently forgets that he himself has proved that Vedas reveal Muhammad in another article! (Perhaps because he forgot to read it before asking his henchmen to copy from Qadiyani book and paste under his name on his site and in books.)

In summary, Zakir Bhai continues to use Qadiyani sources to show his scholarly capabilities but refuses to accept Qadiyanis as Muslims because he claims to be Wahabi and is funded by Wahabi militants. Or is he a Qadiyani spy in Wahabi disguise? Only Zakir Bhai knows the reality, but his acts suffice to invite hatred of Qadiyanis as well as other Muslim sects.

Progressive Muslims hate Zakir Naik

Zakir Bhai justifies non-vegetarianism as a scientific Islamic trait. While he does acknowledge that even a Muslim can be vegetarian, he attempts to justify meat-eating on crazy arguments including research by some farmers. (Agniveer has already busted this lie). This catches ire of several progressive Muslims, who refuse to believe that meat-eating has any association with religion. Many progressive Muslims have even started a Muslim Vegetarian Society that is among the most powerful protagonists of Vegetarianism and opponents of Halal meat. They have severely condemned Zakir Naik and his spurious research for disgracing Islam to justify the lust of his own tongue.

Deoband issued a fatwa against Zakir Naik

Being a Wahabi he has a soft corner for Osama Bin Laden. When someone questioned him on his views on Osama, he replied that he admires him because he has terrorized America! He shied away from criticizing terrorist activities of Osama.

Deoband even issued a Fatwa against him probably because his use of literature of Qadiyani sect – considered worst by Deoband – to further Islamic cause.
Reason why Zakir supports Osama is – the money that funds Osama and money that funds Zakir Bhai have allegedly the same sources. Many terrorists caught in recent times involving the ones of Dhaka attacks, Chief of Hyderabad ISIS Module, first Indian ISIS fighter have allegedly accredited Zakir Naik to be their inspiration.

Devout Muslim hates Zakir Naik for wearing Kafir dress code

While on the surface, he claims to be a conservative Muslim; he wears a non-Islamic dress which as per Islamic hadiths would lead one to be treated as a non-Muslim during Judgment Day. Many devout Muslims thus consider their dress very seriously and hate Dr. Zakir Naik for setting wrong examples by wearing Kafir dress of tie, suit, and coat. Zakir Naik teaches fanaticism to others but himself adopts conveniences as per his own will.

Sufis and graves worshippers hate Zakir Naik

Wahabis have destroyed many Sufi shrines and the even house of Prophet Muhammad because they believe these to be signs of idol worship. They killed many Muslim men, women, and children in their campaigns to destroy tombs and holy places. In the same footsteps, Zakir Naik severely condemns these practices to be anti-Muslim and hence is hated by those who worship graves, Sufis and tombs.

Shias hate Zakir Naik

Shias obviously have a reason to hate Zakir Bhai MBBS because of his staunch anti-Shia stance, being a Wahabi. But his admiration of Yazeed, considered to be the culprit for the massacre of Prophet’s family in Karbala has been a strong point of contention for other Muslims. So much is the hatred against Yazeed that many people curse by the name of Yazeed. But Zakir Naik respects Yazeed in similar way as Prophet Muhammad by stating ‘Peace be Upon Him’ or something similar after his name. This PBUH/similar words are restricted only for the most revered people in Islam.

Progressive Muslims hates Zakir Naik for his ultra-fanaticism

Zakir justifies the ban on the worship of other religions in Muslim countries. He however also justifies that Muslims should be allowed in other countries to promote their religion. The logic is curious — as per Zakir Bhai, in matters of religion, Muslims are the best. So they should be allowed everywhere — Muslim or non-Muslim countries. But non-Muslims should not be allowed to build places of worship in Muslim countries because their religions are inferior to Islam!

Such ultra-fanaticism irks the most progressive Muslims, who want to integrate with rest of the world and rise above religious dogmas and hatred.

Muslims hate him for being ultra-conservative

Being an ultra-conservative, he propagates that despite a person being as much good or noble, unless they unconditionally accept his version of Islam, they will go to Hell and Hell alone and forever. This goes against beliefs of more progressive Muslims, who believe that all who act with genuineness, regardless of their religion will go to Heaven and not Hell.

Muslim women hate Zakir Naik

Muslim women obviously have all the reasons to hate Zakir Bhai because in the name of pseudo-science he is simply restricting their freedom that has been ordained by the Creator. For example, he states that Muslim women should always wear Hijab and Burqa and cover their entire body always. Medical researchers are worried that such unreasonable practices cause dreaded diseases due to lack of Vitamin D in Muslim countries which enforce such beliefs on women. More liberal Muslims see such insistence as dangerous dogma harming the cause of Muslims and Human Rights.

He further states that Muslim women should not work in offices because they may have a chance to be alone with men even for a second. The only men that a woman is allowed to be alone with are her husband and those who have suckled her. Taking this crazy dogma of Zakir Bhai further, the Head of Hadith Department of the most reputed university of Islam in the world recently issued a fatwa that Muslim women should allow their male colleagues to suckle their breasts five times. This will allow them to work with these men, even when alone. Because after this, they will be like mothers to them!

Zakir Bhai debars women from being any doctor except gynecologists because that is haram as per his version of Islam. Women should not take part in sports as well!

He further defends polygamy by furnishing false data on population but disallows polyandry.

He justifies the belief that women are less intelligent than men, and hence evidence of two women equals that of one man!

He thus also justifies that women cannot inherit equally to their male counterparts!

He also believes that majority of hell dwellers will be women.

No wonder, he agrees to the dogma that to prove rape, a woman should bring an ample number of witnesses who have witnessed actual penetration!

Wahabis calls Zakir Naik a Shaitan

The list of people who hate Zakir Naik can go on and on. So much that now even Wahabis have started calling Zakir Bhai a Shaitan.

Other sects who do not receive as much funding as Osama or Zakir Naik try tooth and nail to debunk his fraud through all means.

They are even more upset by the fact that Zakir Naik does not even know how to read Arabic and merely imitates Ahmed Deedat, another preacher considered deviant by many scholars.

Conclusion

The process of seeking truth demands process of elimination. One may not be sure and continue to debate on which of the 72 or more sects of Islam would lead one to Heaven, or whether Quran itself is the authentic Quran and not the new Quran as created recently. One may not be sure whether a permanent Hell or Heaven or Angels or Genies exist in first place. One may doubt if Muhammad was a great non-divine social -reformer or actually a Messenger of Allah’s word. One can debate if Quran deserves to be the final word of Allah and what should be its interpretation. Or what new good concept Quran provides that was not present in previous books.

But one fact is sure. There is not even a scope for debate – Certain persons should be out-rightly banished to Hell or hell-like place for the benefit of rest of the peaceful, civilized society. They include:

• people who dare not condemn terrorists like Osama Bin Laden. And instead say “Every Muslim should be a terrorist”. “Every Muslim must terrorize America.”
• people who consider that all except their sect will burn in permanent Hell despite how-so-much good they do in their lives
• people who cannot tolerate others but want themselves to be tolerated everywhere
• people who believe that women are inferior or bereft of intelligence
• people who justify inferior rights and curtailment of freedom for women
• people who refuse to change their stands despite the presence of factual information proving the opposite
• people who do not clear their stand and purely use material prepared by someone else to claim scholar status for self and yet condemn the source

Such terrorism sympathizers are a threat to any civilized society. Progressive and even conservative Muslims have shown the right way by criticizing Zakir Naik so severely. The first and foremost religion of humans is humanity. The way noble-minded Muslims have shown courage and mettle to condemn the dangerous frauds of Zakir Naik that are detrimental to entire humanity is warmly welcomed. Such steps in right direction pave the way for right direction for seekers of true knowledge.

This article is also available in Hindi at http://agniveer.com/3293/hate-zakir-hi/

[mybooktable book=”every-muslim-is-not-a-terrorist” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”][mybooktable book=”complete-works-agniveer” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”false”]

What I think of Dr Zakir Naik and why I am against him?
Dr Zakir Naik MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) is a preacher and speaker from the Islamic community talking on various different topics relating widely on religions, religious scriptures, political issues and many other topic. One of unique things about Dr Zakir Naik is that he suggests that he knows everything about different religions, Islamic, Christianity, Jewish, Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism and Jainism. Moreover he is also aware of what is said in every scripture’s and knows the chapters, verses and quotes of by heart. He has been all over different places countries and spreading those lectures in relation to these areas specifically. In every session taken place on different topics, the whole building has been full up with public for his lecture. A lot of people ask questions in relation to those topics and they answered very smartly by him, whether the person asking is Muslim or not Muslim.
What I personally believe about Dr Zakir Naik?
With Dr Zakir Naik talking about all these different topics and spreading his opinion is not right and I believe that it is totally wrong. This is because; he always thinks logically his way and assumes that must be the right way. As a result, most of the people see what he believes and happens to change their decision in that case. Should that be allowed publicly?
Why I believe this about Dr Zakir Naik?
For Dr Zakir Naik having this type of discussion influences people and believed that it is only him that is aware of what is right and wrong. The people drown into what he believes. As a result, this gives him to opportunity to divert their brain however he wants them. This then would stop them from thinking and they believe that Dr Zakir Naik is the god.
Comparing two different religious scriptures:
It is a fact that all different religions have their own scriptures. More common is that even the scripture say the same thing; they are going to have different meaning and different belief because; they introduce different religions. The way Dr Zakir Naik approaches them is by comparing two different scriptures from different religion. The most common way is to by looking at the similarities and mentioning those points in an Islamic way. Also, in various scripture, he says that he knows Chapter, verses and quotes of by heart, which is not the case all the time. Also misinterprets the meaning, but makes it some obvious to public and they believe them. This turns down other scriptures and make them less informative to people that belong or do not belong that community. The main effort by him is having good argument and logic involved on those topics. But to my point of view, it is totally baseless if they are not to have the real meaning. The audience happen to believe them as they are influenced by them very strongly. But it gets a lot worse when people from those community loss faith. I believe that is very bad and unacceptable way to lecture over different religion. It is not only me, but various other people that are Muslim and non Muslim thinks the same.
Comparing two different religions:
When the discussions are done on religion, Dr Zakir Naik has the common approach carried out by comparing two different religions. The religion introduced all the time is Islamic and in comparison introduced other religions that are Christianity and Hinduism most of the time. By introducing Christianity, he implies how their values and Islamic values are similar. It is the same approach with the Hinduism and what values come under that religion. The comparison introduced in this what Hindus and Islamic believe in common. I really am not satisfied when such comparisons are made that do not have any similarities at all. This is because; in comparison, he makes judgement of what Hinduisms have in common. Comments are made by him regarding Hindus believing in Idols as god and holy offering that are given in temple to the worshipers and in counter responses brings in what the scriptures say by misinterpreting it. Can this not have negative impact on what people should believe in Hinduism? I see that it has nothing go to do with Dr Zakir Naik and he does not the real fact on what Hinduism believes. The most approaches carried out are by connecting things that have different meaning but want to introduce that their in no dedication like this. With Hinduism being vegetarian, he also counter argue and introduce false believe is carried out. In many discussions, he has been discussing about existence of the Hindu gods and introduces what the Hindu scriptures say by totally misinterpreting what it means. As a result, this misguides many people and they happen to go against the belief. This creates a lot of problem because other religions would have bad opinion about Hinduism and can brainwash people from Hinduism and other people from different community. Is Dr Zakir not racist? Also, in discussion suggests some things that Hinduism needs to follow by saying that they do not. Is this not going to demoralise the Hindus community? Will it not make the Hindu community look bad in comparison to other communities?
Discussing about political issues (Islamic Terrorism):
Apart from religion Dr Zakir Naik also has discussion on political issues that very closely relate to Islamic community. One of the main topics introduced by him is on terrorism and in what ways political reasons have defamed the Islamic community in the society. To make the people think in a different way, Dr Zakir Naik shows how other religions and community are part of terrorist organisation. In the discussion, Dr Zakir Naik had involved how Great Britain had been affected by terrorism. It was obvious that Great Britain was affected by terrorism on the 7 July 2005 and America on the 9/11 attack. In defence of Islamic community, Dr Zakir Naik introduces how Great Britain and America was affected by the IRA (Irish Republic Army). But the fact is that IRA (Irish Republic Army) terrorist organisation was finished a long time ago and recently, they have not done terrorist attack. Why would Dr Zakir Naik want to bring in something that is old? Apart from that, LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) was brought in front. But LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) only causes problems to Sri Lanka and they have finished. Also, they did not spread their ideology all through out the world. The Islamic terrorism had started a long time and ago and they are still on going and there is no end to it. I believe this is one of the ways to victimise other religious minorities and make them look like the culprit. On top of that, also make the British media responsible for all this. Despite the evidence are shown, still Dr Zakir Naik comes out with defence on them. But all the information is given by him is orally and no concrete evidence on that is introduced.
Calling people from different religion’s to Public sessions:
Dr Zakir Naik call people called from different religion for discussion. This makes it more obvious to the audience that anything. Also, they would not feel that he is biased and the person brought into the conversation and the public would take more interest. They all have discussion on the religious discussion on the topic raised in the session. Later, they argue on that issue of what is said in the scriptures and how the religious society and community is made. As a result, Dr Zakir Naik is able to win the arguments. The affect of the public is that they believe that he is very knowledgeable on the all the religions comparing to the other people. To my point of view, this is not right because just arguing any point logically and having evidence presented falsely would not mean that they are the winner. Are all the people right all the time of they win the arguments?
When people talk about Dr Zakir Naik?
People are going to be talking about Dr Zakir Naik in public and general conversation as they are influenced by them. As a result, they would make others interested in to what they believe and later they would also follow Dr Zakir Naik. This is just one of the ways people would not follow what they believe and go against their principle. This could against their religion and how they see things. This will only happen because in every session Dr Zakir Naik always goes on about how different topics and is very detailed. I believe this is wrong because other people that are also like Dr Zakir Naik would not be seen by the public and will be ignore. As a result, this is wrong make others turned down in that fashion. Is this going to be a bad influence on other people?
Where does Dr Zakir Naik travel for his purpose?
There are various nations that Dr Zakir Naik has travelled to experience how people in different countries are like. The main logic for Dr Zakir Naik is to have a public session and make people aware about him. As a result, he would involve them and make them as part of those lectures. In the lectures, he would want to discuss what facilities those are in their country and how they are bad influence they to them. Dr Zakir Naik would not even understand anything as in those countries as he himself would not know and just talk about it. Even if the information is not right, he would not bother as the public would follow and understand what his logic and understanding is. Also, those public would be coming often their and they would develop understanding of what he is trying to say. But Dr Zakir Naik does not just want to spread logic round the world but spread Islamic logic and make people think their way. Would it be right to use Islamic logic to have public sessions?
Who comes to be part of Dr Zakir Naik Public sessions?
This makes people from different religion and countries come and listen as all this may relate to them. This results Dr Zakir Naik to be a lot famous in front of the people that belong to different cultures and community. Does Zakir Naik have any rights to famous that way? In the nation wherever they live, they would not follow the rules and regulation as part of that religion and would look for changes in those nations. In certain nation, they have their own logic and ways to deal with thing. I totally do not see point that Zakir Naik should make any comments of everything. Also he would not have the full knowledge what happens in different countries. As a result, their conflicts and be a problem to those areas. This is just a way that Dr Zakir Niak is going to cause a dispute and problem overall by spreading irrelevant logical reasons.
How do people react after listening to Dr Zakir Naik?
People are brainwashed of what he says in the public sessions. As a result, in future only his logic would be used by people. This would people see ways differently and not understand their own belief, cultures and background, which they come from. Those people become so dedicated and all follow his logic. Does anyone even bother to look at why Dr Zakir Naik thinks of anything that way? The problem occurs when others get affected by these types of thought and later produces disturbance all through out.
People in the public end up converting their religions:
Dr Zakir Naik in all of the conversation has mentioned about the Islamic community and what benefits they have. Also to produce more depth in the information discusses about how the Islamic community function with the community, society and community. In contrast says a lot opposite about other religion and community. In the audience, this would influence many people against other religion and also go against their religion. This would result to extent that they would convert their religion to Islamic community. This has taken place in the public session that he has and ask them of they have not being forced. But the fact is that they have been forced and they are not going to admit that in public as they know the result later on for them could be bad. Also, they are brainwashed about Islamic community and they happen to follow Islam. Many British, Americans, Australian and many different citizens have converted to Islam and they are successful Islamic scholar and have discussion on what Islam is all about afterwards. Also in Hinduism, many cases people have been forced to convert to Islam and they are not originally from the Islamic community. Previously, many Hindus have been forced to convert to Islam. In Dr Zakir Naik public session, this has been the same result and many of them have taken the similar step. I would like to ask that how many people belonging to Islamic community have converted to other religion. This is because; if atheist can convert to Islam that apply many restriction to them, then why cannot people from Islamic community converted to atheist? As a result, they would have much more freedom and also would keep balance on what Islamic community take, they can also give. If not atheist, then other different religion, they can covert to. There are various Muslims in the world that are not strict Muslims and do not going the Quran like other Muslim. But is says in the holy Quran that if any Muslim converts to another religion, they are going to be given a death sentence. Is this not just going to develop Islamic community and turn down other religions?
Negative impact of Dr Zakir Naik on different people and professions:
On all discussion, Dr Zakir Naik introduces negative information on politician, religions, Media and so on that all happens to be wrong. To my point of view, it is just going to be defaming people and their profession. The information presented is always one sided by him and introduce nothing positive about the same topics. This would influence the public to think only one side and not allow them to use their own initiative. If any dispute between communities or religious minorities happen, Dr Zakir Naik would blame others and defame them. This would make it obvious in terms that he would always have logic used all the way through. In contrast to all this, it is only Dr Zakir Naik that is gaining honour and getting away. As a result, he is quite successful in terms how the audience is responding to him. This also allows him to continue on what he believe is right to do all the time. Is this right way to use the knowledge? Dr Zakir Naik also came on NDTV 24X7 in the “Walk the Talk” show. Later he denied what he had said in the news and said that the whole of show was cut and pasted. Can anybody believe Dr Zakir Naik? In this issue it is possible that the media for the audience attraction, they may lie. But in many cases Dr Zakir Naik have done the same and ruined people and professions. As a result, I cannot believe that Dr Zakir Naik is right as on many occasions he has made up opinions. There are people that have bad opinion on him, would believe that anything mentioned negative about him in the media would have to right. It is obvious that Dr Zakir Naik would not agree with that and would counter argue to self defend himself.
May result religious dispute between two different communities for example Genocide?
This can cause a religious dispute between two different cultures because on many occasions he has only talked positive about Islam and negative about other religions. The effect of this on the community has been negative at some point. If is gets a lot worse, he can create genocide between two communities and have people killing each other in the name of religion. Dr Zakir Naik wants communities to be closer and live happily in the society. But certain actions have caused damages to many people are not happy about it because only he himself and Islamic community have earned the benefit. Are the people from other communities not going to feel abused? As a result, two different communities are going to have dispute and later spread disturbance all round. Even if the situation gets worse for the two different communities, it will be again that Dr Zakir Naik would come and have public session and blamed other and get away for that causes. But the real culprit would be he himself. In future, different communities would not appreciate help and mixture of others, which would result worse atmosphere. In response to all this, I would see he is one of Blasphemers that people in the community, Muslims and Non-Muslims have as risk.
Dr Zakir Naik using different ways to attract the audience:
When I had gone on Your Tube, I had seen many different videos on Dr Zakir Naik’s public discussion on the religious topics. This implies that there are many different ways he is trying to pass his message to the audience. To my point of view, I believe this is one of ways; he is trying to catch people and brainwash. In the commenting section, many different people have given positive comment on his logic. But in contrast, I have seen many people giving negative comments on his video. This illustrates that many people do not like the way as he is using his knowledge and they want all this to stop. Moreover the people that do not like him, they have also made video of him to introduce his way of logic is not right. In that case, I believe those type of videos produced against him, should be understood why they are made. This would enlighten people not to fall in his trick and believe what he says. Also, I would recommend the owner of the Your Tube to eliminated his video for as they are relating to Blasphemy.
Dr Zakir Naik doing Fraud:
On having so many public sessions, Dr Zakir Naik has earned a lot of respect on what he believes people in the community think of him. Later, the news had come out that he had been charged with fraud. The fraud involved using the quotes for the Quran and copying and pasting and giving his own point of view. This implies that he has plagiarised someone work and effort, and tried to earn his name. To my point of view, wherever anybody does as part of their work, they need to have their own knowledge and understand. Using other people’s knowledge for your purpose is known as stealing and anybody who lives in respective community and society would not appreciate that. It also makes me believe that all the public sessions that he has are nothing and have no value because; he had been carrying this type of approach all the way through or exaggerating information. Dr Zakir Naik was going to come to Britain to have a public session. But he was not refused to come and was not able to make it. The reason why he was banned because of the way he was spread his Islamic logic all the way and on the public this was a band influence. I believe that this was the right approach to make the people think how his attitude can cause a problem. There were few people that were not happy but mainly, they were people that belong to the same community has him. It makes it much worse if the religious community that he belongs to in questioned because; they would feel pinpointed. To my point of view, I believe that these types of people should be thrown out the community and society.
Public have different point of view of Dr Zakir Naik now:
After seen different point of views, many people also have negative opinion on Dr Zakir Naik and believe that in many ways he is wrong. This has created his negative images in front of the people that are dedicated to him and believe that he just wanted to be their god in front of them and use them. In response, not just Non-Muslims but, many Muslims disagree with him and the way his attitude towards the society and community is. This may imply people that his approach has not been right been right. The public at some point believe that he has been a cheater to them and believe that he was just wanted to get noticed by the public. He was a doctor and studied MBBS (Bachelor in Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery). So did he not continue with practicing his medicine degree? This can just mean that he was not happy with his profession or found it hard to cope with it. As a result, he decided to become a preacher in that case and later take that as a different approach. Dr Zakir Naik could have been someone in the society and community that would have treated normally. But this type of response has given him a bad impression overall at some point.
How people in the world are and what Dr Zakir Naik talk about them in public sessions?
There are people that have their own way to deal with things and are able to keep themselves safe from all the problems. As a result, he had made a lot of personal comments on how people live the community and society. It is important to make sure that you stay safe and respect people in the community and society. Also cultures and religion for the people plays a major role in terms of their dedication and I believe many people do show respect. But personally, I think people have their own lives and they have full rights to live how they like to on their agreement of the community and society. If in the middle of the road, somebody has a problem, are they not going to ask for help without looking at what they are and who they are? This demonstrates people understand that if somebody live life different, does not mean that they do not have humanity. On this issue, I am able to come across Dr Zakir Naik is so interested in discussing on how people to people can be a threat and introducing a lot of superstition. As a result, I think that Dr Zakir Naik has no rights to talk about people.
Political power that Dr Zakir Naik may have:
If Dr Zakir Naik gets away after all this, it will be politics in terms of what type of support he has. Also many people support him and if anything happens to him, the public that are very dedicated to him, will protest for him. Also with him, there are other systems that would be in his contact and can do something to support him. In political purpose even if people are wrong they will get away easily or if they are caught, they would be have other higher people that could have put their effort behind them, which would save them. As a result, these people would have no end till the others are caught as well. I would suggest the community and the people in the society to stay away form this type of people are concentrate in how to follow you culture, religion and faith. There is no need to compare religions
Conclusion on what I think should happen to Dr Zakir Naik?
As conclusion, I believe that however Dr Zakir Naik has behaved in the public sessions as a blasphemer should be penalised from doing that and stopped appearing in front of public for public sessions. Moreover, a police complaint and the case should be filed on his name and press serious chargers. On the basis of that, he should be given a serious punishment for his deeds. It is not only Dr Zakir Naik that has been part of this but, may other Islamic Scholar have been involved in this and they should be given the same punishment. This would imply to anybody not to become a blasphemer like him and treat people from different community and religion with respect. The community that have been following him, does not realise that he has been creating problems for others. Most of the problems have come when he had talked about religious comparison, religious scriptures and political issues. In the entire topics he had always used Islamic logic and diverted the public’s attention on them. In contrast, made others turned down. If in future they should only have religious scholar discussing about their own religion, religious scriptures, society, community, belief and so on. This will keep peace and harmony in the community and make others feel a lot satisfied that way.

1131 COMMENTS

Mohammed Irfan - Indian April 18, 2011 At 3:39 pm

Well, seriously I didnt go through your complete scribble… Anyway I got the point…. As every so called Dr.Zakir Naiks, fan knows what would be your basic topics of smear campaign…… Ok. coming back to the point – All the visitors of this website or for that matter Dr. Zakir Naiks or any other religious pedia…. dig deep… take your time…. You need not to make a decision within 5 min. of visiting any of these information centers…. Its a matter of a PHILOSOPHY which is going to shape your life further, or may your next generations…. so you are the crossroads to decide and take a decision… Well, so take time… I took almost 5 years to understand the things…. some of my friends took hardly 6 months….. !!! Whatever it is – finally u will find the truth….. !!! To find the truth people like Zakir naik or Agnivesh could be a key… and finally you will find the truth… be sincere to yourself… and when you venture to find out the truth, pray to the almighty the one who created you and this universe for Guidance…. !!!! Good luck…. Mr. Agnivesh, religion works purely on law of conservation…. Things will attain equilibrium, no matter how mcuh one tries to create imbalance….. Good lock to your efforts…. I am sure, TRUTH SHALL PREVAIL…!!!

saroj April 18, 2011 At 10:35 pm

namasthe agniveerji:
please watch this also:
http://youtu.be/8XAPapLR8kw

KalBhairav April 20, 2011 At 2:20 pm

@Shak:

Learn to love, live in harmony….do not hurt another persons feelings and all should be OK. I agree that there muslims who do wrong in the name of Islam. E.g. World Trade Centre bombings….if it was Bin-laden, I believe it is wrong period…Let the religion of Humanity continue.

Agree whole-heartedly. Let us take this to the next level by zeroing in on some fundamental issues.

I hope you do not condemn just the perpetrators of WTC bombings, Bin-laden etc. Hope you will stand with me in condemning the barbarity of invading hordes of Arabs/Turks/Mughals who killed Hindus/Buddhists in Nalanda and destroyed temples in Somnath, Varanasi and Mathura. Additionally I hope you will agree that any religion that believes it alone provides the sole means to the divine is wrong and hateful as it lays the philosophical foundation for terrorism. Such religions need to be provided with a new interpretation so that they dont divide the world into believers and infidels based on whether they believe in the exclusivity of the son of God or the last prophet, etc. Do you agree? Finally, I hope you will agree that religion should not form the basis of nationhood.

As far Salman Rushdie, another idiot in my opinion.

He may be arrogant and attention-seeking but his analysis of political Islam is pretty much spot on. BTW, I hope you believe in freedom of speech. As Ayaan Hirsi Ali puts it – “Free speech is the bedrock of liberty and a free society. And yes, it includes the right to blaspheme and to offend.” Do you agree with this? Would you also agree that Islamic countries that placed a bounty on his head are wrong and going against the principles of free speech?

- Shak April 21, 2011 At 4:13 am
  
  @ KalBhairav
  
  Sure I agree to most of your comments however Freedom of speech does have it’s limitations. Start posting some crap on US President Obama or former George Bush and let thousands join in and see if they call that freedom of speech. Similarly if other religion members including mine and yours start making derogatory remarks of Jesus Christ. How would this make the Christians feel? Why was there a big uproar for the book “The Da Vinci Code” .At the end we are just hurting the next human being which is totally wrong and sickening.
  
  Cheers
  
  - KalBhairav April 21, 2011 At 7:59 am
    
    @Shak:
    
    Theres a difference and that is in the case of Islam, blasphemy and apostasy carry the weight of state-sanctioned death..
    
    Sure there is outrage when a Christian cross is immersed in a jar of urine. Sure there is outrage when pictures of Ganesha are displayed on slippers/shoes. Do you see any country (US or India) call for the death of those who do this? Calling for the death of those who “insult” Islam seems to be a unique preoccupation of Muslim-majority countries.
    
    Islam is badly in need of reinterpretation to make it compatible with 21st century human civilization. Good luck.
  - Rashid April 25, 2011 At 12:23 pm
    
    Bhai jisne bhi kisi k mazhab k bare me kuch bhi bura kaha ho ya bhala kaha ho unko saza milni chahiye. Yahan Islam ya Vadik dram ki baat nhi hai. Quraan me Allah ne kaha hai ” Tum kisi aur mazhab k Khuda ko bura mat Kaho.”
  - KalBhairav April 25, 2011 At 6:52 pm
    
    @Rashid:
    
    No. You are wrong. If we punish on earth for apostasy/blasphemy what will Allah do? He also needs to inflict some pain on disbelievers, no? I mean, what if the punishment a blasphemer gets makes him develop more immunity against punishment? Then Allah has to make his punishment even more stringent to make an impact on the blasphemer 🙁 Why trouble Allah?
Light of Truth April 20, 2011 At 11:37 pm

@ All friends

Here is an invitation cum challenge to our Muslim friends

http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/

hashim April 25, 2011 At 8:08 pm

guidance from god comes as a mercy and grace . It is the result of each one’s inner desire to know about his own creator. if one prays in the late hours of night to his own creator ,with stongest desire to know about Him ,god will help him. Feelings about the god is there in evrybody ‘s inner self since birth,whatever be his religion.some allow it to flurish.some allow it to be extinguished. Truth never cannot be created with one’ s self made ideas and imaginations.it flowed to human mind thru generations thru millions of prophets. not thru self made incarnees.
READ ALL SCRIPTURES WITHOUT PREJUDICE , THRUTH WILL FLOW TO YOU
GOD IS ONE,HE NEVER BEGETS,NEVER BEGOTTEN,THERE IS NOTHING LIKE HIM
GOD WILL FORGIVE ALL SINS EXCEPT SHIRK, IDOL WORSHIP AND CLAIMING PARTNERS TO GOD
HE IS ONE AND THERE IS NOTHING LIKE HIM

- adolf April 26, 2011 At 2:38 am
  
  Why he will not forgive shirk and idol worship? Has he got anything personal against idols?
  Is he afraid of his son overthrowing him from his golden throne?
  
  What is truth you are talking about? Can you define truth?
  
  A dog is lot better than a god who is afraid of lifeless idols and relatives.
  
  - dharmayoddha April 26, 2011 At 9:48 pm
    
    @adolf
    
    Good answer adolf. This allah is some kind of devil who is afraid of idols, what kind of false god is he, who is afraid if we hindus worship false idols? Tat means, inter alia he is false god. Or COWARDLY god. And his followers are cowards.
  - shahulhameed April 27, 2011 At 5:29 pm
    
    Dear Dharma/Adolf,
    
    Assamu alaikum
    
    Your answer is not really related to the topic. I feel sorry about your knowledge about the religion ISLAM.
    
    It is easy to criticize any religion with in seconds. Any one can do it. But it is hard to get to know about that religion.
    
    Though I am a muslim, I accept some of the principles of Hinduism, Christianity.
    
    But Islam is far greater than tat.
    
    FYI…. Islam is the fastest growing religion. In USA, 30000 people is converted to islam every year. More than 60% are womens. Refer Google, if u doubt me.
    
    As a muslim, I use Jesus (pbuh) where most of the christians are not.
    
    Again I making this statement.
    There is not even a single unequal or unambiguous statement in the entire bible, where jesus christ (pbuh) himself says, “I AM GOD” or “WORSHIP ME”.
    
    It is the church who made Jesus(pbuh) as god. It is the church made these blasphemy, that the peoples are made sin by birth.
    
    We muslim, consider jesus pbuh, as one of the mightiest messenger of God. But not GOD.
    
    I appreciate a health discussion. Not teasing and hurting others feelings. Its worth none for a change.
    
    Thanks
    Shahul Hameed
  - adolf April 27, 2011 At 8:43 pm
    
    @shahulhameed
    
    peace be upon you.
    
    My answer is in reply to hashim – for his statement that shirk and idol worship will not be forgiven by God.
    I do not have any intention on my part to tell you or any muslims that you are going in a wrong way or to make you feel bad because you believe something which i do not believe.
    
    I am a hindu by birth and want to know one good reason why idol worship is bad and why god will not forgive me if am an idol worshipper?
    
    How can god forgive someone who is a killer and not accpet me who is just an idol worshipper? Can killing be equated to idol worship?
    
    Also could you please explain the concept of eternal hell.
    
    What good it serves for either god or for anybody else to throw me in eternal hell just because i do idol worship? Can god really be given name as mercifull?
  - shahulhameed April 28, 2011 At 6:14 pm
    
    Dear Adolf,
    
    Assalamu alaikum
    
    Thx for replying in very polite way.
    
    In Islam, it is given that every thing can be forgiven by god if we pray for the wrong doings we have done in this world. The only thing, God will never forgive is that, if we compare God.
    
    You too know, God is incomparable. With your full mind, if u can imagine the shape of GOD, then that ill not be GOD.
    
    You think that GOD who created you will be imaginable. Then tat ill be not GOD. And also in Vedas, It is said that, i think so Its In Rigveda , “GOD IS IMAGELESS”
    
    GOD in the name of Jesus or Ram or Allah is far supreme from human thoughts. This has been said by many scholars.
    
    Few years back, a famous english channel had a one on one meeting with our famous hindu scholar. He said “PARTIAL KNOWLEDGE IN SCIENCE MAKES YOU AWAY FROM GOD. INDEPTH KNOWLEDGE IN SCIENCE MAKES YOU A BELIEVER IN GOD.”. This is the statement he gave.
    
    If you are a believer of Hereafter(Judgement day), a killer or rapist will be definitely be given punishment in the day of judgement.
    
    Any wrong thing you do in this world will be surely punished in JD(Judgement Day).
    
    That’s y, we are worshiping Allah who is incomparable. That’s what Islam says.
    
    Many think tat we are worshiping Kabah in mecca. Tats totally wrong. Our beloved prop. mohamed pbuh has united us to the side of Kabah. Tats the only reason we worship to the direction of Kabah,
    
    Forgive me, If i said anything which could hurt your feelings.
    
    I have a English Veda with me. I will make a research in Vedas and will let you know about the same. In mean time, you can also do the same.
    
    I will get back to you real quick. I just want to get the people know islam better. Want to banish the misconception about Islam(The Religion of Peace).
    
    Thank you.
    Salam.
  - dharmayoddha April 29, 2011 At 10:11 pm
    
    @SHAHUL HAMEED
    
    You are parroting the same islamic garbage. Worship only one god allah, dont worship idols. Now who are you or any muslim to tell me that? You respect my way of life, then only I respect yours.
    You people dont respect my idols, and want to insult them, and (possibly ) break them and then you people complain of discrimination, riots etc.
    And please, forget what god will do to me on day of judgement. It is between me and my god, no muslim needs to tell me. And please dont read or translate the vedas, theere are enough idiots like zakir naik who do that, and infuriate me.
Rumee April 26, 2011 At 4:11 pm

The author first should know about Islam very well.

- Indian Agnostic April 26, 2011 At 6:02 pm
  
  Namaste Rumee
  
  Rest assured he does 🙂
  
- Rushmore April 26, 2011 At 6:08 pm
  
  Rumee, From darkness you have taken your first baby step towards enlightenment. Welcome to the real world, where you do not get punished for not wearing a pyjama that descends beneath the ankles.
  
sanjay kumar April 29, 2011 At 7:35 pm

to dear all muslim brothers,
why you all sing only one tune, dont you see , even after murder of over one crore infidels, by Islamist invaders, you are much behind, pl see the difference in people of Iran, Zoroastrians, who left to be converted into islam luckily, and iranians who converted to islam, they belong to one race, but hell lot of difference in approach, only because of islam approach, even highly secular people are feeling that till a single muslim is alive, the world can not rest in peace

AmericanMuslim April 30, 2011 At 2:13 am

You hate him, dont you!?

Just TWO comments :

1. This article is very poorly put together and lacks logic and facts! Seems to be nothing more than a haphazard mix of things picked up from here and there against someone very popular and successful (and hence considered very dangerous by the already insecure!). Dr Naik is very well known, and highly respected around the world, especially here in the USA, as well as in India! And, sorry to expose ur blatant lie, but he is highly popular amongst many Shias ( i know that ‘coz i have many Shia friends) and is really respected by Muslim women! A little amount of “real” research would tell you that many women have accepted Islam after listening to Dr Zakir’s lectures.

2. CONTRARY TO WHAT THE WRITER IS DESPERATE TO IMPLY, most of the anti-Zakir and anti-Muslim comments posted here are by non-muslims, so u know who ACTUALLY hates who and WHY! 🙂

To sum it up, the reason why SOME NON-MUSLIMS HATE him and WE MUSLIMS RESPECT him is the same! He is spreading Islam!! And is ALHAMDOLILLAH, very successful at what he is doing, as the jealousy and hate expressed here shows !!

(I wish u guys had done half of this research into ur own religion. As for us Muslims, whether we r Shia, Sunni, Wahabi or whoever, we love Allah, His Messenger and His Religion. And anyway, Dr Naik is not alone, there are thousands like him preaching Allah’s message. Now go spread hate against them all ! 🙂
So Sit back, take a deep breath . . .

- SDC April 30, 2011 At 6:05 pm
  
  Who do you think are insecure? And, who is considered dangerous? I think you have got your conjectures awfully wrong. The very fact that “secure” people like you have to come to this site and go on parroting those hackneyed phrases over and over again (viz. islam is spreading, zakir naik is loved by all, your research is shoddy, etc. etc.) tells the story.
  
  And why do think there is only 1 agniveer, we all are agniveers, and we are determined to stop the juggernaut of islam from rolling any further. We are going to stop it dead on its tracks.
  
  - ismail May 13, 2011 At 6:25 am
    
    hey sdc… Many muslim haters have said that before… The fact that islam continues to spread like wildfire shows that they failed just like you will fail if you try…
  - SDC May 13, 2011 At 10:00 am
    
    a sweeping statement, rather. A few conversions here or there do not change demographics significantly, but yes the rate at which muslims procreate is definitely something to be taken into account when doing the math.
  - krishna arya May 13, 2011 At 10:57 am
    
    and what will you say about this facebook group??
    
    nearly 2000 people who are supporting anti zakir naik group.. and all those are muslims !!
    
    http://www.facebook.com/pages/Anti-Zakir-Naik/226309421710
- hillaz May 21, 2011 At 12:21 pm
  
  Why mansoor al hillaj ,a sufi saint was killed? how can your zakir naik defend his killing in the name of allah….because mansoor was talking about higher level of religion get killed by followers of osl.
  
- pearlsweet May 22, 2011 At 3:36 pm
  
  HA HA …It’s funny to see that U HAVE DONE SO MUCH RESEARCH IN ISLAM…When u had enough time to talk so much bad about Zakir Naik ..Y dont u spend some time to read the benefits of ISLAM..and there are loads of excellent video lectures that Dr.Zakir Naik has given..We appreciate his Work Mashaalah..MAY ALLAH Forgive all the wrong doers..It is not the muslims who hate Dr.Zakir ..It is people like you who envy his growth and evny the spread of our Religion..
  
  - veer aryan May 22, 2011 At 8:16 pm
    
    @pearlsweet – It seems from your recation that you have lost your mind.
    First you laugh on someone saying that he has done extensive research on Dr. Zakir Naik . What’s there 2 laugh in this ? Bcoz you don’t have an answer / explanation to the frauds being exposed, so you trying 2 divert attention by reacting in such a manner which exhibits utmost stupidy.
    Then if it all bogus then why don’t you have an explanation to the faruds being exposed.
    Its because of mindless and spineless people like you that such frauds possess the support and courage to carry out their fraudulent activities.
    I hope that you know what Islam and the holy Quran says about frauds and their supporters !
    I advice you please go through the relevant pages.
Sameer May 1, 2011 At 12:13 pm

MUSLIM BROTHERS do you know PROPHET MOHAMMAD PROPHESIED ABOUT “NAJD WOLF” ZAKIR NAIK AND HIS NAJD SHAITAN MASTERS WAHHABIS IN SAHIH HADITHS AND OTHER HADITHS.

Allah and Prophet Mohammad warned Muslims against Shaitan of Najd (Wahhabis) and its Stooges like Zakir Naik who will divide Ummah, who recite Quran but Quran will not go beyond their throat, who will kill or support killers of Muslim etc see below verses.

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar: The Prophet (s)said, “O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen.” The People said, “And also on our NAJD.” He said, “O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Sham (north)! O Allah! Bestow Your blessings on our Yemen.” The people said, “O Allah’s Apostle! And also on our NAJD.” I think the third time the Prophet (s) said, “There (in NAJD) is the place of earthquakes and afflictions and from there comes out the side of the head of Satan.”
Sahi Bukhari (Book #88, Hadith #214)

Allama Dahlan narrates an authentic Hadith in his book “Addarus Sunniah”, which he has quoted from Sihaah. The Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) is reported to have said: “There will rise a group of people in the East who will recite the Holy Quran, but alas, the Quran will not go beyond their throat. This group will keep rising till the Day of Judgement and they will eventually rise with Dajjal.” “Their main symbol will be to sit in groups.” (Halqa) (from Bukhari Sharief, Vol. iii)

http://forums.islamicawakening.com/f20/hadiths-on-najd-wahabism-31284/

See the above Hadiths verses clearly refers to Wahabis and Zakir Naik

Zakir Naik has divided the Ummah along the lines of Wahhabi, Sunni, Shias, Sufis and Ahmadiyas. He supported Bin Laden who killed many Muslims. Zakir Naik’s getup only shows that he follows Quran till throat below throat he wears Kufr western clothes and not following Sunnah clothes. Zakir Naik speaks hours and hours of lecture to wear Hijab and Sunnah clothing to woman and others but himself never wears Sunnah Clothing at Public. . Even DEOBANDIS ADVOCATES THIS TRUTH ABOUT WAHHABIS AND ZAKIR NAIK.

http://deoband.8m.net/custom3.html

AmericanMuslim May 2, 2011 At 1:01 am

Wow! some frustration! 🙂

Very swift and equally desperate replies by non-Muslims (including those POSING to be Muslims!) prove my point 100%! Most Muslims like Dr Zakir; Most non-Muslims hate him. Simple.
Come out in the open you guys. Stop this propaganda and such conspiracies. And listen (AGAIN)…
NO, WE MUSLIMS (SHIA OR SUNNI OR WAHHABI OR OTHERS DO NOT (R) DO NOT HATE ANYONE WHO SPREADS THE MESSAGE OF GOD)!! Want me to repeat that??
God, you guys are either too frustrated by the spread of Islam or in serious denial!!
And, for your info, the logical option for any of you non-Muslims to have an open debate with Dr Naik on any tv channel of the world is still open! 🙂

But i do agree with sdc, you hindus sure are desperate to stop him in his tracks! 🙂
By all means, do; but see if you can outdo him the civilized way , ie through speeches in front of voluntary audiences! By the way, i hope you guys know that many Hindu scholars, preachers and saints accept and acknowledge Dr Naik’s caliber and good work. (Now please dont tell me all those people are. . . )

And also keep in mind that Islam started with ZERO followers in your Bharat, and now they are ALHAMDOLILLAH more than 500 million in the” Sub-continent”!!
Even wondered what the biggest reason for that miraculous spread of Islam is?.. It is THIS kind of attitude of the Hindus, the kind this article portrays… Narrow-mindedness, denial, treachery and intolerance towards others, which only makes people abandon you, no doubt so many people are accepting Islam in India even today despite this kind of venomous propaganda!
So keep at it.. i REALLY wish you do (this kind of stuff only makes our job easier!) 🙂

( BTW, here in the USA, Dr Naik is already very popular and respected.)

- KalBhairav May 2, 2011 At 2:19 am
  
  @AmericanMuslim:
  
  You are not in one of the so many Islamic countries but in liberal non-Islamic West that practises separation of church and state because…?
  
- Vajra May 2, 2011 At 7:24 am
  
  Namaste AmericanMuslim
  
  What is your take on http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/?
  
  While you are enjoying the prosperity of west, Mujahideen of Islam belonging to different sects Shia, Sunni, Barelvi, Deobandi, Wahabi here in Asia are slitting throats of each other 🙁 Now who will give them your message that “SHIA OR SUNNI OR WAHHABI OR OTHERS DO NOT (R) DO NOT HATE ANYONE WHO SPREADS THE MESSAGE OF GOD”
  
  Only meaning an Asian can extract from your quote who is well aware of sectarian bloodshed among Muslims is that neither of Shia or Sunni or Wahabi is spreading message of peace because they hate each other, they kill each other 🙁
  
  BTW may I know which sect of Islam do you belong?
  
- SDC May 2, 2011 At 11:48 am
  
  “And also keep in mind that Islam started with ZERO followers in your Bharat, and now they are ALHAMDOLILLAH more than 500 million in the” Sub-continent”!!”
  
  Now, tell me why is it that islam spread so expeditiously in the first 200-300 years, but then it’s spread somewhat slackened and then eventually died down. Why? The answer is simple: Islam spread by the sword. No person in his good senses would embrace such dehumanizing philosophy. By the way, the miraculous spread of islam can also be attributed to the internecine rivalry between kings, the bane of caste system, the spread of nonviolent philosophies like buddhism and jainism, etc.
  
  Civilized way? The problem is Zakir represents the intellectual face of islamic terrorism. He is out there to justify the terrorist activities of muslims by projecting them as victims of circumstances and also trying to hoodwink the masses about the true face of islam. Apparently, he has named his dawaah channel, Peace TV. Can you see the irony in this?
  
  BTW, here in the USA, Dr Naik is already very popular and respected. Among whom?
  
- Rj3865 May 16, 2011 At 4:01 am
  
  Brother ,
  you said that national t.v is always open to debate with Zakir Naik , But instead you browse http://www.youtube.com/truthofwisdom2008 where Mehendra Pal Arya challenged Zakir Naik several times , but instead of having debate he haven’t replaind him since 2008 , and which religion Hinduism is afraid and insecure of . Its simple Logic Evil spreads on eye blink but its takes thousands of years to prove truth , this is what story of Islam .
  
  We Hindus never advertise our religion as if its a daily soap which has to be used to become fairer , the same way Islam propagates and advertise its religion through T.V. shows , internet , newspaper , posters ,etc .. see how much insecure you guys are that you need to spread it as soon as possible ..
  
  your authentic Quran says Allah has shape and size in several place , it says Allah made Adam of his own hand , he made Adam in his own form , on judgement day he will be seated in a crown and 8 angels will carry it etc then why you guys say Allah is shapeless, and most important you guys trust islam and Allah becouse its written in Quran , and you have to . Islam not even give authority to decide what is right and wrong becouse its written in Quran that whatever mentioned in Quran is authentic and true and muslims believe as fools without any proof .
  
KalBhairav May 2, 2011 At 12:44 pm

@Sayed:

Hi brother first tell me the meaning of word God.

Bro…Profound question indeed. I suggest you contemplate on any commentary of the Brahmasutras to get a sense of the Hindu idea of God.

But I am fairly confident that God is not the one mentioned in the Quran bro 🙁 I find the God of the Quran highly discriminative, jealous, petty and foolish enough to supposedly entrust his entire Truth to one messenger after another finally culminating in Mohammed (PBUH) and supposedly decreeing that anyone who does not believe in “La Ilaha Il Allah Mohammed Rasool Allah” is hell-bound. 🙁 These are not qualities I would like to associate with my God. My God needs to be even-handed, confident and wise. The Vedic God is all of that and more bro!

- Apolloreach May 2, 2011 At 1:12 pm
  
  @ Kal Bhairav: One of Sayed’s friends started something like this on the islamhinduism website in the comments section of the distorted post what is hinduism. Now that same person has indirectly conceded by showing an evidence himself that Allah existed much before islam. The inference obviously is that Allah was a pagan God.
  
  - KalBhairav May 2, 2011 At 1:19 pm
    
    @Apollo:
    
    Now that same person has indirectly conceded by showing an evidence himself that Allah existed much before islam. The inference obviously is that Allah was a pagan God.
    
    Good point. The internal contradictions that Muslims run into would be enough to make my head explode! I wonder how they manage 😉
    
    The usual line Muslims give is, even before Mohammed’s birth, Islam was there. In fact, Adam and Eve were the first Muslims according to them. So, they have to end up issuing death threats to anyone who supports Darwinism because it completely shakes the foundation of their faith leading to its destruction.
    
    They also claim everybody is a born Muslim. When questioned whether a new-born baby has any clue of Mohammed Rasool Allah, they shut up. 🙂
AmericanMuslim May 5, 2011 At 12:32 am

@kalbhairav : wow! onto personal attacks now, are we? Fine! Ok then.. i am here for the same reason that so many of your Dharti-Maa-loving Hindus are! (And btw, dont worry too much about me. I am practicing my religion as freely as i want to here, and watching it spread slowly and peacefully, and doing the best i can to serve it.) And now that you’ve mentioned it, I basically hail from a place called Srinagar, symbol of injustice and tyranny for the whole world, and most certainly NOT A PART OF INDIA!! 🙂

@Vajra : Peace to you too!
I am a Muslim.. should suffice. 🙂 My beloved Prophet (SAW) wanted the Muslims to remain united. But i do agree that there are many sects of Muslims today, something i neither denied nor appreciate. If you ask me, i do wish Muslims werent divided, but they are, like people of so many of the major religions of the world.
For a moment, look around you.. ok who do you trust? Wikipedia good enough? or take any neutral source of your choice. Try to find out how many sects (types) of Christians there are.. how many kinds of Jews..how many castes of Hindus! Lets not be naive please. As for Christians, they differ on the Most Fundamental concepts of their religion, ie trinity, concept of God, concept of eternal sin etc, and yes they have been fiercely fighting over them too. You need a lot of time to grasp the true extent of the war of the Churches (that goes on even today). And what have Hindus have been doing ‘to each other’ on the basis of the caste-system, the world knows. (Oh you think its over, do you?)

@sdc : This spread-by-the-sword nonsense has been answered and refuted so many times that if you still arent convinced, you wont ever be!
But wait a minute, if you are implying that the 500 million+ of us in the Sub-Continent were also ALL converted by the sword, then God help you! Really!!
I recommended you stop reading your centuries-old narrow minded anti-Islam literature, and get into reading some real history! Truth is, almost all of Islam that spread in this region was through Saints, Sufis and Preachers! You wont happen to know Hazat Ali Hijveri, Khwaja Moin, Hazrat Ijmeri, Shah Rukne Alam and hundreds more, would you? May i recommend you take some time out and study their lives and the kind of amazing influence they had on people (any book would do, hopefully). How the Hindus that were for centuries betrayed and victimized by the most oppressive Hindu caste-system were attracted towards Islam’s message of love and peace and converted to Islam is obvious, logical and well documented! (But i know you wont bother!) 🙂

(And btw, whoever told you that spread of Islam died down after initial 200-300 years is in for a shock the moment he finds out whats happening in the West right now, especially after 9/11!) And world over too, despite of the clever Christian tactic of blackmailing and converting poor Africans to Christianity by giving the starving people food n stuff put on a cross!

Finally, if you are bent upon hating Islam i really wont want to stop you. And i mean that!

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.”

Peace.

- KalBhairav May 5, 2011 At 12:41 am
  
  @AmericanMuslim:
  
  Sure there are Indian Hindus in the West, as are Parsis, as are Israeli Jews, etc. The difference is that none of these folks want to see a Hindu USA, Parsi USA or Jewish USA. They are wise enough to realize that their religion is a *personal* affair and ought to play no role in governing a diverse country. It seems to be a unique preoccupation of Muslims in the West that they want a country ruled by Shariah…Damn…didnt you or your parents run from the same hell-hole that was created *because* of Shariah? So, your analogy is flawed.
  
  “Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated.”
  
  Either you havent read/understood the Quran/Hadiths or you must have a monstrous burden on your back. Which is it?
  
  - rs May 20, 2011 At 9:00 pm
    
    well said Kalbhairav. Years of mind numbing doctrine has caused intellectual paralysis in american muslim. I am not sure, in which hell kafir like will go , but he is already in the hell hole of ignorance , arrogance and damn right stupidity.
- Vajra May 5, 2011 At 1:00 am
  
  Namaste AmericanMuslim
  
  Being Muslim does not suffice my friend 🙁
  
  Do you know about the prophecy of Muhammad regarding splitting of his Ummah into 73 sects and only one having passport to Jannat? So in such case, the only question is that how do you know you belong to that sect? Every sect claims itself to be true and others to be false!
  
  And if being Muslim suffices then being human too suffices by the same logic
  
- Rushmore May 5, 2011 At 11:24 am
  
  @ American Muslim: I am glad that you are practicing your faith freely in the States. I am sure you know that the US isquite an open country and respects many a culture. Infact I have seen foot baths in the airport @ Indianapolis that enables Muslims to wash theselves to perform their prayers.
  
  At the same time, without going down the dead logic of 2+2=4, can you explain why Arab nations are so insecure about letting other faiths preactice and propagate their faiths freely?If they are cock sure that their way to salvation is the right way,what’s wrong with allowing a few Churches or Synagogues to be present in an Arab city. When night clubs and wine flows freely in these glittering cities (which are haram in Islam) why are the Arabs so insecure about letting a non-Muslim practice his faith freely, in their land.
  
  And Islam having been spread by the sword is not non-sense. Have you had a chance to read Islamic history through Arab sources themselves? It is not as if Persians willingly fell in love with Islam or that North Africans flocked into Islam. For now, I am keeping this discussion neutral by not bringing in the history of subcontinent. We will discuss that in detail later. Meanwhile, the nomadic Arabs were partly civilized only after they saw Persian culture. But like what Spaniards did to Latin America, Arabs successfully Arabized Persia to the letter, literally. The Persian script was Arabized in 9th century. And Arab aristocracy (the nomads became aristocrats by aping Persian society) unleashed barbarism against Persians, whom, the Arabs though were barbaric. I can go on and on and list down incidents of mass genocides with timeline and geography of Arabic/Islamic brutality on Parsis & Bahais. Unlike Cyrus, the great Persian emperor,who won battles but respected local religion/customs, Arabs were all about Arabizing/Islamizing Persians. So much for equality in Islam…Today the youth of Iran have covertly started de-Islamizing themselves and are reaching back to their original roots.So there you go..
  
  Where North Africa is concerned, the headcount of the people, the flourishing trade between N.Africa and Europe and the local cultures were all wiped out by maruading Muslims from Arab mainland. Tripoli was sacked in 666 AD and after that the blood laced Islamization of North Africa never stopped.
  I can once again add more genocides that were unleashed by Arabs with local converts in parts of Africa. There are many Arab resources that have documented these conquests and mass murders.
  
  Now there are schisms within every faith. You yourself have stated the same about Islam too. A presbyterian or a methodist is still a Xtian. A sudra or a vysya is still a Hindu . But why are Shias and Ahmedeyas not even considered to be a Muslim? Given you are a Kashmiri, there is a greater chance of you beliving in Sufi or Shiite ethos (I could be wrong). Please check with Arabs that you know whether Shias are at par with Sunni Arabs? Arabs get upset even about saying Khuda Hafiz. So much repsct for Ummah….
  
  A Christian can walk away from Church, a Hindu can call himself an atheist but why does fiqh of Islam get an apostate killed? The poponents of both pro / anti capital punishment use the same sources of Quran and Hadiths to make their cases. Would one of your Muslim friends be able to state in a Mosque that he is leaving Islam and get away with it. Even in the US,a free non-Islamic country, his life will always be endangered. Can a Wafa Sultan or a Salman Rushdie walk past the Islamic center on Virgil Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, without being attacked?
  
- SDC May 6, 2011 At 2:05 pm
  
  Srinagar, symbol of injustice and tyranny for the whole world, indeed it is. So, who doubts it, not me. Remember the entire hindu community was traumatized and systematically uprooted from their home and hearth. BTW, KASHMIR IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF INDIA.
  
  Well, hindus have definitely brought great misfortune upon themselves by inventing this caste system, and they definitely had to pay for this. What about the muslims? Have they not been killing each other on sectarian grounds? We hear of bomb blasts in sufi shrines almost every week in your beloved Pakistan. And yes, you definitely don’t have shudars (untouchables) and brahmans, but you have mawalis, and you are one, isn’t it, serves you right, eh.
  
  So, what you say about the spread of islam is right and the rest is all propaganda? So, you are the self-appointed judge, jury, and the hangman, all rolled in one. And the spread-by-the-sword theory is nonsense. Fine, I at least do not claim to be a know-all scholar. Let me also recommend you a reading of magna opera like the Chachnama, Baburnama, written none other than by muslims of course, also do make it a point to read about blood-thirsty conquistadors like Mahmud ghazni, muhammad ghori, timur lane, nadir shah, ahmad shah abdali, iltutmish, allaudin khilji, etc., but I also know that you won’t bother.
  
  I did not say that islam died down after 200-300 years, and hence no shock for me there. I only said that the rate of spread of islam has terribly weakened to the point that even with thousands of daee’s like Zakir Naik, the whole world is still not darul islam (and take it from me, it will never be so).
  
  Christians may be cleverly giving food on the cross, but muslims gave islam at the tip of the sword. So, why grumble? At least, they are better than you guys when it comes to propagation of faith.
  
AmericanMuslim May 6, 2011 At 1:38 am

@kalbhairav: I can understand your love for hate; but please relax, go back, and go through my previous mail and try to figure out what heaven, turned-hellhole by Hindus, i belong to. 🙂

@ Vajra: Believe me it does, my friend! 🙂 Hazrat Mohammad (PBUH), or his Sahabas (companions) did not belong to any sect. Please understand that sect means a group. It shouldn’t have a name other than Muslim. What my beloved Prophet (PBUH) meant was that there would be one group who would follow the right path (And Allah know best). And like i already said, people of most major religions have been fighting amongst themselves over religious differences. Believe me many fight over more fundamental concepts than the kind that separate a deobandi from a wahabi etc. Btw, your interest in my salvation is appreciated! 🙂

@ Rushmore : Please understand the simple fact that what Arabs do or think does not necessarily represent what Islam preaches. We all know not just this but many other flaws in the Arab society and way of thinking; just as we know so many bad things about so many Christians (even priests) and so many Hindus. How would you like to be considered a part/representative of some particular group of Hindus, eg the terrorist Shiv Sena (Army of the Shiv!!)?
So, why dont you stop looking at the bad examples, of which there are plenty in every religion. Not only is this not working, it might do your argument more harm than good! 🙂

We know it was precisely the Hindu ‘religion’ that divided the Hindu society into castes. Many Muslims of today may disapprove of sects other than their own, but they dont consider people belonging to them as ‘created inferior’ or inferior by birth, as is the case in Hindu religion. We dont have shudars (untouchables) and brahmans.

Oh, and Christians and others never fought amongst themselves over religious differences!?

Now you want me to start talking about genocide? You have no idea that Muslims have been one of the biggest sufferers of systematic and most brutal ethnic cleansing the world has seen. Heard of a place called Bosnia? Or why go that far, go ask the first Kashmiri (the first you see in Kashmir i challenge you!) what he thinks about your Hindus’ than (the place for Hindus!).. or open the history book to find out how the Christains gave Spain a bath with Muslims’ blood, or how Iraq lost millions of Muslims in the name of the now officially-accepted error-of-judgement, or discover that more than 20% (the lowest quoted figure is 10%) of Afghanistan was completely destroyed by Soviet Union and millions of Musims were killed just because the SU felt uncomfortable with the new regime there (imagine SU’s size and might, and the ‘danger’ the poor Afghanistan could pose to them); and then the carpet bombing that killed thousands of people who didnt even know who had arrived and why!
I could go on and on if you want…

But why worry; your conscience is clean! Its Muslims blood after all; so why care. Keep saying to yourself “i am told the Muslims used the sword and thats how they got to number about a billion! And even now Islam is one of the fastest growing religion in the world because of the sword (etc) (talk of being obsessed!) (btw, i didnt say ‘the fastest’ which is widely acknowledged because you may come up with some figures from somewhere to say no, its the second or the fifth fastest!) Its growing rapidly, thats sufficient for the argument.

I thought it’d have dawned onto you by now that the sword does NOT have the potential to create the second biggest religion of the world. We have an endless list of preachers, saints, sufis who went to many parts of the world and spread the message!
Its time you gave hate some time off and replace some of it with logic. You’ll immediately feel the difference in your perspective! 🙂

Oh, btw, i am more than eager to hear your version of the spread of Islam in the Sub-continent! And i really hope it’ll be an interesting one! 🙂

Once again, most Muslims, like myself, think Dr Naik and many others are doing a wonderful job, and they are highly appreciated and respected by us Muslims, irrespective of the sect we belong to (except a few people of course, i agree).

BTW, desperation of this website’s creator is made so obvious by the fact that out of the 990 or so posts here, (this small figure itself says a lot about the site’s popularity), most are auto-messages telling us to visit some hate-website to see even more hatred being spread against Mr Naik!!

And hate…!!

- adolf May 6, 2011 At 2:05 am
  
  @AmericanMuslim:
  I think you are desperate to prove that all Muslims love zakir naik. I can understand your desperation ( birds of same feather flock together).
  
  >>>most Muslims, like myself, think Dr Naik and many others are doing a wonderful job
  
  Can I know what wonderful work zakir naik is doing? keeping aside non existing god, what help is he doing to mankind?
  
  Don’t be sooooo desperate to prove all Muslims love khal naik, and stop using the argument of “desperate”. Agniveer site does not ask you to come and read it. you came and argued that indicates that you are irritated and desperate to prove other wise(by your own logic).
  
- KalBhairav May 6, 2011 At 4:10 am
  
  @AmericanMuslim:
  
  I can understand your love for hate; but please relax, go back, and go through my previous mail and try to figure out what heaven, turned-hellhole by Hindus, i belong to. 🙂
  
  Nice try making Hindus the guilty party in J&K. My point still stands. Scores of Muslims escape from Iran/Iraq/Egypt/Syria/Indonesia to prosper in the West taking advantage of the open society there. They leave their home country *because* of Islam and when pointed out say that oh, our home countries never followed true Islam…If only US/UK would follow true Islam (whatever that is) would there be peace on earth.
  
YM May 7, 2011 At 6:57 am

Refutation of Zakir Naik by Muslim Scholars Saudi Arabia

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YVZNoFH0u20

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_SVg2Au2V8&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i69Lud7y5No&feature=related

Indian May 8, 2011 At 3:25 pm

The person who has written and published this article is stupid. Mr. Zakir Naik is following and conveying the message of peace. Those persons who have any doubt, they can read and understand their religious scriptures. Whatever Mr. Zakir Naik is saying, if it is against your religious scriptures, then do follow those things. Important point is understand your religious scriptures and live life according to the commandments.
Even if you do not want to follow your religious scriptures then you will go to the hell.

- truth seeker May 8, 2011 At 3:41 pm
  
  @Indian
  
  Yes you are right, People who are following Kuran, killing the Kafr is first & last mission of Kuran follower & Jakir naik. Kuran clearly allow kill the non-believer and Idol worshiper. Osama was the great Jihadi of Islam. Islam should proud on him. I request to all Muslim, support Osama and take avenge of Osama death from Kufr. Islam need today more Osama to establish Islam in world.
  
  - Faisal Khan May 20, 2011 At 5:33 pm
    
    @truth seeker
    
    Jihad means fight for ourselves, other peoples (For Humanity). You people think that Islam needs violence then it means you are very poor in history and u have fake knowledge or you just believed in ears. Go Go take full knowledge not only about Islam but also yours too.
    
    If Islam need violence then all peoples even you are also one of the follower it.
    You just want to satisfied yourself by doing this type of activities. You know that you are nothing.
  - dharmayoddha May 20, 2011 At 7:55 pm
    
    @Faisal khan
    
    Abe shaane, Islam is based on violence against non-muslims and I can give you proof, NOt poor in history and fake knowledge.
    
    My hindu dharma and community was wiped out from pakistan and bangladesh and now kashmir, go to kashmir and see for yourself the desecrated temples, and then tell me why shouldnt I hate islam. I have false knowledge moron? And you got true knowledge?
  - anjum May 22, 2012 At 12:58 am
    
    owee y r u so afraid ahahhahaha …are not u thinking that islam is overpowering ya religion that’s y many of tv channels shows abut ya fake religion ..yup u have false knowelege insane …then tell me abut shiv wteva he ruined the world when sati was bured it means wheneva u have girlfriend and his father doesnt want thsi religion u demolish and cut off his head hahahhaha …itna gussa bhagwan khud par control nahi kar sakta and he is so helpless that he couldnt save his girl freind ,,Shiva sensed this catastrophe, and his rage was incomparable. He created Virabhadra and Bhadrakali, some call as [Manbhadra], two ferocious creatures who wreaked havoc and mayhem on the scene of the horrific incident. Nearly all those present were indiscriminately felled overnight. Daksha himself was decapitated. horrified me also hahhaha
    “Hatred and anger leads to unhappiness, pain and misery. So, one should always be soft-spoken and all ‘karma-yogis’ should tread on the path of righteousness.”
    
    Yajur Veda verse then y shiv is so short tempered
  - dharmayoddha May 20, 2011 At 8:04 pm
    
    @Faisal Khan
    
    Jihad means fight for ourselves, other peoples (For Humanity). You people think that Islam needs violence then it means you are very poor in history and u have fake knowledge
    
    Then can you translate this? “Jihad fi sabilillah”? Also can you tell me among the various types of jihad, what is jihad bis saif?
    
    We are poor in history( the entire history of Indiafor past 1000 years is jihad by muslim looters) and have fake knowledge?
  - SDC May 22, 2012 At 9:29 am
    
    Well, Shiva might have been short tempered, but your prophet was most merciful of all who killed people when they simply opposed him in words (not in actions). He spared none, not even old women and children. Those killings must have been ordained by your merciful Allah is not it?. Islam is verily the religion of peace that gives rise to peaceful people who spread peace the world over. And hence we have a peaceful Pakistan and Afghanistan in our vicinity. Peace also reigns supreme in most of the Islamic countries. Waah re! piss-full Islam. And yes, people world over are afraid of the peaceful overtures of your piss-full people and want to counter them.
Indian May 8, 2011 At 3:29 pm

The person who has written and published this article is stupid. Mr. Zakir Naik is following and conveying the message of peace. Those persons who have any doubt, they can read and understand their religious scriptures. Whatever Mr. Zakir Naik is saying, if it is against your religious scriptures, then do follow those things. Important point is understand your religious scriptures and live life according to the commandments.
Even if you do not want to follow your religious scriptures then you will go to the hell.

If you are son of your mother then challenge Dr. Zakir Naik and have a debate with him. If you donot do that and misguiding people in this way. that means you are a bastard.

- truth seeker May 8, 2011 At 4:11 pm
  
  @Indian
  
  Very good comment, Brother what is difference between Veda follower & Islam Follower? Why Sanatan Religion follower consider God first teaching e.i. Veda eternal? They are foolish according to Kuran God is not perfect, that is why he always make amendments in his teachings. Latest amended teaching were sent by God through the help of Mohamad Sahab. Brother Indian please you make them understand that Allah is not perfect like Veda God. He amends his teaching as per ages. Allah is grateful to Mohamad, because without help of Mohamad allah could not send his teaching. Oh, very poor Allah of Kuran!
  
  - Rj3865 May 22, 2011 At 4:43 am
    
    @FAisal
    Brother have you seen your ALLAH , See how these verses contradicts each other ….
    
    Can Allah be seen and did Muhammad see his Lord?
    Yes [S. 53:1-18, 81:15-29],
    No [6:102-103, 42:51].
    First you prove ur Quran to be a revelation and then come to oppose other scriptures……
  - Faisal Khan May 25, 2011 At 6:47 pm
    
    @truth seeker
    You just tell me if Allah comes to earth and show his magical power then, then everyone accept the religion.
    Allah showed good path for humanity through prophets. And its upon us to grasp it.
    All teaching are very clear for human beings. I think you should check it all. And then we will discuss.
  - Vajra May 26, 2011 At 12:04 am
    
    Namaste Faisal Khan
    
    Why does not then Allah come down to earth? Is He unable to do that? When He could come down from His Arsh to make earth as per Quran, why cant He come down again to teach the people on earth how to live?
    
    BTW what is your take on http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/ ?
- adolf May 8, 2011 At 4:25 pm
  
  There is nothing in our religious scriptures which says a person goes to hell just because he did not believe in god/his book. It is the deeds he did on earth which give their fruits in the next life.It is not his belief.
  Zakir Naik has given enough justification for terrorism. He could have least said something against killing innocent people in the name of religion.
  
  Every one is son of their mothers (The statement should be if you are son of your fathers) . Please learn how to insult kafirs from your pakistani muslim friends. We have already challenged. See the site for challenge they made.
  
- dharmayoddha May 8, 2011 At 8:18 pm
  
  The person who published this is a scholar, you are stupid. What zakir naik says is against my religion, he openly abuses my religion, thats why I hate him. Now you dont like that, I hate you too.
  Now what I do with my religious scriptures in MY problem, not zakir khalnayak or you. Respect my way of life, or be prepared to face the flak,
  
  - Faisal Khan May 20, 2011 At 5:40 pm
    
    @dharmayoddha
    Islam never teaches to hate other religion.
    Just check this link and then talk http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qtEoJ9kFkRA
  - Vajra May 20, 2011 At 6:09 pm
    
    Namaste Faisal Khan
    
    Islam will be judged based on what Mullahs say and not what a Hindu idol worshipper says. Here we go
    
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maHSOB2RFm4&playnext=1&list=PL853D589E9AFA2EEE
    
    and see what Muslims do when they make whole world Dar ul Islam, they start barking and prove that Islam is not for humans
    
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jjzebZG3F4
  - dharmayoddha May 20, 2011 At 8:00 pm
    
    @faisal Khan
    Islam never teaches to hate other religion.
    
    Really? Read koran, full of hate for munafiqs who do not accept islam despite all the signs . Read koran chapter 9 verse 5, the verse of the sword, ayat al saif, talwaar ki ayat.
    
    It says kill all “mushrikeen” wherever you find them. I am mushrik, now come and kill me if you got guts? If you dont believe in this verse, (lots of other verses) leave islam and accept hinduism.
- Rj3865 May 21, 2011 At 6:38 am
  
  Brother INDIAN ,
  If Zakir Naik is son of his mother then ask him to accept to debate with Arya Samaj and you know what he never replies to Arya samaj since when Arya Samaj has defeated Tariq Aziz his Guru and a orator of peace T.V … Don’t you have a sense that Zakir Naik only ask people to follow ISLAM and Quran and does not believe in other religious scriptures , isn’t is Farting like … How can i or everyone disbelieve on their own religion and faith and accept Islam just for sake of Heaven , you know what if I embrace Islam just for heaven and 72 virgins after death then islam will make my life hell until i m alive …. This is true so don’t poke your filthy nose in other religion to convert them in a Most Violent and inhuman religion …
  hope you Understood …..
  
Rushmore May 10, 2011 At 12:51 am

@ American Muslim: Bosnia is a cakewalk when compared to what Muslims did to West Asia, North Africa, Europe and India. And by the way the Americans enabled a semblance of normality to return.

Pre-Islamic Arabs did not invade India or Turkey but Islamic Arabs did. Pre-Islamic Turks did not invade Kabul or India but Islamic Turks did. Pre-Islamic Persians did not enter India but Islamic Persians did. Pre-Islamic Arabs did not invade Spain but Islamic Arabs did. Do you see a trend pal? Turks were a combo of Buddhists,pagans and Xtians before Islam. Arabs were paganas,Jews and Xtians before Islam. Persians were Zorastrians before Islam. Afghans were Buddhists before Islam. Again, do you see a trend, pal? It is ISLAM,ISLAM,ISLAM….But for the slavery of Islam, Arabs,Turks and Persians and Mongols would have been normal humans during the medival period.

Mr.American Muslim, please return to this page often. Your enforced slumber will be gone. Mull over this, for starters.

Hasan Nizami an Arab historian records “In 1196 AD Qutbuddin Aibak advanced against Anahilwar Patan, the capital of Gujarat. After Raja Karan was defeated and forced to flee, “fifty thousand infidels were despatched to hell by the sword” and “more than twenty thousand slaves, and cattle beyond all calculation fell into the hands of the victors”. The city was sacked, its temples demolished, and its palaces plundered. On his return to Ajmer, Aibak destroyed the Sanskrit College of Visaladeva, and laid the foundations of a mosque which came to be known as ADhãî Din kã JhoMpaDã.

Tãrîkhu’l-Hind: The author Abû Rîhan Muhammad accompanied Mahmud of Ghazni, during his invasion of India. ““The linga he raised was the stone of Somnath, for soma means the moon and natha means master, so that the whole word means master of the moon. The image was destroyed by the Prince Mahmud, may God be merciful to him! – AH 416. He ordered the upper part to be broken and the remainder to be transported to his residence, Ghaznin, with all its coverings and trappings of gold, jewels, and embroidered garments. Part of it has been thrown into the hippodrome of the town, together with the Cakrasvamin, an idol of bronze, that had been brought from Taneshar. Another part of the idol from Somanath lies before the door of the mosque of Ghaznin, on which people rub their feet to clean them from dirt and wet.”

Srabanty Ahmed May 12, 2011 At 11:03 pm

it is the habit of human being to find throne except flowers…………zakir Naik is one of the most valuable gifts for all the muslims……..at least I think so…………he is geneus…well educated………n my favouritec one………..so…………I will support him all the time………..

- krishna arya May 13, 2011 At 8:35 am
  
  sir!
  such blind support only hurts.
  
  read the above article carefully.
  read why fatwas given against him.
  
  still supporting him is dumbing the mind ….. also his lectures are filled of chapter no. xx verse no. xx and if that impresses you without cross checking … then… keep supporting..
  
  dont support someone just bcoz he is talking your side… be sure to check he is correct or wrong… for it will harm you yourself at end… as muslims had to bring a fatwa against this jakir naik…
  
- Rj3865 May 16, 2011 At 4:16 am
  
  @Srabanty Ahmed
  Brother what made you think that he is flower , you thought this because he debates nicely .
  If yes then you must know maximum reference he gives are false and unanuthentic , all he do is just to prove anyhow , nothin more .. dont be biased and just seek for truth , that is VEDAS
  
sks May 13, 2011 At 12:14 am

All religions are equal.No need to change from one religion to other.Some one like Zakir naik has fundamentalist view in his religion.His intention is to market the Islam rather than spreading peace. Most autocratic governments in the world are lead by fundamentalist muslims.Muslims are the real sufferers,They cant enjoy freedom in his own country.Civil society should come forward to change this situation.

human May 19, 2011 At 9:42 pm

ppeople should know more about this so called man dr. naik.
who thinks & make everyone think & believe that only his religion is right & everything is wrong. he personally met with god, sorry ”allah” & collected quran & hadees etc. and clarified by his own eyes that what is true & what is not. I mean he was present at the time when all the incidents happened which is described in quran or gita or bibble. he also got the power of knowledge to expose a religion and make people hate each other, such as hindus. but this man cannot teach the lesson of islam & quran to the people of his own religion, who is becoming a bomber a terrorist, a most wanted criminals etc etc… dr. naik please teach about peace to your own community. not to kill innocent people in the name of jihad, not to become most wanted criminals or terrorist or anti-social. the world knows the truth, so better you see your own religion & community first & let every other religion live in peace. please don’t waste your time & energy by giving all those bull shit lectures on religion. you are best & everyone is wrong. the main purpose of hinduism is spreading love & respect the world knows the fact, so please don’t give birth to terrorist or criminals or anti socials by your f###ing lectures, people like you become terrorist and make others fight in the name of religion. you are so qualified but you don’t know loving others respecting others feelings. you give all those bull shit lectures & making hindu & muslims divided. you are a anti social a terrorist. you should teach that no problem whatever other religion is, respect every religion respect everyone. one more thing I just wanted to say that you are a person who gained knowledge to teach hatred, to teach how to disrespect others, how to laugh on someones religion, you teach muslims how to hate hindus & by which points you can tease the hindus.
mr stupid naik, peace will come only when you teach how to respect everyone, every religion, we belong to the same god but the paths are different. we have the same color of blood & organs. we are all equal. but the shit you don’t teach this. just change your channel name from peace tv to fu## india’s peace tv…
you better teach people what is islam & what is jihad. and please ask your so called peacefull allah ke bande, your good good religion followers to stop crime. without pulling the leg of hindu’s

bhaskarbhatti May 21, 2011 At 7:42 am

@American muslim and other brain washed ZAKIR fANS ,parrots and everybody..

Please go through the site run by a different sect of Islam exposing zakir naik and wahabi propoganda..

http://www.cifiaonline.com/drzakirnaik.htm

- anjum May 22, 2012 At 1:40 am
  
  hindus ki bhi site banao yaar atleast sach saamne ayega that why is this religion meant for?Attraction towards opposite sex is a natural phenomena then why parents and society objects but at the same time also pray in the temple of lord Krishna 16108 wifes and one girlfriend omg krishna ne record tod dya if u really a follower of hinduism then u have to married about 16108 women ,Siddhi and Buddhi are two wives of Lord Ganesha,In the Mahābhārata, Dhritarashtra (Sanskrit: धृतराष्ट्र, dhritarāshtra) was King of Hastinapur at the time of the Kurukshetra War, the epic’s climactic event. He was born the son of Vichitravirya’s first wife Ambika, and was fathered by Vyasa. He was blind from birth, and became father to a hundred children by his wife Gandhari (Gāndhārī).guys noted here hundered children again shoked
  AYYAPA He is the son born to Siva and Vishnu as a result of a homosexual act.VISHNU went to the nether world in the guise of Mohini, a woman of exquisite beauty,
  Shiva got intoxicated with her beauty and had sexual intercourse with her, who was in reality Vishnu. Vishnu became pregnant as a result of the homosexual act, and gave birth to Sastha from his thigh. Both Shiva and Vishnu discarded this un-naturally born illegitimate child in the forests of Sabarimalai in Kerala. …
  .In reality none of these gods exist or ever existed. They are the products of mental fantasies of some surrealistic creative thinkers of the past. Even today there are mentally deranged persons indulging in creating new gods. All the amorous stores connected with these gods also are the subjective creations of sex-starved surrealistic thinkers obsessed with sexual thoughts.
  
  - SDC May 22, 2012 At 9:22 am
    
    Accepted. What about the sexual fantasies of your beloved prophet who would not be satisfied by 11 wives and hence he had devise new methods of sexual gratification viz., sexual slavery, rapes, war booty. And you all are so happy to acknowledge him your prophet of some sick Allah who will provide pearly bottomed boys and houris to people who will kill, loot, plunder, rape in his name? You Allah must be 1 sick bastard up there.
hillaz May 22, 2011 At 5:15 am

Islam is an organised crime against humanity!Muslims required Thu for tat treatment.if Muslin kills 50Hindus in godhr and 3000in newYork Americans killed thousand time in Afghanistan , Iraq and this is the only way can match their mercifull Alah Satnic verses!

amyn111 May 27, 2011 At 3:29 am

islam and qoran teaches us compassion, kindness, mercy, brotherhood, charity, respect for parents, helping orphans, helping poor, every verse or ayat begins with bismillahi rehmane rahim allah is most merciful most kind and compassionate we help poors by giving part of our earnings as zakat we hold fast for more than a month qoran teaches us to lead pious life to ask for siratal mustaqim the path of truth honesty
BUT…………….. what i dont understand is that some muslim scholars mind it only some of them just find the lessons of hatred in qoran so my question is are there lessons of hatred in qoran? and these people are constantly trying to identify infidel kafir do we have authority to do so? in qoran allah says i have hell fire reserved for kafirs and also he punishes them so its not our job to identify kafirs for us every human being is muslim unless and until allah says he is kafir and for us is to lead a life of kindness. compassion. mercy, forgiveness,, brotherhood, charity, siratal mustaqim . ALLAH help us to follow the path of siratal mustaqim and not the path upon which descended your wrath or your anger khauf…….

- Vajra May 27, 2011 At 3:36 am
  
  Namaste Dear Friend amyn111
  
  ————-its not our job to identify kafirs for us every human being is muslim unless and until allah says he is kafir————–
  
  Many salutes to you! This is what Muslims at large should realize.
  
  I would like to see your comments on http://satyagni.com/4091/i-am-a-non-arab-muslim/
  
  best wishes
  
Mohil Patel May 27, 2011 At 3:34 am

What I think of Dr Zakir Naik and why I am against him?
Dr Zakir Naik MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) is a preacher and speaker from the Islamic community talking on various different topics relating widely on religions, religious scriptures, political issues and many other topic. One of unique things about Dr Zakir Naik is that he suggests that he knows everything about different religions, Islamic, Christianity, Jewish, Buddhism, Sikhism, Hinduism and Jainism. Moreover he is also aware of what is said in every scripture’s and knows the chapters, verses and quotes of by heart. He has been all over different places countries and spreading those lectures in relation to these areas specifically. In every session taken place on different topics, the whole building has been full up with public for his lecture. A lot of people ask questions in relation to those topics and they answered very smartly by him, whether the person asking is Muslim or not Muslim.
What I personally believe about Dr Zakir Naik?
With Dr Zakir Naik talking about all these different topics and spreading his opinion is not right and I believe that it is totally wrong. This is because; he always thinks logically his way and assumes that must be the right way. As a result, most of the people see what he believes and happens to change their decision in that case. Should that be allowed publicly?
Why I believe this about Dr Zakir Naik?
For Dr Zakir Naik having this type of discussion influences people and believed that it is only him that is aware of what is right and wrong. The people drown into what he believes. As a result, this gives him to opportunity to divert their brain however he wants them. This then would stop them from thinking and they believe that Dr Zakir Naik is the god.
Comparing two different religious scriptures:
It is a fact that all different religions have their own scriptures. More common is that even the scripture say the same thing; they are going to have different meaning and different belief because; they introduce different religions. The way Dr Zakir Naik approaches them is by comparing two different scriptures from different religion. The most common way is to by looking at the similarities and mentioning those points in an Islamic way. Also, in various scripture, he says that he knows Chapter, verses and quotes of by heart, which is not the case all the time. Also misinterprets the meaning, but makes it some obvious to public and they believe them. This turns down other scriptures and make them less informative to people that belong or do not belong that community. The main effort by him is having good argument and logic involved on those topics. But to my point of view, it is totally baseless if they are not to have the real meaning. The audience happen to believe them as they are influenced by them very strongly. But it gets a lot worse when people from those community loss faith. I believe that is very bad and unacceptable way to lecture over different religion. It is not only me, but various other people that are Muslim and non Muslim thinks the same.
Comparing two different religions:
When the discussions are done on religion, Dr Zakir Naik has the common approach carried out by comparing two different religions. The religion introduced all the time is Islamic and in comparison introduced other religions that are Christianity and Hinduism most of the time. By introducing Christianity, he implies how their values and Islamic values are similar. It is the same approach with the Hinduism and what values come under that religion. The comparison introduced in this what Hindus and Islamic believe in common. I really am not satisfied when such comparisons are made that do not have any similarities at all. This is because; in comparison, he makes judgement of what Hinduisms have in common. Comments are made by him regarding Hindus believing in Idols as god and holy offering that are given in temple to the worshipers and in counter responses brings in what the scriptures say by misinterpreting it. Can this not have negative impact on what people should believe in Hinduism? I see that it has nothing go to do with Dr Zakir Naik and he does not the real fact on what Hinduism believes. The most approaches carried out are by connecting things that have different meaning but want to introduce that their in no dedication like this. With Hinduism being vegetarian, he also counter argue and introduce false believe is carried out. In many discussions, he has been discussing about existence of the Hindu gods and introduces what the Hindu scriptures say by totally misinterpreting what it means. As a result, this misguides many people and they happen to go against the belief. This creates a lot of problem because other religions would have bad opinion about Hinduism and can brainwash people from Hinduism and other people from different community. Is Dr Zakir not racist? Also, in discussion suggests some things that Hinduism needs to follow by saying that they do not. Is this not going to demoralise the Hindus community? Will it not make the Hindu community look bad in comparison to other communities?
Discussing about political issues (Islamic Terrorism):
Apart from religion Dr Zakir Naik also has discussion on political issues that very closely relate to Islamic community. One of the main topics introduced by him is on terrorism and in what ways political reasons have defamed the Islamic community in the society. To make the people think in a different way, Dr Zakir Naik shows how other religions and community are part of terrorist organisation. In the discussion, Dr Zakir Naik had involved how Great Britain had been affected by terrorism. It was obvious that Great Britain was affected by terrorism on the 7 July 2005 and America on the 9/11 attack. In defence of Islamic community, Dr Zakir Naik introduces how Great Britain and America was affected by the IRA (Irish Republic Army). But the fact is that IRA (Irish Republic Army) terrorist organisation was finished a long time ago and recently, they have not done terrorist attack. Why would Dr Zakir Naik want to bring in something that is old? Apart from that, LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) was brought in front. But LTTE (Liberation of Tigers of Tamil Eelam) only causes problems to Sri Lanka and they have finished. Also, they did not spread their ideology all through out the world. The Islamic terrorism had started a long time and ago and they are still on going and there is no end to it. I believe this is one of the ways to victimise other religious minorities and make them look like the culprit. On top of that, also make the British media responsible for all this. Despite the evidence are shown, still Dr Zakir Naik comes out with defence on them. But all the information is given by him is orally and no concrete evidence on that is introduced.
Calling people from different religion’s to Public sessions:
Dr Zakir Naik call people called from different religion for discussion. This makes it more obvious to the audience that anything. Also, they would not feel that he is biased and the person brought into the conversation and the public would take more interest. They all have discussion on the religious discussion on the topic raised in the session. Later, they argue on that issue of what is said in the scriptures and how the religious society and community is made. As a result, Dr Zakir Naik is able to win the arguments. The affect of the public is that they believe that he is very knowledgeable on the all the religions comparing to the other people. To my point of view, this is not right because just arguing any point logically and having evidence presented falsely would not mean that they are the winner. Are all the people right all the time of they win the arguments?
When people talk about Dr Zakir Naik?
People are going to be talking about Dr Zakir Naik in public and general conversation as they are influenced by them. As a result, they would make others interested in to what they believe and later they would also follow Dr Zakir Naik. This is just one of the ways people would not follow what they believe and go against their principle. This could against their religion and how they see things. This will only happen because in every session Dr Zakir Naik always goes on about how different topics and is very detailed. I believe this is wrong because other people that are also like Dr Zakir Naik would not be seen by the public and will be ignore. As a result, this is wrong make others turned down in that fashion. Is this going to be a bad influence on other people?
Where does Dr Zakir Naik travel for his purpose?
There are various nations that Dr Zakir Naik has travelled to experience how people in different countries are like. The main logic for Dr Zakir Naik is to have a public session and make people aware about him. As a result, he would involve them and make them as part of those lectures. In the lectures, he would want to discuss what facilities those are in their country and how they are bad influence they to them. Dr Zakir Naik would not even understand anything as in those countries as he himself would not know and just talk about it. Even if the information is not right, he would not bother as the public would follow and understand what his logic and understanding is. Also, those public would be coming often their and they would develop understanding of what he is trying to say. But Dr Zakir Naik does not just want to spread logic round the world but spread Islamic logic and make people think their way. Would it be right to use Islamic logic to have public sessions?
Who comes to be part of Dr Zakir Naik Public sessions?
This makes people from different religion and countries come and listen as all this may relate to them. This results Dr Zakir Naik to be a lot famous in front of the people that belong to different cultures and community. Does Zakir Naik have any rights to famous that way? In the nation wherever they live, they would not follow the rules and regulation as part of that religion and would look for changes in those nations. In certain nation, they have their own logic and ways to deal with thing. I totally do not see point that Zakir Naik should make any comments of everything. Also he would not have the full knowledge what happens in different countries. As a result, their conflicts and be a problem to those areas. This is just a way that Dr Zakir Niak is going to cause a dispute and problem overall by spreading irrelevant logical reasons.
How do people react after listening to Dr Zakir Naik?
People are brainwashed of what he says in the public sessions. As a result, in future only his logic would be used by people. This would people see ways differently and not understand their own belief, cultures and background, which they come from. Those people become so dedicated and all follow his logic. Does anyone even bother to look at why Dr Zakir Naik thinks of anything that way? The problem occurs when others get affected by these types of thought and later produces disturbance all through out.
People in the public end up converting their religions:
Dr Zakir Naik in all of the conversation has mentioned about the Islamic community and what benefits they have. Also to produce more depth in the information discusses about how the Islamic community function with the community, society and community. In contrast says a lot opposite about other religion and community. In the audience, this would influence many people against other religion and also go against their religion. This would result to extent that they would convert their religion to Islamic community. This has taken place in the public session that he has and ask them of they have not being forced. But the fact is that they have been forced and they are not going to admit that in public as they know the result later on for them could be bad. Also, they are brainwashed about Islamic community and they happen to follow Islam. Many British, Americans, Australian and many different citizens have converted to Islam and they are successful Islamic scholar and have discussion on what Islam is all about afterwards. Also in Hinduism, many cases people have been forced to convert to Islam and they are not originally from the Islamic community. Previously, many Hindus have been forced to convert to Islam. In Dr Zakir Naik public session, this has been the same result and many of them have taken the similar step. I would like to ask that how many people belonging to Islamic community have converted to other religion. This is because; if atheist can convert to Islam that apply many restriction to them, then why cannot people from Islamic community converted to atheist? As a result, they would have much more freedom and also would keep balance on what Islamic community take, they can also give. If not atheist, then other different religion, they can covert to. There are various Muslims in the world that are not strict Muslims and do not going the Quran like other Muslim. But is says in the holy Quran that if any Muslim converts to another religion, they are going to be given a death sentence. Is this not just going to develop Islamic community and turn down other religions?
Negative impact of Dr Zakir Naik on different people and professions:
On all discussion, Dr Zakir Naik introduces negative information on politician, religions, Media and so on that all happens to be wrong. To my point of view, it is just going to be defaming people and their profession. The information presented is always one sided by him and introduce nothing positive about the same topics. This would influence the public to think only one side and not allow them to use their own initiative. If any dispute between communities or religious minorities happen, Dr Zakir Naik would blame others and defame them. This would make it obvious in terms that he would always have logic used all the way through. In contrast to all this, it is only Dr Zakir Naik that is gaining honour and getting away. As a result, he is quite successful in terms how the audience is responding to him. This also allows him to continue on what he believe is right to do all the time. Is this right way to use the knowledge? Dr Zakir Naik also came on NDTV 24X7 in the “Walk the Talk” show. Later he denied what he had said in the news and said that the whole of show was cut and pasted. Can anybody believe Dr Zakir Naik? In this issue it is possible that the media for the audience attraction, they may lie. But in many cases Dr Zakir Naik have done the same and ruined people and professions. As a result, I cannot believe that Dr Zakir Naik is right as on many occasions he has made up opinions. There are people that have bad opinion on him, would believe that anything mentioned negative about him in the media would have to right. It is obvious that Dr Zakir Naik would not agree with that and would counter argue to self defend himself.
May result religious dispute between two different communities for example Genocide?
This can cause a religious dispute between two different cultures because on many occasions he has only talked positive about Islam and negative about other religions. The effect of this on the community has been negative at some point. If is gets a lot worse, he can create genocide between two communities and have people killing each other in the name of religion. Dr Zakir Naik wants communities to be closer and live happily in the society. But certain actions have caused damages to many people are not happy about it because only he himself and Islamic community have earned the benefit. Are the people from other communities not going to feel abused? As a result, two different communities are going to have dispute and later spread disturbance all round. Even if the situation gets worse for the two different communities, it will be again that Dr Zakir Naik would come and have public session and blamed other and get away for that causes. But the real culprit would be he himself. In future, different communities would not appreciate help and mixture of others, which would result worse atmosphere. In response to all this, I would see he is one of Blasphemers that people in the community, Muslims and Non-Muslims have as risk.
Dr Zakir Naik using different ways to attract the audience:
When I had gone on Your Tube, I had seen many different videos on Dr Zakir Naik’s public discussion on the religious topics. This implies that there are many different ways he is trying to pass his message to the audience. To my point of view, I believe this is one of ways; he is trying to catch people and brainwash. In the commenting section, many different people have given positive comment on his logic. But in contrast, I have seen many people giving negative comments on his video. This illustrates that many people do not like the way as he is using his knowledge and they want all this to stop. Moreover the people that do not like him, they have also made video of him to introduce his way of logic is not right. In that case, I believe those type of videos produced against him, should be understood why they are made. This would enlighten people not to fall in his trick and believe what he says. Also, I would recommend the owner of the Your Tube to eliminated his video for as they are relating to Blasphemy.
Dr Zakir Naik doing Fraud:
On having so many public sessions, Dr Zakir Naik has earned a lot of respect on what he believes people in the community think of him. Later, the news had come out that he had been charged with fraud. The fraud involved using the quotes for the Quran and copying and pasting and giving his own point of view. This implies that he has plagiarised someone work and effort, and tried to earn his name. To my point of view, wherever anybody does as part of their work, they need to have their own knowledge and understand. Using other people’s knowledge for your purpose is known as stealing and anybody who lives in respective community and society would not appreciate that. It also makes me believe that all the public sessions that he has are nothing and have no value because; he had been carrying this type of approach all the way through or exaggerating information. Dr Zakir Naik was going to come to Britain to have a public session. But he was not refused to come and was not able to make it. The reason why he was banned because of the way he was spread his Islamic logic all the way and on the public this was a band influence. I believe that this was the right approach to make the people think how his attitude can cause a problem. There were few people that were not happy but mainly, they were people that belong to the same community has him. It makes it much worse if the religious community that he belongs to in questioned because; they would feel pinpointed. To my point of view, I believe that these types of people should be thrown out the community and society.
Public have different point of view of Dr Zakir Naik now:
After seen different point of views, many people also have negative opinion on Dr Zakir Naik and believe that in many ways he is wrong. This has created his negative images in front of the people that are dedicated to him and believe that he just wanted to be their god in front of them and use them. In response, not just Non-Muslims but, many Muslims disagree with him and the way his attitude towards the society and community is. This may imply people that his approach has not been right been right. The public at some point believe that he has been a cheater to them and believe that he was just wanted to get noticed by the public. He was a doctor and studied MBBS (Bachelor in Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery). So did he not continue with practicing his medicine degree? This can just mean that he was not happy with his profession or found it hard to cope with it. As a result, he decided to become a preacher in that case and later take that as a different approach. Dr Zakir Naik could have been someone in the society and community that would have treated normally. But this type of response has given him a bad impression overall at some point.
How people in the world are and what Dr Zakir Naik talk about them in public sessions?
There are people that have their own way to deal with things and are able to keep themselves safe from all the problems. As a result, he had made a lot of personal comments on how people live the community and society. It is important to make sure that you stay safe and respect people in the community and society. Also cultures and religion for the people plays a major role in terms of their dedication and I believe many people do show respect. But personally, I think people have their own lives and they have full rights to live how they like to on their agreement of the community and society. If in the middle of the road, somebody has a problem, are they not going to ask for help without looking at what they are and who they are? This demonstrates people understand that if somebody live life different, does not mean that they do not have humanity. On this issue, I am able to come across Dr Zakir Naik is so interested in discussing on how people to people can be a threat and introducing a lot of superstition. As a result, I think that Dr Zakir Naik has no rights to talk about people.
Political power that Dr Zakir Naik may have:
If Dr Zakir Naik gets away after all this, it will be politics in terms of what type of support he has. Also many people support him and if anything happens to him, the public that are very dedicated to him, will protest for him. Also with him, there are other systems that would be in his contact and can do something to support him. In political purpose even if people are wrong they will get away easily or if they are caught, they would be have other higher people that could have put their effort behind them, which would save them. As a result, these people would have no end till the others are caught as well. I would suggest the community and the people in the society to stay away form this type of people are concentrate in how to follow you culture, religion and faith. There is no need to compare religions
Conclusion on what I think should happen to Dr Zakir Naik?
As conclusion, I believe that however Dr Zakir Naik has behaved in the public sessions as a blasphemer should be penalised from doing that and stopped appearing in front of public for public sessions. Moreover, a police complaint and the case should be filed on his name and press serious chargers. On the basis of that, he should be given a serious punishment for his deeds. It is not only Dr Zakir Naik that has been part of this but, may other Islamic Scholar have been involved in this and they should be given the same punishment. This would imply to anybody not to become a blasphemer like him and treat people from different community and religion with respect. The community that have been following him, does not realise that he has been creating problems for others. Most of the problems have come when he had talked about religious comparison, religious scriptures and political issues. In the entire topics he had always used Islamic logic and diverted the public’s attention on them. In contrast, made others turned down. If in future they should only have religious scholar discussing about their own religion, religious scriptures, society, community, belief and so on. This will keep peace and harmony in the community and make others feel a lot satisfied that way.

ilyas May 29, 2011 At 12:43 am

Mr Agniveer,
Why are so afraid of Zakir Naik? It is because you are afraid that truth will prevail one day and you will be left out , your insecurity had made you write all this. Look into your heart , dont be afraid accept the truth and you will find peace. May the God ALMIGHTY help you overcome your fears.

- Vik May 29, 2011 At 3:16 am
  
  @ilyas
  
  Listen ilyas, its not Agniveer who is scared, but Zakir Naik. Zakir Naik has been openly challenged for a debate many years before, till today, he refuses to accept the challenge of Arya Samaj. Why dont you google search “zakir naik challenged by Arya” and go on youtube and search for “islam vs arya samaj debate”, you would know ur answers then. People like you are always scared to debate. Naik has been running away for the last 7 years.
  
tej May 14, 2012 At 8:57 pm

fuck up for scholding hindus you IDOIT!!!

mohammad osama qureshi May 18, 2012 At 3:07 pm

Hazrat ali [r.a] se 1 shaks ne musalman hone k baad kaha k Daur-E-jahiliyat may maine manath mangithi k mujhe beta hoga toh mai kutte k sath roti khaunga, ab mai kya karun? Aisi MANAT NA manga kro ,ab dur wale gaon may jao aur Talash karo jis ne 3din namaz na padhi ho9 us k asth roti khalo.

alikhan May 24, 2012 At 5:37 pm

mr.agni veer tum baten to badi 2 kr rahe ho.lekin tumhra 1 priest ravi shankar ka debate hua tha dr. zakir naik se wo ravi shankar jo bolta tha ki usne 3 -3 geeta kop zubani yad kiya hua h wo dr.zakir naik k 1 ques ka b ans nahi de paya.kisi ke piche usko kuch b kehna bht asan h.agr himmat h to samne debate krke bata .dr.zakir naik to dur mujhse debate krke bata.i challenge u now.

- raj.hyd May 24, 2012 At 11:09 pm
  
  manniy shri ali ji, shri ravishankar ji [zakir nayak ji ke manch par unki bat ka uttr dene nahi gaye the aur n kuran par prashn karne bhi nahi gaye the vah to matr apas me prem ki bat rakhne gaye the 1 fir “dibert ki bat kaha se uthti hai ? ab ap batlaye ki kaaynat banane ke pahale kurani allah kya kiya karte the? is prshn se ham apse ek”shuruat” kar rahe hai sabut sahit batlaiyega ! thoda apni buddhi bhilaga lijiyega ? baki bate bad me ….?
  
samio May 27, 2012 At 7:20 am

[Hujurat 49:11] O People who Believe! Men must not ridicule other men for it could be that the ridiculed are better than the mockers, nor must the women ridicule other women for the ridiculed women may be better than the mockers; and do not insult one another, nor assign evil nicknames; how base it is to be called a sinner after being a Muslim! And whoever does not repent – then it is they who are unjust.

- raj.hyd June 4, 2012 At 6:09 am
  
  kuran me to anek ayte paraspar virodhi baton ka aadesh deti hai ! dekhe kuran5/51 jisme muslimo se kaha gaya hai kiisai v yahudi se dosti mat karo ! dekhe kuran 9/123 jisme muslimo se kaha gaya hai kivah aspas ke gair muslimo se ladne ko kaha gaya hai, aur unse sakhti karo ! dekhe kuran 8/12 jisme gair muslimo ki gardane maro unke por-por par chot pahunchao! dekhe kuran33/61 jisme fitkare huye [gair muslim]jahan kahi paye jayenge buri tarah katl kiye jayenge ! aisi anek ayte kuran me aur bhi jagah maujud hai
  
KalBhairav June 3, 2012 At 12:08 am

@All:

Some funny animated hadiths…bookmark, enjoy and spread!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv9lJPMLW4Y

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsz4FMuM-MU

- mohammad osama qureshi June 3, 2012 At 11:47 pm
  
  WHAT THE HELL IS THIS YOU IDIOT
  
mohammad osama qureshi June 3, 2012 At 10:21 pm

Apni zaban ki taqat us maa-baap par kabhi mat aazmao jisne tume bolna sikhaya hai (HAZRAT ALI)

mohammad osama qureshi June 3, 2012 At 11:44 pm

Ek yahodi alim nay majmay mai musalmano say 3 sawal kiya takay muslims ko gumrah ker sakay.
1. ALLAH hai toh us se pehle bhi koi hoga?
2.ALLAH ka mun kis taraf hai?
3.ALLAH is waqt kya kar raha hai
Majme se ek 9 saal ka bacha utha aur kaha ginti gino yahudi-123456. phir bacha ab ulti ginti karo. yahudi -654321
bacha- 1 se pahle kya aata hai yahudi bola kuch nahi.Bacha-allah ek hai aur usse pehle kuch nahi hai .Bacha-ek diya laya aur usko jalake poocha iski roshni ka mu kis taraf hai.yahudi bola charo taraf. toh bacha bola allah noor hai aur uska chehra har taraf hai. raha 3 sawal ka jawab toh ALLAH is waqt ek 9 saal ke bache se ek yahudi ko zaleel karwa raha hai.
PROUD TO BE A MUSLIM….

- raj.hyd June 4, 2012 At 5:36 am
  
  paramadarniy sri osama ji , kuriti manne vala bhi garv kar leta hai sharab pine vala bhi garvkar leta hai vaisa hi ap bhi muslim hone ka garv kar lete hai ! jara batlaiye , dekhe kuran 38./75 jisme kurani allah kahate hai ki hamne adam ko” dono hatho ” se banaya hai!dekhe kuran39/67jisme kurani allah apne “dayen hath se kahamat ke bad asman ko lapetne ki bat karte hai !dekhe kuran 5/64 jisme ek yahudi ko javab dene ke liye apne “dono khule hatho ” ka jikar karne ko majbur hote hai !kuran me anek jagah kuani allah kahate hai ki vah satve asman par jisko 8 farishte ek sighasan uthaye huye hai , us singhasan par kurani allah virajman hai!8 farishte “simit” singhasan “simit” fir us par baitha hua kurani allah simit kyo nahi hoga ? jo simit ho vah sarvshaktiman kyo kahalaya jayega ? fir kaise vah sarasansar ka nirmata ban sakega ? ab batlaye ki kurani allah kaise “noor ” hai !ham apse ya kisi bhi muslim se javab chahenge is manch se bhagne ki koshish mat kijiyega ! varna kuran ki sangati chhod dijiyega !apko hamare vichar se kuch taklif ho sakti hai iske liye hamap sabhi se agrim asankhybar kshama bhi chahenge ! ap is manch me aye uska bhi kotish: dhanyvad hai !
  
  - raj.hyd June 6, 2012 At 3:14 pm
    
    mahamahim sri osama ji ,apne hamare uthaye huye prshno ka javab dena “uchit ” nahi samjha? aisa kyo ? ap hamse hindi bhasdha me bat kijiye tab hi ham apko uttra de sakenge! ham angreji bhasha se parchit nahi hai !
mohammad osama qureshi June 6, 2012 At 11:50 am

As-Salāmu `Alaykum Raj.hyd,
I think you will not belive me but I AM JUST 13 YEARS OLD.BUT According to scriptures there are 320 million (32 Crores) GODS.. The Hindus are not polytheistic. Hinduism speaks of one God” according to A. Parthasarathy. He explains: “The different gods and goddesses of the Hindu pantheon are mere representatives of the powers and functions of the one supreme God in the manifested world.”

Other Hindus claim that there are 330 million gods.

So it depends on who you ask. One God is bad enough but picking and chosing from over 3,000. and calling it a religion?
Thats 10 times worse than all those cafeteria Catholics out there. Hindu Scriptures of India, in the following quote. This shows them to be very unscientific, hence disproving Eastern religions and modern New Age thinking which are based on the Vedas.

1-The moon is 50,000 leagues higher than the sun.
2- Moon shines by its own light.
3- night is caused by the sun’s setting behind a huge mountain.
4- several thousand feet high, sun located in the centre of the earth.
5- that this world, flat and triangular.
6- world is composed of 7 states one of honey, another of sugar, a third of butter, and still another of wine,
7- the whole mass is borne on the heads of countless elephants, which in shaking produce earthquakes.”

As you can see, there are at least seven clear scientific errors in this short passage of the Vedas.
ONLY ONE MISTAKE IS ENOUGH TO PROVE THAT VEDA IS NOT A BOOK OF GOD.HINDU also can eat meat because
It is mentioned in Ayodhya Khandam, verses 20,26 and 94 that when Rama was sent for Banavas he told his mother that he would have to sacrifice his tasty meat dishes. If Rama had to sacrifice his tasty meat dishes it meant that Rama had likeness for meat. If Rama can have meat, why can’t the Hindus have meat? FEW SCIENTIFIC ERRORS IN HINDU SCRIPTURES

1.“He who fixed firm the earth that staggered, and set at rest the agitated mountains, who measured out the air’s wide…

mohammad osama qureshi June 6, 2012 At 12:21 pm

2.“In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born only Lord of all created beings. He fixed and holds up the earth and the heaven.” Rig Ved: 10: 121: 1. We all know today that the earth revolves and rotates and is not fixed.

3.“Firm is the sky and firm is the earth and steadfast are also these hills. Steadfast is all this living world…..” Rig Ved: 10: 173: 4

4.“The Bull has supported the sky.” Yajur Ved: 4: 30

5.“God has firmly fixed the earth with pegs around it.” Yajur Ved: 5: 16

6.“ North West of the heavens.” Yajur Ved: 13: 56, 57

7.“The sky is supported by pillars.” Yajur Ved: 4: 30

8.“The Bull has supported the sky.” Yajur Ved: 14:5

9.“A lamp kept in windless place does not shake.” Bhagvad Gita: 6: 19 Scientifically this is not true.

10. Arjun says to Krishna ,“The sun and moon are your eyes.” Bhagvad Gita: 11: 19

hari June 6, 2012 At 4:52 pm

Lord Krishna’s visvarupa or divine universal form having His eyes being the sun and moon. It should be understood as both the sun and the moon which originate from Him. Her him refers not to physical krishna , it is his self or atma or cosmic purusha as krishna is fully realized soul who knows that he is not just body he his paramatma . Infinite nature of divine is explained . he is explaining tatwamasi to arjuna. Here writer just added an allegorical meaning by expaining that sun orginated from his eyes to give a beauty to lords words .Then this is in accordance with the Rig Veda that states: Since all the 330 million demigods have been produced from just a portion of the Supreme Lord they are glorified as His individual parts.Lord is explaining and giving arjuna a divine gift to visualize true form which constitutes entire universe .
“The Bull has supported the sky.” Yajur Ved: 4: 30
THE CORRECT TRANSLATION : THE WORD VRUSHABHAM IN THIS MANTRA MEANS GLORIOUS
NOT BULL. IT IS NATURAL FOR AUM TO CREATE AND PERVADE THE SUN, WIND,LIGHT ANDHEAVENLY BODIES LIKE THE EARTH . Indra is often compared to a bull.

“In the beginning rose Hiranyagarbha, born only Lord of all created beings. He fixed and holds up the earth and the heaven.” Rig Ved: 10: 121: 1.
THE CORRECT TRANSLATION : ” In the beginning was Hiranyagarbha – the One Lord of the creation. He sustains the sun and the earth. We adore Him – the all BlissfulBeing =AUM .”
. “Firm is the sky and firm is the earth and steadfast are also these hills. Steadfastis all this living world…..” Rig Ved: 10: 173: 4
THE CORRECT TRANSLATION: “Firm is the sky and firm is the earth and steadfast are also these hills (ACCORDING TO THE RULE S ORDAINED BY AUM
Steadfast is this entire living world (ACCORDING TO THE RULES ORDAINED BY AUM) . LET THISKING BE STEADFAST (THE KING SHOULD STICK TO THE RULE OF LAW) .THE SANSKRIT WORD USED IS DHRUVA
(STEADFAST) I.E. WE SHULD BE ABLE TOFOLLOW THE KING IN TERMS OF ADHERENCE TO RULES/LAW OF THE LAND .

5.“God has firmly…

- hari June 6, 2012 At 5:01 pm
  
  “God has firmly fixed the earth with pegs around it.” Yajur Ved: 5: 16
  THE CORRECT TRANSLATION : [VYASKAMNA = SAMYAK STAMBHAN] AUM SUSTAINSTHE EARTH AND PERVADES IT……….
  QURAN COPIES THIS CONCEPT FROM THE VEDAS.
  “North West of the heavens.” Yajur Ved: 13: 56, 57
  THE CORRECT TRANSLATION : JUST LIKE THE LEARNED MEN ATTAIN THE LIGHT OF KNOWLEDGE TO OTHERS , I, O WOMAN WILL ATTAIN POWER ALONG WITH YOU.PASHCHAT TASYA=THE SUN PRESENT IN THE WESTERN DIRECTION WHICH ISBEHELD BY NETRA=EYES…..MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD LEARN AT THE FEET OF GURUS. IDAM UTTARAT SWAH=THE SOURCE OF HAPPINESS/SUKHA IN THE NORTH DIRECTION……
  .“The sky is supported by pillars.” Yajur Ved: 4: 30
  THE CORRECT TRANSLATION : IT IS NATURAL FOR AUM TO SUSTAIN THE SUN , THESPACE BETWEEN HEAVENLY BODIES,
  , TOSUSTAIN . IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PILLARS . Here an allegorical meaning is given to sustain by using word pillar.
  THIS CONCEPT HAS BEEN COPIED FROM THE VEDAS TO THE QURAN
  
- proud hindu June 6, 2012 At 5:39 pm
  
  anyone who wants to eat meat and feed it to his / her children, should first watch how chicken are slaughtered and how quadrupeds suffer with a broken skull – not even beheaded! to furnish that “precious” food. After watching the slaughter, they are free to eat meat if they still want it.
  The Ksatriya class are allowed to eat meat once in a fortnight during the day of amavasya after making an offering to Mother Kali in a temple outside the city limits. They are allowed to do so because they have to keep their competence to kill enemies opposed to dharma. But wanton killing of animals on a large scale in slaughter houses were not allowed. One has to kill the animal by himself and should chant mamsa. Or Sah mam khadati. He shall eat me in his next life. This is an irrevocable truth because for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The other varnas are not allowed to eat meat. The vedic scriptures and itihasas could sometimes contain this word mamsa which could also mean flesh of a fruit. Meat is considered food in lower modes namely Tamo Guna or ignorance according to Bhagavad Gita .
  But this never applies to Cow. Cow is always given an special position in Vedas. Cow protection is the dharma of vaishyas. Even Lord Krishna emphasized of protection of Cow by his own example.
  
hari June 6, 2012 At 5:17 pm

“A lamp kept in windless place does not shake.” Bhagvad Gita: 6: 19
Correct Translation:As a lamp in a windless place does not waver, so the transcendentalist, whose mind is controlled, remains always steady in his meditation on the transcendent self. He gives a simile comparing an unwavering flame in a windless place with the mind of a yogi rapt in concentrated mediatation on the atma or soul. The purport is as a candle flame is sheltered from the wind, the mind of a yogi shines bright by the unflickering effulgence of the atma.
SO BEFORE COPYING CORRUPTED TRANSLATIONS OF VEDAS FROM WEBSITES OF INDOLOGISTS AND CHRISTIAN MISSIONARIES STUDY TRUE VEDAS .
It is because you are afraid that truth will prevail one day and you will be left out , your insecurity had made you write all this.
KETTODA PANNA KAZHUVARADA MONE , PANNI KUNNE .

mohammad osama qureshi June 7, 2012 At 1:25 pm

As-Salāmu `Alaykum Hari,
In your vedas its written that the whole world is created by one brahma. I also belive in one god that is ALLAH The most merciful.So if brahma created the earth why are you worshiping other gods.You should belive in one god.Once my hindu friend gave me prasad on the ganesh chatrapati.I asked him a simple question Who is ganesh? He told me that Ganesha was born with a human head and body and his mother said that i am taking rest don’t allow anyone to come. and when shiva wants to enter the house ganesh stops him and said you cannot go inside the house.Shiva gets angry and beheaded him. THEN I QUESTION YOU IF SHIVA CANNOT REMEMBER HIS SON HOW CAN HE REMMBER YOU AND ME.THEN HOW CAN HE BE THE GOD.IS lord shri ram god? prophet? messanger? or just ahuman?LET US BEGIN WITH THE VICTORY OF LORD RAMA IN THE LAND OF LANKA SO we all know rama renounced mothe sita.After killing ravan in the battlefield. rama was silent while sita entering fire to prove she is pure ans sinless to the world. this clearly shows that rama was a mere human.

- SDC June 7, 2012 At 2:48 pm
  
  We all evolve with time. We learn from our mistakes and grow wiser. We toil hard and achieve glory. Hinduism/SD recognizes this. It recognizes that each and every soul is potentially divine and can reach great spiritual heights. But the Abrahamic faiths do not. They only believe in God-sent messengers.
  
  - raj.hyd June 7, 2012 At 4:39 pm
    
    jara batalaiye ki, sarve bhavantu sukhin:……. kis granth me hai ? ved me yah hai nahi shyad upnishad me hona chahiye ! iska sampurn pata hamko chahiye ! kya ap batla sakenge ?
  - mohammad osama qureshi June 7, 2012 At 10:22 pm
    
    yeh shayd upanishad ma hai
- hari June 9, 2012 At 9:50 am
  
  osama ,
  the word allah itself is preislamic word used by nabateans cult similar to Elah in ugarit texts . allah is the preislamic word for supreme diety worshipped in kabba along with hubal and manat , also aluzza (venus)was also mighty one for tribes . each tribe there worshipped different dieties . And allat was wife of allah , similar to elah married to elat . hubal was son of allat (solar diety ) , hubal was similar to greek dionsyus who gave thunder and lightning . They used to sacrifice and venerate before them based on divine arrows . Based on this muslims created story of ibrahim sacrifing his son , which was actually based on sacrifice of Abdullah bin ‘Abdul Muttalib before hubal . It was then replaced with camels for slaughtering . As hubal was synonymous with allah at that time muslim scriptures donot mention about hubal . Their prophet simply for political means destroyed everything which is preislamic , 360 idols and other but attributed qualities of different dieties to his new allah but still retained pagan customs of worship which is a reformed paganism . as islam and preislamic worship is a cult hubal was also considered their allah at some point of time when aluzza , allat and manat was assosciated as his daughters . ancient arabians worshiped only two gods mainly one is oratalt which became hubal recently and other is aphrodite which became allat . Allat was worshiped as a vulva black stone in kabba which they kissed along with other but it was retained for new cult of islam placed in the corner now. after 300 years koran was composed by some known person just copying jewish scriptures and replaced jewish name for god with allah and added myths of gabriel and other for political reasons added banning alcohol , adultery etc which is jewish and not islamic . haj was prevalent in arabia way before islam , which is still continued with new cult of one allah whose idol was also destroyed . girls used to rune nude during hajj in kabba , but weared dress similar to what is now weared in…
  
mohammad osama qureshi June 7, 2012 At 10:20 pm

As-Salāmu `Alaykum Raj.hyd
yeh shyad upanishad me hai..the word Mahamad appears in the Puranas, Mamah in Kuntap Sukt (in Atharva Veda) and Ahmad in Sama Veda… Among the eighteen volumes of the Puranas is one by the title ‘Bhavishya Puran,’ literally meaning future events. The Hindus regard it as the Word of God. The prophecy containing Prophet Muhammad by name is found in Prati Sarg Parv III: 3, 3, Verse 5.
The translation of Verses 5-27 (Sanskrit text of the Puranas, Prati Sarg Parv III: 3, 3) is presented.The Sama Veda contains many prophecies of the advent of Prophet Mohammad.
Here, one of them is presented. It is found in Sama Veda, II:6,8:
aur es ke saht mai apko andhera se roshne ki taraf ane ke dawat date hu

- ganesh June 8, 2012 At 11:45 am
  
  @mohammad osama , tumhari ye zakir naik ki bakwaas agniveer ne bahut pehle refute kiya hai — http://agniveer.com/528/prophet-vedas/
  
- hari June 9, 2012 At 9:59 am
  
  osam
  Mamah is not a single word nor a name. It is a combination of two words ‘mamo’ and ‘ahe’, meaning “to me”.
  
- hari June 10, 2012 At 4:20 pm
  
  poda pulle , u r just copying currupt translations of vedas to prove that mamah is muhammad , if u still believe then it is u who shud convert to sanatana dharma , sanskrit translations can be mistranslated .
  
mohammad osama qureshi June 8, 2012 At 12:45 pm

As-Salāmu `Alaykum,
Why are you worshiping the idols that can’t speak or hear.You are making the idols and worshiping them.How can they halp you if they need help.

- SDC June 8, 2012 At 2:10 pm
  
  The same can be said of grave worship that so prevalent among muslims. Why do you need to worship dead people? How can they help you? Also, why do associate partners with Allah by praying to them?
  
  - Maria Muntaha July 8, 2012 At 5:34 am
    
    @SDC
    
    ” Why do you need to worship dead people? How can they help you? Also, why do associate partners with Allah by praying to them?”
    
    This is not true Islam. A true Muslim can never do such things u mentioned.
- ganesh June 8, 2012 At 2:44 pm
  
  Idol se Allah ke pet mai dard hota hai ?..Allah akela maalik hai to use dar kis baat ka ?..Agar idol kuch kar nahi sakta to Allah ko kis baat ki jeolousy ?….Idol banane se kisiko hurt hota hai ? ..koi mar gaya,ksi ka nuksaan ho gaya ?..bomb phut gaya ? ..hua kya idol banaane se ?
  
  - mohammad osama qureshi June 9, 2012 At 11:50 am
    
    As-Salāmu `Alaykum,
    Mai agniveer se ya kahne chahta hu ki app ke jo under me ganesh hai woh bohot batameze se bat karte hai . App mere pahle ka comments padya mene kabhi kisi se batameza se baat nahi ke ya app ka kisi bhagwan ke bara me kuch ganda nahi kha. App apne raligion ke bare me bata rahe hai aur me apne religion ke bare me. ganesh ji apne is ka matlab khut hi mann liya ki app idol ki pujja karte hai aur ALLAH ki pet me kyu dard ho ga kyu ki woh bada reham karne wala hai aur es ke saht mai apko andhera se roshne ki taraf ane ke dawat date hu
  - ganesh June 9, 2012 At 2:03 pm
    
    ab allah par sawaal karna batameze ho gayi ?..waah ! aur tum kyo sawaal puchte ki idol ko kyu pujte ho ?..Jab tumhe kaaba aur masjid aur kabro ke saamne jhukna idol worship nahi lagta to hame bhi mandir mai jo idol hai wo sirf symbolic ya medium lagta hai GOD ko pujne k liye…..Lekin quran ke Allah ko jealousy kyu hoti hai ?…Agar nahi hoti , to idol ko shirk nahi maante …kisi aur ko shirk maante…samjhe !…….Isliye mai tumhe Ved apnane ka dawat deta hoo !
  - mohammad osama qureshi June 9, 2012 At 2:22 pm
    
    As-Salāmu `Alaykum,
    Agar app ved par chalta hai to sirf 4ved par hi chaliya isea hinduism me jo galat bate sahi ho sakhte hai.Apne ved ke bare me bataye mai padna pasand karu ga.
    ALLAH apko hidayth de……
  - ganesh June 9, 2012 At 2:09 pm
    
    @mohammad osama ., aur haan mai ek baat batana bhul gaya ki Allah isliye jealous feel karta hai kyuki wo khud ek IDOL /IMAGE — refer sahih muslim Book 40, Number 6809:
mohammad osama qureshi June 9, 2012 At 11:38 am

As-Salāmu `Alaykum Hari,
The word “Hindu” is neither a Sanskrit word nor is this word found in any of the native dialects and languages of India. It should be noted that “Hindu” is NOT a religious word at all. There is no reference of the word “hindu” in the Ancient Vedic Scriptures.It is said that the Persians used to refer to the Indus river as Sindhu. Indus is a major river which flows partly in India and partly in Pakistan. However, the Persians could not pronounce the letter “S” correctly in their native tongue and mispronounced it as “H.” Thus, for the ancient Persians, the word “Sindhu” became “Hindu.” The ancient Persian Cuneiform inscriptions and the Zend Avesta refer to the word “Hindu” as a geographic name rather than a religious name. When the Persian King Darious 1 extended his empire up to the borders of the Indian subcontinent in 517 BC, some people of the Indian subcontinent became part of his empire and army. Thus for a very long time the ancient Persians referred to these people as “Hindus”. The ancient Greeks and Armenians followed the same pronunciation, and thus, gradually the name stuck.
The proper word to use for those people who follow the Scriptures of The Vedas is “Sanatana Dharma”, not “Hinduism”

- hari June 10, 2012 At 5:33 pm
  
  Osama,
  We have not denied that hindu is persian . Sanatana dharma is our religion and way of life . Even persia was under control of indian kings , and zoroastranism is based on vedic fire worship. The religion and way of life followed by people of bharat or bharat varsha is sanatana dharma . The name bharat varsha became name of this land after the king Bharat .He was son of King Dushyanta of Hastinapura ( In Uttar Pradesh )and Queen Śakuntalā of lunar dynasty of kshatriya varna . Bharata have conquered all of Greater India, uniting it into a single political entity which was named after him as “Bhāratavarṣa”The people who follow these philosophies can be called sanatanis or dharmist or vedic .The Bharat Empire included the whole territory of the Indian subcontinent, including parts of Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, siberia[3], Turkmenistan, North-west Tibet, Nepal and Bangladesh. The word india was coined by foreigners . The geographical nature of Bharat that we see today was different from that what was before . Pakistan afganisthan and bangladesh became different countries . This was due frequent invasions from foreign lands , and even by indo iranian tribes during battle of ten kings .
  
Muslim June 9, 2012 At 12:53 pm

Allah has everything and created human with highest rank among other creature. and He wants that human should obey him and also worship him. Allah can forgive everything but can not forgive shirk i.e worshiping any other thing except HIM. It is same as your wife considers another strange person as husband. or you say to you father that you are not my father which no one can tolerate.

- mohammad osama qureshi June 9, 2012 At 2:36 pm
  
  As-Salāmu `Alaykum,
  muslims kya app mere saat hai yeh hindus aur agniveer ko inshallah hum islam kabul karwae ge.
  
  - Truth Seeker June 9, 2012 At 4:24 pm
    
    @mohammad osama qureshi
    Me tumhare sath hu par mai rapist and pedophilia mohammed ko uske kiye huye gunaho ke liye jee bhar ke pitna chahta hu & uske baad me Allah ko dekhunga jo ki satan ki maa hai.
  - Zain June 18, 2012 At 5:27 pm
    
    mr.truth seeker u r abusing a lot, i request u to know what is right and what is wrong. if that we muslims are wrong then we will be punished by some supernatural power which we call Allah and some Call RAM and etc .., etc…,
  - raj.hyd June 9, 2012 At 7:20 pm
    
    manniy sri osama ji ,ham islam me ane ke ichhuk hai lekin usko samajhne ke bad ,1, batalaiye yah sansar banane ke pahale kurani allah kya karte the ?2 param adarniy sri iblees ji ko kisne banaya ?3,ibllees ji ki allah se nafarmani ki bat kurani allah kyo nahi jan sake ?3 kurani allah ne farishto ko adam ke samne sijda karne ko kaha tha iblis ko nahi , fir allah ka adesh uspr kaise lagu hua ? vah to” jinno” me se tha, vah aag se paida hua tha, fir farishte kisse paida huye the ?4 jab kurani allah sabse bade shaitan ko nafarmani karne bavjud usko ajivan jinda rahane ki “raham ” de sakta hai, tab chote mote manushyo ke murti puja jaise bato par “raham ” kyo nahi kar sakta jab ki namaj bhi kaba ki disha me karne ko kahate hai, uske pahale baitul mukaddas ki disha me namaj hoti thi, yah niti usne kyo badli? kya kaba ki disha me naja padhna jadta ki nishani nahi hai? jab ki kurani allah satve asman par rahate hai fir to let karke namaj padhni chahiye thi 5jab kurani allah “kun”[ho ja ] kahane se sansar ban jata hai tab vah ibllis ki nafarmani kyo nahi rok paye ?6 kurani alalh ka sabse bada dushman” murti puja ” kyo hai? , jabki farishto ko kurani allah ek adam ko ‘sijda’ karne ka adesh dete hai !7. dekhe kuran38/75 jisme kurani allah apne “dono hatho ” se adam ko banane ka dava karte hai ! kya kurani allah ke dono hath hai ?hath ka nirman to kisi mata ji ke” garbhashay ” me hota hai ? fir kureani allah ji ki mata ji kaunn thi? unka kya nam tha ?8. ajkal farishte v hure, gimme [launde ] kya karte hai? kis kary me lage huye hai ?9 kuran ki ayte “betrteeb” kyo hai ?10, kuran ki ayte dene ke liye kurani allah ne fareshte ki sahayta kyo li ? kya kurani allah apne muhammad ji ko sidhe[ dairect] dene me kamjor the? ky hamare apke v aany sabke dimag me naye vichar [idia] nahi ate hai ? abhi itni bato ka javbab dijiye bad me aur bhi prashn kar lenge !
  - proud hindu June 29, 2012 At 12:36 pm
    
    Mohammad Osama Qureshi,
    
    एक आदमी ने ईश्वर से पूछा, आपके प्रेम और मानवीय प्रेम में क्या अन्तर है। ईश्वर ने कहा, आसमान में उड़ता पंछी मेरा प्रेम है और पिंजरे में कैद पंछी मानवीय प्रेम है।
    
    और मुस्लिम धर्म को मानने वाले भी,मुस्लिम धर्म रूपी उसी पिंजरे मैं कैद पंछी के जैसे है,जिसने अगर उड़ने की कोशिश की तो उसके पर काट दिए जाते है अर्थात धरम के नाम पर उसकी बलि ले ली जाती है,और क्रूरता का नंगा नाच देखने को मिलता है.Times पत्रिका के कवर पर ऐसी कई तस्वीरें गाहे बगाहे देखने को मिलती रहती हैं.
    
    विद्वानों की कदर विद्वान ही करते हैं। मूर्खों में विद्वानों की वैसी ही दशा होती है जैसे अंधों में किसी सुंदरी की और नास्तिकों में सदग्रंथ की। एक अन्धे पुरूष की पत्नी की व्यथा इस बात से प्रकट होती है – सखी री ! काहे को करूं मैं सिंगार, पिया मोरे आंधरे। इसी प्रकार सदग्रंथ की कदर नास्तिक और मूर्ख नहीं कर सकते, न उससे लाभ उठा सकते हैं।
    तुम भी उन्ही मूर्खों मैं से एक हो और तुम्हारे सभी खोखले विचार व धमकियां केवल हमें हंसाने का कार्य बहुत अच्छी तरह कर रही है.इसके पश्चात भी यदि तुम्हे विश्वास है कि तुम हम मैं से किसी को १% भी तुम्हारी और मिला सकोगे तो तुमसे बड़ा मूर्ख इस त्रिलोक मैं कोई नहीं है.
    पीतल को सोना कह कर बेच देने से वह सोना नहीं हो जाती,यह याद रखो.
    बाकी ईश्वर तुम्हे सद्बुधि प्रदान करें.
Truth Seeker June 9, 2012 At 1:34 pm

@Muslim
___________Allah can forgive everything but can not forgive shirk i.e worshiping any other thing except HIM. It is same as your wife considers another strange person as husband___________
If my wife consider another person as husband that means another person exist that is why I am jealous with him. So is case with Allah not sure about its oneness.

hari June 10, 2012 At 5:54 pm

This is for muslims to know .
It is thus said by al-Bukhari that the ur prophet himself said:
“This world shall not pass away until the buttocks of the women of Daws
wiggle [again] around the dhu-al-Khalasah and they worship it
as they were want to do [before Islam]”. so u guys do this !.

hari June 10, 2012 At 6:02 pm

word allah it self is preislamic and it is just a title used by arabs to denote a god . A MAN MARRYING HIS DAUGHTER IN LAW HAS NO PLACE IN VEDAS WHOM MUSLIMS WANT TO PROVE AND TO WHITE WASH THAT THEIR PROPHET IS IN VEDIC SCRIPTURES .

hari June 10, 2012 At 6:38 pm

To mlecchas,
Several people have translated these Kuntap Suktas like M. Bloomfield, Prof. Ralph Griffith . The translators mentioned by IRF, two are western indologists who had their own Christian agenda. They can no way be considered relevant for understanding of Vedas. Atharvaveda and other vedas were composed years before the start of many civilizations . It was currupted by western missionaries , which IRF is trying to copy now . The problem with muslims is ego and lack of understanding of hindu scriptures which is tough and they are trying defend and accuse others by any means .

hari June 10, 2012 At 6:56 pm

A vedic or dharmic is prohibited from riding a camel or an ass and to bathe naked. He should purify himself by suppressing his breath”. It is forbidden . kaurama is actually praise on King Parikshit. mamahe is verb and not a noun .

hari June 10, 2012 At 7:00 pm

To mlecchas,
The Arabic term b-ismi-llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm which is uttered before every verse of Quran is literal translation of “Dayanand ki Jai”. Does Quran sings glory of Dayanand?If u shud adopt true vedas . Now Dayanand has been the strongest critic of Quran ever. So muslims shud approve vedas . We can also mistranslate , and we can hurt u .

hari June 10, 2012 At 7:11 pm

U people have several options as ur book is based on jewish , arab pagan and aspects of christian teachings , and now claiming to be of vedic approval , u guys can become a true arab pagan , a complete jew , a follower of jesus or sanatanis . If jewish and arab paganism aspect is removed its left with nothing but a political movement . Many people in middle east have started to turning to christianity as report says .

hari June 10, 2012 At 7:17 pm

jesus actually tried to spread buddhist aspects to jews for what he was killed . he didnot created any new religion but it was paul and constantine who made militant christianity .

syed anas subzwari June 13, 2012 At 3:49 pm

hello, viewers, i m fully convinced with mr. m.a.khan and dishad’s views. It is true that lots of wolfs are hidden in form of sheeps amongs us and others. Who cannot bear this fact that “entire ummah should come under one umberala” i.e. one Allah one Quran and one Mohammad. Any person who try to bring the ummah on the subject “UNDERSTAND QURAN” they will be against that person in one way or other. Infact, He has changed my life and i think, lots of other people s life also, entirely, when we started learning and undertanding Quran. What is “HAQ” and “STRAIGHT PATH”? you will be able to understand only when you understand Qur’an and Sunnah. I pray for
Dr. Zakir and his team and request him, please carry on your mission and entire ummah is with u except some wolfs in form of sheeps.
syed anas subzwari, meerut