Dr Naik's Introduction to Hinduism (edited with comments)

There is a proverb in Sanskrit which states that if one mixes even a little poison in the food, the entire plate has to be rejected.

We shall understand the implications of this proverb through a case study. We shall take one of the articles of Dr Zakir Naik, the self-proclaimed scholar of comparative religion for this. We have already seen in previous series how Dr Naik has ably proved that Prophet Muhammad was predicted in Hindu scriptures, even if meant accepting that the Prophet was a ghost, demon, mass-murderer. You can review the analysis of Dr Naik’s research at http://agniveer.com/featured/prophet-hindu/ as a three part series.

Today, we shall take the excellent research article: “Introduction to Hinduism” by Dr Zakir Naik. You can review the original article at http://www.irf.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=145&Itemid=128

What we shall do here is to edit the article by strikethrough of certain portions and providing replacement in red color and comments in italics. By the end of the article, you would realize how a little poison makes the entire food deadly. You shall also realize this further when we analyze his next article on Hinduism in future.

A REQUEST: KINDLY PROVIDE YOUR COMMENTS AND FEEDBACK SO THAT WE ARE MOTIVATED FOR FURTHER RESEARCH AND IMPROVING UPON OUR WORK. ALSO SHARE THE CONTENT AND SITE WITH FRIENDS IF YOU FND IT USEFUL. KNOWLEDGE THAT IS NOT SHARED EVENTUALLY GETS DESTROYED.

So here we BEGIN:

INTRODUCTION TO HINDUISM by Dr. Zakir Naik (Comment: We shall review his medical knowledge in a later post on Science in Quran and Vedas)

“The most popular among the Aryan religions is Hinduism.”

Comment:
(1. Very smartly, he has started by sowing doubts that Aryan and Hinduism imply different things. Later he says that Hinduism is based on Vedas.

2. Can Dr Naik or his IRF Team name few other religions which are Aryan but not Hinduism? Can they prove that the word Arya did not originate from Vedas? The strategy was Divide and Rule by sowing seeds of differences among smaller groups)

Dr Naik: “‘ Hindu’ is actually a Persian word that stands for the inhabitants of the region beyond the Indus Valley. However, in common parlance, Hinduism is a blanket term for an assortment of religious beliefs, most of which are (which is) based on the Vedas, the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita. “(as final authority and Upanishads and Geeta as other guiding texts)
Comment:
(Even Upanishads and Mahabharat claim Vedas to be the Supreme authority and clearly state that all other texts including Purans are to be interpreted in lines with Vedas. This is important because, what IRF will do is to twist and try to manipulate the meaning of verses to suit their own agenda of proving Muhammad left, right and center!)

Dr Naik: “II INTRODUCTION TO HINDU SCRIPTURES.
There are several sacred scriptures of the Hindus. Among these are the Vedas, Upanishads and the Puranas.

1. VEDAS:

1. The word Veda is derived from vid which means to know, knowledge par excellence or sacred wisdom. There are four principal divisions of the Vedas”

(although according to their number, they amount to 1131 out of which about a dozen are available)

Comment:
(1. This sentence was deliberately put to prove that complete Vedas are not available and hence Hindus should accept Quran as full and final message of God.

2. But the fact is that there are only 4 Vedas and ALL are available in exactly same format as they were first given.

3. The 1131 number of branches being referred is those of explanations/ variants of original Veda Samhitas. The original still remain intact without change of even a single pronunciation or pitch) .

Dr Naik: “According to Maha Bhashya of Patanjali, there are 21 branches of Rigveda, 9 types of Atharvaveda, 101 branches of Yajurveda and 1000 of Samveda).

2. The Rigveda, the Yajurveda and the Samveda are considered to be more ancient books and are known as Trai Viddya or the ‘Triple Sciences’. The Rigveda is the oldest and has been compiled in three long and different periods of time. The 4th Veda is the Atharvaveda, which is of a later date.
Comment:
(1. All Vedas are considered to be of same age. They were revealed at inception of human civilization. There is no proof whatsoever to conclude that Vedas were written over a long period of time and some Vedas are older, some of later date.

2. Dr Naik has brought forth the baseless conjecture of western indologists and communists to suit his own agenda.

3. Fact remains that there is not one single evidence to support his hypothesis except that it suits the agenda of invaders to prove that even Aryans were invaders and Vedas are not revealed.

4. Dr Naik has been openly challenged officially to come for a debate on this, but he prefers to remain in hiding.)

Dr Naik: “3. There is no unanimous opinion regarding the date of compilation or revelation of the four Vedas. According to Swami Dayanand, founder of the Arya Samaj, the Vedas were revealed 1310 million years ago”(1.97 billion years ago)

Comment:
(1. This is not Dayanand’s calculation but as given in Manu Smriti and Surya Siddhanta and accepted by most traditional scholars irrespective of their philosophical beliefs.

2. Modern science cannot refute this estimate and admits that this is near to their estimates of evolution of life on earth.

3. Swami Dayanand was specifically mentioned to emphasize that he gave such ridiculously large number as age of Vedas. This is because Arya Samaj and Swami Dayanand have been the strongest critics of Islam for last 125 years, starting Shuddhi or reconversion movement to come back to Vedic Dharma and a prime force to combat Islamic Jehad. Even today, Dr Naik and his IRF is scared of facing Arya Samaj directly, despite several official challenges for debate.)

Dr Naik: “According to other scholars, they are not more than 4000 years old.”

Comment:
(1. These other scholars are none other than Christian indologists and their followers who have not one single proof to support their claim except that they believe Biblical genesis to happen few thousand years ago!

2. Again this is emphasized to prove Hindus that Vedas may not be as important as they believe, and that Quran is most perfect voice of God.

3. The fact is that Vedas are the only texts in world to have oral traditions running till date and a mechanism to ensure that not even a single syllable or pronunciation can be altered through 10 different Paath Vidhis. (Refer this article)

4. On contrary, Quran was written 20 years after death of Muhammad by those who were fighting against each other and killing each other to prove Islam to be a religion of Peace.

5. A large number of sects of Islam refuse to accept Quran to be perfect or even Muhammad to be final Prophet. Many have thus also developed new Qurans and new Prophets. Click this sentence to refer to this list for 73 divisions of Islam since its inception. Further Islamic hadiths say that only one of them is true and rest will go to Hell! I am not sure where Dr Naik will go!)

Dr Naik: “4. Similarly, there are differing opinions regarding the places where these books were compiled and the Rishis to whom these Scriptures were given. Inspite of these differences, the Vedas are considered to be the most authentic of the Hindu Scriptures and the real foundations of the Hindu Dharma.”

Comment:
(1. The first part of the sentence was put to emphasize that Hindu Dharma is on a very shaky foundation, and thus justifying his appeal to come to Islam. But truth is that these differing opinions come from foreign intellectuals and communists alone who have their own agendas.

2. And most importantly, they can cite not one single evidence in support of this claim except names of certain places in Vedas. And this amounts to saying that Mahabharat has been written in last 10 years because it contains words like Lal, Krishna, Atal, Vihari, Rahul, Arjun, Manmohan, Rajiv, Laal, Prasad and even Naik!)

Dr Naik: “2. UPANISHADS:

1. The word ‘Upanishad’ is derived from Upa meaning near, Ni which means down and Shad means to sit. Therefore ‘Upanishad’ means sitting down near. Groups of pupils sit near the teacher to learn from him the secret doctrines.

According to Samkara, ‘Upanishad’ is derived from the root word Sad which means ‘to loosen’, ‘to reach’ or ‘to destroy’, with Upa and ni as prefix; therefore ‘Upanishad’ means Brahma-Knowledge by which ignorance is loosened or destroyed.
2. The number of Upanishads exceeds 200 though the Indian tradition puts it at 108. There are 10 principal Upanishads. However, some consider them to be more than 10, while others 18.

Comment:
(Again the same ploy to seed doubts over authenticity of our beliefs. Fact is that there are 10 Upanishads considered important, but even these are accepted to be authentic so far they agree with Vedas. This is because only Vedas have a mechanism that ensures they cannot be altered, and all knowledge started from Vedas.)

Dr Naik: “3. The Vedanta meant originally the Upanishads, though the word is now used for the system of philosophy based on the Upanishad. Literally, Vedanta means the end of the Veda, Vedasua-antah, and the conclusion as well as the goal of Vedas. The Upanishads are the concluding portion of the Vedas and chronologically they come at the end of the Vedic period.

4. Some Pundits consider the Upanishads to be more superior to the Vedas.

Comment:
(These must be Dr Naik’s gang of Pandits. Otherwise, even Upanishads declare that Vedas are final authority. This forms the foundation of Sanatan Dharma which needs to shaken to get more converts to IRF brand of Islam!)

Dr Naik: “3. PURANAS:

Next in order of authenticity are the Puranas which are the most widely read scriptures. It is believed that the Puranas contain the history of the creation of the universe, history of the early Aryan tribes, life stories of the divines and deities of the Hindus. It is also believed that the Puranas are revealed books like the Vedas, which were revealed simultaneously with the Vedas or sometime close to it.”

Comment:
(1. Very smartly he has inserted ‘tribe’ with Aryan to demean it. Truth is that if one reads through Hadiths, he would realize what a tribe actually means!

2. No one considers Puranas to be either revealed like Vedas or as old as Vedas. Puranas themselves repeat innumerable times that Vedas are ultimate authority and revelation of God, and Puranas are to be interpreted only as per Vedas.

3. Further, most scholars agree that Puranas contain significant adulterations and/or misinterpretations. That is why, in matters of moral conduct, Puranas are not considered to be the benchmark for Hindu society. And that is why, despite stories of Radha-Krishna, the norm of Hindu society is to emphasize self-control and Brahmacharya in youth. These stories are either rejected by certain scholars or reinterpreted to mean something mystical. But no one takes stories of Puranas literally – this is an important aspect of Hindu Dharma.

4. The reason why Dr Naik wants to emphasize on Puranas being revealed is obvious – He wants to prove Muhammad in Puranas later. But if you read my article on Prophet in Bhavishya Puran, you would realize that it means Muhammad was a demon, ghost and a great nuisance! This may be 74th sect of Islam that would go to Heaven!)

Dr Naik: “Maharishi Vyasa has divided the Puranas into 18 voluminous parts. He also arranged the Vedas under various heads.

Chief among the Puranas is a book known as Bhavishya Purana. It is called so because it is believed to give an account of future events. The Hindus consider it to be the word of God. Maharishi Vyasa is considered to be just the compiler of the book.”

Comment:
(1. This crazy hypothesis was put to prove Muhammad – the ghost and demon – in Bhavishya Puran later!

2. But neither do Hindus take Bhavishya Puran seriously nor does it predict anything. It is a forged Purana that continued to be written till late 19th century. Apart from Muhammad – the ghost and demon, it also contains stories of Shivaji, Aurangzeb, Mughals, Queen Victoria, her Parliament etc etc. This is the least authentic book of Hinduism and contains lots of stories with questionable authenticity.

3. Most people have not even heard of this Purana, and none consider this important for any religious activity or reading. Far from a word of God, it is considered fake by most.

4. The only word of God Hindus believe in are the Vedas. And Dr Naik should be thankful for this, because Bhavishya Puran calls Muhammad a demon, a ghost and a nuisance!)

Dr Naik: “4. ITIHAAS:

The two epics of Hinduism are the Ramayana and the Mahabharata.

A. Ramayana:

According to Ramanuja, the great scholar of Ramayana, there are more than 300 different types of Ramayana: Tulsidas Ramayana, Kumbha Ramayana. Though the outline of Ramayana is same, the details and contents differ. ”

Comment:
(1. Ramanuj was a communist who insulted Ramayana characters by bringing insulting descriptions from different folklores, most known only to him. The daughter of Manmohan Singh, our PM, introduced his chapter in Delhi University. That caused a big uproar and the matter went to Supreme Court. It is still being contested but the chapter has been withdrawn by Delhi University because the Dean got thrashed for defending this insult of Ramayan characters.!

2. Suddenly, this Ramanuj, who is unknown to all except communists, becomes ‘great’ for Dr Naik for obvious reasons.

3. All consider only Valmiki Ramayan to be authentic. Further, even in Valmiki Ramayan, all verses are not considered authentic and many seem to have entered later. Thus, scholars conclude that episodes like Sita’s Agni Pariksha and entire Uttar Ramayan that contains stories like Sita’s exile and Shambook’s death are later era figments of imagination having nothing to do with original Ramayan. We shall review this in a separate research.)

Dr Naik: “Valmiki’s Ramayana:

Unlike the Mahabharata, the Ramayana appears to be the work of one person – the sage Valmiki, who probably composed it in the 3rd century BC.
Comment:
(There is no evidence to date Ramayan to 3rd BC except tales of communist historians! Valmiki is mentioned in several works which are dated much before that!)

Its best-known recension (by Tulsi Das, 1532-1623) consists of 24,000 rhymed couplets of 16-syllable lines organised into 7 books. The poem incorporates many ancient legends and draws on the sacred books of the Vedas. It describes the efforts of Kosala’s heir, Rama, to regain his throne and rescue his wife, Sita, from the demon King of Lanka.

Valmiki’s Ramayana is a Hindu epic tradition whose earliest literary version is a Sanskrit poem attributed to the sage Valmiki. Its principal characters are said to present ideal models of personal, familial, and social behavior and hence are considered to exemplify Dharma, the principle of moral order.”

Comment:
(At last! finally so many lines without significant blunders!)

Dr Naik: “B. Mahabharata:

The nucleus of the Mahabharata is the war of eighteen days fought between the Kauravas, the hundred sons of Dhritarashtra and Pandavas, the five sons of Pandu. The epic entails all the circumstances leading upto the war. Involved in this Kurukshetra battle were almost all the kings of India world joining either of the two parties. The result of this war was the total annihilation of Kauravas and their party. Yudhishthira, the head of the Pandavas, became the sovereign monarch of Hastinapura. His victory is supposed to symbolise the victory of good over evil. But with the progress of years, new matters and episodes relating to the various aspects of human life, social, economic, political, moral and religious as also fragments of other heroic legends came to be added to the aforesaid nucleus and this phenomenon continued for centuries until it acquired the present shape. The Mahabharata represents a whole literature rather than one single and unified work, and contains many multifarious things.

C. Bhagavad Gita:

Bhagavad Gita is a part of Mahabharata. It is the advice given by Krishna to Arjun on the battlefield of Kurukshetra. It contains the essence of the Vedas and is the most popular of all the Hindu Scriptures. It contains 18 chapters.

The Bhagavad Gita is one of the most widely read and revered of the works sacred to the Hindus. It is their chief devotional book, and has been for centuries the principal source of religious inspiration for many thousands of Hindus.

The Gita is a dramatic poem, which forms a small part of the larger epic, the Mahabharata. It is included in the sixth book (Bhismaparvan) of the Mahabaharata and documents one tiny event in a huge epic tale.

The Bhagavad Gita tells a story of a moral crisis faced by Arjuna, which is solved through the interaction between Arjuna, a Pandava warrior hesitating before battle, and Krishna, his charioteer and teacher. The Bhagavad Gita relates a brief incident in the main story of a rivalry and eventually a war between two branches of a royal family. In that brief incident – a pause on the battlefield just as the battle is about to begin – Krishna, one chief on one side (also believed to be the Lord incarnate), is presented as responding to the doubts of Arjuna. The poem is the dialogue through which Arjuna’s doubts were resolved by Krishna’s teachings.”

Comment:
(As a smart covert hypnotist, Dr Naik ends up the article without seeding further doubts so that it all appears unbiased and normal. This also gives time to plant the ideas that he has previously introduced subtly:

a. Aryans were tribals
b. Authenticity of Vedas, the primary texts of Hindu Dharma, are questionable
c. Vedas are not as old as they are assumed to be
d. Swami Dayanand and Arya Samaj make ridiculous assumptions about Vedas
e. Bhavishya Puran is most important text of Hindu Dharma
f. Other texts apart from Vedas are also considered equally authentic
g. Ramayan and Ram may not be authentic

Now these subtle suggestions are to serve his future agenda, as also obvious in his research on Prophet in Hindu Scriptures!)

This is nothing but a variant of a technique permitted in some schools of Islam which allows you to use deceit and confusion to defeat the enemy. But I hope everyone shall accept truth and truth alone! Because a little poison is a dangerous thing!

Related Posts:

Comments

  1. sfauthor yogavidya.com says:

    Do you know about this edition of the Gita?

    http://www.YogaVidya.com/gita.html

  2. vishal says:

    nice work

  3. Wonderful job Sir!
    Actually I learnt more about Hinduism here..
    Keep it up! n1

    Eternal regards,
    Frostmorune

  4. naveen says:

    agniveer ji,
    you are doing a great work plz keep on doing this. you'll definately get success.
    thanks for helping the humanity, and standing with truth. may god gives you more and more knowledge so that you can bring these false and lier in front of humanity.

  5. Siva says:

    Hi agniveer how can I download this article ?
    Thank you

  6. Amina sites.google.com says:

    Very good article. Naik does distort the truth. That is sanctioned by Allah though, its called Taqiyah distorting for the benefit of Islam. Just a couple corrections to suggest:
    - you wrote "…the meaning of verses to suite there " the word should be 'suit' not 'suite', and 'their' not 'there'.

    Also you changed:
    "most of which are" to "(which is)" The which are here is referring to "beliefs" which is plural. In other words "the beliefs are based on … "

    Keep up the good work.

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      Thanks sister for pointing that out.

      The second was not a mistake though. If you read the edited sentence, it would state that "Hinduism is….. , which is based on Vedas as final authority and …..". I wanted to emphasize that despite other differences, Vedas remain the foundation of Hinduism.

  7. Vikram` hindujagruti.org says:

    Good work, Zakir Naik is just a show man. He know very well to trick people just like his Prophet.

    If you want to know a lot of facts about Islam and Muhammad visit this website.

    http://www.faithfreedom.org

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      A lot about islam and Muhammad is already in public forum. But we now need material which also compares that with true perspectives of our own culture. Further, what Zakir Naik propagates is his own Zakirism which is different from conventional Islam as well. Being a tacit partner of Osama Bin laden, he is one of the greatest threats of today's world.

      • Razak says:

        wats ur source of saying tat ?
        all ur sources are wrong.. u want to debate with Dr. Zakir Naik ? no problem… i already spoke to him… Give me ur number i will contact u for more details… Brother u r misguided the translation u did is wrong..
        go to the bext website for vedas i.e. http://www.sacred-text.com
        Bhavishya Purana in the Prati Sarag Parv III Khand 3 Adhay 3 Shloka 5 to 8

        Bhavishya Purana in the Pratisarag Parv III Khand 3 Adhay 3 Shloka 10 to 27 Maharishi Vyas

        Bhavishya Purana, Parv – III Khand 1 Adhay 3 Shloka 21-23

        check it out dnt just copy paste from other websites which has edited text/picture of the verse

        u can email me ur number we can really have a friendly chat….n dicuss ur debate with Dr.Zakir Naik. :) thanks brother….

  8. GREAT REALLY GREAT AGNIVEERJI, WE HINDUS REALLY PROUD OF YOU, KEEP IT UP AND INVITE THAT NONSENSE NAIK TO DEBATE
    ON HINDUISM ON A SUITABLE STAGE.

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      We have invited him countless times. But he is smart enough to choose weaklings as opponents.

      • MZS says:

        You select the best amongst yourselves and ask for a debate. Problem is every blogger wants to have a debate on internet where as your scholars shy from it live with Zakir .Recently UK banned him from entering UK . He cannot entertain everybody as he is human but certainly couple of guys. He had discussions with Sri Ravishankar, lot of things were discussed. So many of you said Ravishankar doesnt know anything. You decide first who is fit to go and make things final rather do propaganda on internet.

        • Arya says:

          @MZS
          Who is “you” and what is “yours”? Problem is that most of the muslims analyze our articles as “written by a hindu”, but we have altogether different perspective. We talk about Vedas and Quran rather than Hindu and Muslim. Zakir knows about Vedic expertise of Arya Samaj scholars and he knows that he will be crushed within minutes. This is why he is running away from debate giving excuses of “less crowd following the Arya Samaj”!

          Zakir has been banned in UK and muslims are crying! Why dont muslims allow people from other religions preach their ideology in Islamic states? This is nothing but cowardliness of muslims to ask freedom of speech in every country but ban everyone else who does not follow Islam. Muslims should not cry on this issue as they do same with others!

          Did Ravishankar ever debate Zakir? Was it a debate or a discussion? Anyway, you would like to see the debate between Arya scholar Pandit Mahendra Pal Arya and Islamic preacher of Peace TV Abdullah Tariq, in which Abdullah Tariq was defeated badly. See this debate on
          http://www.youtube.com/user/truthwisdom2008

          • MZS says:

            No Muslim should weep neither anybody weeping , people are only exposing the hypocrisy of UK govt. They have the right to allow people of their choice but a propaganda is quickly exposed. Their lies covered with so called western ethos is the problem Truth never requires anybody’s help.

            • Arya says:

              @MZS
              Are not muslims hypocrite for not allowing others preach their religion but demand for freedom of speech while preaching Islam? If truth never requires anybody’s help, why do muslims help truth (Islam), by not allowing other religions preach alongside Islam?

              • MZS says:

                Time will come may be everybody will be allowed everywhere. However what I m pointing is the hypocrisy of a govt its not that other govts are truthful

            • MZS says:

              Regarding Islamic countries they never say that they have free speech in their country and truthful in that sense rather than being a hitech hypocrite.

          • MZS says:

            India has more population of Muslims compared to other Muslim countries and everyday they see that Vedas have no place in terms of practicality in present India leave alone rest of the world

            • SDC says:

              and in what ways is the quran being practical, that the extremists treat the hateful verses of quran as the guiding spirit in their endeavor to extirpate the nonmuslims.

      • hindu agniveer.com says:

        ZAKIR NAIK IS A FRAUD N HE S EXPOSED NT TO INDIAN BT ALSO TO THE PPL OUTWARD HE WAS CHALLENGED SEPERATELY FOR DISCUSSION BT HE DENIED IT PROVES THAT HE S A COWARD N HE S A LIAR N DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT OUR DHARMA N ON THE WEBSITE HE S CONTINUOUSLY PROMOTING LIE.HE BELIEVES IN GOEBELS THEORY IT STATES THAT IF U TELL A LIE REPEATEDLY MANY TIMES IT LL APPEAR AS TRUE. BT HE FORGOT THAT THE VEDAS R ABSOLUTE TRUTH N EVEN 600 YEARS OF ISLAMIC RULE COULDNT GT SUCCESS TO MAKE INDIA DARULISLAM THEN HE WONT BE ABLE TO CONVERT A SINGLE HINDU.IF HE GVS ONE LECTURE WE LL CONDUCT TEN LECTURES TO PROVE HIM A LIAR A REAL LIFE LIAR.
        VEDA THE ULTIMATE PATH OF SPIRITUALITY

      • Razak says:

        really ? please u can mail me on r2006doha@gmail.com I will fix an appointment for u … ok ?

  9. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    We need everyone of us together to fight the menace of barbarism and misrepresentation. Its time for us all to unite once again and rewrite the future!

  10. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    With no malice towards anyone, I believe that self-proclaimed gurus are the greatest distraction for our Vedic vision. For them religion is either a business or ply for petty glory (that would end with end of life!). They overrule the criteria and conditions laid down for a sage or a guru and simply fool people. Having such people as leaders of the society will only spell doom. Our present status is evidence of the same.

    I do not expect any guru to come and help us. Let us get back to basics, and discover the vedic role model within our own self. Such role models alone can respond to such frauds.

  11. Anand says:

    @Agniveer
    Well done sir.

  12. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    Namaste

    I agree. I am more than willing to promote the truth regarding our esteemed culture and misconceptions being floated to demean it. An Arya Rashtra in lines of vision of Sri Ram and Sri Krishna is my vision. With whatever resources I had, I started this on internet. I would be happy if interested people can join the mission by helping coordinate with like-minded noble people so that this can be taken further. It would require coordination, planning and management and require us to work coherently. Please note that the research that goes beneath each article takes up a lot of time and energy, because unlike Dr Zakir Naik, I cannot base my articles on falsehood or unreliable sources. Each letter of the article is well-researched and backed with evidence. This becomes a dedicated effort and until I complete the entire spectrum of issues identified in first phase, I do not want to distract into other aspects. But I keep publishing on internet so that others can freely use the content for further propagation. Thus you are most welcome to use it for the mission. And do let me know what I can do further to help the cause.

    Dhanyavad

  13. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    Indeed! I would request that these articles be propagated far and wide, to best each of us can do. I have included social bookmarking features on site to help share it on facebook, digg, myspace etc and email to relevant people. At least let these rebuttals be as popular on net as original frauds of Zakir Naik. And then some of us can take it at ground level also.
    But yes! We will respond to all nonsense that threatens us. And with we all together, we shall do it more powerfully than ever before!

  14. ratnakar agniveer.com says:

    zakir naik is misguiding the whole hindu religion in terms of his own imagination
    without refering to any scriptures .so this type of persons are so dangererous to
    india . how christians are doing by wrong explanations to bhagvadgita

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      Zakir Naik is simply plagiarizing from books of other sects of Islam to claim false popularity. In process, he has become one of the greatest threats for humanity.

  15. I was in confusion after the talks of Dr Zakir Naik which I used to see on the internet.
    I consider myself as a rationalist but was demoralised when I watched the conference between Dr Naik and Sri Sri Ravi Shanker where Dr Naik had an upper hand.
    Thank you for bringing out the truth;satya-meva- jayate,
    Sadar pranam.

    Deepak

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      Zakir Naik is smart enough to choose opponents and formats of programs where he can have upper hand. That is why he keeps ignoring invitations from us for a debate.

  16. Thakur says:

    Nice & correct reply.Perfect comments.

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      If you find them useful, kindly circulate the article. You can subscribe to RSS feed, email and tweet the article using the option next to title. You can also use the Add Options at end of article to share on social networking sites. To bring the truth forth, we need to promote the truth as much as we can. Dhanyavad

  17. satish says:

    namaskar and congratulations to Agniveer
    only recently while talking to one of my Muslim patient who asked me whether i had listened to Zakir Naik. I said he is mad fellow who looks through only one angle and twists the things suitable for his religion. I also said he has not received yet a person who will tackle him well and Lo God listened to me ! He should preach to Muslims Quran and Hadis ok but when the sages and saints of Hindu religion can still dip into Vedas to find new things how Zakir minno will know about Vedas ! — Dr. Satish

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      Zakir Naik knows nothing of Vedas except that he has mugged up certain verse numbers. His knowledge of Hadiths and Quran also is dismal. He is merely a stage performer. Most of the evidences he provides from Quran and Hadiths are also misinterpreted. He has been challenged so many times to accept a debate invitation as per his convenience, but he refuses for obvious reasons.

      I pity the Muslims to have such fraud leaders to disgrace them.

    • RazakK says:

      U can visit IRF library he has all the holy books…. he has studied everything… also really ? u people talking so much non sense writing anything… ISLAM was the religion who gave rights to women… please understand the real Quran not the edited one available on net .. READ QURAN for the real meaning. there are many other Questions of urs i can answer…. just mail me back i will reply to all of ur questions… n please tel agniveer to give me his contact number n i wil lfix a meeting of his n Dr. Zakir Naik. Zakir Naik is ready for the debate…. Thanks Bye…

  18. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    Thanks for propagating the truth. Actually, most Muslims including Zakir Naik who claim such things know that they are indulging in fraud. But they do so because they have a hidden agenda. They have a concept of Taqiah inspired by Quran where one is allowed to indulge in falsehood to destroy the enemy. Their duplicity is exposed when the same scholars would refuse to accept Vedas as divine revelations or actually dwell into mantras in detail. This is merely a ploy to fool Hindus. Zakir Naik has done nothing but has prepared lists of verses from various books and memorize them. He then simply recites these numbers having no iota of understanding about what he is speaking about.

    If someone is willing to devote 2-3 hours daily, I can make him even bigger memory demonstrator than Zakir Naik in just few months.

  19. Ohm says:

    BEAUTIFUL. Beyond explaination.

    This demon has done enough of damage to our scriptures. Character of demon is to confuse the religion, this is what this Dr. Idi0t Naik is good at.

    We need to hold strong to our culture otherwise the people are already there to malign it.

    If these idi0ts can have the "Islamic Research Foundation" what the hell is stopping us from having our own "Vedic Research Foundation" and study of compatriate religions (specifically the demonic cult Islam).

    If these Idi0ts can have "Peace tv"(actually the intellectual terrorism and confusion of other religions by demons), what is stopping us from having "Veda Tv".

    We have the best knowledge. Why are we suffering due to shouting of demons? What is stopping us?

    Why are we not brave enough? Is the strength and knowledge of Almighty enough to shake away all the fears and confusions?

    Tell us how can we unite? Tell us how can we do small contributions to make it a big effort. Tell us how to unite and make this thing big. There is not the time to sleep anymore OH Aryans, its the time to wake up. The demons have already raged the war on you.

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      I agree. We need to unite ignoring petty differences and any internal discrimination. Zakir has access to petro-dollars and terrorist-funds. If we can get a few crores (expense of just one Janamashtmi function in New Delhi), we can really turn the tables. After all truth is with us. Hindus need to realize that collecting funds for such activities is the only way to truly worship their Ishwar.

  20. R-H says:

    Zakir Naik claims that "Quran does not contain even a single error , while other scriptures contains error"…

    Almost all muslims claim that there is no error in Quran…

    For all those who claim that there is no error in Quran… Please go through this link:

    http://www.1000mistakes.com/1000mistakes/index.ph...

    In the above link with valid proof it has been proved that Quran is full of Error…

    The website owner states that :
    "Please inform all and everybody and all relevant fora – f. ex. Internet pages for debate or information – about the address http://www.1000mistakes.com. It is information that is urgently needed by many, not least by Muslims. No god made a book with so many mistakes and other wrongs – and if the Quran and Islam are made up by humans or dark forces, where are the followers of this inhumanly dark and brutal war religion heading for in a possible next life?"

    So please inform about this website to all those(Like Zakir ji) who claim that Quran is without a single error!!

  21. Durgadas satyavidya.com says:

    It's all much like how Muslims also say the Quran has been "misinterpreted". My response to this is if the Quran has been misinterpreted, then all Islamic nations and people have done so! So the fault lies with it's creator.

    And their goal is only some mythical swarglok, not moksh! And they hardly create Swarg here, and even Raawan was a man of intellectual understanding (Veds), nowhere as bad as Mohammud and his illiterates!

    Dr. Naik should read Satyarth Prakash, and Hindus need to stop living in the shadow of Gandhi and his silly ahimsa-dharm! That's what caused Bharat Mata to be overrun by these asurs in the first place!

    http://WWW.SATYAVIDYA.COM

  22. Atul Mukherji.
    I am going through your continuous efforts and also going through the Vedas from Aryasamajjamnagar link.
    Sanskrit was one of my subjects in high school but that was a long time back in 1981.Can you suggest a link which helps me to improve my Sanskrit?
    At the end I shall only add, great work Sir.

  23. agniveer intensedebate.com says:

    I reset all the settings. Kindly let me know if it is working now. Dhanyavad.

    • agniveer intensedebate.com says:

      It seems to work fine on my browser. I have now reduced the number of comments per page and reset again. Kindly clean your browser cache and cookies, restart and check again. Also kindly send me your contact details on my email.

      Dhanyavad

  24. Pradeep says:

    Namaste agniveerji,
    Truely commendable analysis and explanations, to start with I have 5 close friends and all of them are muslims, we are friends like for last 20 years and recently one our friend was forcing me to join Islam and his arguements were exactly same as you have pointed out by Mr Zakir Naik, Thank you for opening the eyes at the right time I am truely greatful to you.

    Also I would like to learn sanskrit and learn vedas by myself do you know where i can learn these?

    Dhanyavad

  25. Dharma says:

    Agniveerji,
    you are doing a great job. Now i know why Zakir Naik and his IRF team is a fraid of Arya Samaj. Satyameva Jayate.

  26. mohit says:

    we need more people like you agniveerji….

    please keep doing the great work.

  27. Madhu says:

    I strongly support whatever it takes to prevent this guy from spreading the nonsense. He is openely encouraging inlarge public functions that one should destroy idol worship and kill all those who does not believe in Mohammed which is equal to terrorism in the name of comparative religion. I am really surprised that the Indian government has not done anything about this. He openely insulted Sri Sri Sri Ravishankar and hinduism in front of scores of people. Ravishankarji just surrendered to him which sends wrong signals to people. I suspect if Ravishankar actually knows this vedic knowledge or he is one among so many Khavi clad Swamy. I think we should take this issue publicly and to governmental level and stop this guy spreading the demon religion and converting tht Vedas itself into Quron.

  28. rashi yahoo says:

    hi agniveer, i m speechless u r doing a wonderful job .how can i join u.

  29. shafira says:

    where can i get information on the life of raawan

  30. dhananjay na says:

    what compensation can demand shambook from rama ,,,,,, for his murder (shambook's) by rama in this kalyug

Trackbacks

  1. [...] Dr Naik’s “Concept of God in Hinduism”By Agniveer on December 30, 2009 [...]

  2. read how zakir naik make fool of people
    plz retweet it
    http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
    many more article on dis web abt lies of naik

  3. SK Singh says:

    RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
    plz retweet it
    http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
    many more article on dis we …

  4. Vivek E P says:

    RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
    plz retweet it
    http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
    many more article on dis we …

  5. RT @rohit1dhiman: read how zakir naik make fool of people
    plz retweet it
    http://agniveer.com/featured/naik/
    many more article on dis we …

Speak Your Mind

Connect with Facebook

*