- Sita’s Agnipariksha in Ramayan
- Polygamy in Hinduism
- FAQ on Hinduism – IITian thrashes Zakir Naik
- ‘Concept of God in Hinduism’
- Introduction to Hinduism (edited with comments)
- Prophet in Hindu Scriptures – Vedas (Part 3)
- Prophet in Hindu Scriptures – Bhavishya Puran (Part 2)
- Prophet in Hindu Scriptures – An analysis (Part 1)
There is a proverb in Sanskrit which states that if one mixes even a little poison in the food, the entire plate has to be rejected.
We shall understand the implications of this proverb through a case study. We shall take one of the articles of Dr Zakir Naik, the self-proclaimed scholar of comparative religion for this. We have already seen in previous series how Dr Naik has ably proved that Prophet Muhammad was predicted in Hindu scriptures, even if meant accepting that the Prophet was a ghost, demon, mass-murderer. You can review the analysis of Dr Naik’s research at http://agniveer.com/featured/prophet-hindu/ as a three part series.
Today, we shall take the excellent research article: “Introduction to Hinduism” by Dr Zakir Naik. You can review the original article at http://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128
What we shall do here is to edit the article by strikethrough of certain portions and providing replacement in red color and comments in italics. By the end of the article, you would realize how a little poison makes the entire food deadly. You shall also realize this further when we analyze his next article on Hinduism in future.
A REQUEST: KINDLY PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK SO THAT WE ARE MOTIVATED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AND IMPROVING UPON OUR WORK. ALSO SHARE THE CONTENT AND SITE WITH FRIENDS IF YOU FND IT USEFUL. KNOWLEDGE THAT IS NOT SHARED EVENTUALLY GETS DESTROYED.
So here we BEGIN:
INTRODUCTION TO HINDUISM by Dr. Zakir Naik (Comment: We shall review his medical knowledge in a later post on Science in Quran and Vedas)
“The most popular among the Aryan religions is Hinduism.”
Comment:
(1. Very smartly, he has started by sowing doubts that Aryan and Hinduism imply different things. Later he says that Hinduism is based on Vedas.
2. Can Dr Naik or his IRF Team name few other religions which are Aryan but not Hinduism? Can they prove that the word Arya did not originate from Vedas? The strategy was Divide and Rule by sowing seeds of differences among smaller groups)
Dr Naik: “‘ Hindu’ is actually a Persian word that stands for the inhabitants of the region beyond the Indus Valley. However, in common parlance, Hinduism is a blanket term for an assortment of religious beliefs, most of which are (which is) based on the Vedas, the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita. “(as final authority and Upanishads and Geeta as other guiding texts)
Comment:
(Even Upanishads and Mahabharat claim Vedas to be the Supreme authority and clearly state that all other texts including Purans are to be interpreted in lines with Vedas. This is important because, what IRF will do is to twist and try to manipulate the meaning of verses to suit their own agenda of proving Muhammad left, right and center!)
Dr Naik: “II INTRODUCTION TO HINDU SCRIPTURES.
There are several sacred scriptures of the Hindus. Among these are the Vedas, Upanishads and the Puranas.
1. VEDAS:
1. The word Veda is derived from vid which means to know, knowledge par excellence or sacred wisdom. There are four principal divisions of the Vedas”
(although according to their number, they amount to 1131 out of which about a dozen are available)
Comment:
(1. This sentence was deliberately put to prove that complete Vedas are not available and hence Hindus should accept Quran as full and final message of God.
2. But the fact is that there are only 4 Vedas and ALL are available in exactly same format as they were first given.
3. The 1131 number of branches being referred is those of explanations/ variants of original Veda Samhitas. The original still remain intact without change of even a single pronunciation or pitch) .
Dr Naik: “According to Maha Bhashya of Patanjali, there are 21 branches of Rigveda, 9 types of Atharvaveda, 101 branches of Yajurveda and 1000 of Samveda).
2. The Rigveda, the Yajurveda and the Samveda are considered to be more ancient books and are known as Trai Viddya or the ‘Triple Sciences’. The Rigveda is the oldest and has been compiled in three long and different periods of time. The 4th Veda is the Atharvaveda, which is of a later date.”
Comment:
(1. All Vedas are considered to be of same age. They were revealed at inception of human civilization. There is no proof whatsoever to conclude that Vedas were written over a long period of time and some Vedas are older, some of later date.
2. Dr Naik has brought forth the baseless conjecture of western indologists and communists to suit his own agenda.
3. Fact remains that there is not one single evidence to support his hypothesis except that it suits the agenda of invaders to prove that even Aryans were invaders and Vedas are not revealed.
4. Dr Naik has been openly challenged officially to come for a debate on this, but he prefers to remain in hiding.)
Dr Naik: “3. There is no unanimous opinion regarding the date of compilation or revelation of the four Vedas. According to Swami Dayanand, founder of the Arya Samaj, the Vedas were revealed 1310 million years ago”(1.97 billion years ago)
Comment:
(1. This is not Dayanand’s calculation but as given in Manu Smriti and Surya Siddhanta and accepted by most traditional scholars irrespective of their philosophical beliefs.
2. Modern science cannot refute this estimate and admits that this is near to their estimates of evolution of life on earth.
3. Swami Dayanand was specifically mentioned to emphasize that he gave such ridiculously large number as age of Vedas. This is because Arya Samaj and Swami Dayanand have been the strongest critics of Islam for last 125 years, starting Shuddhi or reconversion movement to come back to Vedic Dharma and a prime force to combat Islamic Jehad. Even today, Dr Naik and his IRF is scared of facing Arya Samaj directly, despite several official challenges for debate.)
Dr Naik: “According to other scholars, they are not more than 4000 years old.”
Comment:
(1. These other scholars are none other than Christian indologists and their followers who have not one single proof to support their claim except that they believe Biblical genesis to happen few thousand years ago!
2. Again this is emphasized to prove Hindus that Vedas may not be as important as they believe, and that Quran is most perfect voice of God.
3. The fact is that Vedas are the only texts in world to have oral traditions running till date and a mechanism to ensure that not even a single syllable or pronunciation can be altered through 10 different Paath Vidhis. (Refer this article)
4. On contrary, Quran was written 20 years after death of Muhammad by those who were fighting against each other and killing each other to prove Islam to be a religion of Peace.
5. A large number of sects of Islam refuse to accept Quran to be perfect or even Muhammad to be final Prophet. Many have thus also developed new Qurans and new Prophets. Click this sentence to refer to this list for 73 divisions of Islam since its inception. Further Islamic hadiths say that only one of them is true and rest will go to Hell! I am not sure where Dr Naik will go!)
Dr Naik: “4. Similarly, there are differing opinions regarding the places where these books were compiled and the Rishis to whom these Scriptures were given. Inspite of these differences, the Vedas are considered to be the most authentic of the Hindu Scriptures and the real foundations of the Hindu Dharma.”
Comment:
(1. The first part of the sentence was put to emphasize that Hindu Dharma is on a very shaky foundation, and thus justifying his appeal to come to Islam. But truth is that these differing opinions come from foreign intellectuals and communists alone who have their own agendas.
2. And most importantly, they can cite not one single evidence in support of this claim except names of certain places in Vedas. And this amounts to saying that Mahabharat has been written in last 10 years because it contains words like Lal, Krishna, Atal, Vihari, Rahul, Arjun, Manmohan, Rajiv, Laal, Prasad and even Naik!)
Dr Naik: “2. UPANISHADS:
1. The word ‘Upanishad’ is derived from Upa meaning near, Ni which means down and Shad means to sit. Therefore ‘Upanishad’ means sitting down near. Groups of pupils sit near the teacher to learn from him the secret doctrines.
According to Samkara, ‘Upanishad’ is derived from the root word Sad which means ‘to loosen’, ‘to reach’ or ‘to destroy’, with Upa and ni as prefix; therefore ‘Upanishad’ means Brahma-Knowledge by which ignorance is loosened or destroyed.
2. The number of Upanishads exceeds 200 though the Indian tradition puts it at 108. There are 10 principal Upanishads. However, some consider them to be more than 10, while others 18. ”
Comment:
(Again the same ploy to seed doubts over authenticity of our beliefs. Fact is that there are 10 Upanishads considered important, but even these are accepted to be authentic so far they agree with Vedas. This is because only Vedas have a mechanism that ensures they cannot be altered, and all knowledge started from Vedas.)
Dr Naik: “3. The Vedanta meant originally the Upanishads, though the word is now used for the system of philosophy based on the Upanishad. Literally, Vedanta means the end of the Veda, Vedasua-antah, and the conclusion as well as the goal of Vedas. The Upanishads are the concluding portion of the Vedas and chronologically they come at the end of the Vedic period.
4. Some Pundits consider the Upanishads to be more superior to the Vedas. “
Comment:
(These must be Dr Naik’s gang of Pandits. Otherwise, even Upanishads declare that Vedas are final authority. This forms the foundation of Sanatan Dharma which needs to shaken to get more converts to IRF brand of Islam!)
Dr Naik: “3. PURANAS:
Next in order of authenticity are the Puranas which are the most widely read scriptures. It is believed that the Puranas contain the history of the creation of the universe, history of the early Aryan tribes, life stories of the divines and deities of the Hindus. It is also believed that the Puranas are revealed books like the Vedas, which were revealed simultaneously with the Vedas or sometime close to it.”
Comment:
(1. Very smartly he has inserted ‘tribe’ with Aryan to demean it. Truth is that if one reads through Hadiths, he would realize what a tribe actually means!
2. No one considers Puranas to be either revealed like Vedas or as old as Vedas. Puranas themselves repeat innumerable times that Vedas are ultimate authority and revelation of God, and Puranas are to be interpreted only as per Vedas.
3. Further, most scholars agree that Puranas contain significant adulterations and/or misinterpretations. That is why, in matters of moral conduct, Puranas are not considered to be the benchmark for Hindu society. And that is why, despite stories of Radha-Krishna, the norm of Hindu society is to emphasize self-control and Brahmacharya in youth. These stories are either rejected by certain scholars or reinterpreted to mean something mystical. But no one takes stories of Puranas literally – this is an important aspect of Hindu Dharma.
4. The reason why Dr Naik wants to emphasize on Puranas being revealed is obvious – He wants to prove Muhammad in Puranas later. But if you read my article on Prophet in Bhavishya Puran, you would realize that it means Muhammad was a demon, ghost and a great nuisance! This may be 74th sect of Islam that would go to Heaven!)
Dr Naik: “Maharishi Vyasa has divided the Puranas into 18 voluminous parts. He also arranged the Vedas under various heads.
Chief among the Puranas is a book known as Bhavishya Purana. It is called so because it is believed to give an account of future events. The Hindus consider it to be the word of God. Maharishi Vyasa is considered to be just the compiler of the book.”
Comment:
(1. This crazy emphasis on Bhavishya Puran was put to prove Muhammad – as ghost and demon – in Bhavishya Puran later!
2. But neither do Hindus take Bhavishya Puran seriously nor does it predict anything. It is a forged Purana that continued to be written till late 19th century. Apart from Muhammad , it also contains stories of Shivaji, Aurangzeb, Mughals, Queen Victoria, her Parliament etc etc. This is the least authentic book of Hinduism and contains lots of stories with questionable authenticity.
3. Most people have not even heard of this Purana, and none consider this important for any religious activity or reading. Far from a word of God, it is considered fake by most.
4. The only word of God Hindus believe in are the Vedas. And Dr Naik should be thankful for this, because Bhavishya Puran calls Muhammad a demon, a ghost and a nuisance!)
Dr Naik: “4. ITIHAAS:
The two epics of Hinduism are the Ramayana and the Mahabharata.
A. Ramayana:
According to Ramanuja, the great scholar of Ramayana, there are more than 300 different types of Ramayana: Tulsidas Ramayana, Kumbha Ramayana. Though the outline of Ramayana is same, the details and contents differ. ”
Comment:
(1. Ramanuj was a communist who insulted Ramayana characters by bringing insulting descriptions from different folklores, most known only to him. The daughter of Manmohan Singh, our PM, introduced his chapter in Delhi University. That caused a big uproar and the matter went to Supreme Court. It is still being contested but the chapter has been withdrawn by Delhi University because the Dean got thrashed for defending this insult of Ramayan characters.!
2. Suddenly, this Ramanuj, who is unknown to all except communists, becomes ‘great scholar’ for Dr Naik for obvious reasons.
3. All consider only Valmiki Ramayan to be authentic. Further, even in Valmiki Ramayan, all verses are not considered authentic and many seem to have entered later. Thus, scholars conclude that episodes like Sita’s Agni Pariksha and entire Uttar Ramayan that contains stories like Sita’s exile and Shambook’s death are later era figments of imagination having nothing to do with original Ramayan. We shall review this in a separate research.)
Dr Naik: “Valmiki’s Ramayana:
Unlike the Mahabharata, the Ramayana appears to be the work of one person – the sage Valmiki, who probably composed it in the 3rd century BC.
Comment:
(There is no evidence to date Ramayan to 3rd BC except tales of communist historians! Valmiki is mentioned in several works which are dated much before that!)
Its best-known recension (by Tulsi Das, 1532-1623) consists of 24,000 rhymed couplets of 16-syllable lines organised into 7 books. The poem incorporates many ancient legends and draws on the sacred books of the Vedas. It describes the efforts of Kosala’s heir, Rama, to regain his throne and rescue his wife, Sita, from the demon King of Lanka.
Valmiki’s Ramayana is a Hindu epic tradition whose earliest literary version is a Sanskrit poem attributed to the sage Valmiki. Its principal characters are said to present ideal models of personal, familial, and social behavior and hence are considered to exemplify Dharma, the principle of moral order.”
Comment:
(At last! finally so many lines without significant blunders!)
Dr Naik: “B. Mahabharata:
The nucleus of the Mahabharata is the war of eighteen days fought between the Kauravas, the hundred sons of Dhritarashtra and Pandavas, the five sons of Pandu. The epic entails all the circumstances leading upto the war. Involved in this Kurukshetra battle were almost all the kings of India world joining either of the two parties. The result of this war was the total annihilation of Kauravas and their party. Yudhishthira, the head of the Pandavas, became the sovereign monarch of Hastinapura. His victory is supposed to symbolise the victory of good over evil. But with the progress of years, new matters and episodes relating to the various aspects of human life, social, economic, political, moral and religious as also fragments of other heroic legends came to be added to the aforesaid nucleus and this phenomenon continued for centuries until it acquired the present shape. The Mahabharata represents a whole literature rather than one single and unified work, and contains many multifarious things.
C. Bhagavad Gita:
Bhagavad Gita is a part of Mahabharata. It is the advice given by Krishna to Arjun on the battlefield of Kurukshetra. It contains the essence of the Vedas and is the most popular of all the Hindu Scriptures. It contains 18 chapters.
The Bhagavad Gita is one of the most widely read and revered of the works sacred to the Hindus. It is their chief devotional book, and has been for centuries the principal source of religious inspiration for many thousands of Hindus.
The Gita is a dramatic poem, which forms a small part of the larger epic, the Mahabharata. It is included in the sixth book (Bhismaparvan) of the Mahabaharata and documents one tiny event in a huge epic tale.
The Bhagavad Gita tells a story of a moral crisis faced by Arjuna, which is solved through the interaction between Arjuna, a Pandava warrior hesitating before battle, and Krishna, his charioteer and teacher. The Bhagavad Gita relates a brief incident in the main story of a rivalry and eventually a war between two branches of a royal family. In that brief incident – a pause on the battlefield just as the battle is about to begin – Krishna, one chief on one side (also believed to be the Lord incarnate), is presented as responding to the doubts of Arjuna. The poem is the dialogue through which Arjuna’s doubts were resolved by Krishna’s teachings.”
Comment:
(As a smart covert hypnotist, Dr Naik ends up the article without seeding further doubts so that it all appears unbiased and normal. This also gives time to plant the ideas that he has previously introduced subtly:
a. Aryans were tribals
b. Authenticity of Vedas, the primary texts of Hindu Dharma, are questionable
c. Vedas are not as old as they are assumed to be
d. Swami Dayanand and Arya Samaj make ridiculous assumptions about Vedas
e. Bhavishya Puran is most important text of Hindu Dharma
f. Other texts apart from Vedas are also considered equally authentic
g. Ramayan and Ram may not be authentic
Now these subtle suggestions are to serve his future agenda, as also obvious in his research on Prophet in Hindu Scriptures!)
This is nothing but a variant of a technique permitted in some schools of Islam which allows you to use deceit and confusion to defeat the enemy. But I hope everyone shall accept truth and truth alone! Because a little poison is a dangerous thing!
[mybooktable book=”great-rulers-india” display=”summary” buybutton_shadowbox=”true”]
Do you know about this edition of the Gita?
http://www.YogaVidya.com/gita.html
I have downloaded and shall review the same. Dhanyavad for the link.
nice work
Wonderful job Sir!
Actually I learnt more about Hinduism here..
Keep it up! n1
Eternal regards,
Frostmorune
agniveer ji,
you are doing a great work plz keep on doing this. you'll definately get success.
thanks for helping the humanity, and standing with truth. may god gives you more and more knowledge so that you can bring these false and lier in front of humanity.
Hi agniveer how can I download this article ?
Thank you
You can simply copy-paste the content. Dhanyavad.
[…] Dr Naik’s “Concept of God in Hinduism”By Agniveer on December 30, 2009 […]
Very good article. Naik does distort the truth. That is sanctioned by Allah though, its called Taqiyah distorting for the benefit of Islam. Just a couple corrections to suggest:
– you wrote "…the meaning of verses to suite there " the word should be 'suit' not 'suite', and 'their' not 'there'.
Also you changed:
"most of which are" to "(which is)" The which are here is referring to "beliefs" which is plural. In other words "the beliefs are based on … "
Keep up the good work.
Thanks sister for pointing that out.
The second was not a mistake though. If you read the edited sentence, it would state that "Hinduism is….. , which is based on Vedas as final authority and …..". I wanted to emphasize that despite other differences, Vedas remain the foundation of Hinduism.
Good work, Zakir Naik is just a show man. He know very well to trick people just like his Prophet.
If you want to know a lot of facts about Islam and Muhammad visit this website.
http://www.faithfreedom.org
A lot about islam and Muhammad is already in public forum. But we now need material which also compares that with true perspectives of our own culture. Further, what Zakir Naik propagates is his own Zakirism which is different from conventional Islam as well. Being a tacit partner of Osama Bin laden, he is one of the greatest threats of today's world.
wats ur source of saying tat ?
all ur sources are wrong.. u want to debate with Dr. Zakir Naik ? no problem… i already spoke to him… Give me ur number i will contact u for more details… Brother u r misguided the translation u did is wrong..
go to the bext website for vedas i.e. http://www.sacred-text.com
Bhavishya Purana in the Prati Sarag Parv III Khand 3 Adhay 3 Shloka 5 to 8
Bhavishya Purana in the Pratisarag Parv III Khand 3 Adhay 3 Shloka 10 to 27 Maharishi Vyas
Bhavishya Purana, Parv – III Khand 1 Adhay 3 Shloka 21-23
check it out dnt just copy paste from other websites which has edited text/picture of the verse
u can email me ur number we can really have a friendly chat….n dicuss ur debate with Dr.Zakir Naik. 🙂 thanks brother….
you email me your number, we can have a very unfriendly chat :))
how dare you pakistani give me your no.
GREAT REALLY GREAT AGNIVEERJI, WE HINDUS REALLY PROUD OF YOU, KEEP IT UP AND INVITE THAT NONSENSE NAIK TO DEBATE
ON HINDUISM ON A SUITABLE STAGE.
We have invited him countless times. But he is smart enough to choose weaklings as opponents.
You select the best amongst yourselves and ask for a debate. Problem is every blogger wants to have a debate on internet where as your scholars shy from it live with Zakir .Recently UK banned him from entering UK . He cannot entertain everybody as he is human but certainly couple of guys. He had discussions with Sri Ravishankar, lot of things were discussed. So many of you said Ravishankar doesnt know anything. You decide first who is fit to go and make things final rather do propaganda on internet.
@MZS
Who is “you” and what is “yours”? Problem is that most of the muslims analyze our articles as “written by a hindu”, but we have altogether different perspective. We talk about Vedas and Quran rather than Hindu and Muslim. Zakir knows about Vedic expertise of Arya Samaj scholars and he knows that he will be crushed within minutes. This is why he is running away from debate giving excuses of “less crowd following the Arya Samaj”!
Zakir has been banned in UK and muslims are crying! Why dont muslims allow people from other religions preach their ideology in Islamic states? This is nothing but cowardliness of muslims to ask freedom of speech in every country but ban everyone else who does not follow Islam. Muslims should not cry on this issue as they do same with others!
Did Ravishankar ever debate Zakir? Was it a debate or a discussion? Anyway, you would like to see the debate between Arya scholar Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya and Islamic preacher of Peace TV Abdullah Tariq, in which Abdullah Tariq was defeated badly. See this debate on
http://www.youtube.com/user/truthwisdom2008
No Muslim should weep neither anybody weeping , people are only exposing the hypocrisy of UK govt. They have the right to allow people of their choice but a propaganda is quickly exposed. Their lies covered with so called western ethos is the problem Truth never requires anybody’s help.
@MZS
Are not muslims hypocrite for not allowing others preach their religion but demand for freedom of speech while preaching Islam? If truth never requires anybody’s help, why do muslims help truth (Islam), by not allowing other religions preach alongside Islam?
Time will come may be everybody will be allowed everywhere. However what I m pointing is the hypocrisy of a govt its not that other govts are truthful
Regarding Islamic countries they never say that they have free speech in their country and truthful in that sense rather than being a hitech hypocrite.
okay then, that is settled, the west is hypocrite and the arab world is exclusionist, intolerant, and rigid.
oh, and of course, truthful coz they admit being so
India has more population of Muslims compared to other Muslim countries and everyday they see that Vedas have no place in terms of practicality in present India leave alone rest of the world
and in what ways is the quran being practical, that the extremists treat the hateful verses of quran as the guiding spirit in their endeavor to extirpate the nonmuslims.
@SDC
What I mean is that It doesn’t give penal code,formulate one in veda then we shall talk on this.
MZS
muslim parrot, I want to have a debate with zakir nalayak. My question is very simple, the constitution allows me to practise any form of worship, who is this idiot zakir naik to say that idol worshipping is wrong when it is practised by 80% of population. He got more brains than 90 crore hindus?
If I say islam is false and namaz, (raising ass to allah) is wrong, how will he take it in a public debate?
your joker only picks gullible opponents those who dont have enough knowledge about Islam ask him to debate with arya samaj or ali sina his time will end..this same joker says that it is legal to kill the apostats and all religion expect Islam should be banned becos they teach 2+2=5 LOL wat a logic only expected from a muslim scholar
ZAKIR NAIK IS A FRAUD N HE S EXPOSED NT TO INDIAN BT ALSO TO THE PPL OUTWARD HE WAS CHALLENGED SEPERATELY FOR DISCUSSION BT HE DENIED IT PROVES THAT HE S A COWARD N HE S A LIAR N DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT OUR DHARMA N ON THE WEBSITE HE S CONTINUOUSLY PROMOTING LIE.HE BELIEVES IN GOEBELS THEORY IT STATES THAT IF U TELL A LIE REPEATEDLY MANY TIMES IT LL APPEAR AS TRUE. BT HE FORGOT THAT THE VEDAS R ABSOLUTE TRUTH N EVEN 600 YEARS OF ISLAMIC RULE COULDNT GT SUCCESS TO MAKE INDIA DARULISLAM THEN HE WONT BE ABLE TO CONVERT A SINGLE HINDU.IF HE GVS ONE LECTURE WE LL CONDUCT TEN LECTURES TO PROVE HIM A LIAR A REAL LIFE LIAR.
VEDA THE ULTIMATE PATH OF SPIRITUALITY
really ? please u can mail me on [email protected] I will fix an appointment for u … ok ?
namaste agniveerji
plz tell me which book should i reffer while living as hindu…if vedas then why not bhagvatgita?
We need everyone of us together to fight the menace of barbarism and misrepresentation. Its time for us all to unite once again and rewrite the future!
With no malice towards anyone, I believe that self-proclaimed gurus are the greatest distraction for our Vedic vision. For them religion is either a business or ply for petty glory (that would end with end of life!). They overrule the criteria and conditions laid down for a sage or a guru and simply fool people. Having such people as leaders of the society will only spell doom. Our present status is evidence of the same.
I do not expect any guru to come and help us. Let us get back to basics, and discover the vedic role model within our own self. Such role models alone can respond to such frauds.
@Agniveer
Well done sir.
Dhanyavad. This is simply adaptation of the fabulous work done by our sages since dawn of civilization to current context.
Namaste
I agree. I am more than willing to promote the truth regarding our esteemed culture and misconceptions being floated to demean it. An Arya Rashtra in lines of vision of Sri Ram and Sri Krishna is my vision. With whatever resources I had, I started this on internet. I would be happy if interested people can join the mission by helping coordinate with like-minded noble people so that this can be taken further. It would require coordination, planning and management and require us to work coherently. Please note that the research that goes beneath each article takes up a lot of time and energy, because unlike Dr Zakir Naik, I cannot base my articles on falsehood or unreliable sources. Each letter of the article is well-researched and backed with evidence. This becomes a dedicated effort and until I complete the entire spectrum of issues identified in first phase, I do not want to distract into other aspects. But I keep publishing on internet so that others can freely use the content for further propagation. Thus you are most welcome to use it for the mission. And do let me know what I can do further to help the cause.
Dhanyavad
Indeed! I would request that these articles be propagated far and wide, to best each of us can do. I have included social bookmarking features on site to help share it on facebook, digg, myspace etc and email to relevant people. At least let these rebuttals be as popular on net as original frauds of Zakir Naik. And then some of us can take it at ground level also.
But yes! We will respond to all nonsense that threatens us. And with we all together, we shall do it more powerfully than ever before!
zakir naik is misguiding the whole hindu religion in terms of his own imagination
without refering to any scriptures .so this type of persons are so dangererous to
india . how christians are doing by wrong explanations to bhagvadgita
Zakir Naik is simply plagiarizing from books of other sects of Islam to claim false popularity. In process, he has become one of the greatest threats for humanity.
i can understand your condition 🙂 and your fear of threat on humanity 😛 .
I was in confusion after the talks of Dr Zakir Naik which I used to see on the internet.
I consider myself as a rationalist but was demoralised when I watched the conference between Dr Naik and Sri Sri Ravi Shanker where Dr Naik had an upper hand.
Thank you for bringing out the truth;satya-meva- jayate,
Sadar pranam.
Deepak
Zakir Naik is smart enough to choose opponents and formats of programs where he can have upper hand. That is why he keeps ignoring invitations from us for a debate.
Nice & correct reply.Perfect comments.
If you find them useful, kindly circulate the article. You can subscribe to RSS feed, email and tweet the article using the option next to title. You can also use the Add Options at end of article to share on social networking sites. To bring the truth forth, we need to promote the truth as much as we can. Dhanyavad
Respected Sir ,
Its great to read your articles and you are awesum, I would like to request to join a group named TRUE HINDUISM in my fb account and my id is [email protected] …. I’ll surely spreading this msg through all means i can and its our turn to propagate true dharma …
namaskar and congratulations to Agniveer
only recently while talking to one of my Muslim patient who asked me whether i had listened to Zakir Naik. I said he is mad fellow who looks through only one angle and twists the things suitable for his religion. I also said he has not received yet a person who will tackle him well and Lo God listened to me ! He should preach to Muslims Quran and Hadis ok but when the sages and saints of Hindu religion can still dip into Vedas to find new things how Zakir minno will know about Vedas ! — Dr. Satish
Zakir Naik knows nothing of Vedas except that he has mugged up certain verse numbers. His knowledge of Hadiths and Quran also is dismal. He is merely a stage performer. Most of the evidences he provides from Quran and Hadiths are also misinterpreted. He has been challenged so many times to accept a debate invitation as per his convenience, but he refuses for obvious reasons.
I pity the Muslims to have such fraud leaders to disgrace them.
respected agniveerji,
if zakir naik is a coward to talk to you people, I have an idea to tackle him. why don’t you and a group of scholars go to one of his speech and ask him a few questions and challenge him in front of 1000’s of people. in that kind of situation,he will not be in a position to deny it. after that you can expose him . I am waiting for that moment. please fulfill my wish.
thanks
U can visit IRF library he has all the holy books…. he has studied everything… also really ? u people talking so much non sense writing anything… ISLAM was the religion who gave rights to women… please understand the real Quran not the edited one available on net .. READ QURAN for the real meaning. there are many other Questions of urs i can answer…. just mail me back i will reply to all of ur questions… n please tel agniveer to give me his contact number n i wil lfix a meeting of his n Dr. Zakir Naik. Zakir Naik is ready for the debate…. Thanks Bye…
if Islam treated women equally, why don’t men wear burqa or hijab? why the wife is not allowed to hit her husband?and why can’t a women marry 3-4 men. Islam is the most hypocritical religion I have ever seen. you say one and follow the opposite.
[…] Part 1 : http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/ […]
Thanks for propagating the truth. Actually, most Muslims including Zakir Naik who claim such things know that they are indulging in fraud. But they do so because they have a hidden agenda. They have a concept of Taqiah inspired by Quran where one is allowed to indulge in falsehood to destroy the enemy. Their duplicity is exposed when the same scholars would refuse to accept Vedas as divine revelations or actually dwell into mantras in detail. This is merely a ploy to fool Hindus. Zakir Naik has done nothing but has prepared lists of verses from various books and memorize them. He then simply recites these numbers having no iota of understanding about what he is speaking about.
If someone is willing to devote 2-3 hours daily, I can make him even bigger memory demonstrator than Zakir Naik in just few months.
BEAUTIFUL. Beyond explaination.
This demon has done enough of damage to our scriptures. Character of demon is to confuse the religion, this is what this Dr. Idi0t Naik is good at.
We need to hold strong to our culture otherwise the people are already there to malign it.
If these idi0ts can have the "Islamic Research Foundation" what the hell is stopping us from having our own "Vedic Research Foundation" and study of compatriate religions (specifically the demonic cult Islam).
If these Idi0ts can have "Peace tv"(actually the intellectual terrorism and confusion of other religions by demons), what is stopping us from having "Veda Tv".
We have the best knowledge. Why are we suffering due to shouting of demons? What is stopping us?
Why are we not brave enough? Is the strength and knowledge of Almighty enough to shake away all the fears and confusions?
Tell us how can we unite? Tell us how can we do small contributions to make it a big effort. Tell us how to unite and make this thing big. There is not the time to sleep anymore OH Aryans, its the time to wake up. The demons have already raged the war on you.
I agree. We need to unite ignoring petty differences and any internal discrimination. Zakir has access to petro-dollars and terrorist-funds. If we can get a few crores (expense of just one Janamashtmi function in New Delhi), we can really turn the tables. After all truth is with us. Hindus need to realize that collecting funds for such activities is the only way to truly worship their Ishwar.
Actually we need an anti-islamic research foundation.
They have peace TV, we must have War TV. :))
we cannot directly attack other religion on the air. we need to start some channel which preaches the Hindu scriptures with scientific backing. automatically all Muslims will understand Santana dharma. if they criticize once we should do it ten times. by this way we can indirectly attack them
Zakir Naik claims that "Quran does not contain even a single error , while other scriptures contains error"…
Almost all muslims claim that there is no error in Quran…
For all those who claim that there is no error in Quran… Please go through this link:
http://www.1000mistakes.com/1000mistakes/index.ph…
In the above link with valid proof it has been proved that Quran is full of Error…
The website owner states that :
"Please inform all and everybody and all relevant fora – f. ex. Internet pages for debate or information – about the address http://www.1000mistakes.com. It is information that is urgently needed by many, not least by Muslims. No god made a book with so many mistakes and other wrongs – and if the Quran and Islam are made up by humans or dark forces, where are the followers of this inhumanly dark and brutal war religion heading for in a possible next life?"
So please inform about this website to all those(Like Zakir ji) who claim that Quran is without a single error!!
It's all much like how Muslims also say the Quran has been "misinterpreted". My response to this is if the Quran has been misinterpreted, then all Islamic nations and people have done so! So the fault lies with it's creator.
And their goal is only some mythical swarglok, not moksh! And they hardly create Swarg here, and even Raawan was a man of intellectual understanding (Veds), nowhere as bad as Mohammud and his illiterates!
Dr. Naik should read Satyarth Prakash, and Hindus need to stop living in the shadow of Gandhi and his silly ahimsa-dharm! That's what caused Bharat Mata to be overrun by these asurs in the first place!
http://WWW.SATYAVIDYA.COM
@BDUTT
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik-hinduism/
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik-faq-hinduism/
@SanghPariwar
http://tinyurl.com/yl83cnv
http://tinyurl.com/yklah9l
http://tinyurl.com/ylnxpaj
plz retweet nd ask ur followers to retweet it
read how zakir naik make fool of people
plz retweet it
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
many more article on dis web abt lies of naik
RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
plz retweet it
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
many more article on dis we …
RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
plz retweet it
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
many more article on dis we …
RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
plz retweet it
http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
many more article on dis we …
Atul Mukherji.
I am going through your continuous efforts and also going through the Vedas from Aryasamajjamnagar link.
Sanskrit was one of my subjects in high school but that was a long time back in 1981.Can you suggest a link which helps me to improve my Sanskrit?
At the end I shall only add, great work Sir.
I reset all the settings. Kindly let me know if it is working now. Dhanyavad.
It seems to work fine on my browser. I have now reduced the number of comments per page and reset again. Kindly clean your browser cache and cookies, restart and check again. Also kindly send me your contact details on my email.
Dhanyavad
Namaste agniveerji,
Truely commendable analysis and explanations, to start with I have 5 close friends and all of them are muslims, we are friends like for last 20 years and recently one our friend was forcing me to join Islam and his arguements were exactly same as you have pointed out by Mr Zakir Naik, Thank you for opening the eyes at the right time I am truely greatful to you.
Also I would like to learn sanskrit and learn vedas by myself do you know where i can learn these?
Dhanyavad
Agniveerji,
you are doing a great job. Now i know why Zakir Naik and his IRF team is a fraid of Arya Samaj. Satyameva Jayate.
we need more people like you agniveerji….
please keep doing the great work.
I strongly support whatever it takes to prevent this guy from spreading the nonsense. He is openely encouraging inlarge public functions that one should destroy idol worship and kill all those who does not believe in Mohammed which is equal to terrorism in the name of comparative religion. I am really surprised that the Indian government has not done anything about this. He openely insulted Sri Sri Sri Ravishankar and hinduism in front of scores of people. Ravishankarji just surrendered to him which sends wrong signals to people. I suspect if Ravishankar actually knows this vedic knowledge or he is one among so many Khavi clad Swamy. I think we should take this issue publicly and to governmental level and stop this guy spreading the demon religion and converting tht Vedas itself into Quron.
hi agniveer, i m speechless u r doing a wonderful job .how can i join u.
where can i get information on the life of raawan
just read biography of mohammed, worse than ravan. :))
what compensation can demand shambook from rama ,,,,,, for his murder (shambook's) by rama in this kalyug
Which ‘large’ sect in Islam which reject the authenticity of Quran were you referring to? Can you name the sect?
Isn’t that a sham that he considers it as victory over Ravi Shankar?
I have simplest question for any Muslim or stupid Zakir Naik: What is the proof that Allah reveled Koran to Mohammad? Please I asked many times many Muslims? Their reply is: trust me.
Koran says Koran is the proof fro Allah. now ask this what is the meaning of Allah? What is Allah?
Look at the worst things:
Now that Islam and Koran are exposed so miserably, Muslims have come out with arguments like there are many interpretations for Koran.
But Koran says religion is easy and Koran is easy to understand. Hell with this understanding? Muslims themselves are not sure.
Dr. Ali Sina himself offered to debate with this pig. He refused. His cronie says manuy bloggers have challenged him too. It is so interesting that even a blogger could call bluff of Zakir Naik; But if I am correct bloggers are fully equipped with weapons that Zakir Naik can not even answer.
He gives false covering for verses 9:5 and 9:29 and 8:39.
Hey guys, if you ever want to debate with a Muslim, quote this verse of 33:50.
What we have here is reverse submission way: Allah submitting to the carnal desires of Mohammad.
When Allah wants humans submit to his command shouldn’t his message be clear? He was so busy satisfying the carnal desires of Mohammad that he forgot to tell Mohammad to preserve the book and write his biography because Allah mandated that Mohammad is example for Muslims to follow.
dear agniveer
would like to thank you for your sincere efforts . i have made some observations during the last months. zakir naik holds conferences and they are all well planned with predujiced imbeciles who clap at his stupid comments on hinduism and other religions . they are openly saying bad things about our religion .this is now so embarrasing and i wish that you and other good people also arrange similar programs ,well arranged not like how you are doing so now , the debate of pandit suderlal aryaji with the mentor of zakir naik should be like how he has so cunningly planned in a big auditorium with good sound effects.
the fantastic lectures of panditji are in a room with not good audio . the muslims are doing the propoganda so systematically ,so should we .
thanks ninad
@ninad
Why don’t you contact Agniveer at – [email protected] or [email protected]
Logic of Zakir Naik
Example 1)
2+2 = 4, So Islam is true.
This logic is like this:
One day Zakir Naik was teaching about his religion to a few students.
Zakir Naik: ” If the train is running at a speed of 70 km/hour , then what is my age” ?
Student: ” Sir, your age is 44 years.”
Zakir Naik : (proudly gave a back pat to the student and said) : ” Very good. How did you arrive at my correct age ” ?
Student: ” Sir, I have a brother at home who is half mad and he is 22 years old. “
Logic of Zakir Naik
Example 2)
I had read a joke when nearly 10 years back.
It was like this: Two friends are lost in a jungle. The tribals who were cannibals found them. Both of them were tied and taken to the place of sacrifice which was before a big black stone. The tribals started their dance and other rituals. Then the two friends were given coconut water and bathed. Then they were given a choice: Either select death or oogah. They knew what death meant. So to select the safer of the two choices – the first friend opted for oogah.
Immediately 500 tribals stood in queue and removed the clothes of the first friend. Then he was made to stand with his front side resting on a wall and one by one, the 500 took their turns to perform ‘oogah’ by coming to him from the back with their ‘ uncircumcised weapons ‘.
The poor fellow just could not take up all of this. He died.
Then the second friend was given the same choice. He had seen the happenings to his friend and out of fear of the ‘oogah’ performance opted for death.
The tribals respected his choice and said to him – you will get death (your wish is granted) — BUT FIRST OOGAH.
There was no other go for the second friend too. He had to suffer OOGAH.
To sum up – death or no death – OOGAH IS A MUST.
This is the logic of Zakir Naik and all the Islamists.
They will want to debate – at their own terms and according to their own interpretations. Whether you debate with them or not – you are considered defeated. Standing on the debating podium is just a formality. You will be booed and shooed out of your arguments, while their planted people will be hand clapping at all their illogical quotes.
OOGAH :))
3) Circular logic:
Islam is good because the Quran says so.
The Quran is the word of God because Mohammed says so.
Mohammed is great because Islam says so.
4) Logic of Zakir Naik:
An apostate (of Islam) has to be killed – ( he compares with an army desrter) just like a person leaving the army is killed – meaning he is a traitor.
Religion = self improvement
Army = defends borders.
The example Zakir Naik has used is wrong. The army deserters are not killed. They are subject to the laws of the country.
Rather, he should have given the example of a criminal wanting to leave the underworld mafia. The underworld mafia does not allow to leave them as they fear that their secrets will be spilled. They just kill the person who wants to leave crime.
Mohammed prophesied in the Buddhist scriptures – Fool Zakir Naik does not understand the meaning of a monk.
– HE WILL KEEP UP THE SOCIETY OF MONKS NUMBERING MANY THOUSANDS, EVEN AS NOW I KEEP UP A SOCIETY OF MONKS NUMBERING MANY HUNDREDS.”
You are debunked there. Your whole construction is fallacious. Mohammed was not a monk. He was a householder.
A monk is one who is – a celibate, who does not own anything, and one who has renounced the world, one who leads an ascetic life.
A monk does not have sexual life.
Mohammed had 13 wives and countless concubines and sex slaves. And upto his death he had a good sexual appetite and also could satisfy it very much.
Secondly, a BUDDHA does not engage in war. A Buddha does not take any spoils of war. Mohammed engaged in war mercilessly and also took his share of the spoils of war.
A Buddha does not partake of the looted money (sinful)
A Buddha does not loot. Mohammed looted many caravans.
Stop fooling people please.
Go back to the one who has fed you this nonsense and again get something else from him to compare with.
brother, can i ask u one thing? is ur info tht mohammed had sex slaves, looted caravans and was a useless man based on solid evidence or just pure prejudice?
@sona
can i ask you one thing? do you believe that koran and hadiths hold water?
yes…but hav u actually read thm? not those on muslim hating forums but true translations written by scholars? yes brother i do believe in the quran , becoz its the word of god and partially in hadiths becoz those r work of men( scholars) nontheless….yes hadiths may b conflicting but not the quran…
@sona
I have read koran authentic translation, abdullah yusuf ali, and I felt like puking. So, I did the next best thing, flushed it down the toilet after burning it.
Well, mohammed did participate in raiding caravans, and he himself killed about 34 people in his lifetime,and personally destroyed idols in mecca with his own stick. I can give yu exact figueres from authentic muslim sources, but It will take time and a little research.
@ Sona –
I am completing, the remaining weak answer of Manikant.
One who commands looting of a caravan, who marries a child, who approves of killing in the name of God, etc are called negative personalities. Unfortunately we cannot use such words as devil, pedophile, sex maniac, etc.
Why does Islam kill in the name of God?
If you want to get more enlightened about Islam just read the testimonials of those who left Islam from wikiisilam or from the apostatesofislam website or even you can read the testimonials from faithfreedom.org
Why do Muslims after coming out from the Friday prayers seem more agitated than calm? Has anyone wondered? The killings that followed the Quran burning by Terry Jones, in Afghanistan happened on a Friday after the prayers. Mere coincidence?
Why do the peaceful Muslims kill the peaceful Ahmadiyyas in Pakistan and Indonesia?
WARNING – EXTREME Brutality and Killings Indonesia. Use discretion.
http://www.youtube.com/verify_age?next_url=http%3A//www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3DaH2AuhBHDwQ
Killing in the name of Islam
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3N-7qeENdDI&feature=related
What more can one expect from the so called religion of peace?
@sona
U believe in Quran because its a word of god and you believe that its word of god because since childhood you were told so, if I ask you to prove that it is word of god how will you prove it ? You even wont be able to prove yourself that its word of god when u judge being unbiased …
What you will do if I say so that Quran is word of satan , wont you believe me as you believe it a word of god believing what you were said …
Judge your Quran on basis of humanity and intelligence , you will find it a fake , useless book which has no use for mankind…
@ Sona – Mariya, the Copt, was a slave girl. Mohamed had sex with her and had a son – Ibrahim, who died, unfortunately.
Mohamed ordered his people to loot caravans.
As to, you believing only in Quran and not in Hadiths – why?
Afraid that the Hadiths speak more truth than the Quran?
The Hadiths are all true – why? Because no one write a false Hadith. It will be considered as blasphemy and in Islam blasphemy is a sure invitation for death. Do not forget the recent killing of Salman Taseer in Pakistan and another minister who was a Christian in Pakistan. These people were killed just because they tried to dilute the harsh blasphemy laws in Pakistan.
You people selectively choose the Hadiths which paint Mohamed as an angel and reject the Hadiths which paint Mohamed as a negative personality.
Buddha has not compelled to follow him or his books or anything. He also never claimed he is telling the truth. He does not have to offer proofs. All know that Buddha does not lie. He does not gain anything worldly. He was a King who renounced all pleasures of life.
Mohammed was playboy and pleasure seeking. It is the Muslims claiming that Buddha prophesied the coming of Mohammed which is sought to be negated . Quoting selectively to suit one’s purpose defies all logic. While quoting the coming of Mohammed you say Buddha prophesied and hence it is truth. In the same breath you cannot accept that Buddha speaks the truth.
The Buddhas always speak the truth. The Enlightened People never lie.
Mohammed was not an enlightened person
A very interesting question asked on Yahoo/Answers
Muslims; If you truly believe that your religion is the truth then you should be able to answer this question?
Your god is said to be all powerful. Which means he can do anything, am I correct?
Answer this, can he make something so big that he can’t lift it? If yes, there is something he can’t lift, hence he is not all powerful. If no, then there is something he can’t make, hence he is not all powerful.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101121104223AAoLWal
“you cannot judge two thing without knowing both fully” :-to whome ever created this site…
>We need everyone of us together to fight the menace of barbarism and misrepresentation. Its time for us all to unite once again and rewrite the future!
Reply
Indeed Indeed, let the facts speak
one of my muslim frnd was saying to me that Dr.zaheer naik has defeated ssrs and
argued that he found many errors in vedas. though i was very strong in believing our vedas i am miserable to know wats the truth behind his argument now i am very happy that i have known more about vedas by reading urs article and also came 2 know about the true face of zaheer naik
Lord Shiva & Arrangement of Universe
————————————————-
Time, space, Blackhole, and Consciousness are arranged in a “Tetrahedral” geometrical shape in Shiva’s Head.
– Two slighlty opened eyes are “Time & Space”. When Lord Shiva slightly kept opened his two eyes, light enters into it (time & space) and the Universe becomes live.
– Third eye represents all knowing vision or powerful destructive tool to revert back matter into silent space.
– Pineal Gland deep inside the head is the seat of the Consciousness and it is located at the centre of the crown of the planar three eye triangle which forms the tetrahedron a fundamental sacred geometrical structure.
– Time, Space, Blackhole, and Consciousness are arranged in powerful Tetrahedral equilibrium state which is the most stable gemetrical form in the Universe. Diamond is an atomic tetrahedral arrangement of Carbon which is most hardest & stable material on the earth.
– Interaction between Time, Space, Blackhole, and Consciousness is the secret of the Universe how it is functioning which is most critical for understanding how the matter exists and evolve in the Universe.